<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Caroline</id>
	<title>Internet Law Program 2011 - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Caroline"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/Special:Contributions/Caroline"/>
	<updated>2026-07-20T17:02:23Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Student_Projects&amp;diff=1802</id>
		<title>Student Projects</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Student_Projects&amp;diff=1802"/>
		<updated>2011-09-27T16:00:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{TOCright}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All HLS students seeking credit for the iLaw Program must complete a final project. We’d developed four options, which are listed below and include written, oral, participatory, or video projects. All students are encouraged, although not required, to work in teams. Please let us know what assignment you choose via the &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Talk:Student_Projects|sign-up page]]&#039;&#039;&#039; or by emailing [mailto:ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu| ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu] by &#039;&#039;&#039;Friday, September 2nd&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please take care in noting the deadlines or respective timeframes for completing projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More information regarding the projects will be made available as we approach September 6th.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option A. Session Participation and In the Moment Technologies==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deep dialogue, hard questions and genuine interactivity are fundamental to the success and mode of the iLaw Program. Participants will be invited to engage with sessions in diverse ways throughout the program—from the wiki to the question tool, open Q&amp;amp;A, structured interposals, open space and invited conversation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These participants will help us to embed uncertainty and dynamic interplay in the sessions, and help to create genuine opportunities to challenge and test ideas. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They will:&lt;br /&gt;
* Choose a &#039;&#039;&#039;session of interest&#039;&#039;&#039;, along with up to 5 other students. &lt;br /&gt;
* During the session, you and your team will &#039;&#039;&#039;take charge of the question tool, monitor back channels and help identify key questions and priority issues.&#039;&#039;&#039; You will help the session leader to integrate them into the Q&amp;amp;A periods and other parts of the discussion. You may also document some questions that might be useful during the final “Future of the Internet” session on &#039;&#039;&#039;Friday, September 9th&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=1 style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFFCC;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;9-3 Update:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;  Due to the large amount of interest in this session, we have &amp;quot;closed&amp;quot; certain sessions for Project A Sign-ups.  Please see the [[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]] to see which sessions are open. Spots in these sessions will be awarded on a first-come first-served basis.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=1 style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFFCC;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;New responsibility (updated 9-1):&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;  After the session, please provide a &#039;&#039;&#039;2-3 paragraph summary of the key thematic areas, open questions&#039;&#039;&#039;, etc. This summary should be posted to the relevant Talk Page and shared with ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu. It may become a permanent part of wiki or other outputs from iLaw 2011. &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option B. Audio/Video Project==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For students with some knowledge/experience with audio/video production, we would be happy to have you record some portion of the proceedings (including interviews with key commentators, session leads and other contributors) and create a multi-media output. This might be a record of the program overall, a deeper dive into a certain topic, etc. Berkman staff may provide some (modest) production support. &#039;&#039;&#039;All final work products are due by the Friday, October 7th&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;Note from Charlie Nesson: I&#039;m hoping to do some informal video interviews during ilaw and would welcome student help. i need a soundperson, a relief camera person, and help cutting things together. nesson at gmail.com&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=1 style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFFCC;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;9-2 Update in response to questions:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; For this project, we&#039;d like students to choose a session(s) or topic(s) that they are interested in exploring and write up a project &amp;quot;pitch&amp;quot; for us, explaining their approach to the assignment (what they&#039;d like to cover, identify anyone in particular they might interview, describe how they envision the final product, etc) before next Tuesday.  The pitch does not need to be extremely detailed (a few paragraphs will suffice); but, if you choose this project, we&#039;d like to have an idea of what you have in mind.  Once we&#039;ve evaluated and approved the pitch, to the extent that coordination is necessary we can put you in touch with the necessary people to get things moving.  If you have any questions about this assignment, please email us: ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu. &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option C. Final Presentation: Lightning Talk, Provocation, Response Statement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Program_Schedule#Student_Presentations.2FReaction_Statements.2FProposals|2:00-3:30 PM session on Friday afternoon]] is allotted for student and participant presentations. Audience members who sign up will have 5-10 minutes to provide substantive reflections on the iLaw sessions and the program overall, or offer central issues for the faculty to answer/consider during the “Future of the Internet” discussion. They might also provide a deeper dive into a particular module or interesting case for further study, etc. The focus here would be on developing a short and creative presentation or statement, to be followed by brief and lightly moderated Q&amp;amp;A with the broader audience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option D. Written Output: Post-iLaw Reflections==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the wake of the program, and in particular, in light of the “Future of the Internet session,” you will provide a reaction statement or op-ed style piece--no longer than 900 words—that examines some of the hard problems at the core of the developing online space. You might choose to reflect on the evolution of traditional concepts such as privacy, security, and liberty, and their evolution in the online space, or to consider emerging issues that may confirm or challenge some of the core themes that were touched on in our discussion. You could also make the case for other themes, issues, or hard questions that require more attention in future iLaws. The best pieces will be posted to the iLaw wiki.  &#039;&#039;&#039;All final work products are due by Friday, October 7th&#039;&#039;&#039;. Please submit your assignment by emailing [mailto:ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu| ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu], and cc&#039;ing Lisa Carlavati: [mailto:Lisa Carlavati| a2jz@law.harvard.edu]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Student_Projects&amp;diff=1801</id>
		<title>Student Projects</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Student_Projects&amp;diff=1801"/>
		<updated>2011-09-27T15:59:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{TOCright}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All HLS students seeking credit for the iLaw Program must complete a final project. We’d developed four options, which are listed below and include written, oral, participatory, or video projects. All students are encouraged, although not required, to work in teams. Please let us know what assignment you choose via the &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Talk:Student_Projects|sign-up page]]&#039;&#039;&#039; or by emailing [mailto:ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu| ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu] by &#039;&#039;&#039;Friday, September 2nd&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please take care in noting the deadlines or respective timeframes for completing projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More information regarding the projects will be made available as we approach September 6th.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option A. Session Participation and In the Moment Technologies==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deep dialogue, hard questions and genuine interactivity are fundamental to the success and mode of the iLaw Program. Participants will be invited to engage with sessions in diverse ways throughout the program—from the wiki to the question tool, open Q&amp;amp;A, structured interposals, open space and invited conversation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These participants will help us to embed uncertainty and dynamic interplay in the sessions, and help to create genuine opportunities to challenge and test ideas. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They will:&lt;br /&gt;
* Choose a &#039;&#039;&#039;session of interest&#039;&#039;&#039;, along with up to 5 other students. &lt;br /&gt;
* During the session, you and your team will &#039;&#039;&#039;take charge of the question tool, monitor back channels and help identify key questions and priority issues.&#039;&#039;&#039; You will help the session leader to integrate them into the Q&amp;amp;A periods and other parts of the discussion. You may also document some questions that might be useful during the final “Future of the Internet” session on &#039;&#039;&#039;Friday, September 9th&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=1 style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFFCC;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;9-3 Update:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;  Due to the large amount of interest in this session, we have &amp;quot;closed&amp;quot; certain sessions for Project A Sign-ups.  Please see the [[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]] to see which sessions are open. Spots in these sessions will be awarded on a first-come first-served basis.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=1 style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFFCC;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;New responsibility (updated 9-1):&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;  After the session, please provide a &#039;&#039;&#039;2-3 paragraph summary of the key thematic areas, open questions&#039;&#039;&#039;, etc. This summary should be posted to the relevant Talk Page and shared with ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu. It may become a permanent part of wiki or other outputs from iLaw 2011. &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option B. Audio/Video Project==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For students with some knowledge/experience with audio/video production, we would be happy to have you record some portion of the proceedings (including interviews with key commentators, session leads and other contributors) and create a multi-media output. This might be a record of the program overall, a deeper dive into a certain topic, etc. Berkman staff may provide some (modest) production support. &#039;&#039;&#039;All final work products are due by the Friday, October 7th&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;Note from Charlie Nesson: I&#039;m hoping to do some informal video interviews during ilaw and would welcome student help. i need a soundperson, a relief camera person, and help cutting things together. nesson at gmail.com&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=1 style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFFCC;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;9-2 Update in response to questions:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; For this project, we&#039;d like students to choose a session(s) or topic(s) that they are interested in exploring and write up a project &amp;quot;pitch&amp;quot; for us, explaining their approach to the assignment (what they&#039;d like to cover, identify anyone in particular they might interview, describe how they envision the final product, etc) before next Tuesday.  The pitch does not need to be extremely detailed (a few paragraphs will suffice); but, if you choose this project, we&#039;d like to have an idea of what you have in mind.  Once we&#039;ve evaluated and approved the pitch, to the extent that coordination is necessary we can put you in touch with the necessary people to get things moving.  If you have any questions about this assignment, please email us: ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu. &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option C. Final Presentation: Lightning Talk, Provocation, Response Statement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Program_Schedule#Student_Presentations.2FReaction_Statements.2FProposals|2:00-3:30 PM session on Friday afternoon]] is allotted for student and participant presentations. Audience members who sign up will have 5-10 minutes to provide substantive reflections on the iLaw sessions and the program overall, or offer central issues for the faculty to answer/consider during the “Future of the Internet” discussion. They might also provide a deeper dive into a particular module or interesting case for further study, etc. The focus here would be on developing a short and creative presentation or statement, to be followed by brief and lightly moderated Q&amp;amp;A with the broader audience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option D. Written Output: Post-iLaw Reflections==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the wake of the program, and in particular, in light of the “Future of the Internet session,” you will provide a reaction statement or op-ed style piece--no longer than 900 words—that examines some of the hard problems at the core of the developing online space. You might choose to reflect on the evolution of traditional concepts such as privacy, security, and liberty, and their evolution in the online space, or to consider emerging issues that may confirm or challenge some of the core themes that were touched on in our discussion. You could also make the case for other themes, issues, or hard questions that require more attention in future iLaws. The best pieces will be posted to the iLaw wiki.  &#039;&#039;&#039;All final work products are due by Friday, October 7th&#039;&#039;&#039;. Please submit your assignment by emailing ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu, and cc&#039;ing Lisa Carlavati: a2jz@law.harvard.edu. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Mid-Point_Check-in&amp;diff=1713</id>
		<title>Mid-Point Check-in</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Mid-Point_Check-in&amp;diff=1713"/>
		<updated>2011-09-08T18:54:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Logistics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The day will end with a mid-point check in with the audience, led by Charlie Nesson. Charlie will solicit comments from audience members and ask for thoughts, suggestions, and recommendations for program improvements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Part 1: Your Suggestions for Improvement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Add your suggestions to the [[Talk:Mid-Point Check-in|Discussion Page]] or use the [[How_To_Participate_at_iLaw#Live_Question_Tool|Question Tool]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Part 2: Reflections on iLaw from Attendees==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Comments and Questions During the Session===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It seems that with all the intelligent individuals in the room, we should be able to produce a meaningful output from the program&#039;s events.  Let&#039;s start brainstorming and determine an output for the program on the Twitter stream.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Who can we trust to regulate the Internet?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Should law students be learning code?&lt;br /&gt;
**  Someone needs to be at the switch, monitoring the gears, and it’s important to master the fundamental concepts early and understand their effects on higher level issues, so that when the times comes, you will have all the necessary tools to make the right decisions and understand how policy and doctrine factors into the decision-making process.  Perhaps in another program (or at the next ilaw) we can highlight some of the real world cases where the doctrine has affected code, and where code has affected the doctrine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Why should these issues matter to a law student or a first year associate?  As a young lawyer, I may not have the ability to affect these issues; I will not be arguing the key issues at the appellate level, and the FCC will not be asking me for the answer.&#039;&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
**Many past students have moved on after 1 or 2 years after graduating from law school and actually worked on some of the most controversial areas at the FCC, at companies, and at policy oriented departments at firms and other organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
**It’s important to build the blocks.  As a first year associate, you are the person who is working with the law the most.  Your opinion will be carried up the chain to the senior associates and the partners as they argue the cases before the courts.  You do have an impact from day one, and your impact grows over time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Survey Feedback re: Mode/Format===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Media:Speak_to_Us_%28iLaw%29._SurveySummary_09082011.pdf|PDF of all survey responses to &amp;quot;Speak to us&amp;quot; question]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Generally into the tweets, question tool, etc.: “quality, quickness, and variety of the exchange”&lt;br /&gt;
* The most insight comes from the debates, either live or via the digital back channels.  The room seems to come alive when things break down.&lt;br /&gt;
* We are losing good ideas by having the &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; dominate the discussion.  iLaw was opened to students for a reason -- why not a small group or two to get our input?&lt;br /&gt;
* More cold calling&lt;br /&gt;
* It would be nice to see more law at iLaw&lt;br /&gt;
* Would like to see discussion from industry incumbents on issues like open systems -- the discussion felt one-sided and more diverse perspectives would be appreciated&lt;br /&gt;
* Would it be possible to invite/include more people from different parts of the world--there are global scholars in the room who we&#039;d like to engage&lt;br /&gt;
* I wonder if the twitter+chat+question tool distract and detract more than they contribute&lt;br /&gt;
* Some of the discussions can occasionally become derailed by the experts, and become a little too detailed with unfamiliar topics.  a broader level of generality could be helpful, although the discussion between faculty have been fantastic&lt;br /&gt;
* I feel like the discourse has been between professors, academics, foreign scholars, professionals, etc., but relatively little from the students actually taking the course.  If we are to be relegated to the question tool, we ought to go to it more often than we are; there needs to be more interaction between us and the speakers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Logistics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* *Please* stick to a clear schedule; it’s helpful to know when sessions will begin and end, and very disruptive when the schedule is not followed&lt;br /&gt;
* I’ve been a bit uncomfortable with the long sessions and the warm/stuffy room&lt;br /&gt;
* Space out the days of the program more&lt;br /&gt;
* Sessions were too long (especially Wednesday), lunch was too late in the day and awkwardly spaced, by the end of the day the material remains extremely interesting, but becomes increasingly difficult to absorb such a large amount of information&lt;br /&gt;
* Keep being struck by the remarkable people sitting in the audience. Possible next iLaw to dedicate 30 minutes to VERY brief introductions around the room?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Summary of Striking Insights===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Media:Striking_Insight_from_iLaw._SurveySummary_09082011.pdf|PDF of All survey responses to &amp;quot;most striking insight&amp;quot; question]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* interconnectedness of all of these issues&lt;br /&gt;
* level of uncertainty/speed of change surrounding these issues&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;History of the Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Prof. Lessig’s notion of mixed modalities (law, norms, markets architecture) and the power of the collective that falls out&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Privacy&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Herbert Burkert’s “privacy archeology” and the contrast between American and European approaches&lt;br /&gt;
