[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] SSSCA Hearing on Oct. 25
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] SSSCA Hearing on Oct. 25
- From: Noah silva <nsilva(at)atari-source.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 16:55:54 -0400 (EDT)
- In-Reply-To: <200110192052.f9JKqaV20773@zero.monsters.org>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
You can always include the "security" features in the "free" (and I am
assuming Open Source) software. Just make them conditional defines to
it's easy to recompile it without even having to look at the code ;)
-- noah silva
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Stephen L Johnson wrote:
> According to NewSorge (www.newforge.com) the Security Systems Standards and
> Certifications bill is going get it's first hearing. Sen. Hollins will testify
> in front os the Senate Commerce Community about his proposed legislation.
>
> For those unfamiliar with the SSSCA. Here is a good quote from slashdot.org to
> summarizes it.
>
> Under the SSSCA, it would be "unlawful to manufacture, import, offer to the
> public, provide or otherwise traffic in any interactive digital device that
> does not include and utilize certified security technologies." And that rules
> out most Free software, right from the start.
>
> The full NewsForge article: http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=01/10/19/15
> 46246&mode=thread
>
> Stephen L Johnson <sjohnson@monster.org>
>
>