[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] 2001 Best year ever for movies
- To: mickey <mickeym(at)mindspring.com>
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] 2001 Best year ever for movies
- From: Scott A Crosby <crosby(at)qwes.math.cmu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 18:40:27 -0500 (EST)
- Cc: <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- In-reply-to: <3C85A35E.5030107@mindspring.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, mickey wrote:
>
>
> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,47200,00.html
>
> How many films did the major film studios make in 2001? By the "two out
> of ten" guide, around 100?
Both sets of numbers are completely believable. Most films flop. Only a
few films actually make money, but those that do, make it BIG. Same thing
with large-scale commercial music. Most bands lose money, but those ones
are funded by the ones that make money.
So, if we have 10 movies. All cost $10M to make. 2 make $50M, the rest
make $3M, then it is perfectly true that we can have a great year,
making a profit of 24%, yet, have 80% of our movies make barely a third of
their money back. :)
So, Valenti is complaining about the risks of the movie business. But in a
self-serving fashion in front of congress, cause its ALWAYS been that way.
Scott