Difference between revisions of "3. Peer Production and Sharing"

From Yochai Benkler - Wealth of Networks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(spam rollback)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Table Of Contents]]
+
&uarr; [[Table of Contents]]<br />
 +
&larr; [[2. Some Basic Economics of Information Production and Innovation|Chapter 2]] | [[4. The Economics of Social Production|Chapter 4]] &rarr;
  
===[http://www.benkler.org/Benkler_Wealth_Of_Networks_Chapter_3.pdf Download the full chapter here]===
+
== Content ==
  
==Summary of the chapter==
+
* [http://www.benkler.org/Benkler_Wealth_Of_Networks_Chapter_3.pdf Full text (PDF)]===
 +
* [[Commentary Chapter 3|Commentary (wiki)]]
  
===Overview===
+
==Summary==
 
 
===Free/Open Source Software===
 
 
 
===Peer Production of Information, knowledge, and Culture Generally===
 
I would like to comment on one salient aspect of [[Wikipedia]] to which I believe you have not given full enough attention, although I acknowledge it may not serve your thesis in quite the same way.  You write at 74:
 
 
 
What is perhaps
 
surprising is that this success occurs not in a tightly knit community with
 
many social relations to reinforce the sense of common purpose and the
 
social norms embodying it, but in a large and geographically dispersed group
 
of otherwise unrelated participants. It suggests that even in a group of this
 
size, social norms coupled with a facility to allow any participant to edit out
 
purposeful or mistaken deviations in contravention of the social norms, and
 
a robust platform for largely unmediated conversation, keep the group on
 
track.
 
 
 
I believe the characterization of the project not having a "tightly knit community with many social relations" is in a fundamental respect simply not true.  Wikipedia has thousands of users who are registered and who maintain a rich and diverse culture of userpages.  With each page on the encyclopedia, as well as the User: namespace, there exists a discussion page, or Talk: page; it is in the nature of all wikis, especially those running MediaWiki software such as this.  The vast network of intertwined editors have been through the same edit wars, shared opposition to vandals, categorized themselves with userboxes denoting various enthusiasms, wiki-philosophies, collegiate affiliations and so forth.  There are "projects" to enhance content areas with users claiming allegiance to the same.  And, because all edits in the wiki are identified by Username, the User: page is only a click away from any page in the encyclopedia.
 
 
 
Why does this matter?  Because it is not just the social construct of a million thoughtful scribes punching away at this project one keystroke at a time - it is a million '''people'''. '''Humans'''.  With '''personality'''.  It is life's rich pageant to be sure.  It is a proper reflection of the diversity of interest any encyclopedia captures at its best.  These individuals also engage in the time-honored internet traditions of the use of colorful pen names, identities, and mythology.
 
 
 
To this add, there are other dimensions of interaction apart from the facially visible text.  The Wikimedia Foundation has mailing lists for each of its projects and maintains a 24/7 presence in IRC space as well.  Hundreds if not thousands of users will be online at any given time, interacting in ways that are some distance away from any article.
 
 
 
I will return to this page at a more decent hour and add the requisite citations to Wikipedia for those interested.  For now, I was struck by the treatment Wikipedia received in the book, and while it says so much, and captures its academic essence, it is in fact a much, much richer community.  And I'm only talking about '''English''' Wikipedia!  The dozens of other languages will have much more to say about their own subcultures.
 
 
 
The best part is, we are living it now.  It is real now.  And it is changing the world. --[[User:BradPatrick|BradPatrick]] 20:49, 19 April 2006 (PDT)
 
 
 
====Uttering Content====
 
 
 
====Relevance/Accreditation====
 
 
 
====Value-Added Distribution====
 
 
 
====Sharing of Processing, Storage, and Communications Platforms====
 
  
  

Revision as of 04:24, 10 August 2006

Table of Contents
Chapter 2 | Chapter 4

Content

Summary

Sources

Sources cited in the chapter

Other relevant readings

Case Studies

Supporting examples

Amazon Mechanical Turk
Could be considered micro-outsourcing, allows API access to human effort. Also see Turkwatch for an overview of recent MTurk projects

Counter-examples

Indeterminate Examples (in progress)

Mycroft
UCB iSchool research project, a generalization of ClickWorkers by utilizing a few seconds of web surfer's abilities to collaboratively solve large problems, without leaving the page. Currently focusing on Wikipedia image tagging and Project Gutenberg.

Key Concepts