[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Fwd: Bush taps Clarke as CyberdefenseChief
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Fwd: Bush taps Clarke as CyberdefenseChief
- From: Noah silva <nsilva(at)atari-source.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:04:04 -0400 (EDT)
- In-Reply-To: <OF848DE6EB.2CA170AB-ON88256AE6.0071E195@aero.org>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org wrote:
> Now Betty, who is my mother, uses a mac. WRT to your Aunt Betty not
> demanding something better, what's the alternative for the PC? Microsoft
> has a monopoly.....and the government isn't doing much about it right now
> other than letting microsoft screw around and waste time.
<veering slightly off topic...>
My point isn't about wether there are alternatives at all. To me, some
things are acceptible, some things aren't. If every time you drove
somewhere in your car, there was a 25% chance it would fail, I wouldn't be
caught dead in a car. Since the chance is much smaller, it is
acceptable. If every time I use a PC, there's a large chance it will
crash and lose my work, I won't use it most of the time. Without being a
computer expert, I think people should still be able to look at something
and say "this is reasonable" or "this isn't reasonable". My girlfriend's
dad bought a computer around last X-mas with Win ME. It seriously could
not stay running for more than an hour or two at a time without having
serious problems. Maybe it was the computer itself, but I doubt it. Even
if the car was the best thing we had, I would say 25% failure rate is
still too high, and I would still complain.
-- noah silva