A Perspective on Limiting Device Functionality
cinesi fighe batteria acer travelmate 730 mapping cunbias piattaforma aerea usata asics gialle ps2 pc apc (telecomunicazioni) cyber shot dsc t3 silver sony another code ds femme publique film dvd acer n50 premium pocket pc foto porno di uomini gratis donne pesanti eleonora dimiele tratori ww san candido casio digital diary time mechanic frigo freezer nikon af-s dx 12-24 incontri a agrigento acer ferrari 4005 samsung sm793df facolta universitaria informatore medico torino - bruxelles ospedale gaslini italia plus map midifile left outside cerco donna matura vogliosa western digital hard disk esterno media mp3pro plugin nero maio bros traslochi internazionali la ragazza dagli occhi doro t68i cellulari sony ericsson decapitazione berger casais monteiro, adolfo zia anna michela ciccarelli videos porno gratis oakville yamaha apx moltres reinas del mediodia mah j streep olio per massaggio hard disk ultra dma 133 galilea montijo desnuda uomini neri zio nipote www 6rb com piscina cani nokia dual voltage rs-mmc career ragazze aquila decapitazione americano su libero sony micro cmt-nez5 porsche 996 carrera cabrio 2003 viaggi camper discoteca pacha ibiza ricette divertenti gprs gps manhattan transfert cpu water cooler strike commando un amico vero km0 pick up auto km 0 la serenisima manfrotto 190pro hp workstation radioregistratore cd mp3 elisa lazzaro nokia 7380 usb a irda offerta cellulari nokia noleggio subaru valzer sul danubio blu iros monitor lcd 20 acer suocere porche consigli per truccarsi balliamo sul mondo favorino palla pioneer masterizzatore dvd interno cartina geografica croazia coppie anale regola capelli panasonic diesel ds 0002 vecchio scarpone lettini giardino arredo schiller, friedrich mcquail denis sodimm ddr ii 533 maschi bsx a palermo www leoni com copertina calma apparente drag kingston cf bella gnocca donna donna musica tu temi nokia gratis summer go triboniano hotel marina in toscana a marina di mass sandalo trekking utensili moto en el5 problemi renault espace controllo dal dottore generatore still maeco masini teka cayra ristorazione scolastica del comune di ve harley davidson softail ati fire gl t2-128 fujisawa cori inter ultimissime sabacko kolo davon girl pic staffa parete tv lcd samsung vechie k jacques trucchi digimon pipino sankt moritz la vendetta dei sith akg k 141 foto milly carlucci nuda fbt casse attive gps ricevitore nemerix rex r 70 a noleggio costumi ospedali salernitani box esterno hd 3 5 creme anticellulite ripiani scaffale brizeux, auguste lg rh-7900mh protagonista video vasco la frusta di fuoco donne mature in cerca ragazzi elisabetta sirani amici 2005 sexpictuer scheda madre 2 processori scheda radeon x300 humax digitale terrestre hiroshima, mon amour tatu com bertolini arte moja domovina televisione monitor driver c385 hetai puzzle key mediaset distributore sapone liquido siglinde vuco glutamina peptide router 502t draytek router adsl www juegos666 com nero wolfe alexis amore sexxxxxxxxxxx lettori dvd akai usb e-zi waitec mercedes e 300 td avantgarde cuba e lavana medmax monitor 17 lcd rca video xbox ps2 mercedes 220 c sw ultimo cd degli u2 singole 40enni panty sigle sailor moon burt bacharach percorso tra kiev roma altalena per neonati contratto nazionale commercio video pamela anderson and tommy lee sasch koryo uomini alla ventura cazzo duri dancemusic barbecue elettrico lg lcd 26 herny barra grande itaipu de fora ba sardegna piantina televisori jvc lcd 26 free 3gp porn video aklan www centro d abruzzo it In Chapter 11, Benkler premises his “Device” section on the idea that “[u]biquitous access to such basic machines…is a precondition to the improvements in freedom and justice that we can see emerging in the digital environment” and “[i]t is [that access] to basic, general-purpose computers, as opposed to glorified televisions or telephone handsets, that lies at the very heart of the networked information economy.”
Benkler emphasizes the value of “general purpose” devices with “open architectures” because those devices best enable users to continuously explore, experiment, and access things outside the limited sphere of a specialized machine and allow customization without permission or restrictions from the manufacturer.
Benkler appears to get it right with regard to restrictive physical device regulations like the Fritz chip because those regulations remove computing flexibility from a device that already has it and much value is lost without that flexibility. It seems, however, that a line needs to drawn between that kind of device and (1) other limited devices and (2) devices operating on a proprietary platform.
When researching the Wireless Philadelphia initiative, the members of the Harvard Law School Internet Law and Politics semniar concluded that most of the people who do not have internet access also do not have computers – so the “digital divide” seemed to represent that first hurdle of obtaining a computer. Limited devices have a value in this regard because of their potential to bridge the digital divide.
Essentially, machines with limited functionality are likely cheaper and easier to use due to their limited purpose and therefore more likely to saturate the entire market. If someone prefers or can afford a machine that only sends emails, a general purpose computer hardly seems necessary. (While mobile devices with email functionality such as Blackberrys are becoming increasingly prominent, one should note that certain early email-only appliances that were introduced on the market never really took off.) And in actuality, much of the democratizing effect of the Internet is achievable through only a web browser and the trend over the past few years has been to web-enable everything – from email to instant messaging to customized information portals.
Perhaps MIT’s “one laptop per child” initiative best exemplifies the low-cost, limited functionality approach: the machines lack significant storage capacity, computing power, battery life and software. The result, of course, is a computer that can be produced for just over $100. The distribution of that inexpensive laptop results in gains from widespread dissemination of existing uses of the Internet at the expense of true “experimentation” that a fully functional computer provides.
The second consideration that Benkler neglects is that specialized machines may be better at their particular task than a general purpose computer because of advantages in user interface and technology. Machines that “structure their users’ capabilities according to design requirements set by their producers and distributors” are actually designed primarily to satisfy customer demand. People who play networked video games may actually prefer the networked XBox to their networked computer. The XBox bundles together all components necessary for video games, and none that the user does not need. The proprietary platform and network used by an XBox may be necessary for the device to function as it does or for Microsoft to be willing to create the device. In the future there is every reason to think that digital movie viewers may prefer the functionality of movie download to be embedded within their home theater than using a general purpose computer to do the same. And a proprietary platform may necessary for that functionality.
The user interface and technological advantages in specialized devices and proprietary platforms could easily extend to even more interactive purposes and it is possible that users would prefer them either for cost or usability. Blackberry handheld devices are an example of an emerging technology that provides such a service. The “glorified television” experiment of WebTV may have failed for any number of reasons, including poor timing, marketing, and its particular design, but it is shortsighted to give up on the idea of a light-footprint, low-cost device that enables Internet access using technology that already exists in most homes. Linking common devices, like a video game system or a television, to the Internet seems like the most reasonable way to ease the transition into a networked society and that in and of itself creates some value.
Thus, there is little question that devices with limited functionality or specialized proprietary platforms do come some cost of creativity and experimentation – these devices may not be able to create the Diana Ross and Lionel Ritchie “Endless Love” parody that has spread on the Internet or serve as a node in a peer to peer network. Regulatory restrictions on devices certainly act as an obstacle to the networked information economy, as Benkler describes. But there are benefits to specialized and limited functionality machines, whether they develop in response to regulatory restrictions or independently of them.