[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Re: Sen. Hollings plans to introduce DMCA seque l: The SSSCA
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Re: Sen. Hollings plans to introduce DMCA seque l: The SSSCA
- From: Ravi Nanavati <ravi_n(at)mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 12:53:58 -0500
- References: <E06ADA0073926048AD304115DD8AB6BC9D66DE@mail.onetouch.com>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1
>
>
>
>If this monstrosity gets passed, could we overload the courts
>w/ lawsuits against companies that manufacture any digital
>device that does not conform to the law (such as digital
>answering machines) and, in so doing, bring the inconsistancies
>& impracticalities to theattention of the public and the courts?
>
>We don't _have_ to let them get away with selective enforcement.
>By insisting on full enforcement we would be able to break
>them, I think.
>
IANAL, but it seems to me the thing that would make that strategy
difficult to pull
off would be the question of standing. We might want to file suits to
highlight the
true implications of the law, but if we don't have standing our suits
will be dismissed
before we get that far. The Felten case notwithstanding, the thing that
makes our
legal battle harder is that we are almost always playing "defense" not
"offense".
- Ravi Nanavati