[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Power play
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Power play
- From: "Ballowe, Charles" <CBallowe(at)usg.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:17:36 -0600
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Would a work claiming a copyright date of 2003 be considered false
enough? (yes, they do technically have copyright now -- but it is
a false start date) I bought one the other day and was surprised
to see (c)2003 in it.
ISBN: 047126802X
-charlie
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Zulauf [mailto:johnzu@ia.nsc.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:41 PM
> To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Power play
>
>
> Before I starting ranting (sorry) -- can anyone give me an
> explicit ISBN
> reference to a work with the faux copyright notice in it? I know
> someone who might have interest. Thanks.
>