AU: Information Privacy: Difference between revisions

From SeltzerWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 37: Line 37:


* Review [http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/02/google-latitude-adds-location.html Google Latitude] and one other location-based service or technology (RFID, GPS, satellite mapping, Dopplr, etc.).  What privacy should we expect and demand against government use? against private use? against our own over-disclosure?
* Review [http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/02/google-latitude-adds-location.html Google Latitude] and one other location-based service or technology (RFID, GPS, satellite mapping, Dopplr, etc.).  What privacy should we expect and demand against government use? against private use? against our own over-disclosure?
==February 16==
*Location redux, [http://news.cnet.com/8301-13739_3-10159055-46.html Chris Soghoian on Obama's Blackberry]
[Privacy Torts: Intrusion]
==February 18==
Privacy Torts: Disclosure

Revision as of 12:44, 13 February 2009

January 14

January 21

No new reading.

January 26

Lawrence Lessig, Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace: two chapters

January 28

Records, Computers and the Rights of Citizens Report of the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Automated Personal Data Systems, July, 1973

February 1

Privacy from Government: The Fourth Amendment, excerpting

   * Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928)
   * Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)
   * Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979)
   * Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001)

February 3

Privacy from Government: Wire and Electronic Communications Privacy

February 9

Location Privacy

February 11

Location Privacy, part 2

  • Review Google Latitude and one other location-based service or technology (RFID, GPS, satellite mapping, Dopplr, etc.). What privacy should we expect and demand against government use? against private use? against our own over-disclosure?


February 16

[Privacy Torts: Intrusion]



February 18

Privacy Torts: Disclosure