[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Amicus
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Amicus
- From: "someone somewhere" <chaos755(at)hotmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 13:36:33 +0200
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
>From: Jolley <tjolley@swbell.net>
>Reply-To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
>To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
>Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Amicus
>Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 22:20:01 -0500
>
>The answer for an upper limit could be in the constitution.
> ...by securing for limited Times to Authors...
>Anything granted beyond an author's lifetime is being granted to
>someone else.
>
If an author's lifetime would be the upper limit, then there's not much
point to having 'limited times' in there. Then they could have just said :
...by securing to Authors...
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx