[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Definition of "Manufacturing"
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Definition of "Manufacturing"
- From: "Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 12:41:52 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Software as with engineering is seems to be viewed as a mere commodity by
the business community, similar to the famous artists paintings you can
buy at various hotels.
Noah silva <nsilva@atari-source.com>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
02/01/02 12:28 PM
Please respond to dvd-discuss
To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
cc:
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Definition of "Manufacturing"
You know I saw a memo internal to our company the other day, our french
parent company sent instructions, mentioning "blah blah blah... software
manufacturer... blah blah". I know it is probably because it was
translated, but I thought "uhm.. software isn't manufactured, just the
media is".
I think this is important. As a software author, I would like to see my
works recieve protection, but I think that software is a creative effort,
not a manufacturing one. It certainly can't be both.
-- noah silva
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, mickey wrote:
>
> This is an editorial about an effort to broaden the definition of
> "manufacturing" to include software production:
>
> http://www.manufacturingcenter.com/tooling/archives/0701/0701ed.asp
>
> It caught my eye because of the parallel to the "software != device"
> discussions.
>
> mickeym
>
>
>