[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[dvd-discuss] Re: [DMCA_Discuss] Fine Statement re: Copyright Terms
- To: Seth Johnson <seth.johnson(at)realmeasures.dyndns.org>, DVD Discussion List <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: [dvd-discuss] Re: [DMCA_Discuss] Fine Statement re: Copyright Terms
- From: "Peter D. Junger" <junger(at)samsara.law.cwru.edu>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 01:01:44 -0400
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 29 May 2002 16:01:14 EDT." <3CF5338A.E6E9BCF8@RealMeasures.dyndns.org>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Seth Johnson writes:
:
: (Forwarded from DVD Discussion list,
: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu)
:
: -------- Original Message --------
: Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 12:27:04 -0400
: From: "Dean Sanchez" <DSanchez@fcci-group.com>
:
:
: I have major issues regarding allowing copyright to be
: granted on any unpublished work. A manuscript moldering in
: the drawer does not benefit the public. If an author wants
: copyright protection, he must be willing to publish (i.e.
: make it available to the public). Until fairly recently,
: this was part of the social compact. Having to register is
: and was the ideal situation. In this case, if the author is
: dead, there probably is a need to create an incentive for
: the estate to publish. However, the incentive should be
: significantly less than one would give to a living author to
: create an incentive to continue producing new works.
Until recently, 1978 I think it was when the 1976 Copyright Act
went into effect, unpublished works were protected by so-called
common law copyrights under state law. When a work was published
it lost that common law protection and at that point the
work became eligible for federal copyright protection.
--
Peter D. Junger--Case Western Reserve University Law School--Cleveland, OH
EMAIL: junger@samsara.law.cwru.edu URL: http://samsara.law.cwru.edu
NOTE: junger@pdj2-ra.f-remote.cwru.edu no longer exists