[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Interesting Spam v Free Speech Case
- To: dvd-discuss(at)lweb.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Interesting Spam v Free Speech Case
- From: "Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 08:52:38 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Too bad the justices never heard of a mail filter...or seemingly neither
did intel.......
Bryan Taylor <bryan_w_taylor@yahoo.com>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@lweb.law.harvard.edu
12/12/01 06:36 AM
Please respond to dvd-discuss
To: dvd-discuss <dvd-discuss@lweb.law.harvard.edu>
cc:
Subject: [dvd-discuss] Interesting Spam v Free Speech Case
This may be of interest to the crowd here because it is another free
speech on
the internet case: Intel v. Hamidi
http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/C033076.PDF
Forwarded from posting on Declan's list:
http://www.politechbot.com/p-02915.html
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com