[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] A TPM without use limitations -- thoughts?
- To: <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] A TPM without use limitations -- thoughts?
- From: "Richard Hartman" <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:23:30 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Thread-index: AcKBFz+4+QvKWweCS+aRWmfDj4xhRgADFE0g
- Thread-topic: [dvd-discuss] A TPM without use limitations -- thoughts?
Not necessarily. Some companies have put great effort
into creating such branding technologies that are intended
to be recoverable after great changes. At least one of the
digital watermarking technologies for images is supposed
to be discernable even after printing the image and re-scanning
it, or publishing it in a magazine.
--
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com
186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter D. Junger [mailto:junger@samsara.law.cwru.edu]
...
>
> But isn't converting to another format, which in many cases will be
> protected as fair use, going to strip out the fingerprint? Especially
> if the new format is a compressed one?
...