[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dvd-discuss] Some opinions on the appellate court's decision (longish)

On Thursday 29 November 2001 15:57, you wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Claus Fischer wrote:

> > As opposed to other forms of instruction, like recipes and
> > blueprints, where the functional aspect is not so immediate.
> >
> > Perhaps it would be good to argue that for many forms of
> > speech (blueprings, cooking recipes) machines can be
> > constructed which do the same (shove in normed blueprint,
> > press button, get result); the only technical aspect here is
> Such machine exist commercially:
>   http://www.google.com/search?q=3d+prototyping+

It therefore follows that mechanical drawings are illegal, since
they can be used to violate my patents by the "click of a mouse."
Maybe I should sue the pulp&paper industry for contributory

| I'm old enough that I don't have to pretend to be grown up.|
+----------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+