Creative Commons and Science Commons Developments: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
BerkmanSysop (talk | contribs) m (Protected "Creative Commons and Science Commons Developments" [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The Musician and the Scientist Write the Code: Protocols for Compensation and Openness | == The Musician and the Scientist Write the Code: Protocols for Compensation and Openness == | ||
| Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
Five years after the launch of the first Creative Commons licensing suite, Creative Commons and Science Commons invite the community to expand the framework through new tools, or protocols: CC+ to signal external transactions, CC0 to waive rights, and Science Commons Open Data Protocol. Are user communities invited to appropriate, extend and customize the licenses, creating a participatory code? Should musicians self-organize and create their own structures complementary to Creative Commons licensing to collect remuneration, or can collective society schemes accommodate a possible paradigm change from public performance vs private use to commercial vs non commercial rights? How can scientific communities and government develop models to open scientific data? Is online distribution for music, and the semantic web for science, shifting legal paradigms toward âcommercial rights reversedâ and âno rights reservedâ? | Five years after the launch of the first Creative Commons licensing suite, Creative Commons and Science Commons invite the community to expand the framework through new tools, or protocols: CC+ to signal external transactions, CC0 to waive rights, and Science Commons Open Data Protocol. Are user communities invited to appropriate, extend and customize the licenses, creating a participatory code? Should musicians self-organize and create their own structures complementary to Creative Commons licensing to collect remuneration, or can collective society schemes accommodate a possible paradigm change from public performance vs private use to commercial vs non commercial rights? How can scientific communities and government develop models to open scientific data? Is online distribution for music, and the semantic web for science, shifting legal paradigms toward âcommercial rights reversedâ and âno rights reservedâ? | ||
| Line 26: | Line 25: | ||
== Possible participants == | == Possible participants == | ||
(Please add your name to the list) | |||
John Wilbanks | John Wilbanks | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
Ahrash Bissell | Ahrash Bissell | ||
Latest revision as of 09:31, 17 June 2010
The Musician and the Scientist Write the Code: Protocols for Compensation and Openness
Session Organizers
Melanie Dulong de Rosnay
Wendy Seltzer
Five years after the launch of the first Creative Commons licensing suite, Creative Commons and Science Commons invite the community to expand the framework through new tools, or protocols: CC+ to signal external transactions, CC0 to waive rights, and Science Commons Open Data Protocol. Are user communities invited to appropriate, extend and customize the licenses, creating a participatory code? Should musicians self-organize and create their own structures complementary to Creative Commons licensing to collect remuneration, or can collective society schemes accommodate a possible paradigm change from public performance vs private use to commercial vs non commercial rights? How can scientific communities and government develop models to open scientific data? Is online distribution for music, and the semantic web for science, shifting legal paradigms toward âcommercial rights reversedâ and âno rights reservedâ?
Background
Five years after the launch of the first Creative Commons licensing suite, Creative Commons and Science Commons are developing new protocols: CC+ to signal external transactions, CC0 to waive rights, and Science Commons Open Data Protocol. This session will be discussing these ongoing efforts potential and implementation use cases.
Are licences the most appropriate tools to govern all kind of open works and data? How can protocols be adaptated to jurisdictions and scientific communities specific situations? How can CC+ be implemented to develop a bridge between the sharing ecology and the commercial economy?
Possible participants
(Please add your name to the list)
John Wilbanks
Paul Keller
Juan Carlos De Martin
Mike Linksvayer
Ahrash Bissell
Related topics
Collecting societies and alternative compensation systems.
Open public sector information (including legal information) and broadcasting
Open access to scientific publications & free culture