* Extent to which national politics/histories affect attitudes toward privacy in different countries (particularly US vs. Europe)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Citizen Media&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* importance of ties between citizen media and mainstream/broadcast amplification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Intellectual Property&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nesson/Public Domain/John Rawls as a starting Point&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;User Innovation/Peer Production&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* how “scruffy” robust protocols triumph over focused designs -- seems to correspond to how user innovation triumphs over producer innovation&lt;br /&gt;
* when the Internet acts as a space free from market and state controls, we see cooperation, creativity, and altruism, rather than anarchy&lt;br /&gt;
* how to can the idea of user innovation be applied to democratic politics&lt;br /&gt;
* relationship between commons-based peer production and user innovation; relationship of this to justification for IP rights non-economic motives for innovation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Methods&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Observation that the net reproduces social inequalities connects to the overall impression that all of the legal and technical questions are embedded within and bounded by human factor limitations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Overall impression that methods matter&lt;br /&gt;
* I think it’s a shame that lawyers don’t ever deal with good methodology.  Methodology determines so much of knowledge derived from real life.  are cases all we really get?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nagging Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Media:Nagging_Concern_from_iLaw.SurveySummary_09082011.pdf|PDF of survey responses to &amp;quot;any nagging questions&amp;quot;]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What do we do with this information?  What of this information is actionable? What’s the next step?  What are (or how do we find) the solutions to the questions we’ve raised?&lt;br /&gt;
* how can students get involved?&lt;br /&gt;
* what can future lawyers do with this information?&lt;br /&gt;
* does Berkman’s academic research produce political/economic/other results?  should Berkman focus more on pushing for concrete change in these fields, rather than conducting research?&lt;br /&gt;
* what messages/ideas should participants take away from iLaw?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Privacy&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How do we develop law and policy to address the threat to privacy posed by the Internet?&lt;br /&gt;
* How do we balance privacy concerns with freedom of information?&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Cybersecurity&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Many respondents were generally concerned about their own security online--questions about passwords, personal information being “compromised,” protecting selves online, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Role of Law&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Some concern that discussions are focused too much on economics/culture/code and not enough on law&lt;br /&gt;
* What is the relationship between the issues being discussed and “big law”?&lt;br /&gt;
* How do these issues play out in courtrooms and Congress?&lt;br /&gt;
* Tension between generativity/openness and privacy/security/IP concerns&lt;br /&gt;
* How do we stop cybersecurity problems without limiting the openness of the web?  Alternately, how do we preserve the Internet’s openness and generativity while respecting freedom of expression, privacy, and national security?&lt;br /&gt;
* Given the “ever-present ability of governments and corporations to restrict, constrain, and control,” what is the future of the Net?&lt;br /&gt;
* Will professional creativity disappear in the absence of copyright protection?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=File:Speak_to_Us_(iLaw)._SurveySummary_09082011.pdf&amp;diff=1693</id>
		<title>File:Speak to Us (iLaw). SurveySummary 09082011.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=File:Speak_to_Us_(iLaw)._SurveySummary_09082011.pdf&amp;diff=1693"/>
		<updated>2011-09-08T17:29:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=File:Nagging_Concern_from_iLaw.SurveySummary_09082011.pdf&amp;diff=1692</id>
		<title>File:Nagging Concern from iLaw.SurveySummary 09082011.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=File:Nagging_Concern_from_iLaw.SurveySummary_09082011.pdf&amp;diff=1692"/>
		<updated>2011-09-08T17:28:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=File:Striking_Insight_from_iLaw._SurveySummary_09082011.pdf&amp;diff=1691</id>
		<title>File:Striking Insight from iLaw. SurveySummary 09082011.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=File:Striking_Insight_from_iLaw._SurveySummary_09082011.pdf&amp;diff=1691"/>
		<updated>2011-09-08T17:27:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Student_Projects&amp;diff=1684</id>
		<title>Student Projects</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Student_Projects&amp;diff=1684"/>
		<updated>2011-09-08T16:58:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Option A. Session Participation and In the Moment Technologies */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{TOCright}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All HLS students seeking credit for the iLaw Program must complete a final project. We’d developed four options, which are listed below and include written, oral, participatory, or video projects. All students are encouraged, although not required, to work in teams. Please let us know what assignment you choose via the &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Talk:Student_Projects|sign-up page]]&#039;&#039;&#039; or by emailing [mailto:ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu| ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu] by &#039;&#039;&#039;Friday, September 2nd&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please take care in noting the deadlines or respective timeframes for completing projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More information regarding the projects will be made available as we approach September 6th.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option A. Session Participation and In the Moment Technologies==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deep dialogue, hard questions and genuine interactivity are fundamental to the success and mode of the iLaw Program. Participants will be invited to engage with sessions in diverse ways throughout the program—from the wiki to the question tool, open Q&amp;amp;A, structured interposals, open space and invited conversation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These participants will help us to embed uncertainty and dynamic interplay in the sessions, and help to create genuine opportunities to challenge and test ideas. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They will:&lt;br /&gt;
* Choose a &#039;&#039;&#039;session of interest&#039;&#039;&#039;, along with up to 5 other students. &lt;br /&gt;
* During the session, you and your team will &#039;&#039;&#039;take charge of the question tool, monitor back channels and help identify key questions and priority issues.&#039;&#039;&#039; You will help the session leader to integrate them into the Q&amp;amp;A periods and other parts of the discussion. You may also document some questions that might be useful during the final “Future of the Internet” session on &#039;&#039;&#039;Friday, September 9th&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=1 style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFFCC;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;9-3 Update:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;  Due to the large amount of interest in this session, we have &amp;quot;closed&amp;quot; certain sessions for Project A Sign-ups.  Please see the [[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]] to see which sessions are open. Spots in these sessions will be awarded on a first-come first-served basis.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=1 style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFFCC;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;New responsibility (updated 9-1):&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;  After the session, please provide a &#039;&#039;&#039;2-3 paragraph summary of the key thematic areas, open questions&#039;&#039;&#039;, etc. This summary should be posted to the relevant Talk Page and shared with ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu. It may become a permanent part of wiki or other outputs from iLaw 2011. &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option B. Audio/Video Project==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For students with some knowledge/experience with audio/video production, we would be happy to have you record some portion of the proceedings (including interviews with key commentators, session leads and other contributors) and create a multi-media output. This might be a record of the program overall, a deeper dive into a certain topic, etc. Berkman staff may provide some (modest) production support. &#039;&#039;&#039;All final work products are due by the Friday, October 7th&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;Note from Charlie Nesson: I&#039;m hoping to do some informal video interviews during ilaw and would welcome student help. i need a soundperson, a relief camera person, and help cutting things together. nesson at gmail.com&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=1 style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFFCC;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;9-2 Update in response to questions:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; For this project, we&#039;d like students to choose a session(s) or topic(s) that they are interested in exploring and write up a project &amp;quot;pitch&amp;quot; for us, explaining their approach to the assignment (what they&#039;d like to cover, identify anyone in particular they might interview, describe how they envision the final product, etc) before next Tuesday.  The pitch does not need to be extremely detailed (a few paragraphs will suffice); but, if you choose this project, we&#039;d like to have an idea of what you have in mind.  Once we&#039;ve evaluated and approved the pitch, to the extent that coordination is necessary we can put you in touch with the necessary people to get things moving.  If you have any questions about this assignment, please email us: ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu. &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option C. Final Presentation: Lightning Talk, Provocation, Response Statement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Program_Schedule#Student_Presentations.2FReaction_Statements.2FProposals|2:00-3:30 PM session on Friday afternoon]] is allotted for student and participant presentations. Audience members who sign up will have 5-10 minutes to provide substantive reflections on the iLaw sessions and the program overall, or offer central issues for the faculty to answer/consider during the “Future of the Internet” discussion. They might also provide a deeper dive into a particular module or interesting case for further study, etc. The focus here would be on developing a short and creative presentation or statement, to be followed by brief and lightly moderated Q&amp;amp;A with the broader audience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option D. Written Output: Post-iLaw Reflections==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the wake of the program, and in particular, in light of the “Future of the Internet session,” you will provide a reaction statement or op-ed style piece--no longer than 900 words—that examines some of the hard problems at the core of the developing online space. You might choose to reflect on the evolution of traditional concepts such as privacy, security, and liberty, and their evolution in the online space, or to consider emerging issues that may confirm or challenge some of the core themes that were touched on in our discussion. You could also make the case for other themes, issues, or hard questions that require more attention in future iLaws. The best pieces will be posted to the iLaw wiki.  &#039;&#039;&#039;All final work products are due by Friday, October 7th&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Student_Projects&amp;diff=1683</id>
		<title>Student Projects</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Student_Projects&amp;diff=1683"/>
		<updated>2011-09-08T16:57:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Option D. Written Output: Post-iLaw Reflections */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{TOCright}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All HLS students seeking credit for the iLaw Program must complete a final project. We’d developed four options, which are listed below and include written, oral, participatory, or video projects. All students are encouraged, although not required, to work in teams. Please let us know what assignment you choose via the &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Talk:Student_Projects|sign-up page]]&#039;&#039;&#039; or by emailing [mailto:ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu| ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu] by &#039;&#039;&#039;Friday, September 2nd&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please take care in noting the deadlines or respective timeframes for completing projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More information regarding the projects will be made available as we approach September 6th.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option A. Session Participation and In the Moment Technologies==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deep dialogue, hard questions and genuine interactivity are fundamental to the success and mode of the iLaw Program. Participants will be invited to engage with sessions in diverse ways throughout the program—from the wiki to the question tool, open Q&amp;amp;A, structured interposals, open space and invited conversation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These participants will help us to embed uncertainty and dynamic interplay in the sessions, and help to create genuine opportunities to challenge and test ideas. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They will:&lt;br /&gt;
* Choose a &#039;&#039;&#039;session of interest&#039;&#039;&#039;, along with up to 5 other students. &lt;br /&gt;
* During the session, you and your team will &#039;&#039;&#039;take charge of the question tool, monitor back channels and help identify key questions and priority issues.&#039;&#039;&#039; You will help the session leader to integrate them into the Q&amp;amp;A periods and other parts of the discussion. You may also document some questions that might be useful during the final “Future of the Internet” session on Friday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=1 style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFFCC;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;9-3 Update:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;  Due to the large amount of interest in this session, we have &amp;quot;closed&amp;quot; certain sessions for Project A Sign-ups.  Please see the [[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]] to see which sessions are open. Spots in these sessions will be awarded on a first-come first-served basis.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=1 style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFFCC;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;New responsibility (updated 9-1):&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;  After the session, please provide a &#039;&#039;&#039;2-3 paragraph summary of the key thematic areas, open questions&#039;&#039;&#039;, etc. This summary should be posted to the relevant Talk Page and shared with ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu. It may become a permanent part of wiki or other outputs from iLaw 2011. &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option B. Audio/Video Project==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For students with some knowledge/experience with audio/video production, we would be happy to have you record some portion of the proceedings (including interviews with key commentators, session leads and other contributors) and create a multi-media output. This might be a record of the program overall, a deeper dive into a certain topic, etc. Berkman staff may provide some (modest) production support. &#039;&#039;&#039;All final work products are due by the Friday, October 7th&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;Note from Charlie Nesson: I&#039;m hoping to do some informal video interviews during ilaw and would welcome student help. i need a soundperson, a relief camera person, and help cutting things together. nesson at gmail.com&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=1 style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFFCC;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;9-2 Update in response to questions:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; For this project, we&#039;d like students to choose a session(s) or topic(s) that they are interested in exploring and write up a project &amp;quot;pitch&amp;quot; for us, explaining their approach to the assignment (what they&#039;d like to cover, identify anyone in particular they might interview, describe how they envision the final product, etc) before next Tuesday.  The pitch does not need to be extremely detailed (a few paragraphs will suffice); but, if you choose this project, we&#039;d like to have an idea of what you have in mind.  Once we&#039;ve evaluated and approved the pitch, to the extent that coordination is necessary we can put you in touch with the necessary people to get things moving.  If you have any questions about this assignment, please email us: ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu. &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option C. Final Presentation: Lightning Talk, Provocation, Response Statement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Program_Schedule#Student_Presentations.2FReaction_Statements.2FProposals|2:00-3:30 PM session on Friday afternoon]] is allotted for student and participant presentations. Audience members who sign up will have 5-10 minutes to provide substantive reflections on the iLaw sessions and the program overall, or offer central issues for the faculty to answer/consider during the “Future of the Internet” discussion. They might also provide a deeper dive into a particular module or interesting case for further study, etc. The focus here would be on developing a short and creative presentation or statement, to be followed by brief and lightly moderated Q&amp;amp;A with the broader audience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option D. Written Output: Post-iLaw Reflections==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the wake of the program, and in particular, in light of the “Future of the Internet session,” you will provide a reaction statement or op-ed style piece--no longer than 900 words—that examines some of the hard problems at the core of the developing online space. You might choose to reflect on the evolution of traditional concepts such as privacy, security, and liberty, and their evolution in the online space, or to consider emerging issues that may confirm or challenge some of the core themes that were touched on in our discussion. You could also make the case for other themes, issues, or hard questions that require more attention in future iLaws. The best pieces will be posted to the iLaw wiki.  &#039;&#039;&#039;All final work products are due by Friday, October 7th&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Mid-Point_Check-in&amp;diff=1667</id>
		<title>Mid-Point Check-in</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Mid-Point_Check-in&amp;diff=1667"/>
		<updated>2011-09-08T16:07:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Comments and Questions During the Session */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The day will end with a mid-point check in with the audience, led by Charlie Nesson. Charlie will solicit comments from audience members and ask for thoughts, suggestions, and recommendations for program improvements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Part 1: Your Suggestions for Improvement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Add your suggestions to the [[Talk:Mid-Point Check-in|Discussion Page]] or use the [[How_To_Participate_at_iLaw#Live_Question_Tool|Question Tool]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Part 2: Reflections on iLaw from Attendees==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Feedback re: Mode/Format===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Generally into the tweets, question tool, etc.: “quality, quickness, and variety of the exchange”&lt;br /&gt;
* The most insight comes from the debates, either live or via the digital back channels.  The room seems to come alive when things break down.&lt;br /&gt;
* We are losing good ideas by having the &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; dominate the discussion.  iLaw was opened to students for a reason -- why not a small group or two to get our input?&lt;br /&gt;
* More cold calling&lt;br /&gt;
* It would be nice to see more law at iLaw&lt;br /&gt;
* Would like to see discussion from industry incumbents on issues like open systems -- the discussion felt one-sided and more diverse perspectives would be appreciated&lt;br /&gt;
* Would it be possible to invite/include more people from different parts of the world--there are global scholars in the room who we&#039;d like to engage&lt;br /&gt;
* I wonder if the twitter+chat+question tool distract and detract more than they contribute&lt;br /&gt;
* Some of the discussions can occasionally become derailed by the experts, and become a little too detailed with unfamiliar topics.  a broader level of generality could be helpful, although the discussion between faculty have been fantastic&lt;br /&gt;
* I feel like the discourse has been between professors, academics, foreign scholars, professionals, etc., but relatively little from the students actually taking the course.  If we are to be relegated to the question tool, we ought to go to it more often than we are; there needs to be more interaction between us and the speakers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Logistics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* *Please* stick to a clear schedule; it’s helpful to know when sessions will begin and end, and very disruptive when the schedule is not followed&lt;br /&gt;
