[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss]2600 DROPS DECSS APPEAL
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss]2600 DROPS DECSS APPEAL
- From: "someone somewhere" <chaos755(at)hotmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 22:02:06 +0200
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
WTF is this, first the felten case isn't good enough, and now this. What
exactly are they waiting for? Do they think the elcomsoft case will be
better? hello, there russian(!). All these justices lived through the cold
war. Instead of 'hacker', it will be 'russian hacker'. That really sounds
better. Or maybe they expect that the MPAA will sue the new york times, well
forget it. Oh wait, I see, their waiting until there are judges who
understand technology, ok then, I'll check back in the year 2176. Really
really sad......
>From: "Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org>
>Reply-To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
>To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
>Subject: [dvd-discuss]2600 DROPS DECSS APPEAL
>Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 16:01:15 -0700
>
>http://www.2600.com/news/display.shtml?id=1233
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com