[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Royalty-Free DVDs
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Royalty-Free DVDs
- From: microlenz(at)earthlink.net
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 21:41:48 -0700
- In-reply-to: <F15mQwvC3ZdCKgGD4I10000cfcb@hotmail.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
I wonder if the MPAA is starting to get on circumvention like the anti-
communist sketch of Monty Python "they crawling from out from under the bed,
there's one peeping out of my wife's blouse..." certainly the C&D notices for
DeCSS were/are
On 29 May 2002 at 20:24, someone somewhere wrote:
From: "someone somewhere" <chaos755@hotmail.com>
To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Royalty-Free DVDs
Date sent: Wed, 29 May 2002 20:24:05 +0200
Send reply to: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
>
> >New article on /. To save $15 - $20 per player royalties, they've devised a
> >new standard which has higher capacity and apparently can play DVDs. Is it a
> >circumvention device?
> >
> >http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/05/29/1738245&mode=thread&tid=98
>
> I don't think it is, the dmca says that it's primary purpose must be
> circumventing, but here, you still need the legitimate dvd. I think the
> only problem here has to do with patents. ( although I wouldn't be
> surprised if the mpaa ends up saying that it is a circumventing device)
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
>