Copyright 2001 SHEPARD'S - 56 Citing references
Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501, 90 L. Ed. 265, 66 S. Ct. 276, 1946 U.S. LEXIS 3097 (1946)
SHEPARD'S(R) Signal: Warning: Negative treatment is indicated
Restrictions: Analysis (ALLNEGATIVE)
FOCUS Terms: No FOCUS terms
Print Format: FULL
Citing Ref. Signal: Hidden
PRIOR HISTORY ( 2 citing references )
Marsh v. State, 32 Ala. App. 24, 21 So. 2d 558, 1945 Ala. App. LEXIS 352 (Ala. Ct. App. 1945)
Writ of certiorari denied:
Marsh v. State, 246 Ala. 536, 21 So. 2d 564 (1945)
Reversed by (CITATION YOU ENTERED):
Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501, 90 L. Ed. 265, 66 S. Ct. 276, 1946 U.S. LEXIS 3097 (1946)
Reversed by (CITATION YOU ENTERED):
Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501, 90 L. Ed. 265, 66 S. Ct. 276, 1946 U.S. LEXIS 3097 (1946)
CITING DECISIONS ( 54 citing decisions )
U.S. SUPREME COURT
Distinguished by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Arcara v. Cloud Books, Inc., 478 U.S. 697, 92 L. Ed. 2d 568, 106 S. Ct. 3172, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 140, 54 U.S.L.W. 5060 (1986)
Distinguished by:
478 U.S. 697 p.707
92 L. Ed. 2d 568 p.578
106 S. Ct. 3172 p.3177
Distinguished by:
PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74, 64 L. Ed. 2d 741, 100 S. Ct. 2035, 1980 U.S. LEXIS 129, 6 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1311 (1980)
Distinguished by:
447 U.S. 74 p.79
64 L. Ed. 2d 741 p.750
100 S. Ct. 2035 p.2039
Distinguished by:
Flagg Bros., Inc. v. Brooks, 436 U.S. 149, 56 L. Ed. 2d 185, 98 S. Ct. 1729, 1978 U.S. LEXIS 90, 23 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (CBC) 1105 (1978)
Distinguished by:
436 U.S. 149 p.158
56 L. Ed. 2d 185 p.195
98 S. Ct. 1729 p.1735
Distinguished by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner, 407 U.S. 551, 33 L. Ed. 2d 131, 92 S. Ct. 2219, 1972 U.S. LEXIS 137 (1972)
Distinguished by:
407 U.S. 551 p.552
33 L. Ed. 2d 131 p.133
92 S. Ct. 2219 p.2221
1ST CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
Distinguished by:
Cape Cod Nursing Home Council v. Rambling Rose Rest Home, 667 F.2d 238, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 14789 (1st Cir. Mass. 1981)
Distinguished by:
667 F.2d 238 p.240
Distinguished by:
Fletcher v. Rhode Island Hosp. Trust Nat'l Bank, 496 F.2d 927, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8697 (1st Cir. R.I. 1974)
Distinguished by:
496 F.2d 927 p.933
1ST CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
Limited by:
Kelley v. Action for Boston Community Dev., Inc., 419 F. Supp. 511, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13630 (D. Mass. 1976)
Limited by:
419 F. Supp. 511 p.517
2ND CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
Distinguished by:
De Matteis v. Eastman Kodak Co., 511 F.2d 306, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 16225, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P9958, 10 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 153 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1975)
Distinguished by:
511 F.2d 306 p.311
Distinguished by:
Lefcourt v. Legal Aid Soc., 445 F.2d 1150, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9461 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1971)
Distinguished by:
445 F.2d 1150 p.1156
Distinguished by:
Powe v. Miles, 407 F.2d 73, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4380, 32 A.L.R.3d 846 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1968)
Distinguished by:
407 F.2d 73 p.80
2ND CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
Distinguished by:
Zebrowski v. Denckla, 630 F. Supp. 1307, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27188 (E.D.N.Y. 1986)
Distinguished by:
630 F. Supp. 1307 p.1309
Questioned by:
Gray v. Project More, Inc., 469 F. Supp. 621, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12960 (D. Conn. 1979)
Questioned by:
469 F. Supp. 621 p.624
Questioned by:
Huff v. Notre Dame High School, 456 F. Supp. 1145, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15310 (D. Conn. 1978)
Questioned by:
456 F. Supp. 1145 p.1147
Distinguished by:
Kuczo v. Western Connecticut Broadcasting Co., 424 F. Supp. 1325, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11760, 2 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1604, 39 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 1165 (D. Conn. 1976)
Distinguished by:
424 F. Supp. 1325 p.1327
Distinguished by:
Barrett v. United Hospital, 376 F. Supp. 791, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8390 (S.D.N.Y. 1974)
Distinguished by:
376 F. Supp. 791 p.798
376 F. Supp. 791 p.799
3RD CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
Distinguished by:
Cable Invest., Inc. v. Woolley, 867 F.2d 151, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 725, 65 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 1490 (3d Cir. Pa. 1989)
Distinguished by:
