A Perspective on Limiting Device Functionality
pensiline per auto carolina gf 4 fontenay-sous-bois soggiorno taranto monitor sony amare con rabbia sony dcr-hc 10 princess 2028 cd r w the littlest hobo io senza te recorder dvd home theatre recital forza venite classifica serie c calcio lg 42px4rv il canone di pachelbel portatile amd office access 2003 supporto lcd da parete trasporti napoli perugia doredo doremi desideri bordo gonfiabile labtec internet keyboard auricolare treo 650 aree sosta camper torino usb flash disk 512 dronk quien descubrio america delonghi deumidificatore que lloro sinbandera tracce tema maturita 2004 aldo biscardi prestito sesto fiorentino mahra dirisio calma sciacalli prestito pienza louvet de couvray, jean-baptiste messico tour maya masterizzatori dvd per nb polysilicon foto ss lazio vild danse www vidios legais com br guide new york monaldi fax internet bootz love me more los goles de ronaldo fetish piedi immagini www crociere m s c internetgirls org nikon wc-e80 cavo s video tv-out adattatore gsm sony ac-vqp10 peter pindar cock robin cardiofrequenzimetro a5 polar chalet vacanza il commissario maigret - il pazzo di bergerac nashville car audio blaupunkt verona 2000 nellt furtado flaibano giuletta sacco video hard scandalo hai voglia d fisz renault gpl annuncio lavoro bologna i9950 canon stampanti kasam ki kasam assicurazione fiumicino oposiciones aena decoder modulatore corsi formazione personale grand hotel royal viareggio www vascorossi com gigolo s black eye pease un caldo corpo di femmina erice hotel chicco alaska minclip com benny benassi no matter what you do free regione friuli geonav 4c nautica azione obbligazione bratz babyz fiat stilo selespeed jerez de los caballeros foto cbs principessa diana orologi casio illuminator king kong dvd www kimco it gloria constantino foto e l era tardi dvd moana pozzi hit mania 1995 firstservice srl office microsoft renzo arbore batterie sony ericsson cirano di guccini cartolina augurio compleanno sentieri soapopera eric von stroheim tre individui tanto odio macchine da caffe professionali dj casper chachaslide toner xerox 2135 la grigliata foto clitty una rockstar in cerca damore personaggi settimo cielo mendelson dragostea fin tei lyrics nikon - f 55 testo lo strano percorso 883 niurka fotos toner samsung ml-2150 vendita cam eccitazione genitale magic combi warlords battlecry ii napoli kappa mimosa festa donna lacie hard disk usb in tutti i miei giorni canzoni napoletane classiche impianti stereo the simps university jam spoon set me fre acer c300 allenamento per la mtb stampante hp 6840 nikon 70-300 g kt tunstall eye telescope acer mp3 512mb r9250 128mb pci ddr dvi tvo 64bit warp brothers grande sophie netgear wgr614 802 11g wireless router art carney gioco di macchine da corsa pristina musica y videos musicales de yandel frisinga one piece ps2 videogiochi il cuore e un zingaro x ray murder boom boom get here la festa dei folli girlsaloud sound of the underground occhiali ray ban donna www googl com santa clara (u.s.a.) joe lansdale saoke hej nissan micra c c immagine mare lop sony np-fp90 tastiera retro illuminata michel bouble rulli per bicicletta dvx s120 yamaha linea porno gay www i love messenger it fort bliss filato torrie macchina a vapore rian air siemens gigaset sl barabani paolo pesca da riva ingrossamento pene athlon xp 64 3200 scanner fujitsu a3 la strada giusta mollificio cappeller gladiatore rmx teac hd esterno usb kaho counter attak francesi boneym imac 20 di luca brothers spa tim curry street of simcity www banca lombarda www pesca in it a tutto bergman stylus photo r200 In Chapter 11, Benkler premises his “Device” section on the idea that “[u]biquitous access to such basic machines…is a precondition to the improvements in freedom and justice that we can see emerging in the digital environment” and “[i]t is [that access] to basic, general-purpose computers, as opposed to glorified televisions or telephone handsets, that lies at the very heart of the networked information economy.”
Benkler emphasizes the value of “general purpose” devices with “open architectures” because those devices best enable users to continuously explore, experiment, and access things outside the limited sphere of a specialized machine and allow customization without permission or restrictions from the manufacturer.
Benkler appears to get it right with regard to restrictive physical device regulations like the Fritz chip because those regulations remove computing flexibility from a device that already has it and much value is lost without that flexibility. It seems, however, that a line needs to drawn between that kind of device and (1) other limited devices and (2) devices operating on a proprietary platform.
When researching the Wireless Philadelphia initiative, the members of the Harvard Law School Internet Law and Politics semniar concluded that most of the people who do not have internet access also do not have computers – so the “digital divide” seemed to represent that first hurdle of obtaining a computer. Limited devices have a value in this regard because of their potential to bridge the digital divide.
Essentially, machines with limited functionality are likely cheaper and easier to use due to their limited purpose and therefore more likely to saturate the entire market. If someone prefers or can afford a machine that only sends emails, a general purpose computer hardly seems necessary. (While mobile devices with email functionality such as Blackberrys are becoming increasingly prominent, one should note that certain early email-only appliances that were introduced on the market never really took off.) And in actuality, much of the democratizing effect of the Internet is achievable through only a web browser and the trend over the past few years has been to web-enable everything – from email to instant messaging to customized information portals.
Perhaps MIT’s “one laptop per child” initiative best exemplifies the low-cost, limited functionality approach: the machines lack significant storage capacity, computing power, battery life and software. The result, of course, is a computer that can be produced for just over $100. The distribution of that inexpensive laptop results in gains from widespread dissemination of existing uses of the Internet at the expense of true “experimentation” that a fully functional computer provides.
The second consideration that Benkler neglects is that specialized machines may be better at their particular task than a general purpose computer because of advantages in user interface and technology. Machines that “structure their users’ capabilities according to design requirements set by their producers and distributors” are actually designed primarily to satisfy customer demand. People who play networked video games may actually prefer the networked XBox to their networked computer. The XBox bundles together all components necessary for video games, and none that the user does not need. The proprietary platform and network used by an XBox may be necessary for the device to function as it does or for Microsoft to be willing to create the device. In the future there is every reason to think that digital movie viewers may prefer the functionality of movie download to be embedded within their home theater than using a general purpose computer to do the same. And a proprietary platform may necessary for that functionality.
The user interface and technological advantages in specialized devices and proprietary platforms could easily extend to even more interactive purposes and it is possible that users would prefer them either for cost or usability. Blackberry handheld devices are an example of an emerging technology that provides such a service. The “glorified television” experiment of WebTV may have failed for any number of reasons, including poor timing, marketing, and its particular design, but it is shortsighted to give up on the idea of a light-footprint, low-cost device that enables Internet access using technology that already exists in most homes. Linking common devices, like a video game system or a television, to the Internet seems like the most reasonable way to ease the transition into a networked society and that in and of itself creates some value.
Thus, there is little question that devices with limited functionality or specialized proprietary platforms do come some cost of creativity and experimentation – these devices may not be able to create the Diana Ross and Lionel Ritchie “Endless Love” parody that has spread on the Internet or serve as a node in a peer to peer network. Regulatory restrictions on devices certainly act as an obstacle to the networked information economy, as Benkler describes. But there are benefits to specialized and limited functionality machines, whether they develop in response to regulatory restrictions or independently of them.