* I’ve been a bit uncomfortable with the long sessions and the warm/stuffy room&lt;br /&gt;
* Space out the days of the program more&lt;br /&gt;
* sessions were too long (especially Wednesday), lunch was too late in the day and awkwardly spaced, by the end of the day the material remains extremely interesting, but becomes increasingly difficult to absorb such a large amount of information&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Striking Insights===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* interconnectedness of all of these issues&lt;br /&gt;
* level of uncertainty/speed of change surrounding these issues&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;History of the Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Prof. Lessig’s notion of mixed modalities (law, norms, markets architecture) and the power of the collective that falls out&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Privacy&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Herbert Burkert’s “privacy archeology” and the contrast between American and European approaches&lt;br /&gt;
* Extent to which national politics/histories affect attitudes toward privacy in different countries (particularly US vs. Europe)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Citizen Media&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* importance of ties between citizen media and mainstream/broadcast amplification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Intellectual Property&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nesson/Public Domain/John Rawls as a starting Point&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;User Innovation/Peer Production&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* how “scruffy” robust protocols triumph over focused designs -- seems to correspond to how user innovation triumphs over producer innovation&lt;br /&gt;
* when the Internet acts as a space free from market and state controls, we see cooperation, creativity, and altruism, rather than anarchy&lt;br /&gt;
* how to can the idea of user innovation be applied to democratic politics&lt;br /&gt;
* relationship between commons-based peer production and user innovation; relationship of this to justification for IP rights non-economic motives for innovation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Methods&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Observation that the net reproduces social inequalities connects to the overall impression that all of the legal and technical questions are embedded within and bounded by human factor limitations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Overall impression that methods matter&lt;br /&gt;
* I think it’s a shame that lawyers don’t ever deal with good methodology.  Methodology determines so much of knowledge derived from real life.  are cases all we really get?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nagging Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What do we do with this information?  What of this information is actionable? What’s the next step?  What are (or how do we find) the solutions to the questions we’ve raised?&lt;br /&gt;
* how can students get involved?&lt;br /&gt;
* what can future lawyers do with this information?&lt;br /&gt;
* does Berkman’s academic research produce political/economic/other results?  should Berkman focus more on pushing for concrete change in these fields, rather than conducting research?&lt;br /&gt;
* what messages/ideas should participants take away from iLaw?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Privacy&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How do we develop law and policy to address the threat to privacy posed by the Internet?&lt;br /&gt;
* How do we balance privacy concerns with freedom of information?&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Cybersecurity&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Many respondents were generally concerned about their own security online--questions about passwords, personal information being “compromised,” protecting selves online, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Role of Law&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Some concern that discussions are focused too much on economics/culture/code and not enough on law&lt;br /&gt;
* What is the relationship between the issues being discussed and “big law”?&lt;br /&gt;
* How do these issues play out in courtrooms and Congress?&lt;br /&gt;
* Tension between generativity/openness and privacy/security/IP concerns&lt;br /&gt;
* How do we stop cybersecurity problems without limiting the openness of the web?  Alternately, how do we preserve the Internet’s openness and generativity while respecting freedom of expression, privacy, and national security?&lt;br /&gt;
* Given the “ever-present ability of governments and corporations to restrict, constrain, and control,” what is the future of the Net?&lt;br /&gt;
* Will professional creativity disappear in the absence of copyright protection?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Comments and Questions During the Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It seems that with all the intelligent individuals in the room, we should be able to produce a meaningful output from the program&#039;s events.  Let&#039;s start brainstorming and determine an output for the program on the Twitter stream.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Who can we trust to regulate the Internet?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Should law students be learning code?&lt;br /&gt;
**  Someone needs to be at the switch, monitoring the gears, and it’s important to master the fundamental concepts early and understand their effects on higher level issues, so that when the times comes, you will have all the necessary tools to make the right decisions and understand how policy and doctrine factors into the decision-making process.  Perhaps in another program (or at the next ilaw) we can highlight some of the real world cases where the doctrine has affected code, and where code has affected the doctrine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Why should these issues matter to a law student or a first year associate?  As a young lawyer, I may not have the ability to affect these issues; we are litigating them at the appellate level, the FCC isn’t asking us for answers.&#039;&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
**Many past students have moved on after 1 or 2 years after graduating from law school and actually worked on some of the most controversial areas at the FCC, at companies, and at policy oriented departments at firms and other organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
**It’s important to build the blocks.  As a first year associate, you are the person who is working with the law the most.  Your opinion will be carried up the chain to the senior associates and the partners as they argue the cases before the courts.  You do have an impact from day one, and your impact grows over time.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Mid-Point_Check-in&amp;diff=1666</id>
		<title>Mid-Point Check-in</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Mid-Point_Check-in&amp;diff=1666"/>
		<updated>2011-09-08T16:06:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Comments and Questions from Students During the Session */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The day will end with a mid-point check in with the audience, led by Charlie Nesson. Charlie will solicit comments from audience members and ask for thoughts, suggestions, and recommendations for program improvements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Part 1: Your Suggestions for Improvement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Add your suggestions to the [[Talk:Mid-Point Check-in|Discussion Page]] or use the [[How_To_Participate_at_iLaw#Live_Question_Tool|Question Tool]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Part 2: Reflections on iLaw from Attendees==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Feedback re: Mode/Format===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Generally into the tweets, question tool, etc.: “quality, quickness, and variety of the exchange”&lt;br /&gt;
* The most insight comes from the debates, either live or via the digital back channels.  The room seems to come alive when things break down.&lt;br /&gt;
* We are losing good ideas by having the &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; dominate the discussion.  iLaw was opened to students for a reason -- why not a small group or two to get our input?&lt;br /&gt;
* More cold calling&lt;br /&gt;
* It would be nice to see more law at iLaw&lt;br /&gt;
* Would like to see discussion from industry incumbents on issues like open systems -- the discussion felt one-sided and more diverse perspectives would be appreciated&lt;br /&gt;
* Would it be possible to invite/include more people from different parts of the world--there are global scholars in the room who we&#039;d like to engage&lt;br /&gt;
* I wonder if the twitter+chat+question tool distract and detract more than they contribute&lt;br /&gt;
* Some of the discussions can occasionally become derailed by the experts, and become a little too detailed with unfamiliar topics.  a broader level of generality could be helpful, although the discussion between faculty have been fantastic&lt;br /&gt;
* I feel like the discourse has been between professors, academics, foreign scholars, professionals, etc., but relatively little from the students actually taking the course.  If we are to be relegated to the question tool, we ought to go to it more often than we are; there needs to be more interaction between us and the speakers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Logistics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* *Please* stick to a clear schedule; it’s helpful to know when sessions will begin and end, and very disruptive when the schedule is not followed&lt;br /&gt;
* I’ve been a bit uncomfortable with the long sessions and the warm/stuffy room&lt;br /&gt;
* Space out the days of the program more&lt;br /&gt;
* sessions were too long (especially Wednesday), lunch was too late in the day and awkwardly spaced, by the end of the day the material remains extremely interesting, but becomes increasingly difficult to absorb such a large amount of information&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Striking Insights===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* interconnectedness of all of these issues&lt;br /&gt;
* level of uncertainty/speed of change surrounding these issues&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;History of the Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Prof. Lessig’s notion of mixed modalities (law, norms, markets architecture) and the power of the collective that falls out&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Privacy&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Herbert Burkert’s “privacy archeology” and the contrast between American and European approaches&lt;br /&gt;
* Extent to which national politics/histories affect attitudes toward privacy in different countries (particularly US vs. Europe)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Citizen Media&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* importance of ties between citizen media and mainstream/broadcast amplification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Intellectual Property&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nesson/Public Domain/John Rawls as a starting Point&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;User Innovation/Peer Production&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* how “scruffy” robust protocols triumph over focused designs -- seems to correspond to how user innovation triumphs over producer innovation&lt;br /&gt;
* when the Internet acts as a space free from market and state controls, we see cooperation, creativity, and altruism, rather than anarchy&lt;br /&gt;
* how to can the idea of user innovation be applied to democratic politics&lt;br /&gt;
* relationship between commons-based peer production and user innovation; relationship of this to justification for IP rights non-economic motives for innovation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Methods&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Observation that the net reproduces social inequalities connects to the overall impression that all of the legal and technical questions are embedded within and bounded by human factor limitations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Overall impression that methods matter&lt;br /&gt;
* I think it’s a shame that lawyers don’t ever deal with good methodology.  Methodology determines so much of knowledge derived from real life.  are cases all we really get?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nagging Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What do we do with this information?  What of this information is actionable? What’s the next step?  What are (or how do we find) the solutions to the questions we’ve raised?&lt;br /&gt;
* how can students get involved?&lt;br /&gt;
* what can future lawyers do with this information?&lt;br /&gt;
* does Berkman’s academic research produce political/economic/other results?  should Berkman focus more on pushing for concrete change in these fields, rather than conducting research?&lt;br /&gt;
* what messages/ideas should participants take away from iLaw?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Privacy&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How do we develop law and policy to address the threat to privacy posed by the Internet?&lt;br /&gt;
* How do we balance privacy concerns with freedom of information?&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Cybersecurity&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Many respondents were generally concerned about their own security online--questions about passwords, personal information being “compromised,” protecting selves online, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Role of Law&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Some concern that discussions are focused too much on economics/culture/code and not enough on law&lt;br /&gt;
* What is the relationship between the issues being discussed and “big law”?&lt;br /&gt;
* How do these issues play out in courtrooms and Congress?&lt;br /&gt;
* Tension between generativity/openness and privacy/security/IP concerns&lt;br /&gt;
* How do we stop cybersecurity problems without limiting the openness of the web?  Alternately, how do we preserve the Internet’s openness and generativity while respecting freedom of expression, privacy, and national security?&lt;br /&gt;
* Given the “ever-present ability of governments and corporations to restrict, constrain, and control,” what is the future of the Net?&lt;br /&gt;
* Will professional creativity disappear in the absence of copyright protection?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Comments and Questions During the Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It seems that with all the intelligent individuals in the room, we should be able to produce a meaningful output from the program&#039;s events.  Let&#039;s start brainstorming and determine an output for the program on the Twitter stream.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Who can we trust to regulate the Internet?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Should law students be learning code?&lt;br /&gt;
**  Someone needs to be at the switch, monitoring the gears, and it’s important to master the fundamental concepts early and understand their effects on higher level issues, so that when the times comes, you will have all the necessary tools to make the right decisions and understand how policy and doctrine factors into the decision-making process.  Perhaps in another program (or at the next ilaw) we can highlight some of the real world cases where the doctrine has affected code, and where code has affected the doctrine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Why should these issues matter to a law student or a first year associate?  As a young lawyer, I may not have the ability to affect these issues; we are litigating them at the appellate level, the FCC isn’t asking us for answers.  &lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;Many past students have moved on after 1 or 2 years after graduating from law school and actually worked on some of the most controversial areas at the FCC, at companies, and at policy oriented departments at firms and other organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;It’s important to build the blocks.  As a first year associate, you are the person who is working with the law the most.  Your opinion will be carried up the chain to the senior associates and the partners as they argue the cases before the courts.  You do have an impact from day one, and your impact grows over time.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Mid-Point_Check-in&amp;diff=1662</id>
		<title>Mid-Point Check-in</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Mid-Point_Check-in&amp;diff=1662"/>
		<updated>2011-09-08T15:14:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Logistics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The day will end with a mid-point check in with the audience, led by Charlie Nesson. Charlie will solicit comments from audience members and ask for thoughts, suggestions, and recommendations for program improvements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Part 1: Your Suggestions for Improvement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Add your suggestions to the [[Talk:Mid-Point Check-in|Discussion Page]] or use the [[How_To_Participate_at_iLaw#Live_Question_Tool|Question Tool]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Part 2: Reflections on iLaw from Attendees==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Feedback re: Mode/Format===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Generally into the tweets, question tool, etc.: “quality, quickness, and variety of the exchange”&lt;br /&gt;
* The most insight comes from the debates, either live or via the digital back channels.  The room seems to come alive when things break down.&lt;br /&gt;
* We are losing good ideas by having the &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; dominate the discussion.  iLaw was opened to students for a reason -- why not a small group or two to get our input?&lt;br /&gt;
* More cold calling&lt;br /&gt;
* It would be nice to see more law at iLaw&lt;br /&gt;
* Would like to see discussion from industry incumbents on issues like open systems -- the discussion felt one-sided and more diverse perspectives would be appreciated&lt;br /&gt;
* Would it be possible to invite/include more people from different parts of the world--there are global scholars in the room who we&#039;d like to engage&lt;br /&gt;
* I wonder if the twitter+chat+question tool distract and detract more than they contribute&lt;br /&gt;
* Some of the discussions can occasionally become derailed by the experts, and become a little too detailed with unfamiliar topics.  a broader level of generality could be helpful, although the discussion between faculty have been fantastic&lt;br /&gt;
* I feel like the discourse has been between professors, academics, foreign scholars, professionals, etc., but relatively little from the students actually taking the course.  If we are to be relegated to the question tool, we ought to go to it more often than we are; there needs to be more interaction between us and the speakers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Logistics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* *Please* stick to a clear schedule; it’s helpful to know when sessions will begin and end, and very disruptive when the schedule is not followed&lt;br /&gt;
* I’ve been a bit uncomfortable with the long sessions and the warm/stuffy room&lt;br /&gt;
* Space out the days of the program more&lt;br /&gt;
* sessions were too long (especially Wednesday), lunch was too late in the day and awkwardly spaced, by the end of the day the material remains extremely interesting, but becomes increasingly difficult to absorb such a large amount of information&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Striking Insights===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* interconnectedness of all of these issues&lt;br /&gt;
* level of uncertainty/speed of change surrounding these issues&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;History of the Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Prof. Lessig’s notion of mixed modalities (law, norms, markets architecture) and the power of the collective that falls out&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Privacy&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Herbert Burkert’s “privacy archeology” and the contrast between American and European approaches&lt;br /&gt;
* Extent to which national politics/histories affect attitudes toward privacy in different countries (particularly US vs. Europe)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Citizen Media&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* importance of ties between citizen media and mainstream/broadcast amplification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Intellectual Property&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nesson/Public Domain/John Rawls as a starting Point&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;User Innovation/Peer Production&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* how “scruffy” robust protocols triumph over focused designs -- seems to correspond to how user innovation triumphs over producer innovation&lt;br /&gt;
* when the Internet acts as a space free from market and state controls, we see cooperation, creativity, and altruism, rather than anarchy&lt;br /&gt;
* how to can the idea of user innovation be applied to democratic politics&lt;br /&gt;
* relationship between commons-based peer production and user innovation; relationship of this to justification for IP rights non-economic motives for innovation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Methods&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Observation that the net reproduces social inequalities connects to the overall impression that all of the legal and technical questions are embedded within and bounded by human factor limitations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Overall impression that methods matter&lt;br /&gt;
