[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Slightly OT - Japanese copyrights
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Slightly OT - Japanese copyrights
- From: Noah silva <nsilva(at)atari-source.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 13:27:21 -0500 (EST)
- In-reply-to: <E6A0E6DC7BF4D411B3180008C786FAAC115AAFCA@corpmail.usg.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
ok I meant: I own that COPY, but not the copyright, my bad ;)
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Ballowe, Charles wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Noah silva [mailto:nsilva@atari-source.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 11:50 AM
> > To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> > Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Slightly OT - Japanese copyrights
> >
> > If I sold the CD I am still "distributing" it, and surely
> > that is legal.
> > what's the difference to sell the MD? I have one license to it, and I
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > sold it. I own that license, if they stop me from selling
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > it, isn't that like them stealing it from me?
>
> This seems like a bad thing to be saying -- we don't want the
> copyright mafia to start licensing all content that we buy copies
> of. We want to own our copies and be allowed to do with them as
> we please (and if i'm speaking for my self let me know). You own
> one copy, first sale says you may transfer that one copy to someone
> else, fair use says you may space shift it for personal use.
>
> I see nothing wrong with the selling of your MD, but then again
> I'm not a court.
I am pretty sure you're right though. The only problem would be proving
that you did in fact own the copy if it was challenged and your CD and
receipt were burned. I suppose everyone tracking you by credit card can
be usefull now and again ;)
-- noah silva
>
> -Charlie
>