[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] How many bits is a technical protection measure?
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] How many bits is a technical protection measure?
- From: Eric Seppanen <eds(at)reric.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:37:09 -0500
- In-reply-to: <OF5B221B77.70A276E1-ON88256BA5.007AA71E@aero.org>; from Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org on Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 03:32:24PM -0700
- Mail-followup-to: Eric Seppanen <eds@reric.net>,dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
- References: <OF5B221B77.70A276E1-ON88256BA5.007AA71E@aero.org>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 03:32:24PM -0700, Michael A Rolenz wrote:
> I was under the impression that fonts could be copyrighted as graphical
> designs..it this isn't the case, then the C&D letter makes absolutley no
> sense since it isn't protecting copyright material
The point is that scalable fonts contain some instructions about how to
render the font at different sizes, and it's arguable that the font itself
is a computer program.
See http://nwalsh.com/comp.fonts/FAQ/cf_13.htm