Difference between revisions of "History of open access"
|Line 16:||Line 16:|
''Analogy''. Suppose a small town began to grow in a former wilderness. Early in its history it had a newspaper covering daily events. In time it had a phone book, tax roll, town hall, post office, telegraph office, public library, school, church, cemetery, train station, doctor, and
''Analogy''. Suppose a small town began to grow in a former wilderness. Early in its history it had a newspaper covering daily events. In time it had a phone book, tax roll, town hall, post office, telegraph office, public library, school, church, cemetery, train station, doctor, and each accumulating records, each in its own idiosyncratic, incomplete way<!-- on births, deaths, marriages, graduations, taxes, and land transfers-->. None of these caches of information is a history of the town. All are materials useful for studying the history of the town. In this sense, I haven't written a history of OA. But I've created materials, alone or with others, useful for studying the history of OA. Ithem , with some notes their scope and searchability. (By no means have I created all the materials needed to study the history of OA. But here I only link to those in which I've had a hand.) Needless to say, the history of OA is still unfolding. The small town didn't disappear except in the sense that it grew into a large city.
== Timeline ==
== Timeline ==
Revision as of 20:59, 8 April 2018
Nobody has yet written a comprehensive history of open access (OA), and I don't plan to. But many of my writings and projects over the years will help those who want to study or write up parts of that history. Here are some of those pieces and projects.
|Quick summary of the four major ones:|
Analogy. Suppose a small town began to grow in a former wilderness. Early in its history it had a newspaper covering daily events. In time it had a phone book, tax roll, town hall, post office, telegraph office, public library, school, church, cemetery, train station, doctor, surveyor, and private eye, each accumulating records, each in its own idiosyncratic, incomplete way. None of these caches of information is a history of the town. All are materials useful for studying the history of the town. Someone who knew where a good fraction of them were located would do a service by pointing it out. In this sense, I haven't written a history of OA. But I've created materials, alone or with others, useful for studying the history of OA. And here I'm pointing them out, with some notes their scope and searchability. (By no means have I created all the materials needed to study the history of OA. But here I only link to those in which I've had a hand.) Needless to say, the history of OA is still unfolding. The small town didn't disappear except in the sense that it grew into a large city.
- In February 2002 I started a Timeline of the Open Access Movement.
- At first it was a hand-coded HTML page.
- But as progress accelerated, and we passed OA milestones more frequently, that method didn't scale. In February 2009, I created a wiki version of the timeline at the Open Access Directory to crowd-source the job of updating and improving it.
- Unfortunately very few people have contributed to the OAD (wiki) version. But the OAD is open to public edits and ready for contributions.
- Right now the timeline is fairly thorough up to and including 2007, and very meager after that.
- In my summary at the top of the page I say "from the earliest days to 2007". That's because I stopped updating the timeline myself in 2007. However, the OAD version is crowd-sourced, and if the crowd takes an interest, the timeline could become comprehensive right up to the present.
- I wrote a regular newsletter on OA for 12 years. For its first two years it was called the Free Online Scholarship Newsletter (2001-2002). Then I renamed it the SPARC Open Access Newsletter (2003-2013). At first (from March 2001) it was weekly, with a few exceptions. In July 2003 it became monthly, and in September 2011 it became quarterly.
- Here's a list of links to each issue on the Earlham College server. Each issue and each major article is also on deposit in DASH, Harvard's institutional repository.
- I often wrote about contemporaneous OA developments. In that sense, the newsletter articles are relevant in the way that my blog posts are relevant, though the articles provide much more detail and analysis. Sometimes I wrote about the history of OA itself.
- Here are some of my articles on the history of OA itself. I know there are more and I'll add them as I find time.
- A glimpse of our history, October 2004.
- From 2003-2010 I wrote annual surveys of what happened with OA in the previous year. In the early years I linked to the developments I mentioned. But as they became longer and longer, I stopped linking to each development, and referred readers to my blog or earlier issues of the newsletter itself.
- You can search the newsletter with a Google "site" search of the section of my Earlham site containing the Earlham versions of each issue.
- This method will search my blog and newsletter together, which is usually an advantage.
- You can also search the newsletter in Google without special syntax. Just precede each search string with "peter suber" (keeping the quotation marks) and newsletter. This method will include some hits that quote the newsletter, but it won't omit any hits from the newsletter itself.
- You can also search the newsletter together with my other writings on OA, but not including my blog, by searching DASH, Harvard's institutional repository. However, the DASH search engine is not as flexible as Google with boolean or phrase searching
Open Access News (2002-2010)
- I launched Open Access News in May 2002 and blogged heavily until April 2010. My goal was to track and share all that was going on with OA. I didn't succeed, of course. But I covered a lot: about 18,000 posts, with occasional co-bloggers.
- OAN is still online at its original site on the Earlham College server.
- Do not trust the search engine in the blog sidebar. When the blog was alive, this search engine was comprehensive. But now that the blog is dead, it's very sketchy.
- All of OAN is preserved in the section of Harvard's H-Sities that captures and preserves my entire Earlham College web site. While comprehensive and well-preserved, this copy is hard to search.
- Most of OAN is backed up and searchable in a Google Group of the same name.
- I forget what trick I used to send each blog post to the Google Group. But whatever it was, I didn't think of it until after I'd been posting for a while. The Group captures about 14k of the 18k posts. You don't need to be a member to view or search the Group.
- I was the only member of the Group, and now that I've stopped posting to OAN, I've also stopped posting to this Group. There's no reason to ask to join.
