IP: News and Views: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
=September= | =September= | ||
'''Company Patents Playlists, Sues Everyone''' "A company called Premier International Associates filed suit against a slew of tech companies . . . [for] violating Premier's patents for an electronic "List building system"âthe older of which was applied for in 1997 and issued in 2001." [http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070914-company-patents-playlists-sues-everyone.html Ars Technica] 9/14/07 | |||
'''Microsoft Patents Watermark That May Protect DRM-free Music''' Microsoft Corp. has won a patent for a digital-watermarking technology that could be used to protect the rights of content owners even when digital music is distributed without DRM protection. [http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/20070912/tc_pcworld/137106;_ylt=AqHWO1oXfN_CBjbZUlfitvgjtBAF Microsoft Patents Watermark] | '''Microsoft Patents Watermark That May Protect DRM-free Music''' Microsoft Corp. has won a patent for a digital-watermarking technology that could be used to protect the rights of content owners even when digital music is distributed without DRM protection. [http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/20070912/tc_pcworld/137106;_ylt=AqHWO1oXfN_CBjbZUlfitvgjtBAF Microsoft Patents Watermark] |
Revision as of 09:57, 15 September 2007
What's new in IP-land?
September
Company Patents Playlists, Sues Everyone "A company called Premier International Associates filed suit against a slew of tech companies . . . [for] violating Premier's patents for an electronic "List building system"âthe older of which was applied for in 1997 and issued in 2001." Ars Technica 9/14/07
Microsoft Patents Watermark That May Protect DRM-free Music Microsoft Corp. has won a patent for a digital-watermarking technology that could be used to protect the rights of content owners even when digital music is distributed without DRM protection. Microsoft Patents Watermark
Copyright Protection for Sound Recordings Will Not be Extended in the UK [1] -- Not exactly new news, but I find it interesting that the US extended protection for Mickey Mouse and the UK isn't going to do it for the Beatles
House Passes Patent Reform Bill The Patent Law Blog -- The Patent Law Blog has a good review of the provisions of the patent reform bill, H 1908. It's provisions include a transition to a first to file system, and an overhaul of the way courts should calculate damages. 9/11/07
Doctor Who Leaked Documents Will Pay $100,000 to Lilly NYT -- Dr. Egilman received the documents as a litigation expert, then provided them to other sources including the New York Times. Is the NYT liable for trade secret misappropriation too?
Pharma Companies form Joint Venture â THe New York Times is reporting that two companies, Isis Pharmaceuticals and Alnylam Pharmaceuticals have formed an equally owned joint venture, Regulus Pharmaceuticals. One of the driving forces behind the joint venture was to combine their IP, specifically, patents, in order to do research without fear of patent infringement. (Snitty 08:20, 7 September 2007 (EDT))
Tech, drug companies battle over patent reform. The Washington Post, reports on some of the lobbying around proposed Patent Reform that Congress will consider on its return from recess. Look at the industry groups lined up on opposing sides. 9/3/07
Before Models Can Turn Around, Knockoffs Fly Fashion designers want IP protection for their designs. Should they get some? New York Times, 9/3/07
A big victory: Golan v. Gonzales Professor Larry Lessig blogs about the unanimous court ruling, effectively working towards that works that are in the public domain stay in the public domain. Also: [Stanford Center for Internet and Society] 9/5/07
Pepsi Alerted Coca-Cola to Stolen-Coke-Secrets Offer In this article, Fox News reports on an attempt to sell Pepsi some of Coke's trade secrets.
August
Unlocking the iPhone could invite DMCA suit This link PC WORLD article speaks about how some really intelligent hackers may get into trouble with AT&T and Apple. Apparently, reverse engineering and innovation is not always a good thing, especially when companies are making money for their hard work to keep an exclusive relationship.
Google Settles Trademark Suit Google settled a suit brought by American Blind and Wallpaper Factory for their AdWords program. The theory of the suit was that Google was getting revenue from using trademarks owned by AB&WF. When someone would search for American Blind, google would display sponsored results, thereby making money off of their trade mark. The settlement ended up not being for money, but for a promise that Google wouldn't change AdWords policy to adversely affect AB&WF. You can view the story here: New York Times --Ben Snitkoff
Failure to adhere to Open Source License is not Copyright Breach A blog article detailing Jacobsen v. Katzer. 8/27/07 link title