Difference between revisions of "Writings on open access"

From Peter Suber
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 160: Line 160:
  
 
* [http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/03-02-10.htm#contest Word contest], SPARC Open Access Newsletter, March 2, 2010.
 
* [http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/03-02-10.htm#contest Word contest], SPARC Open Access Newsletter, March 2, 2010.
** Also see [http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/3743006 this issue of the newsletter] in [http://dash.harvard.edu/ DASH].
+
** [http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/3743006/suber_new143.html?sequence=2#contest Copy] in [http://dash.harvard.edu/ DASH].
  
 
* [http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/02-02-10.htm#energy Four analogies to clean energy], SPARC Open Access Newsletter, February 2, 2010.
 
* [http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/02-02-10.htm#energy Four analogies to clean energy], SPARC Open Access Newsletter, February 2, 2010.

Revision as of 12:40, 31 July 2013

I've written a lot over the years about open access to science and scholarship. This bibliography of my writings on OA focuses less on news and more on commentary and analysis —that is, the pieces that may still be of interest. It includes books, newsletter essays, journal articles, preprints, and interviews. I omit the pure news pieces as well as minor pieces such as blog postings, listserv messages, letters to editors, presentation slides, and small web pages. I plan to keep it up to date. — Peter Suber.




Most recent first.

  • Unlocking Research. A 28 minute audio interview with me by David Weinberger for Harvard's Berkman Center for Internet & Society, August 16, 2012.
  • Open Access, MIT Press, June 2012.
  • Free Knowledge. A 24 minute audio interview with me by David Weinberger for the Harvard Library Innovation Laboratory, June 2, 2011.
  • Public Access to Federally Funded Research: Copyright and Other Issues. A 68-video discussion of federal open-access policy between me and Mark Seeley, Senior Vice President and General Counsel at Elsevier. Held at Harvard Law School, sponsored by the American Bar Association Committee on University Intellectual Property Law, and recorded April 9, 2012.
    • Also see my blog post on this event for some follow-up discussion.
  • Open Accessories, Radio Berkman, recorded February 26, 2009, released March 3, 2009. A 17:30 minute podcast interview with me by David Weinberger.
  • E. Canessa and M. Zennaro (eds.), Science Dissemination using Open Access, Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, July 2008. (This book knits together pieces from many sources into a single narrative. Several of the pieces are mine.)
  • "Open access", a radio interview with me by Jesse Brown for his show, Search Engine, on Canada's CBC Radio One, May 29, 2008. Now a podcast. The interview starts at minute 13:30 and lasts about seven minutes.
  • Towards Open Access, The Earlhamite, Winter 2008. An interview with me by Jonathan Graham. (Not online.)
    • A revised version of this article was published in a special issue of CT Watch (Vol. 3, No. 3, Fall 2007) on The Coming Revolution in Scholarly Communications & Cyberinfrastructure.
    • Copy in DASH.
  • The Promise of 'Open Access' Publishing, transcript of a live, online colloquy sponsored by the Chronicle of Higher Education, January 29, 2004. Lila Guterman was the host who moderated the discussion, and I was the guest who answered questions.
  • The Database Paradox: Unlimited Information and the False Blessing of 'Objectivity', Library Hi Tech, 10, 4 (1992) 51-57.
    • A revised and expanded version of "How Teachers Teach, How Students Learn: Teaching in a Blizzard of Information," in Evan Farber (ed.), Teaching and Technology: The Impact of Unlimited Information Access on Classroom Teaching, Pierian Press, 1991, pp. 67-74, which is itself a revised and expanded version of "Teaching in a Blizzard of Information," Issues in Science and Technology, 5, 4 (July 1989) 29-31.
    • Copy in DASH.




The following are (or were) continuously updated and can't easily be placed in the chronological order above.