* I think it’s a shame that lawyers don’t ever deal with good methodology.  Methodology determines so much of knowledge derived from real life.  are cases all we really get?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nagging Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What do we do with this information?  What of this information is actionable? What’s the next step?  What are (or how do we find) the solutions to the questions we’ve raised?&lt;br /&gt;
* how can students get involved?&lt;br /&gt;
* what can future lawyers do with this information?&lt;br /&gt;
* does Berkman’s academic research produce political/economic/other results?  should Berkman focus more on pushing for concrete change in these fields, rather than conducting research?&lt;br /&gt;
* what messages/ideas should participants take away from iLaw?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Privacy&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How do we develop law and policy to address the threat to privacy posed by the Internet?&lt;br /&gt;
* How do we balance privacy concerns with freedom of information?&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Cybersecurity&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Many respondents were generally concerned about their own security online--questions about passwords, personal information being “compromised,” protecting selves online, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Role of Law&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Some concern that discussions are focused too much on economics/culture/code and not enough on law&lt;br /&gt;
* What is the relationship between the issues being discussed and “big law”?&lt;br /&gt;
* How do these issues play out in courtrooms and Congress?&lt;br /&gt;
* Tension between generativity/openness and privacy/security/IP concerns&lt;br /&gt;
* How do we stop cybersecurity problems without limiting the openness of the web?  Alternately, how do we preserve the Internet’s openness and generativity while respecting freedom of expression, privacy, and national security?&lt;br /&gt;
* Given the “ever-present ability of governments and corporations to restrict, constrain, and control,” what is the future of the Net?&lt;br /&gt;
* Will professional creativity disappear in the absence of copyright protection?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Mid-Point_Check-in&amp;diff=1661</id>
		<title>Mid-Point Check-in</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Mid-Point_Check-in&amp;diff=1661"/>
		<updated>2011-09-08T15:14:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Feedback re: Mode/Format */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The day will end with a mid-point check in with the audience, led by Charlie Nesson. Charlie will solicit comments from audience members and ask for thoughts, suggestions, and recommendations for program improvements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Part 1: Your Suggestions for Improvement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Add your suggestions to the [[Talk:Mid-Point Check-in|Discussion Page]] or use the [[How_To_Participate_at_iLaw#Live_Question_Tool|Question Tool]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Part 2: Reflections on iLaw from Attendees==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Feedback re: Mode/Format===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Generally into the tweets, question tool, etc.: “quality, quickness, and variety of the exchange”&lt;br /&gt;
* The most insight comes from the debates, either live or via the digital back channels.  The room seems to come alive when things break down.&lt;br /&gt;
* We are losing good ideas by having the &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; dominate the discussion.  iLaw was opened to students for a reason -- why not a small group or two to get our input?&lt;br /&gt;
* More cold calling&lt;br /&gt;
* It would be nice to see more law at iLaw&lt;br /&gt;
* Would like to see discussion from industry incumbents on issues like open systems -- the discussion felt one-sided and more diverse perspectives would be appreciated&lt;br /&gt;
* Would it be possible to invite/include more people from different parts of the world--there are global scholars in the room who we&#039;d like to engage&lt;br /&gt;
* I wonder if the twitter+chat+question tool distract and detract more than they contribute&lt;br /&gt;
* Some of the discussions can occasionally become derailed by the experts, and become a little too detailed with unfamiliar topics.  a broader level of generality could be helpful, although the discussion between faculty have been fantastic&lt;br /&gt;
* I feel like the discourse has been between professors, academics, foreign scholars, professionals, etc., but relatively little from the students actually taking the course.  If we are to be relegated to the question tool, we ought to go to it more often than we are; there needs to be more interaction between us and the speakers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Logistics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* logistical plea: *please* stick to a clear schedule; it’s helpful to know when sessions will begin and end, and very disruptive when the schedule is not followed&lt;br /&gt;
* logistical concerns: I’ve been a bit uncomfortable with the long sessions and the warm/stuffy room&lt;br /&gt;
* sessions were too long (especially Wednesday), lunch was too late in the day and awkwardly spaced, by the end of the day the material remains extremely interesting, but becomes increasingly difficult to absorb such a large amount of information&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Striking Insights===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* interconnectedness of all of these issues&lt;br /&gt;
* level of uncertainty/speed of change surrounding these issues&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;History of the Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Prof. Lessig’s notion of mixed modalities (law, norms, markets architecture) and the power of the collective that falls out&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Privacy&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Herbert Burkert’s “privacy archeology” and the contrast between American and European approaches&lt;br /&gt;
* Extent to which national politics/histories affect attitudes toward privacy in different countries (particularly US vs. Europe)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Citizen Media&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* importance of ties between citizen media and mainstream/broadcast amplification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Intellectual Property&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nesson/Public Domain/John Rawls as a starting Point&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;User Innovation/Peer Production&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* how “scruffy” robust protocols triumph over focused designs -- seems to correspond to how user innovation triumphs over producer innovation&lt;br /&gt;
* when the Internet acts as a space free from market and state controls, we see cooperation, creativity, and altruism, rather than anarchy&lt;br /&gt;
* how to can the idea of user innovation be applied to democratic politics&lt;br /&gt;
* relationship between commons-based peer production and user innovation; relationship of this to justification for IP rights non-economic motives for innovation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Methods&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Observation that the net reproduces social inequalities connects to the overall impression that all of the legal and technical questions are embedded within and bounded by human factor limitations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Overall impression that methods matter&lt;br /&gt;
* I think it’s a shame that lawyers don’t ever deal with good methodology.  Methodology determines so much of knowledge derived from real life.  are cases all we really get?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nagging Questions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What do we do with this information?  What of this information is actionable? What’s the next step?  What are (or how do we find) the solutions to the questions we’ve raised?&lt;br /&gt;
* how can students get involved?&lt;br /&gt;
* what can future lawyers do with this information?&lt;br /&gt;
* does Berkman’s academic research produce political/economic/other results?  should Berkman focus more on pushing for concrete change in these fields, rather than conducting research?&lt;br /&gt;
* what messages/ideas should participants take away from iLaw?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Privacy&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How do we develop law and policy to address the threat to privacy posed by the Internet?&lt;br /&gt;
* How do we balance privacy concerns with freedom of information?&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Cybersecurity&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Many respondents were generally concerned about their own security online--questions about passwords, personal information being “compromised,” protecting selves online, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Role of Law&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Some concern that discussions are focused too much on economics/culture/code and not enough on law&lt;br /&gt;
* What is the relationship between the issues being discussed and “big law”?&lt;br /&gt;
* How do these issues play out in courtrooms and Congress?&lt;br /&gt;
* Tension between generativity/openness and privacy/security/IP concerns&lt;br /&gt;
* How do we stop cybersecurity problems without limiting the openness of the web?  Alternately, how do we preserve the Internet’s openness and generativity while respecting freedom of expression, privacy, and national security?&lt;br /&gt;
* Given the “ever-present ability of governments and corporations to restrict, constrain, and control,” what is the future of the Net?&lt;br /&gt;
* Will professional creativity disappear in the absence of copyright protection?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Talk:Evening_Events&amp;diff=1657</id>
		<title>Talk:Evening Events</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Talk:Evening_Events&amp;diff=1657"/>
		<updated>2011-09-08T14:53:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Sign-up for Poker with Charlie Nesson */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Sign-up for Poker with Charlie Nesson==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Pizza and soda will be available! Please join us at the Berkman Center for this session.&lt;br /&gt;
Space is unlimited! Add name and email address below to sign-up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Amrit (adhir(at)jd13.law.harvard.edu)&lt;br /&gt;
# Mayo Fuster Morell (mayo.fuster(at)eui.eu) &amp;gt; don&#039;t have a clue about poker, but curious&lt;br /&gt;
# Breanne (bgilpatrick@jd12.law.harvard.edu) &lt;br /&gt;
# Amanda Vaughn, avaughn@jd13.law.harvard.edu&lt;br /&gt;
# Matthias Glatthaar (mglatthaar@llm12.law.harvard.edu)&lt;br /&gt;
# Patrick McKeown (pmckeown@llm12.law.harvard.edu)&lt;br /&gt;
# Matt Vitins (mvitins@llm12.law.harvard.edu)&lt;br /&gt;
# Ethan Craig (ecraig@jd12.law.harvard.edu)&lt;br /&gt;
# Sonia (smcneil@jd12)&lt;br /&gt;
# Elettra Bietti (ebietti@llm12.law.harvard.edu)&lt;br /&gt;
# Jake Levine (jlevine@jd13.law.harvard.edu) [can i come a little late? have a meeting that goes till 7:30]&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ideas for Food For Thought Dinners==&lt;br /&gt;
Add your ideas here!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Food For Thought Dinner Sign-ups==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These dinners allow conference attendees to engage in self-organized informal, themed conversation with other conference participants. Since these dinners are self-organized, there is no limit to the number of dinners that can occur on Thursday evening. We have not yet made reservations for dinners at restaurants; so if any conference attendees are looking to initiate/host a dinner, you are responsible for organizing and making reservations and communications. Also, please note that dinner attendees are expected to pay their own dinner costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You may organize and sign-up for Food For Thought dinners below. All iLaw attendees are welcome to add their ideas for interesting topics or propose dinner locations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Food For Thought dinners tend to work best when the group size is small enough to be intimate (around 8 people or so). For restaurants in Harvard Square, expect approximately a 10-minute walk from Austin. For restaurants in Porter Square, expect approximately a 15 to 20-minute walk from Austin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[http://www.citmedialaw.org/ Citizen Media Law Project], Temple Bar, [http://maps.google.com/maps?ie=UTF-8&amp;amp;oe=utf-8&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&amp;amp;um=1&amp;amp;q=temple+bar&amp;amp;near=Cambridge,+MA&amp;amp;fb=1&amp;amp;cid=0,0,13500899818381353596&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=local_result&amp;amp;resnum=1&amp;amp;ct=image 1688 Massachusetts Ave], 7p.m. - Mobile media and citizen journalism===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CMLP will host a dinner at Temple Bar (1688 Massachusetts Ave.) on mobile media and citizen journalism, discussing recent events such as the BART phone blackout, arrests of citizens recording video in public (including the recent First Circuit decision in &#039;&#039;Glik v. Cunniffe&#039;&#039;), and libel-by-tweet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sign-up List&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. [http://www.cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/asellars Andy Sellars, Berkman Fellow]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. [http://www.cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jhermes Jeff Hermes, Berkman Fellow]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Allison Trzop&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Gita Srivastava&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Lauren Henry&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Arthur Bright, CMLP Research Attorney&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/psuber Peter Suber], [http://www.casablanca-restaurant.com/ Casablanca], [http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;amp;source=s_q&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;geocode=&amp;amp;q=Casablanca,+40+Brattle+Street,+Cambridge,+MA+02138&amp;amp;aq=0&amp;amp;sll=42.373676,-71.121272&amp;amp;sspn=0.010431,0.016007&amp;amp;vpsrc=0&amp;amp;g=40+brattle+street+cambridge,+ma+02138&amp;amp;ie=UTF8&amp;amp;hq=Casablanca,&amp;amp;hnear=40+Brattle+St,+Cambridge,+Massachusetts+02138&amp;amp;ll=42.373589,-71.12139&amp;amp;spn=0.010431,0.016007&amp;amp;z=16 40 Brattle Street], 7p.m. - Open Access to Research ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sign-up List&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/psuber Peter Suber, Berkman Fellow]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. [http://derechosdigitales.org Claudio Ruiz, ONG Derechos Digitales (Chile)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Scott Bradner, Harvard CTO&#039;s Office&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Peer Production and Online Cooperation Research (Aaron Shaw and many others), Cambridge Common, 1667 Massachusetts Avenue, 7p.m.===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Come join a group of Berkman Fellows and friends engaged in research into various aspects of peer production and online cooperation. Among those planning to attend are [http://mako.cc Mako Hill], [http://www.law.harvard.edu/academics/degrees/gradprogram/sjd/sjd-current-students/jennifer-shkabatur.html Jennifer Shkabatur], [http://www.mit.edu/~amonroy/ Andres Monroy], [http://aaronshaw.org Aaron Shaw] and [http://www.onlinecreation.info Mayo Fuster Morell].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sign-up List&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Mayo Fuster Morell &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jhergueux Jerome Hergueux]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mike King, Restaurant TBD 7 pm, Technical Discussion for non-Techies===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those without technical background, here&#039;s a chance to get some insight on &amp;quot;how the Internet works,&amp;quot; in a conversational, non-&amp;quot;geek speak&amp;quot; manner.  Topics could include how DNS works, how a web browser fetches and renders a page, how email is transmitted and why spam developed into the problem it is, and so forth. Bring your questions.  (And suggest a venue to this non-local guy.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sign-up List&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Molly Jennings (Changsho is nice for groups, has round tables that can seat somewhere between 8 and 10, located north of law school at 1712 Mass. Ave.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[Jordan Gimbel] [Open for Suggestions - from the other coats - 7p.m.]- [Evolution of your impact in this ilaw space]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sign-up List&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[Organizer 6] [Restaurant/Location/7p.m.]- [Topic of Conversation]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sign-up List&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[Organizer 7] [Restaurant/Location/7p.m.]- [Topic of Conversation]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sign-up List&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Talk:Evening_Events&amp;diff=1656</id>
		<title>Talk:Evening Events</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Talk:Evening_Events&amp;diff=1656"/>
		<updated>2011-09-08T14:52:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Sign-up for Poker with Charlie Nesson */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Sign-up for Poker with Charlie Nesson==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Pizza and soda will be available! Please join us at the Berkman Center for this sesssion.&lt;br /&gt;
Space is unlimited! Add name and email address below to sign-up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Amrit (adhir(at)jd13.law.harvard.edu)&lt;br /&gt;
# Mayo Fuster Morell (mayo.fuster(at)eui.eu) &amp;gt; don&#039;t have a clue about poker, but curious&lt;br /&gt;
# Breanne (bgilpatrick@jd12.law.harvard.edu) &lt;br /&gt;
# Amanda Vaughn, avaughn@jd13.law.harvard.edu&lt;br /&gt;
# Matthias Glatthaar (mglatthaar@llm12.law.harvard.edu)&lt;br /&gt;
# Patrick McKeown (pmckeown@llm12.law.harvard.edu)&lt;br /&gt;
# Matt Vitins (mvitins@llm12.law.harvard.edu)&lt;br /&gt;
# Ethan Craig (ecraig@jd12.law.harvard.edu)&lt;br /&gt;
# Sonia (smcneil@jd12)&lt;br /&gt;
# Elettra Bietti (ebietti@llm12.law.harvard.edu)&lt;br /&gt;
# Jake Levine (jlevine@jd13.law.harvard.edu) [can i come a little late? have a meeting that goes till 7:30]&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ideas for Food For Thought Dinners==&lt;br /&gt;
Add your ideas here!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Food For Thought Dinner Sign-ups==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These dinners allow conference attendees to engage in self-organized informal, themed conversation with other conference participants. Since these dinners are self-organized, there is no limit to the number of dinners that can occur on Thursday evening. We have not yet made reservations for dinners at restaurants; so if any conference attendees are looking to initiate/host a dinner, you are responsible for organizing and making reservations and communications. Also, please note that dinner attendees are expected to pay their own dinner costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You may organize and sign-up for Food For Thought dinners below. All iLaw attendees are welcome to add their ideas for interesting topics or propose dinner locations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Food For Thought dinners tend to work best when the group size is small enough to be intimate (around 8 people or so). For restaurants in Harvard Square, expect approximately a 10-minute walk from Austin. For restaurants in Porter Square, expect approximately a 15 to 20-minute walk from Austin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[http://www.citmedialaw.org/ Citizen Media Law Project], Temple Bar, [http://maps.google.com/maps?ie=UTF-8&amp;amp;oe=utf-8&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&amp;amp;um=1&amp;amp;q=temple+bar&amp;amp;near=Cambridge,+MA&amp;amp;fb=1&amp;amp;cid=0,0,13500899818381353596&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=local_result&amp;amp;resnum=1&amp;amp;ct=image 1688 Massachusetts Ave], 7p.m. - Mobile media and citizen journalism===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CMLP will host a dinner at Temple Bar (1688 Massachusetts Ave.) on mobile media and citizen journalism, discussing recent events such as the BART phone blackout, arrests of citizens recording video in public (including the recent First Circuit decision in &#039;&#039;Glik v. Cunniffe&#039;&#039;), and libel-by-tweet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sign-up List&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. [http://www.cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/asellars Andy Sellars, Berkman Fellow]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. [http://www.cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jhermes Jeff Hermes, Berkman Fellow]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Allison Trzop&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Gita Srivastava&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Lauren Henry&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Arthur Bright, CMLP Research Attorney&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/psuber Peter Suber], [http://www.casablanca-restaurant.com/ Casablanca], [http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;amp;source=s_q&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;geocode=&amp;amp;q=Casablanca,+40+Brattle+Street,+Cambridge,+MA+02138&amp;amp;aq=0&amp;amp;sll=42.373676,-71.121272&amp;amp;sspn=0.010431,0.016007&amp;amp;vpsrc=0&amp;amp;g=40+brattle+street+cambridge,+ma+02138&amp;amp;ie=UTF8&amp;amp;hq=Casablanca,&amp;amp;hnear=40+Brattle+St,+Cambridge,+Massachusetts+02138&amp;amp;ll=42.373589,-71.12139&amp;amp;spn=0.010431,0.016007&amp;amp;z=16 40 Brattle Street], 7p.m. - Open Access to Research ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sign-up List&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/psuber Peter Suber, Berkman Fellow]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. [http://derechosdigitales.org Claudio Ruiz, ONG Derechos Digitales (Chile)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Scott Bradner, Harvard CTO&#039;s Office&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Peer Production and Online Cooperation Research (Aaron Shaw and many others), Cambridge Common, 1667 Massachusetts Avenue, 7p.m.