RE: [dvd-discuss] Court Sides With Geac in Mainframe Software Cas e

["D. C. Sessions" <dcs(at)lumbercartel.com>]

On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 09:36, Richard Hartman wrote:

> AFAICT the third-party did not modify code -- nor did
> they _have_ the code -- they modified the binary ... 
> perhaps they could only do this because they had 
> knowledge of the product from when the worked there
> ... but nonetheless, they didn't modify -- or view 
> -- the code when they were working for the third-party.

Are we reading the same case?
As I read it, the add-on didn't modify the code
at all, just accessed it in novel ways.

-- 
| The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong. |
| Because the slow, feeble old codgers like me cheat.                |
+--------------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> --------------+