[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] clean flicks and moral rights
- To: <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] clean flicks and moral rights
- From: "Richard Hartman" <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 10:03:09 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Thread-index: AcLEAfTxWukMcAdlSLaO9LKOwSbt7AEh7BFA
- Thread-topic: [dvd-discuss] clean flicks and moral rights
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Zulauf [mailto:email@example.com]
> Whether or not that single offensive (in the eye of the
> beholder) is in
> the mainstream of the authors other work is irrelevant. Only the
> assertion of "moral rights. In this post modern world where nothing is
> held sacred, how anything could claim the right to censor a derivative
> work on some moral "natural law" is beyond me.
It is particularly ironic when they are arguing on
the grounds of "moral rights" when what the are
seeking to preserve is in itself (in the eyes of
the CleanFlicks customers) immoral in nature.
-Richard M. Hartman
186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!