[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Bunner wins DeCSS trade secret appeal
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Bunner wins DeCSS trade secret appeal
- From: Noah silva <nsilva(at)atari-source.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 15:44:56 -0500 (EST)
- In-Reply-To: <200111051906.fA5J6WA16128@lumbercartel.com>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, D. C. Sessions wrote:
> On Monday 05 November 2001 11:42, you wrote:
> > Well my personal guieline for what constitutes a program is simple, I
> > divide it into three areas:
> >
> > a.) Data (Gif files, text files, wavs files, etc.)
>
> Is a self-extracting ZIP file a data file or a program?
lol
I knew people would have fun picking this apart.
but in all seriousness, I didn't mean it to be a legal definition, but a
practical one. Obviously because computers and the law are both something
that depend on technicalities, they cause problems with each other.
At any rate, if you made a processor that understood ANSI C natively, then
that would be binary code, and current courts would ban it ;)
-- noah silva