[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] SCC, Lexmark, and copyright versus reverse-engineering
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] SCC, Lexmark, and copyright versus reverse-engineering
- From: microlenz(at)earthlink.net
- Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 16:21:08 -0800
- In-reply-to: <1048979213.7892.89.camel@feklar>
- References: <3E85B544.14740.28CEBA@localhost>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On 29 Mar 2003 at 18:06, noah silva wrote:
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] SCC, Lexmark, and copyright versus
reverse-engineering
From: noah silva <nsilva@atari-source.com>
To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
Organization: atari-source.com
Date sent: 29 Mar 2003 18:06:54 -0500
Send reply to: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> 2003 $BG/ (B03 $B7n (B29 $BF| (B( $BEZ (B) $B$N (B18 $B;~ (B01 $BJ,$K (B
> microlenz@earthlink.net $B[)$/ (B: > On 29 Mar 2003 at 17:40, Seth Finkelstein
> wrote: > > Date sent: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 17:40:41 -0500 > From:
> Seth Finkelstein <sethf@sethf.com> > To:
> dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu > Subject: [dvd-discuss] SCC, Lexmark,
> and copyright versus reverse-engineering > Send reply to:
> dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu > > > In the court's decision, there doesn't
> seem to be much dispute > > that in *theory*, other downloadable programs could
> be written that > > performed the same operations as Lexmark's programs. The
> difficulty is > > knowing the details of the program and operating environment,
> in the > > first place. > > <DA on> > And if Lexmark has made RE so much more
> difficult, then they are entitled to > their competitive advantage. That's the
> capitalist system at work. > <DA off>
>
> erm...
>
> in the capitalist system... wouldn't ink jet cartridges be a proper
> commodity, produced by multiple vendors, nd the market would set the
> cost?
>
> wouldn't the government institute anti-trust action against a company
> for stifling competition?
SCC has files a suit...to be realistic...Look at Ashcroft. Look at the DoJ and
Microsoft. Look at merger mania, Enron, SBC, Global crossing and a lot of
others...IANAL but how does a private citizen say "this is anti trust. attorney
general (lower case in ashcroft's case) do you job"
>
> > > --
> > > Seth Finkelstein Consulting Programmer sethf@sethf.com http://sethf.com
> > > Anticensorware Investigations - http://sethf.com/anticensorware/ Seth
> > > Finkelstein's Infothought blog - http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/
> --
> Thanks,
> Noah Silva
>
> A T A R I - S O U R C E . C O M
>