[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Skylarov indicted for trafficing and conspiracy.
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Skylarov indicted for trafficing and conspiracy.
- From: Richard Hartman <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:21:38 -0700
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Sounds like he has a good case for wrongful prosecution. (Is that the right
term? IANAL ...)
--
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com
186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Neu [mailto:tim@tneu.visi.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 12:35 PM
> To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Skylarov indicted for trafficing and
> conspiracy.
>
>
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Steve Hosgood wrote:
>
> > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 03:17:09PM +0300, MosheVainer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > BTW, in case he is found innocent, would the US be
> > > > responsible to pay damages due to his inability to support
> > > > his family in Russia while on trial?
> > > > Any lawyer would like to comment?
> > >
> > > Not as far as I am aware....
> > >
> >
> > What, so the US govt. can arbitrarily arrest a foreign
> national(*), chuck him
> > in jail, drag him in chains from one state to another,
> deprive him of
> > all accepted 'rights' and after all *that* if a judge
> chucks the case out
> > of the window they can just say "oops, sorry" and expect
> not to get sued
> > for at least a million bucks(**) by their victim?
>
> Yep.
>
> One of the 2600 folks (Shapeshifter, I believe) was arrested at the
> Republican National Convention. The police claimed he was
> calling someone
> on his cellular phone and advocating the blockage of streets in the
> protest. Some streets were blocked, but people dispersed
> when the police
> asked.
>
> At his trial, the only evidence the prosecution had was a
> videotape that
> DIDN'T EVEN HAVE HIM IN IT.
>
> The judge apologized for wasting the jury's time and
> dismissed the case.
>
> The bond that was paid for his bail was not even all returned
> to him, even
> though he was found innocent. Evidently, 750 dollars of the
> bail money
> was allowed to be kept for "Administration costs". Evidently, being
> suspected of a crime is enough to allow these costs to stick, because
> there is no other reasonable explanation.
>
> You can read about this at
> http://www.2600.com/news/display.shtml?id=510
> (and other places in their news archive).
>
> People are getting screwed by the system all the time. There are not
> enough lawers who will fight for the common good anymore.
> The dvd-discuss
> list and the EFF lawyers are a rare breed, for which I am
> very thankfull.
> We need more of these.
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> All of the problems associated with Intellectual property can easily
> be resolved by keeping those who believe in it on a strict diet of
> Intellectual bread and water.
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> ______ _ __ "If you don't have the freedom to
> use what you
> / ' ) ) own - then you do not own
> anything."
> / o ______ / / _ . . No apologies to Jack Valenti or the MPAA
> / <_/ / / < / (_</_(_/_ -- tneu@visi.com /
> http://www.visi.com/~tneu --
>
>
>