===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Come join a group of Berkman Fellows and friends engaged in research into various aspects of peer production and online cooperation. Among those planning to attend are [http://mako.cc Mako Hill], [http://www.law.harvard.edu/academics/degrees/gradprogram/sjd/sjd-current-students/jennifer-shkabatur.html Jennifer Shkabatur], [http://www.mit.edu/~amonroy/ Andres Monroy], [http://aaronshaw.org Aaron Shaw] and [http://www.onlinecreation.info Mayo Fuster Morell].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sign-up List&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Mayo Fuster Morell &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jhergueux Jerome Hergueux]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mike King, Restaurant TBD 7 pm, Technical Discussion for non-Techies===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those without technical background, here&#039;s a chance to get some insight on &amp;quot;how the Internet works,&amp;quot; in a conversational, non-&amp;quot;geek speak&amp;quot; manner.  Topics could include how DNS works, how a web browser fetches and renders a page, how email is transmitted and why spam developed into the problem it is, and so forth. Bring your questions.  (And suggest a venue to this non-local guy.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sign-up List&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Molly Jennings (Changsho is nice for groups, has round tables that can seat somewhere between 8 and 10, located north of law school at 1712 Mass. Ave.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[Jordan Gimbel] [Open for Suggestions - from the other coats - 7p.m.]- [Evolution of your impact in this ilaw space]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sign-up List&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[Organizer 6] [Restaurant/Location/7p.m.]- [Topic of Conversation]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sign-up List&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[Organizer 7] [Restaurant/Location/7p.m.]- [Topic of Conversation]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sign-up List&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Online_Liberty_and_Freedom_of_Expression&amp;diff=1638</id>
		<title>Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Online_Liberty_and_Freedom_of_Expression&amp;diff=1638"/>
		<updated>2011-09-07T20:38:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Student Reflections on this Session */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Tuesday, 2:00-3:30pm&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Format&#039;&#039;: Lecture, featuring guest respondents&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jpalfrey John Palfrey]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Potential Participants&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/betling Bruce Etling], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/rfaris Rob Faris], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/ezuckerman Ethan Zuckerman], and others&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Led by John Palfrey, this session will focus on online liberty and freedom of express and expand on some of the core themes introduced in the preceding sessions by providing an overview of the different phases of content regulation on the Internet. It will engage the audience with questions regarding the ways in which different political contexts shape different methods of and motivations for government control, and how various approaches in different countries inform each other. Respondents will be invited to reflect on key issues, including different forms of government controls and online speech regulation: China (a mix of “traditional” technical filtering with legal and informal regulatory mechanisms); the Arab Spring (just-in-time filtering combined with the arrest and intimidation of bloggers and digital activists); Russia (mostly non-technical, second and third generation controls rather than technical filtering); and US/Western Europe (mostly focused on child pornography and the illegal spread of copyrighted content). They will also grapple with hard questions related the role of intermediaries in response to government requests for user information, content removal or account deactivation and the implications of the current phase of control for free expression and privacy worldwide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Required Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Filtering===&lt;br /&gt;
*John Palfrey, [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1658191 &amp;quot;Four Phases of Internet Regulation&amp;quot;] &#039;&#039;Social Research&#039;&#039;, Vol. 77, No. 3, Fall 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Summary of Four Phases]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Jonathan Zittrain &amp;amp; John Palfrey, [[Media:Deibert_03_Ch02_029-056.pdf| &amp;quot;Internet Filtering: The Politics and Mechanisms of Control,&amp;quot;]] &#039;&#039;Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering&#039;&#039;, (Cambridge: MIT Press) 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Arab Spring===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://opennet.net/mena-net-watch MENA Net Watch]&lt;br /&gt;
* Masashi Crete-Nishihata and Jillian York, [http://opennet.net/blog/2011/01/egypt%E2%80%99s-internet-blackout-extreme-example-just-time-blocking “Egypt’s Internet Blackout: Extreme Example of Just-in-Time Blocking,”] ONI Blog, January 28, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;[http://www.dsg.ae/portals/0/ASMR2.pdf Civil Movements: The Impact of Facebook and Twitter], Arab Social Media Report, May 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;[[Exploring the Arab Spring|Also recommended: Exploring the Arab Spring]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Digital Tools===&lt;br /&gt;
* John Palfrey, Bruce Etling, Robert Faris, and John Gorham, [http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4609956/SAIS%20online%20organizing%20paper%20final.pdf &amp;quot;Political Change in the Digital Age: The Fragility and Promise of Online Organizing,&amp;quot;], 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
* Yochai Benker, [http://www.benkler.org/Benkler_Wealth_Of_Networks_Chapter_1.pdf &amp;quot;Chapter 1: Introduction: A Moment of Opportunity and Challenge,&amp;quot;] in &#039;&#039;Wealth of Networks: How Social production Transforms Markets and Freedom&#039;&#039; (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006). &#039;&#039;&#039;Update: read all Chapter 1&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* Yochai Benkler, [http://www.benkler.org/Benkler_Wealth_Of_Networks_Chapter_7.pdf &amp;quot;Chapter 7: Political Freedom Part 2: Emergence of the Networked Public Sphere,&amp;quot;] in &#039;&#039;The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom&#039;&#039; (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006). &#039;&#039;&#039;Update: read first 22 pages of Chapter 7&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recommended Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Filtering===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/blog The OpenNet Initiative&#039;s Blog]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/profiles/china ONI&#039;s China Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/mena-net-watch ONI&#039;s Middle East and North Africa Profiles and News]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/profiles/russia ONI&#039;s Russia Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/regions/namerica ONI&#039;s United States and Canada Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/regions/europe ONI&#039;s Europe Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Arab Spring===&lt;br /&gt;
*James Cowie, [http://www.renesys.com/blog/2011/01/egypt-leaves-the-internet.shtml “Egypt Leaves the Internet,”] Renesys, January 27, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Second- and Third-Generation Controls===&lt;br /&gt;
*Ron Deibert and Rafal Rohozinski, [[Media:chapter-1.pdf|“Beyond Denial: Introducing Next Generation Information Access Controls,”]] &#039;&#039;Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace&#039;&#039;, (Cambridge: MIT Press) 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Russia Project===&lt;br /&gt;
*Bruce Etling, et al., [[Media:Public_Discourse_in_the_Russian_Blogosphere_2010.pdf|“Public Discourse in the Russian Blogosphere: Mapping RuNet Politics and Mobilization,”]] October 18, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Cases==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[GNI/Role of Intermediaries]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Student Reflections on this Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;By Clare Selden&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session, Professor Palfrey presented an overview of the use of technology in limiting access to controversial content during the four phases of development of the Internet. During the “Open Internet” period, the internet was viewed as a separate sphere, which some scholars viewed as being impervious to government regulation (although this was quickly shown not to be the case). The creation of the net enabled greater individual autonomy as well as informal network formation among like-minded individuals, and facilitated collective action. Diverse cultures could also be united by the common language of the virtual space; for example, [http://globalvoicesonline.org/ Global Voices] connects diverse communities who wouldn’t otherwise be communicating by translating postings into many languages and facilitating discussion across borders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [http://opennet.net/accessdenied “Access Denied”] phase, states began to think of activities and expression on the Internet as threats needing to be blocked or managed in various ways, and governments began to employ various filtering and blocking mechanisms in order to regulate online speech and conduct. These methods include DNS filtering, internet provider filtering, and blocking specific URLs, all of which prevent information from reaching the recipient who requests it. The OpenNet Initiative monitors the degree to which more than 70 states restrict access to controversial sites at the national level, using a consistent “global basket” of test sites as an index.  Some governments, including those of Cuba and North Korea, have gone as far as blocking internet access entirely in order to prevent their citizens from accessing controversial information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [http://opennet.net/access-controlled “Access Controlled”] phase, effective blocking and [http://opennet.net/about-filtering filtering] became more difficult, and alternative methods of controlling the communication of controversial ideas have became more prevalent. These methods include licensing restrictions, mandatory identification of internet users at access points (Turkey), and direct threats of arrest or bodily harm by government officials. Although [http://www.palermo.edu/cele/english/staff.html Eduardo Bertoni] pointed out that use of government intimidation to chill free speech is not new, our discussion of the recent intimidation of bloggers in China and various Arab nations (as tracked on [http://threatened.globalvoicesonline.org/ Threatened Voices]) highlights the tragic efficacy of this alternate approach to the effective suppression of ideas, and illustrates a shift from viewer-targeted methods of internet control to producer-targeted methods.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
As we enter the [http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&amp;amp;tid=12683 “Access Contested”] phase, debate surrounding the right of governments to maintain technological control over their citizens’ access to information remains at the forefront of the discussion, as does the possibility of using internet technology to empower and increase democratic action around the world. Questions raised by this discussion include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Palfrey points out that “technical filtering is problematic both for censors, who must choose either overbroad or under-inclusive filtering, and citizens, who face challenges to creativity and innovation and a reduction of free expression and privacy.” How should this balance be struck, and what makes that option better than the alternatives? If a ﬁltering regime cannot be implemented in an accurate manner, should it be undertaken at all?&lt;br /&gt;
# [http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/ Ethan Zuckerman] explains that [http://globalvoicesonline.org/ Global Voices] has attempted to address the problem of selective global attention by providing an outlet for news stories from underrepresented countries. However, Zuckerman states that they have not been as effective in setting the agenda in such a way that these stories receive widespread readership. Is this sort of “agenda setting” desirable, or does deliberately emphasizing stories that are underrepresented in mainstream media merely exacerbate the problem of the media telling individuals what stories they should care about? How can we determine whether the right amount of audience attention has been achieved?&lt;br /&gt;
# If we accept the premise that some government regulation of the content of the internet is necessary (for example, to prevent distribution of child pornography), to what extent should a country’s legal and regulatory restrictions track those that govern similar prohibited offline conduct? Does the global reach of the internet call for stricter regulatory standards than more traditional modes of communication in order to protect the larger population that will be exposed to the information, or do the challenges of enforcing national regulations in the context of a border-transcending medium like the internet imply that governments should only attempt to enforce minimally restrictive requirements?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Pillars of iLaw]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Online_Liberty_and_Freedom_of_Expression&amp;diff=1637</id>
		<title>Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Online_Liberty_and_Freedom_of_Expression&amp;diff=1637"/>
		<updated>2011-09-07T20:36:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Student Reflections on this Session */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Tuesday, 2:00-3:30pm&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Format&#039;&#039;: Lecture, featuring guest respondents&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jpalfrey John Palfrey]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Potential Participants&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/betling Bruce Etling], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/rfaris Rob Faris], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/ezuckerman Ethan Zuckerman], and others&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Led by John Palfrey, this session will focus on online liberty and freedom of express and expand on some of the core themes introduced in the preceding sessions by providing an overview of the different phases of content regulation on the Internet. It will engage the audience with questions regarding the ways in which different political contexts shape different methods of and motivations for government control, and how various approaches in different countries inform each other. Respondents will be invited to reflect on key issues, including different forms of government controls and online speech regulation: China (a mix of “traditional” technical filtering with legal and informal regulatory mechanisms); the Arab Spring (just-in-time filtering combined with the arrest and intimidation of bloggers and digital activists); Russia (mostly non-technical, second and third generation controls rather than technical filtering); and US/Western Europe (mostly focused on child pornography and the illegal spread of copyrighted content). They will also grapple with hard questions related the role of intermediaries in response to government requests for user information, content removal or account deactivation and the implications of the current phase of control for free expression and privacy worldwide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Required Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Filtering===&lt;br /&gt;
*John Palfrey, [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1658191 &amp;quot;Four Phases of Internet Regulation&amp;quot;] &#039;&#039;Social Research&#039;&#039;, Vol. 77, No. 3, Fall 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Summary of Four Phases]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Jonathan Zittrain &amp;amp; John Palfrey, [[Media:Deibert_03_Ch02_029-056.pdf| &amp;quot;Internet Filtering: The Politics and Mechanisms of Control,&amp;quot;]] &#039;&#039;Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering&#039;&#039;, (Cambridge: MIT Press) 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Arab Spring===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://opennet.net/mena-net-watch MENA Net Watch]&lt;br /&gt;
* Masashi Crete-Nishihata and Jillian York, [http://opennet.net/blog/2011/01/egypt%E2%80%99s-internet-blackout-extreme-example-just-time-blocking “Egypt’s Internet Blackout: Extreme Example of Just-in-Time Blocking,”] ONI Blog, January 28, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;[http://www.dsg.ae/portals/0/ASMR2.pdf Civil Movements: The Impact of Facebook and Twitter], Arab Social Media Report, May 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;[[Exploring the Arab Spring|Also recommended: Exploring the Arab Spring]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Digital Tools===&lt;br /&gt;
* John Palfrey, Bruce Etling, Robert Faris, and John Gorham, [http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4609956/SAIS%20online%20organizing%20paper%20final.pdf &amp;quot;Political Change in the Digital Age: The Fragility and Promise of Online Organizing,&amp;quot;], 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
* Yochai Benker, [http://www.benkler.org/Benkler_Wealth_Of_Networks_Chapter_1.pdf &amp;quot;Chapter 1: Introduction: A Moment of Opportunity and Challenge,&amp;quot;] in &#039;&#039;Wealth of Networks: How Social production Transforms Markets and Freedom&#039;&#039; (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006). &#039;&#039;&#039;Update: read all Chapter 1&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* Yochai Benkler, [http://www.benkler.org/Benkler_Wealth_Of_Networks_Chapter_7.pdf &amp;quot;Chapter 7: Political Freedom Part 2: Emergence of the Networked Public Sphere,&amp;quot;] in &#039;&#039;The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom&#039;&#039; (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006). &#039;&#039;&#039;Update: read first 22 pages of Chapter 7&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recommended Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Filtering===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/blog The OpenNet Initiative&#039;s Blog]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/profiles/china ONI&#039;s China Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/mena-net-watch ONI&#039;s Middle East and North Africa Profiles and News]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/profiles/russia ONI&#039;s Russia Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/regions/namerica ONI&#039;s United States and Canada Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/regions/europe ONI&#039;s Europe Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Arab Spring===&lt;br /&gt;
*James Cowie, [http://www.renesys.com/blog/2011/01/egypt-leaves-the-internet.shtml “Egypt Leaves the Internet,”] Renesys, January 27, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Second- and Third-Generation Controls===&lt;br /&gt;
*Ron Deibert and Rafal Rohozinski, [[Media:chapter-1.pdf|“Beyond Denial: Introducing Next Generation Information Access Controls,”]] &#039;&#039;Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace&#039;&#039;, (Cambridge: MIT Press) 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Russia Project===&lt;br /&gt;
