[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Transcript Online
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Transcript Online
- From: "Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 08:43:51 -0700
- Cc: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu, owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Very interesting reading. The Justices were discussing the issue with
Lessig, probing, exploring arguments, but with S.G. Olson, they were
almost antagonistic....as in "OK what's the limit. GIVE ME A LIMIT. IF YOU
CAN"T GIVE ME A LIMIT ONE DOES NOT EXIST" I think there is no question
that they Supremes are leaning towards Lessig, the question is one of
Judicial restraint and using the golden bullets.....
"James S. Tyre" <jstyre@jstyre.com>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
10/17/2002 05:12 PM
Please respond to dvd-discuss
To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
cc:
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Transcript Online
Note that, to the extent Aaron has inserted names of individual Justices,
he is relying on his memory, The official and thoroughly annoying
practice
of the Court is to not identify the specific Justice who is speaking. The
unmodified official transcript simply says "QUESTION: ...."
At 07:32 PM 10/17/2002 -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
>(Forwarded from No DMCA in Canada list)
>
>-------- Original Message --------
>Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 18:47:42 -0400 (EDT)
>From: mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca
>To: discuss@digital-copyright.ca
>
>The transcript from the Eldred oral argument of a couple
>weeks ago is now online. My own impression of it is that
>our side did better than it sounded from the earlier reports
>I'd read, including Lessig's own; the Court seemed to be a
>lot harder on the Government's argument, and the
>Government's representative seemed less able to put forward
>a compelling presentation, than on our side. However, it's
>still much too early to declare victory, and as has been
>noted elsewhere, the oral argument isn't exactly the most
>important determining factor in a Supreme Court case
>anyway. They'll be deciding it based on the written stuff.
>Anyway, here's the link; see what you think.
>
> > http://www.aaronsw.com/2002/eldredTranscript
>
>--
>Matthew Skala
>mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca Embrace and
>defend.
>http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/
>
>--
>For (un)subscription information, posting guidelines and
>links to other related sites please see
>http://www.digital-copyright.ca
--------------------------------------------------------------------
James S. Tyre mailto:jstyre@jstyre.com
Law Offices of James S. Tyre 310-839-4114/310-839-4602(fax)
10736 Jefferson Blvd., #512 Culver City, CA 90230-4969
Co-founder, The Censorware Project http://censorware.net