867 F.2d 151 p.162
Distinguished by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
Parks v. "Mr. Ford", 556 F.2d 132, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13991 (3d Cir. Pa. 1977)
Distinguished by:
556 F.2d 132 p.139
Distinguished by:
Gibbs v. Titelman, 502 F.2d 1107, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7355, 14 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (CBC) 1443, 29 A.L.R. Fed. 406 (3d Cir. Pa. 1974)
Distinguished by:
502 F.2d 1107 p.1113
3RD CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
Distinguished by:
Cyber Promotions v. American Online, 948 F. Supp. 436, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16237, 24 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2505 (E.D. Pa. 1996)
Distinguished by:
948 F. Supp. 436 p.442
Criticized in:
Eggert v. Tuckerton Volunteer Fire Co. No. 1, 938 F. Supp. 1230, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13098 (D.N.J. 1996)
Distinguished by:
Robison v. Canterbury Village, Inc., 651 F. Supp. 360, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 260 (W.D. Pa. 1987)
Distinguished by:
651 F. Supp. 360 p.363
Distinguished by:
Hoagburg v. Harrah's Marina Hotel Casino, 585 F. Supp. 1167, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17121 (D.N.J. 1984)
Distinguished by:
585 F. Supp. 1167 p.1171
Distinguished by:
Pendrell v. Chatham College, 370 F. Supp. 494, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12648, 7 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P9188, 7 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 163 (W.D. Pa. 1974)
Distinguished by:
370 F. Supp. 494 p.497
Distinguished by:
Asociacion de Trabajadores Agricolas v. Green Giant Co., 376 F. Supp. 357, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8309, 86 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2932, 75 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10485 (D. Del. 1974)
Distinguished by:
376 F. Supp. 357 p.359
4TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
Distinguished by:
NAACP, Frederick County Chapter v. Thompson, 648 F. Supp. 195, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19414 (D. Md. 1986)
Distinguished by:
648 F. Supp. 195 p.204
Distinguished by:
Curtis v. Rosso & Mastracco, Inc., 413 F. Supp. 804, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15164, 94 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2178, 79 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11492 (E.D. Va. 1976)
Distinguished by:
413 F. Supp. 804 p.809
5TH CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
Distinguished by:
United States v. Francoeur, 547 F.2d 891, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 14559 (5th Cir. Fla. 1977)
Distinguished by:
547 F.2d 891 p.893
Distinguished by:
Greco v. Orange Memorial Hospital Corp., 513 F.2d 873, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14468 (5th Cir. Tex. 1975)
Distinguished by:
513 F.2d 873 p.879
513 F.2d 873 p.881
Distinguished by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
United States v. Flower, 452 F.2d 80, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7225 (5th Cir. Tex. 1971)
Distinguished by:
452 F.2d 80 p.83
Distinguished by:
Palmer v. Thompson, 419 F.2d 1222, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10492 (5th Cir. Miss. 1969)
Distinguished by:
419 F.2d 1222 p.1225
5TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
Distinguished by:
Story v. Tate, 382 F. Supp. 1078, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13543 (N.D. Tex. 1971)
Distinguished by:
382 F. Supp. 1078 p.1079
6TH CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
Distinguished by:
Northrip v. Federal Nat'l Mortg. Asso., 527 F.2d 23, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 11516 (6th Cir. Mich. 1975)
Distinguished by:
527 F.2d 23 p.29
6TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
Distinguished by:
Anderson v. Randall Park Mall Corp., 571 F. Supp. 1173, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13279 (N.D. Ohio 1983)
Distinguished by:
571 F. Supp. 1173 p.1175
Distinguished by:
Family Forum v. Archdiocese of Detroit, 347 F. Supp. 1167, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12226 (E.D. Mich. 1972)
Distinguished by:
347 F. Supp. 1167 p.1170
7TH CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
Distinguished by:
Chicago Area Military Project v. Chicago, 508 F.2d 921, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 16690 (7th Cir. Ill. 1975)
Distinguished by:
508 F.2d 921 p.925
Distinguished by:
Chicago Joint Board, etc. v. Chicago Tribune Co., 435 F.2d 470, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 5920, 76 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2218 (7th Cir. Ill. 1970)
Distinguished by:
435 F.2d 470 p.473
435 F.2d 470 p.474
Distinguished by:
