[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Judge Rejects Challenge to eBook Case
- To: <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Judge Rejects Challenge to eBook Case
- From: "Ernest Miller" <ernest.miller(at)aya.yale.edu>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 11:11:22 -0400
- References: <OF9222BCF0.2C60F417-ON88256BB9.0052E5AB@aero.org>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
I'm writing a major analysis for LawMeme. Hopefully, I'll publish it later
this week or next Monday.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org>
To: <dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Judge Rejects Challenge to eBook Case
> The opinion is interesting. The PDF for it is at
>
> http://www.eff.org/IP/DMCA/US_v_Elcomsoft/20020508_dismiss_deny_order.html
>
>
> when they get the html scanned in (or I extract the text from the PDF),
> I'll start a TWIKI thread at openlaw for commentary. I may be wrong (and I
> haven't finished reading it) but the Judge slapped the Ps on the speech
> argument but almost seemed to be baiting the Ds on their arguments. Almost
> a "this is the obvious counter argument. Now come up with a better one
> [that I can use?]"