Chilling Effects

From SeltzerWiki
Revision as of 14:49, 25 November 2009 by 166.84.7.31 (talk) (Copied from cyber/team)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Chilling Effects Teamspace

We have some resources for Chilling Effects development. What should we do and how should we prioritize? Please add your ideas to the mix.

  • Nov. 13 -- add ideas over next few weeks. Next steps, circulate among other Chill participants, prioritize, and turn into an RFP/Statement of Work.

Major categories

  • Design
  • Functionality (for public viewers, for admins)
  • Data manipulation


Data dump

Ideas from WS Nov. 12 email:

  1. . current workflow automation -- can we make data entry more efficient and standardize entries better for data analysis?
  2. . interactivity -- where might we make the site more dynamic for users?
  3. . aggregation -- perhaps incorporate news feeds from related sites, including CMLP.
  4. . security -- let's get the admin interface into SSL; make sure entries are being properly sanitized.
  5. . despam -- lots of spam notices lately. can we set up more effective filters without driving away real contributors?

Ideas from Nov. 13 telephone call:

  1. - update the look and feel, give the site a consistent branding
  2. - make the site more responsive from the admin side, speed repetitive entry
  3. - fix the ordering of questions in drop-downs (WS will change default ordering to by-category)
  4. - create more group FAQs (like 745, 746) to make rapid annotation easier
  5. - add a (re)captcha to the notice-entry form
  6. - possible bulk-update feature
  7. - user testing
  8. - make search-by-field more prominent
  9. - add aggregated real-time news, perhaps in place of "related" boxes
  10. - interactive or real-time data-visualizations (think about what type of data might be interesting to watch) ticker, graphs, changing display, Google mapping
  11. - data manipulation tools, e.g. to standardize "sender" fields

Resources

Our past design choices: https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/team/wiki/Tech:_Design_Resources

as well as developer resources: https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/team/wiki/Tech:_Development_Consulting

Sites whose design we like

  • Ars Technica