[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[dvd-discuss] Correction: ReplayTV: Some Citizens, Some Not
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: [dvd-discuss] Correction: ReplayTV: Some Citizens, Some Not
- From: "Rares Marian" <rmarian(at)linuxmail.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 10:18:40 +0500
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Somewhere there's a "right not to xyz" being infringed here.
Forcing people to say a certain thing is just as much censorship as muzzling them on other topics.
What of independent film makers? DRM costs extra money for content producers when they buy equipment. It costs the viewer much less because the manufacturers are the publishers. One item sold at loss equals many items sold at profit.
Sony Records = Sony Electronics = Sony.
Sony = Sony = Sony.
If the technical measure is assumed and integrated it hurts everyone who doesn't use it.
I wouldn't care if the non-DRM alternatives were not targetted out of existence.
In the last episode, microlenz wrote:
The whole DMCA, BPDG, SSS? CD?, issue for the protection of
copyrights all miss
the point. Society must want to protect copyright (as .002 pointed
out the
reaction to many as somebody tries to swipe a paper while your have
the dorr
open on the paper stand after you've paid your money is "get your won
DA*MNED
paper"). Putting in technological measure now means that society has
no
responsibility to protect copyright. Ergo. Society will not protect
copyright
and it's down the tubes.
--
Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org
Powered by Outblaze