Difference between revisions of "3. Peer Production and Sharing"

From Yochai Benkler - Wealth of Networks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(revert)
(Added links to various examples)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
I call this commons-based peer production. Commons (as opposed to property) because no one person controls how the resource is used, they are either open to the public or a defined group. Peer production because it is done through self-selected, decentralized individual action.
 
I call this commons-based peer production. Commons (as opposed to property) because no one person controls how the resource is used, they are either open to the public or a defined group. Peer production because it is done through self-selected, decentralized individual action.
  
Examples: Free software, NASA Clickworkers, Wikipedia, Second Life.  
+
Examples: Free software, [http://clickworkers.arc.nasa.gov/top NASA Clickworkers], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Wikipedia], [http://secondlife.com/ Second Life].  
  
Relevance and accredditation technology can ensure the results are good: Open Directory Project, Slashdot (karma).
+
Relevance and accreditation technology can ensure the results are good: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Directory_Project Open Directory Project], [http://slashdot.org/ Slashdot] (karma).
  
Distribution tech too: Project Gutenberg.
+
Distribution tech too: [ http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Main_Page Project Gutenberg].
  
Sharing tech: SETI@Home, Napster
+
Sharing tech: [ http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ SETI@Home], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napster Napster]
  
 
==Sources==
 
==Sources==

Revision as of 16:37, 7 July 2009

Table of Contents
Chapter 2 | Chapter 4

Content

Summary

It is not intuitive that thousands of volunteers could beat big companies. Yet they do.

Coase argues that corporations exist because the transaction costs of using the market are too high. Yet GNU/Linux, Apache, Perl and others use neither markets nor hierarchies.

I call this commons-based peer production. Commons (as opposed to property) because no one person controls how the resource is used, they are either open to the public or a defined group. Peer production because it is done through self-selected, decentralized individual action.

Examples: Free software, NASA Clickworkers, Wikipedia, Second Life.

Relevance and accreditation technology can ensure the results are good: Open Directory Project, Slashdot (karma).

Distribution tech too: [ http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Main_Page Project Gutenberg].

Sharing tech: [ http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ SETI@Home], Napster

Sources

Sources cited in the chapter

Other relevant readings

Case Studies

Supporting examples

Amazon Mechanical Turk
Could be considered micro-outsourcing, allows API access to human effort. Also see Turkwatch for an overview of recent MTurk projects

Counter-examples

Indeterminate Examples (in progress)

Mycroft
UCB iSchool research project, a generalization of ClickWorkers by utilizing a few seconds of web surfer's abilities to collaboratively solve large problems, without leaving the page. Currently focusing on Wikipedia image tagging and Project Gutenberg.

Key Concepts