[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[dvd-discuss] Teach ACT OF2001 -NOTHING to do with Teaching but DMCA Tothe Classroom
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: [dvd-discuss] Teach ACT OF2001 -NOTHING to do with Teaching but DMCA Tothe Classroom
- From: "Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:58:49 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Sorry to double post but
ftp://ftp.loc.gov/pub/thomas/cp107/sr031.txt
The digital transmission of works to students poses greater risks to
copyright owners than transmissions through analog broadcasts. Digital
technologies make possible the creation of multiple copies, and their
rapid and widespread dissemination around the world. Accordingly, the
TEACH Act includes several safeguards not currently present in section
110(2).
First, a transmitting body or institution seeking to invoke the
exemption is required to institute policies regarding copyright and to
provide information to faculty, students and relevant staff members
that
accurately describe and promote compliance with copyright law. Further,
the transmitting organization must provide notice to recipients that
materials used in connection with the course may be subject to
copyright
protection. These requirements are intended to promote an environment
of
compliance with the law, inform recipients of their responsibilities
under copyright law, and decrease the likelihood of unintentional and
uninformed acts of infringement.
Second, in the case of a digital transmission, the transmitting body
or institution is required to apply technological measures to prevent
(i) retention of the work in accessible form by recipients to which it
sends the work for longer than the class session, and (ii) unauthorized
further dissemination of the work in accessible form by such
recipients.
Measures intended to limit access to authorized recipients of
transmissions from the transmitting body or institution are not
addressed in this subparagraph (2)(D). Rather, they are the subjects of
subparagraphs (2)(C).
The requirement that technological measures be applied to limit
retention for no longer than the ``class session'' refers back to the
requirement that the performance be made as an ``integral part of a
class session.'' The duration of a ``class session'' in asynchronous
distance education would generally be that period during which a
student
is logged on to the server of the institution or governmental body
making the display or performance, but is likely to vary with the needs
of the student and with the design of the particular course. It does
not
mean the duration of a particular course (i.e., a semester or term),
but
rather is intended to describe the equivalent of an actual single
face-to-face mediated class session (although it may be asynchronous
and
one student may remain online or retain access to the performance or
display for longer than another student as needed to complete the class
session). Although flexibility is necessary to accomplish the
pedagogical goals of distance education, the Committee expects that a
common sense construction will be applied so that a copy or phonorecord
displayed or performed in the course of a distance education program
would not remain in the possession of the recipient in a way that could
substitute for acquisition or for uses other than use in the particular
class session. Conversely, the technological protection measure in
subparagraph (2)(D)(ii) refers only to retention of a copy or
phonorecord in the computer of the recipient of a transmission. The
material to be performed or displayed may, under the amendments made by
the Act to section 112 and with certain limitations set forth therein,
remain on the server of the institution or government body for the
duration of its use in one or more courses, and may be accessed by a
student each time the student logs on to participate in the particular
class session of the course in which the display or performance is
made.
The reference to ``accessible form'' recognizes that certain
technological protection measures that could be used to comply with
subparagraph (d)(D)(ii) do not cause the destruction or prevent the
making of a digital file; rather they work by encrypting the work and
limiting access to the keys and the period in which such file may be
accessed. On the other hand, an encrypted file would still be
considered
to be in ``accessible form'' if the body or institution provides the
recipient with a key for use beyond the class session.
Paragraph (2)(D)(ii) provides, as a condition of eligibility for the
exemption, that a transmitting body or institution apply technological
measures that reasonably prevent both retention of the work in
accessible form for longer than the class session and further
dissemination of the work.
"Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
01/30/02 01:13 PM
Please respond to dvd-discuss
To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
cc:
Subject: [dvd-discuss] TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND COPYRIGHT HARMONIZATION ACT OF2001
This caught my eye while looking for something else
ftp://ftp.loc.gov/pub/thomas/cp107/sr031.txt
1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment
of this Act and after a period for public comment, the Undersecretary
of
Commerce for Intellectual Property, after consultation with the
Register
of Copyrights, shall submit to the Committees on the Judiciary of the
Senate and the House of Representatives a report describing
technological protection systems that have been implemented, are
available for implementation, or are proposed to be developed to
protect
digitized copyrighted works and prevent infringement, including
upgradeable and self-repairing systems, and systems that have been
developed, are being developed, or are proposed to be developed in
private voluntary industry-led entities through an open broad based
consensus process. The report submitted to the Committees shall not
include any recommendations, comparisons, or comparative assessments of
any commercially available products that may be mentioned in the
report.
(2) Limitations.--The report under this subsection--