[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Slightly OT - Japanese copyrights
- To: <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Slightly OT - Japanese copyrights
- From: "Ernest Miller" <ernest.miller(at)aya.yale.edu>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 12:40:49 -0500
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0202281233040.14419-100000@sparcy.internal.lan>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
I agree patches or "diffs" should be legal - but they must not contain any
copyrighted material from the original themselves.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Noah silva" <nsilva@atari-source.com>
To: <dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Slightly OT - Japanese copyrights
> I agree, I don't even think it would be a material change, but the wording
> would be more clear, so as to stop some suites before they start
>
> Or you could distribute patches like I suggested. This is difficult to do
> with analog media though.
>
> -- noah silva
>
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Ernest Miller wrote:
>
> > Space shifting is generally legal and if you subtitled a movie that you
used
> > yourself you probably would be fine. However, distribute that movie and
you
> > will get in trouble (having violated both copying and distribution
rights).
> >
> > This, of course, is what does not make sense to me. Copying is legal
for
> > personal use (mostly) but not if you distribute it. Why not get rid of
> > copying as a violation at all? Why not just have public distribution be
the
> > crime?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ballowe, Charles" <CBallowe@usg.com>
> > To: <dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu>
> > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 11:50 AM
> > Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Slightly OT - Japanese copyrights
> >
> >
> > > I thought space shifting was legal under fair use - or is doing so
only
> > > legal if you do it yourself and not as a service to someone else?
> > >
> > > Where I can see some problems coming up is in laws that guarantee that
> > > works of art viewed in the manner that the artist originally intended.
> > > (I seem to remember a discussion of a law in Florida, I think, on this
> > > list sometime last spring maybe)
> > >
> > > -Charlie
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Ernest Miller [mailto:ernest.miller@aya.yale.edu]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 10:44 AM
> > > > To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> > > > Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Slightly OT - Japanese copyrights
> > > >
> > > > The subtitles would be a derivative work and illegal. Copyright law
> > > > prohibits copying. If you make a copy and destroy the
> > > > original, you still
> > > > have violated copyright law. I agree that this makes no
> > > > sense, which is why
> > > > I advocate eliminating the "right to copy" as part of copyright law.
> > > >
> >
> >