*Bruce Etling, et al., [[Media:Public_Discourse_in_the_Russian_Blogosphere_2010.pdf|“Public Discourse in the Russian Blogosphere: Mapping RuNet Politics and Mobilization,”]] October 18, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Cases==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[GNI/Role of Intermediaries]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Student Reflections on this Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;By Clare Selden&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session, Professor Palfrey presented an overview of the use of technology in limiting access to controversial content during the four phases of development of the Internet. During the “Open Internet” period, the internet was viewed as a separate sphere, which some scholars viewed as being impervious to government regulation (although this was quickly shown not to be the case). The creation of the net enabled greater individual autonomy as well as informal network formation among like-minded individuals, and facilitated collective action. Diverse cultures could also be united by the common language of the virtual space; for example, [http://globalvoicesonline.org/ Global Voices] connects diverse communities who wouldn’t otherwise be communicating by translating postings into many languages and facilitating discussion across borders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [http://opennet.net/accessdenied “Access Denied”] phase, states began to think of activities and expression on the Internet as threats needing to be blocked or managed in various ways, and governments began to employ various filtering and blocking mechanisms in order to regulate online speech and conduct. These methods include DNS filtering, internet provider filtering, and blocking specific URLs, all of which prevent information from reaching the recipient who requests it. The OpenNet Initiative monitors the degree to which more than 70 states restrict access to controversial sites at the national level, using a consistent “global basket” of test sites as an index.  Some governments, including those of Cuba and North Korea, have gone as far as blocking internet access entirely in order to prevent their citizens from accessing controversial information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [http://opennet.net/access-controlled “Access Controlled”] phase, effective blocking and [http://opennet.net/about-filtering filtering] became more difficult, and alternative methods of controlling the communication of controversial ideas have became more prevalent. These methods include licensing restrictions, mandatory identification of internet users at access points (Turkey), and direct threats of arrest or bodily harm by government officials. Although [http://www.palermo.edu/cele/english/staff.html Eduardo Bertoni] pointed out that use of government intimidation to chill free speech is not new, our discussion of the recent intimidation of bloggers in China and various Arab nations (as tracked on [http://threatened.globalvoicesonline.org/ Threatened Voices]) highlights the tragic efficacy of this alternate approach to the effective suppression of ideas, and illustrates a shift from viewer-targeted methods of internet control to producer-targeted methods.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
As we enter the “Access Contested” phase, debate surrounding the right of governments to maintain technological control over their citizens’ access to information remains at the forefront of the discussion, as does the possibility of using internet technology to empower and increase democratic action around the world. Questions raised by this discussion include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Palfrey points out that “technical filtering is problematic both for censors, who must choose either overbroad or under-inclusive filtering, and citizens, who face challenges to creativity and innovation and a reduction of free expression and privacy.” How should this balance be struck, and what makes that option better than the alternatives? If a ﬁltering regime cannot be implemented in an accurate manner, should it be undertaken at all?&lt;br /&gt;
# [http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/ Ethan Zuckerman] explains that [http://globalvoicesonline.org/ Global Voices] has attempted to address the problem of selective global attention by providing an outlet for news stories from underrepresented countries. However, Zuckerman states that they have not been as effective in setting the agenda in such a way that these stories receive widespread readership. Is this sort of “agenda setting” desirable, or does deliberately emphasizing stories that are underrepresented in mainstream media merely exacerbate the problem of the media telling individuals what stories they should care about? How can we determine whether the right amount of audience attention has been achieved?&lt;br /&gt;
# If we accept the premise that some government regulation of the content of the internet is necessary (for example, to prevent distribution of child pornography), to what extent should a country’s legal and regulatory restrictions track those that govern similar prohibited offline conduct? Does the global reach of the internet call for stricter regulatory standards than more traditional modes of communication in order to protect the larger population that will be exposed to the information, or do the challenges of enforcing national regulations in the context of a border-transcending medium like the internet imply that governments should only attempt to enforce minimally restrictive requirements?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Pillars of iLaw]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Online_Liberty_and_Freedom_of_Expression&amp;diff=1636</id>
		<title>Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Online_Liberty_and_Freedom_of_Expression&amp;diff=1636"/>
		<updated>2011-09-07T20:34:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Student Reflections on this Session */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Tuesday, 2:00-3:30pm&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Format&#039;&#039;: Lecture, featuring guest respondents&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jpalfrey John Palfrey]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Potential Participants&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/betling Bruce Etling], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/rfaris Rob Faris], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/ezuckerman Ethan Zuckerman], and others&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Led by John Palfrey, this session will focus on online liberty and freedom of express and expand on some of the core themes introduced in the preceding sessions by providing an overview of the different phases of content regulation on the Internet. It will engage the audience with questions regarding the ways in which different political contexts shape different methods of and motivations for government control, and how various approaches in different countries inform each other. Respondents will be invited to reflect on key issues, including different forms of government controls and online speech regulation: China (a mix of “traditional” technical filtering with legal and informal regulatory mechanisms); the Arab Spring (just-in-time filtering combined with the arrest and intimidation of bloggers and digital activists); Russia (mostly non-technical, second and third generation controls rather than technical filtering); and US/Western Europe (mostly focused on child pornography and the illegal spread of copyrighted content). They will also grapple with hard questions related the role of intermediaries in response to government requests for user information, content removal or account deactivation and the implications of the current phase of control for free expression and privacy worldwide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Required Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Filtering===&lt;br /&gt;
*John Palfrey, [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1658191 &amp;quot;Four Phases of Internet Regulation&amp;quot;] &#039;&#039;Social Research&#039;&#039;, Vol. 77, No. 3, Fall 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Summary of Four Phases]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Jonathan Zittrain &amp;amp; John Palfrey, [[Media:Deibert_03_Ch02_029-056.pdf| &amp;quot;Internet Filtering: The Politics and Mechanisms of Control,&amp;quot;]] &#039;&#039;Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering&#039;&#039;, (Cambridge: MIT Press) 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Arab Spring===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://opennet.net/mena-net-watch MENA Net Watch]&lt;br /&gt;
* Masashi Crete-Nishihata and Jillian York, [http://opennet.net/blog/2011/01/egypt%E2%80%99s-internet-blackout-extreme-example-just-time-blocking “Egypt’s Internet Blackout: Extreme Example of Just-in-Time Blocking,”] ONI Blog, January 28, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;[http://www.dsg.ae/portals/0/ASMR2.pdf Civil Movements: The Impact of Facebook and Twitter], Arab Social Media Report, May 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;[[Exploring the Arab Spring|Also recommended: Exploring the Arab Spring]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Digital Tools===&lt;br /&gt;
* John Palfrey, Bruce Etling, Robert Faris, and John Gorham, [http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4609956/SAIS%20online%20organizing%20paper%20final.pdf &amp;quot;Political Change in the Digital Age: The Fragility and Promise of Online Organizing,&amp;quot;], 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
* Yochai Benker, [http://www.benkler.org/Benkler_Wealth_Of_Networks_Chapter_1.pdf &amp;quot;Chapter 1: Introduction: A Moment of Opportunity and Challenge,&amp;quot;] in &#039;&#039;Wealth of Networks: How Social production Transforms Markets and Freedom&#039;&#039; (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006). &#039;&#039;&#039;Update: read all Chapter 1&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* Yochai Benkler, [http://www.benkler.org/Benkler_Wealth_Of_Networks_Chapter_7.pdf &amp;quot;Chapter 7: Political Freedom Part 2: Emergence of the Networked Public Sphere,&amp;quot;] in &#039;&#039;The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom&#039;&#039; (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006). &#039;&#039;&#039;Update: read first 22 pages of Chapter 7&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recommended Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Filtering===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/blog The OpenNet Initiative&#039;s Blog]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/profiles/china ONI&#039;s China Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/mena-net-watch ONI&#039;s Middle East and North Africa Profiles and News]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/profiles/russia ONI&#039;s Russia Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/regions/namerica ONI&#039;s United States and Canada Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/regions/europe ONI&#039;s Europe Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Arab Spring===&lt;br /&gt;
*James Cowie, [http://www.renesys.com/blog/2011/01/egypt-leaves-the-internet.shtml “Egypt Leaves the Internet,”] Renesys, January 27, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Second- and Third-Generation Controls===&lt;br /&gt;
*Ron Deibert and Rafal Rohozinski, [[Media:chapter-1.pdf|“Beyond Denial: Introducing Next Generation Information Access Controls,”]] &#039;&#039;Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace&#039;&#039;, (Cambridge: MIT Press) 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Russia Project===&lt;br /&gt;
*Bruce Etling, et al., [[Media:Public_Discourse_in_the_Russian_Blogosphere_2010.pdf|“Public Discourse in the Russian Blogosphere: Mapping RuNet Politics and Mobilization,”]] October 18, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Cases==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[GNI/Role of Intermediaries]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Student Reflections on this Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;By Clare Selden&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session, Professor Palfrey presented an overview of the use of technology in limiting access to controversial content during the four phases of development of the Internet. During the “Open Internet” period, the internet was viewed as a separate sphere, which some scholars viewed as being impervious to government regulation (although this was quickly shown not to be the case). The creation of the net enabled greater individual autonomy as well as informal network formation among like-minded individuals, and facilitated collective action. Diverse cultures could also be united by the common language of the virtual space; for example, [http://globalvoicesonline.org/ Global Voices] connects diverse communities who wouldn’t otherwise be communicating by translating postings into many languages and facilitating discussion across borders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [http://opennet.net/accessdenied “Access Denied”] phase, states began to think of activities and expression on the Internet as threats needing to be blocked or managed in various ways, and governments began to employ various filtering and blocking mechanisms in order to regulate online speech and conduct. These methods include DNS filtering, internet provider filtering, and blocking specific URLs, all of which prevent information from reaching the recipient who requests it. The OpenNet Initiative monitors the degree to which more than 70 states restrict access to controversial sites at the national level, using a consistent “global basket” of test sites as an index.  Some governments, including those of Cuba and North Korea, have gone as far as blocking internet access entirely in order to prevent their citizens from accessing controversial information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [http://opennet.net/access-controlled “Access Controlled”] phase, effective blocking and [http://opennet.net/about-filtering filtering] became more difficult, and alternative methods of controlling the communication of controversial ideas have became more prevalent. These methods include licensing restrictions, mandatory identification of internet users at access points (Turkey), and direct threats of arrest or bodily harm by government officials. Although Eduardo Bertoni pointed out that use of government intimidation to chill free speech is not new, our discussion of the recent intimidation of bloggers in China and various Arab nations (as tracked on Threatened Voices) highlights the tragic efficacy of this alternate approach to the effective suppression of ideas, and illustrates a shift from viewer-targeted methods of internet control to producer-targeted methods.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
As we enter the “Access Contested” phase, debate surrounding the right of governments to maintain technological control over their citizens’ access to information remains at the forefront of the discussion, as does the possibility of using internet technology to empower and increase democratic action around the world. Questions raised by this discussion include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Palfrey points out that “technical filtering is problematic both for censors, who must choose either overbroad or under-inclusive filtering, and citizens, who face challenges to creativity and innovation and a reduction of free expression and privacy.” How should this balance be struck, and what makes that option better than the alternatives? If a ﬁltering regime cannot be implemented in an accurate manner, should it be undertaken at all?&lt;br /&gt;
# [http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/ Ethan Zuckerman] explains that [http://globalvoicesonline.org/ Global Voices] has attempted to address the problem of selective global attention by providing an outlet for news stories from underrepresented countries. However, Zuckerman states that they have not been as effective in setting the agenda in such a way that these stories receive widespread readership. Is this sort of “agenda setting” desirable, or does deliberately emphasizing stories that are underrepresented in mainstream media merely exacerbate the problem of the media telling individuals what stories they should care about? How can we determine whether the right amount of audience attention has been achieved?&lt;br /&gt;
# If we accept the premise that some government regulation of the content of the internet is necessary (for example, to prevent distribution of child pornography), to what extent should a country’s legal and regulatory restrictions track those that govern similar prohibited offline conduct? Does the global reach of the internet call for stricter regulatory standards than more traditional modes of communication in order to protect the larger population that will be exposed to the information, or do the challenges of enforcing national regulations in the context of a border-transcending medium like the internet imply that governments should only attempt to enforce minimally restrictive requirements?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Pillars of iLaw]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Online_Liberty_and_Freedom_of_Expression&amp;diff=1635</id>
		<title>Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Online_Liberty_and_Freedom_of_Expression&amp;diff=1635"/>
		<updated>2011-09-07T20:32:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Student Reflections on this Session */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Tuesday, 2:00-3:30pm&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Format&#039;&#039;: Lecture, featuring guest respondents&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jpalfrey John Palfrey]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Potential Participants&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/betling Bruce Etling], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/rfaris Rob Faris], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/ezuckerman Ethan Zuckerman], and others&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Led by John Palfrey, this session will focus on online liberty and freedom of express and expand on some of the core themes introduced in the preceding sessions by providing an overview of the different phases of content regulation on the Internet. It will engage the audience with questions regarding the ways in which different political contexts shape different methods of and motivations for government control, and how various approaches in different countries inform each other. Respondents will be invited to reflect on key issues, including different forms of government controls and online speech regulation: China (a mix of “traditional” technical filtering with legal and informal regulatory mechanisms); the Arab Spring (just-in-time filtering combined with the arrest and intimidation of bloggers and digital activists); Russia (mostly non-technical, second and third generation controls rather than technical filtering); and US/Western Europe (mostly focused on child pornography and the illegal spread of copyrighted content). They will also grapple with hard questions related the role of intermediaries in response to government requests for user information, content removal or account deactivation and the implications of the current phase of control for free expression and privacy worldwide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Required Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Filtering===&lt;br /&gt;
*John Palfrey, [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1658191 &amp;quot;Four Phases of Internet Regulation&amp;quot;] &#039;&#039;Social Research&#039;&#039;, Vol. 77, No. 3, Fall 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Summary of Four Phases]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Jonathan Zittrain &amp;amp; John Palfrey, [[Media:Deibert_03_Ch02_029-056.pdf| &amp;quot;Internet Filtering: The Politics and Mechanisms of Control,&amp;quot;]] &#039;&#039;Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering&#039;&#039;, (Cambridge: MIT Press) 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Arab Spring===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://opennet.net/mena-net-watch MENA Net Watch]&lt;br /&gt;
* Masashi Crete-Nishihata and Jillian York, [http://opennet.net/blog/2011/01/egypt%E2%80%99s-internet-blackout-extreme-example-just-time-blocking “Egypt’s Internet Blackout: Extreme Example of Just-in-Time Blocking,”] ONI Blog, January 28, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;[http://www.dsg.ae/portals/0/ASMR2.pdf Civil Movements: The Impact of Facebook and Twitter], Arab Social Media Report, May 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;[[Exploring the Arab Spring|Also recommended: Exploring the Arab Spring]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Digital Tools===&lt;br /&gt;
* John Palfrey, Bruce Etling, Robert Faris, and John Gorham, [http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4609956/SAIS%20online%20organizing%20paper%20final.pdf &amp;quot;Political Change in the Digital Age: The Fragility and Promise of Online Organizing,&amp;quot;], 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
* Yochai Benker, [http://www.benkler.org/Benkler_Wealth_Of_Networks_Chapter_1.pdf &amp;quot;Chapter 1: Introduction: A Moment of Opportunity and Challenge,&amp;quot;] in &#039;&#039;Wealth of Networks: How Social production Transforms Markets and Freedom&#039;&#039; (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006). &#039;&#039;&#039;Update: read all Chapter 1&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* Yochai Benkler, [http://www.benkler.org/Benkler_Wealth_Of_Networks_Chapter_7.pdf &amp;quot;Chapter 7: Political Freedom Part 2: Emergence of the Networked Public Sphere,&amp;quot;] in &#039;&#039;The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom&#039;&#039; (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006). &#039;&#039;&#039;Update: read first 22 pages of Chapter 7&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recommended Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Filtering===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/blog The OpenNet Initiative&#039;s Blog]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/profiles/china ONI&#039;s China Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/mena-net-watch ONI&#039;s Middle East and North Africa Profiles and News]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/profiles/russia ONI&#039;s Russia Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/regions/namerica ONI&#039;s United States and Canada Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/regions/europe ONI&#039;s Europe Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Arab Spring===&lt;br /&gt;
*James Cowie, [http://www.renesys.com/blog/2011/01/egypt-leaves-the-internet.shtml “Egypt Leaves the Internet,”] Renesys, January 27, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Second- and Third-Generation Controls===&lt;br /&gt;
*Ron Deibert and Rafal Rohozinski, [[Media:chapter-1.pdf|“Beyond Denial: Introducing Next Generation Information Access Controls,”]] &#039;&#039;Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace&#039;&#039;, (Cambridge: MIT Press) 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Russia Project===&lt;br /&gt;
