[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] dmca international?
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] dmca international?
- From: Noah silva <nsilva(at)atari-source.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:12:10 -0500 (EST)
- In-reply-to: <OF3CD61B74.FE6D6101-ON88256B43.00644772@aero.org>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
I think it's pretty sad that a country that most in the US considered "the
enemy" for so many years has better consumer rights laws than we do.
-- noah silva
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Michael A Rolenz wrote:
> I'm not surprised. The lawyer is protecting his client and is likely to
> take that interpretation. OTOH, as we have seen over and over again, the
> distinction between the medium and the material seems to be a subtle
> abstraction that the legal community (save notable exceptions :-) doesn't
> quite grasp.
>
> But it also raises some questions regarding the sovereighty of nations.
> Look at Dmitri. Assuming Russia were a party to a WIPO type treaty, then
> Russia might be required to prosecute him because of the DMCA even though
> what he is doing is legal and what Adobe is doing is not....OK turn that
> around, should the USA prosecute Adobe because they are providing ebooks
> in a illegal format in Russia? While a WIPO, WTO treaty may provide
> general guidelines, there WILL be differences and most nations won't yield
> their sovereighty to another nation (usually called appeasement,
> annexation, conquered, or defeated).
>
>
>
>
> Tom <tom@lemuria.org>
> Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> 01/16/02 09:40 AM
> Please respond to dvd-discuss
>
>
> To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> cc:
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] dmca international?
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 08:19:35AM -0800, Michael A Rolenz wrote:
> > I guess the question is that while COPYRIGHT applies to works, the DMCA
> is
> > not a law regarding copyrights but "protecting" access and prohibiting
> > tools that "circumvent" access schemes.
>
> that was part of my argument agains this, but the legal guy essentially
> said "it does without question govern copyright". I guess this is one
> of the "legal hooks" the various behind-the-scenes documents mentioned,
> namely that because SOME of it governs a copyright aspect, ALL of it
> gets the full advantage of international agreements.
>
> clever, these guys.
>
>
> --
> http://web.lemuria.org/pubkey.html
> pub 1024D/D88D35A6 2001-11-14 Tom Vogt <tom@lemuria.org>
> Key fingerprint = 276B B7BB E4D8 FCCE DB8F F965 310B 811A D88D 35A6
>
>
>
>