2003年03月29日(土)の18時01分に microlenz@earthlink.net 曰く:
> On 29 Mar 2003 at 17:40, Seth Finkelstein wrote:
>
> Date sent: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 17:40:41 -0500
> From: Seth Finkelstein <sethf@sethf.com>
> To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> Subject: [dvd-discuss] SCC, Lexmark, and copyright versus reverse-engineering
> Send reply to: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
>
> > In the court's decision, there doesn't seem to be much dispute
> > that in *theory*, other downloadable programs could be written that
> > performed the same operations as Lexmark's programs. The difficulty is
> > knowing the details of the program and operating environment, in the
> > first place.
>
> <DA on>
> And if Lexmark has made RE so much more difficult, then they are entitled to
> their competitive advantage. That's the capitalist system at work.
> <DA off>
erm...
in the capitalist system... wouldn't ink jet cartridges be a proper
commodity, produced by multiple vendors, nd the market would set the
cost?
wouldn't the government institute anti-trust action against a company
for stifling competition?
> > --
> > Seth Finkelstein Consulting Programmer sethf@sethf.com http://sethf.com
> > Anticensorware Investigations - http://sethf.com/anticensorware/
> > Seth Finkelstein's Infothought blog - http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/
--
Thanks,
Noah Silva
A T A R I - S O U R C E . C O M
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part