Re: [dvd-discuss] Geeks in government: A good idea?

[microlenz(at)earthlink.net]

On 18 Aug 2002 at 17:26, Tom wrote:

Date sent:      	Sun, 18 Aug 2002 17:26:51 +0200
From:           	Tom <tom@lemuria.org>
To:             	dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
Subject:        	Re: [dvd-discuss] Geeks in government: A good idea?
Send reply to:  	dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu

> On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 10:00:55AM -0400, mickey wrote:
> > It matters because Eric Corley cannot speak the truth from his website, 
> > nor can he refer you to someone who knows the truth.
> > mickeym
> 
> Once again, I am still speaking about a larger picture, not individual
> pieces. Yes, Eric was fucked over and he cannot speak the truth.
> However, that is his loss, not the loss of the truth which can (and is)
> still being spoken in lots of other places. More actually than it was
> before they fucked with him.

As with Dred Scott? Too bad that the initiative was lost. Had his case been 
appealed to the USSC, then either they would have declined to hear the appeal 
or not. If they did they they would affirm it or not. IF not we win. If they 
do, then it defines the boundary that must be redefined though 
social/political/programming action. Rather than bringing the pot to a boil, 
the pot has been left merely simmering. 


> 
> 
> -- 
> http://web.lemuria.org/pubkey.html
> pub  1024D/2D7A04F5 2002-05-16 Tom Vogt <tom@lemuria.org>
>      Key fingerprint = C731 64D1 4BCF 4C20 48A4  29B2 BF01 9FA1 2D7A 04F5