*Bruce Etling, et al., [[Media:Public_Discourse_in_the_Russian_Blogosphere_2010.pdf|“Public Discourse in the Russian Blogosphere: Mapping RuNet Politics and Mobilization,”]] October 18, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Cases==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[GNI/Role of Intermediaries]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Student Reflections on this Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;By Clare Selden&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session, Professor Palfrey presented an overview of the use of technology in limiting access to controversial content during the four phases of development of the Internet. During the “Open Internet” period, the internet was viewed as a separate sphere, which some scholars viewed as being impervious to government regulation (although this was quickly shown not to be the case). The creation of the net enabled greater individual autonomy as well as informal network formation among like-minded individuals, and facilitated collective action. Diverse cultures could also be united by the common language of the virtual space; for example, [http://globalvoicesonline.org/ Global Voices] connects diverse communities who wouldn’t otherwise be communicating by translating postings into many languages and facilitating discussion across borders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [http://opennet.net/accessdenied “Access Denied”] phase, states began to think of activities and expression on the Internet as threats needing to be blocked or managed in various ways, and governments began to employ various filtering and blocking mechanisms in order to regulate online speech and conduct. These methods include DNS filtering, internet provider filtering, and blocking specific URLs, all of which prevent information from reaching the recipient who requests it. The OpenNet Initiative monitors the degree to which more than 70 states restrict access to controversial sites at the national level, using a consistent “global basket” of test sites as an index.  Some governments, including those of Cuba and North Korea, have gone as far as blocking internet access entirely in order to prevent their citizens from accessing controversial information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [http://opennet.net/access-controlled “Access Controlled”] phase, effective blocking and filtration became more difficult, and alternative methods of controlling the communication of controversial ideas have became more prevalent. These methods include licensing restrictions, mandatory identification of internet users at access points (Turkey), and direct threats of arrest or bodily harm by government officials. Although Eduardo Bertoni pointed out that use of government intimidation to chill free speech is not new, our discussion of the recent intimidation of bloggers in China and various Arab nations (as tracked on Threatened Voices) highlights the tragic efficacy of this alternate approach to the effective suppression of ideas, and illustrates a shift from viewer-targeted methods of internet control to producer-targeted methods.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
As we enter the “Access Contested” phase, debate surrounding the right of governments to maintain technological control over their citizens’ access to information remains at the forefront of the discussion, as does the possibility of using internet technology to empower and increase democratic action around the world. Questions raised by this discussion include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Palfrey points out that “technical filtering is problematic both for censors, who must choose either overbroad or under-inclusive filtering, and citizens, who face challenges to creativity and innovation and a reduction of free expression and privacy.” How should this balance be struck, and what makes that option better than the alternatives? If a ﬁltering regime cannot be implemented in an accurate manner, should it be undertaken at all?&lt;br /&gt;
# [http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/ Ethan Zuckerman] explains that [http://globalvoicesonline.org/ Global Voices] has attempted to address the problem of selective global attention by providing an outlet for news stories from underrepresented countries. However, Zuckerman states that they have not been as effective in setting the agenda in such a way that these stories receive widespread readership. Is this sort of “agenda setting” desirable, or does deliberately emphasizing stories that are underrepresented in mainstream media merely exacerbate the problem of the media telling individuals what stories they should care about? How can we determine whether the right amount of audience attention has been achieved?&lt;br /&gt;
# If we accept the premise that some government regulation of the content of the internet is necessary (for example, to prevent distribution of child pornography), to what extent should a country’s legal and regulatory restrictions track those that govern similar prohibited offline conduct? Does the global reach of the internet call for stricter regulatory standards than more traditional modes of communication in order to protect the larger population that will be exposed to the information, or do the challenges of enforcing national regulations in the context of a border-transcending medium like the internet imply that governments should only attempt to enforce minimally restrictive requirements?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Pillars of iLaw]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Online_Liberty_and_Freedom_of_Expression&amp;diff=1634</id>
		<title>Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Online_Liberty_and_Freedom_of_Expression&amp;diff=1634"/>
		<updated>2011-09-07T20:28:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Tuesday, 2:00-3:30pm&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Format&#039;&#039;: Lecture, featuring guest respondents&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jpalfrey John Palfrey]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Potential Participants&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/betling Bruce Etling], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/rfaris Rob Faris], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/ezuckerman Ethan Zuckerman], and others&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Led by John Palfrey, this session will focus on online liberty and freedom of express and expand on some of the core themes introduced in the preceding sessions by providing an overview of the different phases of content regulation on the Internet. It will engage the audience with questions regarding the ways in which different political contexts shape different methods of and motivations for government control, and how various approaches in different countries inform each other. Respondents will be invited to reflect on key issues, including different forms of government controls and online speech regulation: China (a mix of “traditional” technical filtering with legal and informal regulatory mechanisms); the Arab Spring (just-in-time filtering combined with the arrest and intimidation of bloggers and digital activists); Russia (mostly non-technical, second and third generation controls rather than technical filtering); and US/Western Europe (mostly focused on child pornography and the illegal spread of copyrighted content). They will also grapple with hard questions related the role of intermediaries in response to government requests for user information, content removal or account deactivation and the implications of the current phase of control for free expression and privacy worldwide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Required Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Filtering===&lt;br /&gt;
*John Palfrey, [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1658191 &amp;quot;Four Phases of Internet Regulation&amp;quot;] &#039;&#039;Social Research&#039;&#039;, Vol. 77, No. 3, Fall 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Summary of Four Phases]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Jonathan Zittrain &amp;amp; John Palfrey, [[Media:Deibert_03_Ch02_029-056.pdf| &amp;quot;Internet Filtering: The Politics and Mechanisms of Control,&amp;quot;]] &#039;&#039;Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering&#039;&#039;, (Cambridge: MIT Press) 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Arab Spring===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://opennet.net/mena-net-watch MENA Net Watch]&lt;br /&gt;
* Masashi Crete-Nishihata and Jillian York, [http://opennet.net/blog/2011/01/egypt%E2%80%99s-internet-blackout-extreme-example-just-time-blocking “Egypt’s Internet Blackout: Extreme Example of Just-in-Time Blocking,”] ONI Blog, January 28, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;[http://www.dsg.ae/portals/0/ASMR2.pdf Civil Movements: The Impact of Facebook and Twitter], Arab Social Media Report, May 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;[[Exploring the Arab Spring|Also recommended: Exploring the Arab Spring]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Digital Tools===&lt;br /&gt;
* John Palfrey, Bruce Etling, Robert Faris, and John Gorham, [http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4609956/SAIS%20online%20organizing%20paper%20final.pdf &amp;quot;Political Change in the Digital Age: The Fragility and Promise of Online Organizing,&amp;quot;], 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
* Yochai Benker, [http://www.benkler.org/Benkler_Wealth_Of_Networks_Chapter_1.pdf &amp;quot;Chapter 1: Introduction: A Moment of Opportunity and Challenge,&amp;quot;] in &#039;&#039;Wealth of Networks: How Social production Transforms Markets and Freedom&#039;&#039; (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006). &#039;&#039;&#039;Update: read all Chapter 1&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* Yochai Benkler, [http://www.benkler.org/Benkler_Wealth_Of_Networks_Chapter_7.pdf &amp;quot;Chapter 7: Political Freedom Part 2: Emergence of the Networked Public Sphere,&amp;quot;] in &#039;&#039;The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom&#039;&#039; (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006). &#039;&#039;&#039;Update: read first 22 pages of Chapter 7&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recommended Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Filtering===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/blog The OpenNet Initiative&#039;s Blog]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/profiles/china ONI&#039;s China Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/mena-net-watch ONI&#039;s Middle East and North Africa Profiles and News]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/profiles/russia ONI&#039;s Russia Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/regions/namerica ONI&#039;s United States and Canada Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/regions/europe ONI&#039;s Europe Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Arab Spring===&lt;br /&gt;
*James Cowie, [http://www.renesys.com/blog/2011/01/egypt-leaves-the-internet.shtml “Egypt Leaves the Internet,”] Renesys, January 27, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Second- and Third-Generation Controls===&lt;br /&gt;
*Ron Deibert and Rafal Rohozinski, [[Media:chapter-1.pdf|“Beyond Denial: Introducing Next Generation Information Access Controls,”]] &#039;&#039;Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace&#039;&#039;, (Cambridge: MIT Press) 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Russia Project===&lt;br /&gt;
*Bruce Etling, et al., [[Media:Public_Discourse_in_the_Russian_Blogosphere_2010.pdf|“Public Discourse in the Russian Blogosphere: Mapping RuNet Politics and Mobilization,”]] October 18, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Cases==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[GNI/Role of Intermediaries]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Student Reflections on this Session==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;By Clare Selden&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this session, Professor Palfrey presented an overview of the use of technology in limiting access to controversial content during the four phases of development of the Internet. During the “Open Internet” period, the internet was viewed as a separate sphere, which some scholars viewed as being impervious to government regulation (although this was quickly shown not to be the case). The creation of the net enabled greater individual autonomy as well as informal network formation among like-minded individuals, and facilitated collective action. Diverse cultures could also be united by the common language of the virtual space; for example, Global Voices connects diverse communities who wouldn’t otherwise be communicating by translating postings into many languages and facilitating discussion across borders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the “Access Denied” phase, states began to think of activities and expression on the Internet as threats needing to be blocked or managed in various ways, and governments began to employ various filtering and blocking mechanisms in order to regulate online speech and conduct. These methods include DNS filtering, internet provider filtering, and blocking specific URLs, all of which prevent information from reaching the recipient who requests it. The OpenNet Initiative monitors the degree to which more than 70 states restrict access to controversial sites at the national level, using a consistent “global basket” of test sites as an index.  Some governments, including those of Cuba and North Korea, have gone as far as blocking internet access entirely in order to prevent their citizens from accessing controversial information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the “Access Controlled” phase, effective blocking and filtration became more difficult, and alternative methods of controlling the communication of controversial ideas have became more prevalent. These methods include licensing restrictions, mandatory identification of internet users at access points (Turkey), and direct threats of arrest or bodily harm by government officials. Although Eduardo Bertoni pointed out that use of government intimidation to chill free speech is not new, our discussion of the recent intimidation of bloggers in China and various Arab nations (as tracked on Threatened Voices) highlights the tragic efficacy of this alternate approach to the effective suppression of ideas, and illustrates a shift from viewer-targeted methods of internet control to producer-targeted methods.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
As we enter the “Access Contested” phase, debate surrounding the right of governments to maintain technological control over their citizens’ access to information remains at the forefront of the discussion, as does the possibility of using internet technology to empower and increase democratic action around the world. Questions raised by this discussion include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Palfrey points out that “technical filtering is problematic both for censors, who must choose either overbroad or under-inclusive filtering, and citizens, who face challenges to creativity and innovation and a reduction of free expression and privacy.” How should this balance be struck, and what makes that option better than the alternatives? If a ﬁltering regime cannot be implemented in an accurate manner, should it be undertaken at all?&lt;br /&gt;
# Ethan Zuckerman explains that [http://globalvoicesonline.org/ Global Voices] has attempted to address the problem of selective global attention by providing an outlet for news stories from underrepresented countries. However, Zuckerman states that they have not been as effective in setting the agenda in such a way that these stories receive widespread readership. Is this sort of “agenda setting” desirable, or does deliberately emphasizing stories that are underrepresented in mainstream media merely exacerbate the problem of the media telling individuals what stories they should care about? How can we determine whether the right amount of audience attention has been achieved?&lt;br /&gt;
# If we accept the premise that some government regulation of the content of the internet is necessary (for example, to prevent distribution of child pornography), to what extent should a country’s legal and regulatory restrictions track those that govern similar prohibited offline conduct? Does the global reach of the internet call for stricter regulatory standards than more traditional modes of communication in order to protect the larger population that will be exposed to the information, or do the challenges of enforcing national regulations in the context of a border-transcending medium like the internet imply that governments should only attempt to enforce minimally restrictive requirements?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Pillars of iLaw]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Online_Liberty_and_Freedom_of_Expression&amp;diff=1608</id>
		<title>Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Online_Liberty_and_Freedom_of_Expression&amp;diff=1608"/>
		<updated>2011-09-06T18:26:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Overview */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Tuesday, 2:00-3:30pm&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Format&#039;&#039;: Lecture, featuring guest respondents&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jpalfrey John Palfrey]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Potential Participants&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/betling Bruce Etling], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/rfaris Rob Faris], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/ezuckerman Ethan Zuckerman], and others&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Led by John Palfrey, this session will focus on online liberty and freedom of express and expand on some of the core themes introduced in the preceding sessions by providing an overview of the different phases of content regulation on the Internet. It will engage the audience with questions regarding the ways in which different political contexts shape different methods of and motivations for government control, and how various approaches in different countries inform each other. Respondents will be invited to reflect on key issues, including different forms of government controls and online speech regulation: China (a mix of “traditional” technical filtering with legal and informal regulatory mechanisms); the Arab Spring (just-in-time filtering combined with the arrest and intimidation of bloggers and digital activists); Russia (mostly non-technical, second and third generation controls rather than technical filtering); and US/Western Europe (mostly focused on child pornography and the illegal spread of copyrighted content). They will also grapple with hard questions related the role of intermediaries in response to government requests for user information, content removal or account deactivation and the implications of the current phase of control for free expression and privacy worldwide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Required Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Filtering===&lt;br /&gt;
*John Palfrey, [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1658191 &amp;quot;Four Phases of Internet Regulation&amp;quot;] &#039;&#039;Social Research&#039;&#039;, Vol. 77, No. 3, Fall 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Summary of Four Phases]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Jonathan Zittrain &amp;amp; John Palfrey, [[Media:Deibert_03_Ch02_029-056.pdf| &amp;quot;Internet Filtering: The Politics and Mechanisms of Control,&amp;quot;]] &#039;&#039;Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering&#039;&#039;, (Cambridge: MIT Press) 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Arab Spring===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://opennet.net/mena-net-watch MENA Net Watch]&lt;br /&gt;
* Masashi Crete-Nishihata and Jillian York, [http://opennet.net/blog/2011/01/egypt%E2%80%99s-internet-blackout-extreme-example-just-time-blocking “Egypt’s Internet Blackout: Extreme Example of Just-in-Time Blocking,”] ONI Blog, January 28, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;[http://www.dsg.ae/portals/0/ASMR2.pdf Civil Movements: The Impact of Facebook and Twitter], Arab Social Media Report, May 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;[[Exploring the Arab Spring|Also recommended: Exploring the Arab Spring]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Digital Tools===&lt;br /&gt;
* John Palfrey, Bruce Etling, Robert Faris, and John Gorham, [http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4609956/SAIS%20online%20organizing%20paper%20final.pdf &amp;quot;Political Change in the Digital Age: The Fragility and Promise of Online Organizing,&amp;quot;], 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
* Yochai Benker, [http://www.benkler.org/Benkler_Wealth_Of_Networks_Chapter_1.pdf &amp;quot;Chapter 1: Introduction: A Moment of Opportunity and Challenge,&amp;quot;] in &#039;&#039;Wealth of Networks: How Social production Transforms Markets and Freedom&#039;&#039; (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006). &#039;&#039;&#039;Update: read all Chapter 1&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* Yochai Benkler, [http://www.benkler.org/Benkler_Wealth_Of_Networks_Chapter_7.pdf &amp;quot;Chapter 7: Political Freedom Part 2: Emergence of the Networked Public Sphere,&amp;quot;] in &#039;&#039;The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom&#039;&#039; (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006). &#039;&#039;&#039;Update: read first 22 pages of Chapter 7&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recommended Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Filtering===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/blog The OpenNet Initiative&#039;s Blog]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/profiles/china ONI&#039;s China Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/mena-net-watch ONI&#039;s Middle East and North Africa Profiles and News]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/profiles/russia ONI&#039;s Russia Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/regions/namerica ONI&#039;s United States and Canada Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/regions/europe ONI&#039;s Europe Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Arab Spring===&lt;br /&gt;
