Difference between revisions of "NIH policy"

From Peter Suber
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 50: Line 50:
 
* [https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4322581 The mandates of January], SPARC Open Access Newsletter, February 2, 2008.
 
* [https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4322581 The mandates of January], SPARC Open Access Newsletter, February 2, 2008.
  
* An open access mandate for the National Institutes of Health, Open Medicine, April 16, 2008.
+
* [https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4723860 An open access mandate for the National Institutes of Health], Open Medicine, April 16, 2008.
https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4723860
 
  
 
* [https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4322592 A bill to overturn the NIH policy], SPARC Open Access Newsletter, October 2, 2008.
 
* [https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4322592 A bill to overturn the NIH policy], SPARC Open Access Newsletter, October 2, 2008.

Revision as of 14:52, 13 December 2019

Here are my articles specifically on the adoption of the NIH policy. Chronological order.

  • Public Access to Federally Funded Research: Copyright and Other Issues. A 68-video discussion of federal open-access policy between me and Mark Seeley, Senior Vice President and General Counsel at Elsevier. Held at Harvard Law School, sponsored by the American Bar Association Committee on University Intellectual Property Law, and recorded April 9, 2012. Also see my blog post (June 1, 2012) on this event for some follow-up discussion.