[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Public Domain Enhancement Bill
- To: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Public Domain Enhancement Bill
- From: "John Zulauf" <johnzu(at)ia.nsc.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:26:22 -0600
- References: <Pine.SGI.4.44.0306260919270.11543195-100000@attila.stevens-tech.edu>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
Kurt Hockenbury wrote:
> If Disney were really smart, they would support it. Not for brownie points,
> but for more public domain to pull from.
>
> Step one: get this bill passed.
> Step two: let the public start re-discovering 50+ year old stuff.
> Step three: when something in the new public domain starts gaining popularity,
> make a Disney version.
>
> C.F. "The Secret Garden".
And adversaries in the copyright fight or not. Nobody recycles,
packages, and markets "pre-owned" content better than Disney. Think of
the number of traditional stories the culturally canonical form of which
is the Disney version.
The Sorcerer's Apprentice
Winnie-the-Pooh
Peter Pan
Cinderella
...
I'd like to Lessig pitch it directly to Disney (with a list of
remarketable "abandonware"). Also deep pockets would allow Disney, et.
al. to consume omnivorously any smaller rights holding houses without
the ability to afford re-registry. While this reduces the PD created in
the first round of registry, the result ROI "follow-up" meetings** would
cause careful examination for all subsequent years. Also, any
investment in zombie-ware (the rights are still held clearly, but the
work isn't no longer in circulation) would tend to drive some attempt to
ressurect the zombie-ware by bringing it back into print or
distribution, or reinvention. While not PD enhancing, it is an
improvement over the current situation.
.002
**"We spend $X for rights Y... what did we make on it?"