Difference between revisions of "Sentence-sliced Text Part Two"
(loading the text)
|Line 1:||Line 1:|
== Part Two: The Political Economy of Property and Commons ==
== Part Two: The Political Economy of Property and Commons ==
Latest revision as of 11:56, 18 January 2007
Part Two: The Political Economy of Property and Commons
How a society produces its information environment goes to the very core of freedom.
Who gets to say what, to whom?
What is the state of the world?
What counts as credible information?
How will different forms of action affect the way the world can become?
These questions go to the foundations of effective human action.
They determine what individuals understand to be the range of options open to them, and the range of consequences to their actions.
They determine what is understood to be open for debate in a society, and what is considered impossible as a collective goal or a collective path for action.
They determine whose views count toward collective action, and whose views are lost and never introduced into the debate of what we should do as political entities or social communities.
Freedom depends on the information environment that those individuals and societies occupy.
Information underlies the very possibility of individual self-direction.
Information and communication constitute the practices that enable a community to form a common range of understandings of what is at stake and what paths are open for the taking.
They are constitutive components of both formal and informal mechanisms for deciding on collective action.
Societies that embed the emerging networked information economy in an institutional ecology that accommodates nonmarket production, both individual and cooperative, will improve the freedom of their constituents along all these dimensions.
The networked information economy makes individuals better able to do things for and by themselves, and makes them less susceptible to manipulation by others than they were in the mass-media culture.
In this sense, the emergence of this new set of technical, economic, social, and institutional relations can increase the relative role that each individual is able to play in authoring his or her own life.
The networked information economy also promises to provide a much more robust platform for public debate.
It enables citizens to participate in public conversation continuously and pervasively, not as passive recipients of "received wisdom" from professional talking heads, but as active participants in conversations carried out at many levels of political and social structure.
Individuals can find out more about what goes on in the world, and share it more effectively with others.
They can check the claims of others and produce their own, and they can be heard by others, both those who are like-minded and opponents.
At a more foundational level of collective understanding, the shift from an industrial to a networked information economy increases the extent to which individuals can become active participants in producing their own cultural environment.
It opens the possibility of a more critical and reflective culture.
Unlike the relationship of information production to freedom, the relationship between the organization of information production and distributive justice is not intrinsic.
However, the importance of knowledge in contemporary economic production makes a change in the modality of information production important to justice as well.
The networked information economy can provide opportunities for global development and for improvements in the justice of distribution of opportunities and capacities everywhere.
Economic opportunity and welfare today-of an individual, a social group, or a nation-depend on the state of knowledge and access to opportunities to learn and apply practical knowledge.
Transportation networks, global financial markets, and institutional trade arrangements have made material resources and outputs capable of flowing more efficiently from any one corner of the globe to another than they were at any previous period.
Economic welfare and growth now depend more on knowledge and social organization than on natural sources.
Knowledge transfer and social reform, probably more than any other set of changes, can affect the economic opportunities and material development of different parts of the global economic system, within economies both advanced and less developed.
The emergence of a substantial nonmarket sector in the networked information economy offers opportunities for providing better access to knowledge and information as input from, and better access for information outputs of, developing and less-developed economies and poorer geographic and social sectors in the advanced economies.
Better access to knowledge and the emergence of less capital-dependent forms of productive social organization offer the possibility that the emergence of the networked information economy will open up opportunities for improvement in economic justice, on scales both global and local.
The basic intuition and popular belief that the Internet will bring greater freedom and global equity has been around since the early 1990s.
It has been the technophile's basic belief, just as the horrors of cyberporn, cybercrime, or cyberterrorism have been the standard gut-wrenching fears of the technophobe.
The technophilic response is reminiscent of claims made in the past for electricity, for radio, or for telegraph, expressing what James Carey described as "the mythos of the electrical sublime." The question this part of the book explores is whether this claim, given the experience of the past decade, can be sustained on careful analysis, or whether it is yet another instance of a long line of technological utopianism.
The fact that earlier utopias were overly optimistic does not mean that these previous technologies did not in fact alter the conditions of life-material, social, and intellectual.
They did, but they did so differently in different societies, and in ways that diverged from the social utopias attached to them.
Different nations absorbed and used these technologies differently, diverging in social and cultural habits, but also in institutional strategies for adoption-some more state-centric, others more market based; some more controlled, others less so.
Utopian or at least best-case conceptions of the emerging condition are valuable if they help diagnose the socially and politically significant attributes of the emerging networked information economy correctly and allow us to form a normative conception of their significance.
At a minimum, with these in hand, we can begin to design our institutional response to the present technological perturbation in order to improve the conditions of freedom and justice over the next few decades.
The chapters in this part focus on major liberal commitments or concerns.
Chapter 5 addresses the question of individual autonomy.
Chapters 6, 7, and 8 address democratic participation: first in the political public sphere and then, more broadly, in the construction of culture.
Chapter 9 deals with justice and human development.
Chapter 10 considers the effects of the networked information economy on community.