[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] DeCSS/DVD FAQ Overhaul
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] DeCSS/DVD FAQ Overhaul
- From: Rob Warren <rob(at)greslin.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 22:23:10 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20020412084203.A15441@tampabay.rr.com>; from rob@greslin.org on Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 08:42:03AM -0400
- References: <20020412084203.A15441@tampabay.rr.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
I've already received a few comments and suggestions to private email
about the FAQ. I've got a couple of further requests:
1. Please send FAQ correspondence to dvdfaq@greslin.org. I can't
guarantee that I'll get to your email in a timely manner otherwise.
2. Updates, drafts and rewrites are fine, but please cite references -
preferably ones that can be linked and verified on the Web. If it
can't be backed up, it's not going in the FAQ (or at least it'll be
strongly challenged).
Press stories, links to legal sites, EFF press releases, etc are all
fine provided that I can verify them. *Reliable* hearsay will be
recorded as such.
3. *Please* no new FAQ questions. I realize that it's been two years
since the last update, and a LOT has happened in that time, but first we
need to audit the FAQ as it stands and bring it up to speed. Sklyarov,
the SSSCA/CBDTPA, etc are all important issues but lie outside the scope
of the FAQ for now.
Let's get a handle on everything that's broken. Then we can start
adding new material.
4. Keep updated copy clean, and the politics to a minimum. I want to keep
the focus on the facts, and to try to stay as objective as possible.
This may mean including some unpopular material from time to time (such
as unpleasant facts or opposing viewpoints) for the sake of maintaining
integrity. Necessary evil: it increases the chances of the FAQ being
taken seriously as a factual document by members of the press. The
idea is to be informative, not necessarily persuasive.
Thanks,
--
Rob Warren Email: rob@greslin.org
AIM: Greslin2 Web: http://www.greslin.org