RE: [dvd-discuss] Hacking requires search warrant -- ruling

["Richard Hartman" <hartman(at)onetouch.com>]

Well, aside from that ... how can the RIAA negotiate
the best deal for the government while at the same
time negotiating the best deal for the artists they
represent?  Cain't be done!


-- 
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com

186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glendon M. Gross [mailto:gross@xinetd.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 9:31 AM
> To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Hacking requires search warrant -- ruling
> 
> 
> It seems that way to me.  It would seem to me that it would 
> constitute 
> preferential treatment for RIAA members, leaving non-RIAA 
> members out in 
> the cold.    This seems to me that it would be counter to the best 
> interests of impartial justice, but unfortunately all too 
> typical of the 
> way special interests are represented in U.S. government lately.
> 
> Richard Hartman wrote:
> > Since the RIAA already represents some of the
> > artists, isn't giving them the negotiations
> > responsibility for the government a direct
> > conflict of interest?
> > 
> > 
> 
>