- The Group-specific search search engine leaves a lot to be desired. If you search for "Elsevier", it will tell you there are 11 hits (by default sorted by date). But if you scroll through the hit list to the end, you'll find 203. If you scroll back to the top, you'll see that Google updated its estimate to 203. And if you turn off date sorting, by deleting %7Csort:date from the end of the URL, then Google updates its estimate to "about 490". (Google: What gives?)
- You can also search OAN with a Google "site" search of the section of my Earlham site containing the blog.
- This method will search my blog and newsletter together, which is usually an advantage.
- You can also search OAN in Google without special syntax. Just precede each search string with "peter suber" and "open access news" (keeping the quotation marks). This method will include some hits that quote my blog posts, but it won't omit any of my blog posts.
Open Access Directory (2008-present)
- In 2009, I co-founded the Open Access Directory with Robin Peek. It's an OA encyclopedia of OA. Unlike other encyclopedias, it limits itself to simple factual lists, in part to avoid edit wars and in part to lower barriers to participation.
- I say "2008-present" because that's when OAD has existed. But many of its lists cover OA developments prior to 2008.
- The OAD is a wiki and depends on the OA community to keep it accurate, current, and comprehensive. It's crowd-sourced and distributed under a CC-BY license. To limit spam, editing is limited to registered users, but registration is free and easy.
- See our handout on how to get started as an OAD contributor.
- Many of the OAD lists cover parts or threads of OA history. In most cases (not "Early OA journals), I launched these lists and maintained them with the help of research assistants and interns.
- Here are direct links to the most important OAD lists on OA history.
- Declarations in support of OA
- Discontinued blogs about OA
- Discontinued discussion forums
- Discontinued social media sites about OA
- Early OA journals
- Journal declarations of independence
- Journals that converted from OA to TA
- Journals that converted from TA to OA
- OA by the numbers
- Timeline of the Open Access Movement (also see the section of the present doc on this timeline)
- Unanimous faculty votes
Open Access Tracking Project (2009-present)
- I launched the Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) in April 2009 to provide a crowd-sourced alternative to my blog, Open Access News, which didn't scale as a way to capture and share the rapidly growing number of new developments.
- I say "2009-present" because that's when OATP has existed. But this needs two qualifications.
- On the past: OATP supports and encourages retroactive tagging, and is gradually capturing more and more OA developments from before 2009. To follow the extend of our retroactive tagging search for items that lack the oa.new tag.
- On the future: From the start, OATP benefited from grant-supported tagging, in addition to volunteer tagging But in the summer of 2018 it will wean itself off grant-funded tagging, and depend entirely on the growing cadre of volunteer taggers. After that, its quantity and quality will depend on the OA community at large. To become an OATP tagger or recruit new OATP taggers, see our handouts on how or why to tag for OATP.
- All OATP tag libraries are crowd-sourced and updated in real time. You can make them more complete by taking part as an OATP tagger.
- Here are a few OATP tag libraries particularly relevant to OA history:
- Items tagged with oa.advocacy (advocacy for OA)
- Items tagged with oa.boycotts (boycotts in support of OA)
- Items tagged with oa.declarations (declarations in support of OA)
- Items tagged with oa.declarations_of_independence (mass resignations of editors from paywalled journals in order to launch OA alternatives)
- Items tagged with oa.events (OA-related conferences and workshops)
- Items tagged with oa.growth (growth of OA)
- Items tagged with oa.history_of (works on the the history of OA)
- Items tagged with oa.jobs (OA-related jobs)
- Items tagged with oa.legislation (OA-related legislation)
- Items tagged with oa.litigation (OA-related litigation)
- Items tagged with oa.mandates (mandatory OA policies)
- Items tagged with oa.people (people in the news working for OA)
- Items tagged with oa.petitions (petitions calling for action in support of OA)
- Items tagged with oa.policies (OA policies)
- Items tagged with oa.signatures (declarations, petitions, and other OA initiatives that called for signatures)
- Because every OATP tag publishes a tag library and real-time feed, the list above is just a small sample of what OATP has to offer. For more, see the full list of OATP tags in use (more than 10,000) and the full list of project-approved tags (more than 250).
- Items in a given tag library are listed in the (reverse) order in which they were tagged, not the (reverse) order in which they occurred or were published.
- If you're studying the history of OA (or any other aspect of OA), then use the OATP to to support your research.
Google+ blog (2011-present)
- When I laid down Open Access News in 2010, I didn't want to stop blogging altogether. So in July 2011, I launched a new blog at Google+.
- The purpose of OAN was to cover OA developments comprehensively, but that's precisely what did not scale for an individual blog, and that's the job I shifted to the crowd-sourced Open Access Tracking Project. Hence, the new Google+ blog never intended to OA comprehensively. Nor did I even limit the topics to OA, as I did with OAN. So for the OA historian, this blog contains both omissions (no posts on some OA developments) and "false" positives (posts not about OA). Still, it covers many OA developments.
- It's my only current, active blog, though I also tweet (@petersuber).
- On my G+ blog page, there's a search box at the top of the page. But it's not limited to my posts.
- G+ offers me syntax to limit my searches to my own posts. But as far as I can tell, it doesn't let you limit your searches to my posts. (Google: Why?)
- The best work-around is to search for "peter suber" (keeping the quotation marks" and your search term. That will cover more than just my posts, but at least it will cover all of my posts.
Writings on OA (1992-present)
- See the list of all my writings about OA, including my major newsletter articles. Each entry includes a link to the version in DASH, Harvard's institutional repository.
How you can help
Two of these projects are crowd-sourced and you can help make them more accurate, comprehensive, and up to date.
- As you find relevant items, add them to the lists at the Open Access Directory, including the Timeline.