The Battle for the Internet: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
BerkmanSysop (talk | contribs) m (Protected "The Battle for the Internet" [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) |
||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The session was intended to be a discussion of who would be fighting for the soul of the internet and where. The martial title, however, brought in relatively militant discussants, so we mostly talked about government, control, crime, and openness. | The session was intended to be a discussion of who would be fighting for the soul of the internet and where. I was thinking of fleshing out Zittrain's framework of generativity vs. security. The martial title, however, brought in relatively militant discussants, so we mostly talked about government, control, crime, and openness. | ||
'''The players''' | '''The players''' | ||
I've arranged them from Left to Right, depending upon their commitment to the past | I've arranged them from Left to Right, depending upon their commitment to the past and control, Top to Bottom, based upon their praiseworthiness. (This is a wiki, feel free to revise my opinions.) | ||
NANOG | |||
Nokia | Nokia | ||
Government Agencies | Government Agencies | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Verisign | Verisign | ||
Commercial Spies | Commercial Spies | ||
Russia and China | Russia and China | ||
Pornographers | Pornographers | ||
Organized Crime | Organized Crime | ||
The "battlefields" identified were mostly issues rather than locations. However, Africa and Asia were discussed briefly as places where cell phones were vital additions to their lives, not just alternative internet devices. | The "battlefields" identified were mostly issues rather than locations. However, Africa and Asia were discussed briefly as places where cell phones were vital additions to their lives, not just alternative internet devices. | ||
| Line 29: | Line 28: | ||
'''Battlefields''' | '''Battlefields''' | ||
* DRM: The content owners vs. the consumers with the PC industry caught in the middle. | * DRM: The content owners vs. the consumers with the PC industry caught in the middle. | ||
* Anonymity: The Right described the needs for dependable authentication claiming the internet's anonymity is far too pervasive. The Left observed that ''anonymity is a constitutional right''. | |||
* Anonymity | * Identity Integrity: Being impersonated can be a problem. ''Being authenticated in a blog comment can allow you to build credibility.'' | ||
* Encryption: Left and Right agreed that the barriers to adoption have been usability and enterprise customers, not government, wanting to control users. | |||
* Traffic Blocking: If you count Comcast and Cox blocking Bit Torrent, the ''US does more than any other country''. | |||
* Identity Integrity | * Transparency: The biggest complaint against Comcast service tweaking was their misleading customers. Google and others can be collecting information, but we don't know what -- the new Panopticon. | ||
* Encryption | |||
* Traffic Blocking | |||
* Transparency | |||
Latest revision as of 10:13, 17 June 2010
The session was intended to be a discussion of who would be fighting for the soul of the internet and where. I was thinking of fleshing out Zittrain's framework of generativity vs. security. The martial title, however, brought in relatively militant discussants, so we mostly talked about government, control, crime, and openness.
The players
I've arranged them from Left to Right, depending upon their commitment to the past and control, Top to Bottom, based upon their praiseworthiness. (This is a wiki, feel free to revise my opinions.)
NANOG
Nokia
Government Agencies
OLPC
Microsoft
Intel
Google
ICANN
Telecoms
Content Owners
Comcast & Cox
Verisign
Commercial Spies
Russia and China
Pornographers
Organized Crime
The "battlefields" identified were mostly issues rather than locations. However, Africa and Asia were discussed briefly as places where cell phones were vital additions to their lives, not just alternative internet devices.
Battlefields
- DRM: The content owners vs. the consumers with the PC industry caught in the middle.
- Anonymity: The Right described the needs for dependable authentication claiming the internet's anonymity is far too pervasive. The Left observed that anonymity is a constitutional right.
- Identity Integrity: Being impersonated can be a problem. Being authenticated in a blog comment can allow you to build credibility.
- Encryption: Left and Right agreed that the barriers to adoption have been usability and enterprise customers, not government, wanting to control users.
- Traffic Blocking: If you count Comcast and Cox blocking Bit Torrent, the US does more than any other country.
- Transparency: The biggest complaint against Comcast service tweaking was their misleading customers. Google and others can be collecting information, but we don't know what -- the new Panopticon.