[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dvd-discuss] Hang the RIAA in their own noose.

To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Hang the RIAA in their own noose.
From: Tom <tom(at)lemuria.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 08:00:00 +0200
In-Reply-To: <3BCCD1B9.3050006@eurorights.org>; from larsg@eurorights.org on Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 02:32:57AM +0200
References: <OF039BD141.7B54433A-ON88256AE6.007E1522@aero.org> <LBENIHECGCFKIGFGOBCLOEPGCHAA.john.dempsey7@verizon.net> <20011016093912.A9766@lemuria.org> <3BCCD1B9.3050006@eurorights.org>
Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 02:32:57AM +0200, Lars Gaarden wrote:
> I find it hard to believe that they actually have that right. Which
> US law(s) might potentially be argued to cover their right to trespass
> on my property in order to remove alleged copyright-infringing material?

I don't know the precise article, but I'm sure it's printed on this
greenish paper reading "in god we trust" on one side.


-- 
-- http://web.lemuria.org
--

References:
- Re: [dvd-discuss] Two articals
  - From: Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org
- [dvd-discuss] Hang the RIAA in their own noose.
  - From: "John Dempsey" <john.dempsey7@verizon.net>
- Re: [dvd-discuss] Hang the RIAA in their own noose.
  - From: Tom <tom@lemuria.org>
- Re: [dvd-discuss] Hang the RIAA in their own noose.
  - From: Lars Gaarden <larsg@eurorights.org>

Prev by Date: RE: [dvd-discuss] Hang the RIAA in their own noose.
Next by Date: RE: [dvd-discuss] Two articals
Previous by thread: Re: [dvd-discuss] Hang the RIAA in their own noose.
Next by thread: [dvd-discuss] USG Investigates Online Music Cartel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread