[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Interesting 1st sale-shrinkwrap-EULA-(c) infringementcase
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Interesting 1st sale-shrinkwrap-EULA-(c) infringementcase
- From: Noah silva <nsilva(at)atari-source.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 10:21:33 -0500 (EST)
- In-Reply-To: <E6A0E6DC7BF4D411B3180008C786FAAC05748806@corpmail.usg.com>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
I suppose that's true, since I can sell any particular copy of GPL (or
whatever) software that I like. It's just.. would people be willing to
buy it for very much? ;)
If renting is still legal, and not a first sale, then couldn't companies
like adobe effectively get around this by offering their software only for
rent (say the sale price to rent it for a term of.. 100 years).
-- noah silva
On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Ballowe, Charles wrote:
> The license on GPL (for example) is slightly different -- it doesn't
> cover use, but redistribution. These are rights granted to the
> copyright holder and so are open to negotiation. It's not a software
> license as much as a publishing license. The GPL consists of 3 sections,
> the preamble, "TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND
> MODIFICATION", and a how to apply this to your creation. It makes
> no statement about use.
>
> -Charles Ballowe