[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Gedankenexperiment II
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Gedankenexperiment II
- From: "Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 07:54:51 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Sure...and the can reopen a few estates of authors that have been closed
for decades.
"D. C. Sessions" <dvd@lumbercartel.com>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
02/27/02 09:22 PM
Please respond to dvd-discuss
To: <dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu>
cc:
Subject: [dvd-discuss] Gedankenexperiment II
If retroactive copyright extension is good, and more copyright
extension is better, why not introduce a bill in Congress to
retroactively extend copyright to life+70 or more for all works
previously copyrighted? I recall that, for instance, Rudyard
Kipling lived well into the 1930s.
--
| I'm old enough that I don't have to pretend to be grown up.|
+----------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+