NLRB v. Solo Cup Co., 422 F.2d 1149, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10347, 73 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2789, 62 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10732 (7th Cir. 1970)
Distinguished by:
422 F.2d 1149 p.1151
7TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
Distinguished by:
Vargas v. Salvation Army, 649 F. Supp. 763, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16508, 43 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P37029, 42 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 869 (N.D. Ill. 1986)
Distinguished by:
649 F. Supp. 763 p.768
Distinguished by:
Franceschina v. Morgan, 346 F. Supp. 833, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12338, 80 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3470, 69 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P12960 (S.D. Ind. 1972)
Distinguished by:
346 F. Supp. 833 p.837
Distinguished by:
Bright v. Isenbarger, 314 F. Supp. 1382, 1970 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11036 (N.D. Ind. 1970)
Distinguished by:
314 F. Supp. 1382 p.1393
9TH CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
Distinguished by:
Gorenc v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improv. & Power Dist., 869 F.2d 503, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2744 (9th Cir. Ariz. 1989)
Distinguished by:
869 F.2d 503 p.508
9TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
Distinguished by:
International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Reber, 454 F. Supp. 1385, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16032 (C.D. Cal. 1978)
Distinguished by:
454 F. Supp. 1385 p.1389
454 F. Supp. 1385 p.1390
Criticized by:
De Malherbe v. International Union of Elevator Constructors, 438 F. Supp. 1121, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13744, 16 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P8259, 19 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1581, 25 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 35 (N.D. Cal. 1977)
Criticized by:
438 F. Supp. 1121 p.1132
Distinguished by:
Sunday Mail, Inc. v. Christie, 312 F. Supp. 677, 1970 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12659 (C.D. Cal. 1970)
Distinguished by:
312 F. Supp. 677 p.680
10TH CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
Distinguished by:
Acorn v. City of Albuquerque, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 27783, 1998 Colo. J. C.A.R. 5506 (10th Cir. N.M. 1998)
Distinguished by:
1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 27783
10TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
Distinguished by:
Ross v. Hatfield, 640 F. Supp. 708, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23334 (D. Kan. 1986)
Distinguished by:
640 F. Supp. 708 p.711
Limited by:
Ve-Ri-Tas, Inc. v. Advertising Review Council, Inc., 411 F. Supp. 1012, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15674, 1976-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P61009 (D. Colo. 1976)
Limited by:
411 F. Supp. 1012 p.1017
Distinguished by:
Kirksey v. Theilig, 351 F. Supp. 727, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10896, 11 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (CBC) 879 (D. Colo. 1972)
Distinguished by:
351 F. Supp. 727 p.730
Distinguished by:
Resident Participation of Denver, Inc. v. Love, 322 F. Supp. 1100, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14704 (D. Colo. 1971)
Distinguished by:
322 F. Supp. 1100 p.1104
11TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
Distinguished by:
Garrison v. City of Lakeland, 954 F. Supp. 246, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1430, 156 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2650 (M.D. Fla. 1997)
Distinguished by:
954 F. Supp. 246 p.250
Distinguished by:
Cook v. Advertiser Co., 323 F. Supp. 1212, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15029 (M.D. Ala. 1971)
Distinguished by:
323 F. Supp. 1212 p.1214
CALIFORNIA COURTS OF APPEAL
Distinguished by questionable precedent at:
Golden Gateway Center v. Golden Gateway Tenants Assn., 73 Cal. App. 4th 908, 1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 688, 87 Cal. Rptr. 2d 22, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Service 5942, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Service 5980, 99 D.A.R. 7527, 27 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2425 (Cal. App. 1st Dist. 1999)
Distinguished by questionable precedent at:
73 Cal. App. 4th 908 p.916
87 Cal. Rptr. 2d 22 p.28
MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT
Questioned by:
State v. Wicklund, 589 N.W.2d 793, 1999 Minn. LEXIS 136, 3 No. 10 Minn. Lawyer 10 (1999)
Questioned by:
589 N.W.2d 793 p.797
3 No. 10 Minn. Lawyer 10 p.11
OHIO COURT OF APPEALS
Distinguished by:
Lantz v. Franklin Park Mall Mgmt. Corp., Lucas County App. No. L-99-1131, 2000 Ohio App. LEXIS 422 (Ohio Ct. App., Lucas County Feb. 11, 2000)
Distinguished by:
Lucas County App. No. L-99-1131