*James Cowie, [http://www.renesys.com/blog/2011/01/egypt-leaves-the-internet.shtml “Egypt Leaves the Internet,”] Renesys, January 27, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Second- and Third-Generation Controls===&lt;br /&gt;
*Ron Deibert and Rafal Rohozinski, [[Media:chapter-1.pdf|“Beyond Denial: Introducing Next Generation Information Access Controls,”]] &#039;&#039;Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace&#039;&#039;, (Cambridge: MIT Press) 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Russia Project===&lt;br /&gt;
*Bruce Etling, et al., [[Media:Public_Discourse_in_the_Russian_Blogosphere_2010.pdf|“Public Discourse in the Russian Blogosphere: Mapping RuNet Politics and Mobilization,”]] October 18, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Cases==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[GNI/Role of Intermediaries]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Pillars of iLaw]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Talk:Student_Projects&amp;diff=1589</id>
		<title>Talk:Student Projects</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Talk:Student_Projects&amp;diff=1589"/>
		<updated>2011-09-05T21:21:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Option A List */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==SIGN-UP Sheet for Student Projects==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Options A, B, D===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For students who wish to sign up for Options A, B, or D, please include your first and last name, any group members, and your selected assignment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option A List==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Note:&#039;&#039;&#039; Please only sign up for &amp;quot;open sessions.&amp;quot;  Due to the large amount of internet (and desire to match students with open sessions) we are limiting the spots going forward.&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Open Sessions:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The History of the Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots)&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
* &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Open Access/Systems&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots)&#039;&#039;&#039;: &lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Study of the Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Mutual Aid&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Jungmee Victoria Lee&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Minds for Sale&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Interoperability&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Future of the Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (1 spot):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Daniel Robinson&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Closed Sessions:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Online Liberty and FOE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Clare Selden&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Exploring the Arab Spring&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Ryan Rippel&lt;br /&gt;
* Oktawian Kuc&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Changing Internet: Cybersecurity&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Adelman&lt;br /&gt;
* Justin Tresnowski&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Redding&lt;br /&gt;
* Ona Balkus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Intellectual Property&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Esther Lim&lt;br /&gt;
* Gita Srivastava&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;User Innovation&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Pooja Patel&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Pearson&lt;br /&gt;
* Lowell Gresock-Battles&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Privacy (closed)&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Crocker&lt;br /&gt;
* Jake Levine&lt;br /&gt;
* Nathan Lovejo&lt;br /&gt;
* Sunshine Yin&lt;br /&gt;
* Amrit Dhir&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Digital Humanities&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Josh Frieman&lt;br /&gt;
* Jordan Roberts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Jason Gross&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Bailey&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Global Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Amanda Vaughn&lt;br /&gt;
* Karissa Fleming&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Cooperation&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Joel Knopf&lt;br /&gt;
* Rachel Krol&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Rubenstein&lt;br /&gt;
* Taz Shahabuddin&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option B List==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* John Bennett&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option D List==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Adam Derry, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matt Scarola, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Steve Jugle, Yael Resnick, Matt Levitan, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Breanne Gilpatrick, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matt Vitins, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Tom Spencer, Matt McDonell, Jake Laperruque, Jordan Baehr, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Gabriela Grinsteins, option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Yana Welinder, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Molly Jennings, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Frank Sabatini, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Tim Grayson, Cynthia Chi, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matthias Glatthaar, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matt Gelfand, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Igor Gorlach, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Charles Allen, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matthew Becker, Allison Trzop, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Robin Achen, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Sonia McNeil, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* David Ashaolu, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Jonathan Cox, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Option C===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to time constraints, Option C is available to a limited number (10) of groups on a first-come first-served basis.  Students who select this option are encouraged to work in groups, each group will be given approximately 5-10 minutes of presentation time.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For students who select this option, please include your first and last name, as well as the names of any additional group members.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Ivar Hartmann, Fernando Serrati Campos Cervera&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Talk:Student_Projects&amp;diff=1588</id>
		<title>Talk:Student Projects</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Talk:Student_Projects&amp;diff=1588"/>
		<updated>2011-09-05T21:21:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Option A List */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==SIGN-UP Sheet for Student Projects==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Options A, B, D===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For students who wish to sign up for Options A, B, or D, please include your first and last name, any group members, and your selected assignment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option A List==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Note:&#039;&#039;&#039; Please only sign up for &amp;quot;open sessions.&amp;quot;  Due to the large amount of internet (and desire to match students with open sessions) we are limiting the spots going forward.&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Open Sessions:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The History of the Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots)&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
* &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Open Access/Systems&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots)&#039;&#039;&#039;: &lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Study of the Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Mutual Aid&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Jungmee Victoria Lee&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Minds for Sale&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Interoperability&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Future of the Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (1 spot):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Daniel Robinson&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Closed Sessions:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Online Liberty and FOE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Clare Selden&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Exploring the Arab Spring&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Ryan Rippel&lt;br /&gt;
* Oktawian Kuc&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Changing Internet: Cybersecurity&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Adelman&lt;br /&gt;
* Justin Tresnowski&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Redding&lt;br /&gt;
* Ona Balkus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Intellectual Property&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Esther Lim&lt;br /&gt;
* Gita Srivastava&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;User Innovation&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Pooja Patel&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Pearson&lt;br /&gt;
* Lowell Gresock-Battles&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Privacy (closed)&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Crocker&lt;br /&gt;
* Jake Levine&lt;br /&gt;
* Nathan Lovejo&lt;br /&gt;
* Sunshine Yin&lt;br /&gt;
* Amrit Dhir&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Digital Humanities&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Josh Frieman&lt;br /&gt;
* Jordan Roberts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Jason Gross&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Bailey&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Global Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Amanda Vaughn&lt;br /&gt;
* Karissa Fleming&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Cooperation&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Joel Knopf&lt;br /&gt;
* Rachel Krol&lt;br /&gt;
* Anayansi Rodriguez&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Rubenstein&lt;br /&gt;
* Taz Shahabuddin&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option B List==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* John Bennett&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option D List==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Adam Derry, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matt Scarola, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Steve Jugle, Yael Resnick, Matt Levitan, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Breanne Gilpatrick, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matt Vitins, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Tom Spencer, Matt McDonell, Jake Laperruque, Jordan Baehr, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Gabriela Grinsteins, option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Yana Welinder, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Molly Jennings, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Frank Sabatini, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Tim Grayson, Cynthia Chi, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matthias Glatthaar, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matt Gelfand, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Igor Gorlach, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Charles Allen, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matthew Becker, Allison Trzop, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Robin Achen, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Sonia McNeil, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* David Ashaolu, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Jonathan Cox, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Option C===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to time constraints, Option C is available to a limited number (10) of groups on a first-come first-served basis.  Students who select this option are encouraged to work in groups, each group will be given approximately 5-10 minutes of presentation time.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For students who select this option, please include your first and last name, as well as the names of any additional group members.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Ivar Hartmann, Fernando Serrati Campos Cervera&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Talk:Student_Projects&amp;diff=1587</id>
		<title>Talk:Student Projects</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Talk:Student_Projects&amp;diff=1587"/>
		<updated>2011-09-05T21:11:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Option A List */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==SIGN-UP Sheet for Student Projects==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Options A, B, D===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For students who wish to sign up for Options A, B, or D, please include your first and last name, any group members, and your selected assignment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option A List==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Note:&#039;&#039;&#039; Please only sign up for &amp;quot;open sessions.&amp;quot;  Due to the large amount of internet (and desire to match students with open sessions) we are limiting the spots going forward.&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Open Sessions:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The History of the Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots)&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
* &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Open Access/Systems&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots)&#039;&#039;&#039;: &lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Study of the Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Mutual Aid&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Jungmee Victoria Lee&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Minds for Sale&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Interoperability&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Future of the Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Daniel Robinson&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Closed Sessions:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Online Liberty and FOE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Clare Selden&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Exploring the Arab Spring&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Ryan Rippel&lt;br /&gt;
* Oktawian Kuc&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Changing Internet: Cybersecurity&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Adelman&lt;br /&gt;
* Justin Tresnowski&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Redding&lt;br /&gt;
* Ona Balkus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Intellectual Property&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Esther Lim&lt;br /&gt;
* Gita Srivastava&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;User Innovation&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Pooja Patel&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Pearson&lt;br /&gt;
* Lowell Gresock-Battles&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Privacy (closed)&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Crocker&lt;br /&gt;
* Jake Levine&lt;br /&gt;
* Nathan Lovejo&lt;br /&gt;
* Sunshine Yin&lt;br /&gt;
* Amrit Dhir&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Digital Humanities&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Josh Frieman&lt;br /&gt;
* Jordan Roberts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Jason Gross&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Bailey&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Global Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Amanda Vaughn&lt;br /&gt;
* Karissa Fleming&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Cooperation&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Joel Knopf&lt;br /&gt;
* Rachel Krol&lt;br /&gt;
* Anayansi Rodriguez&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Rubenstein&lt;br /&gt;
* Taz Shahabuddin&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option B List==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* John Bennett&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option D List==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Adam Derry, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matt Scarola, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Steve Jugle, Yael Resnick, Matt Levitan, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Breanne Gilpatrick, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matt Vitins, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Tom Spencer, Matt McDonell, Jake Laperruque, Jordan Baehr, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Gabriela Grinsteins, option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Yana Welinder, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Molly Jennings, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Frank Sabatini, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Tim Grayson, Cynthia Chi, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matthias Glatthaar, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matt Gelfand, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Igor Gorlach, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Charles Allen, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matthew Becker, Allison Trzop, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Robin Achen, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Sonia McNeil, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* David Ashaolu, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Jonathan Cox, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Option C===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to time constraints, Option C is available to a limited number (10) of groups on a first-come first-served basis.  Students who select this option are encouraged to work in groups, each group will be given approximately 5-10 minutes of presentation time.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For students who select this option, please include your first and last name, as well as the names of any additional group members.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Ivar Hartmann, Fernando Serrati Campos Cervera&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Talk:Student_Projects&amp;diff=1585</id>
		<title>Talk:Student Projects</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Talk:Student_Projects&amp;diff=1585"/>
		<updated>2011-09-05T20:12:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Option A List */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==SIGN-UP Sheet for Student Projects==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Options A, B, D===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For students who wish to sign up for Options A, B, or D, please include your first and last name, any group members, and your selected assignment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option A List==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Note:&#039;&#039;&#039; Please only sign up for &amp;quot;open sessions.&amp;quot;  Due to the large amount of internet (and desire to match students with open sessions) we are limiting the spots going forward.&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Open Sessions:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The History of the Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots)&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
* &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Open Access/Systems&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots)&#039;&#039;&#039;: &lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Study of the Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Mutual Aid&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Jungmee Victoria Lee&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Minds for Sale&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Interoperability&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Future of the Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Daniel Robinson&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Closed Sessions:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Online Liberty and FOE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Clare Selden&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Exploring the Arab Spring&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Ryan Rippel&lt;br /&gt;
* Oktawian Kuc&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Changing Internet: Cybersecurity&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Adelman&lt;br /&gt;
* Justin Tresnowski&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Redding&lt;br /&gt;
* Ona Balkus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Intellectual Property&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Esther Lim&lt;br /&gt;
* Gita Srivastava&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;User Innovation&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Pooja Patel&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Pearson&lt;br /&gt;
* Lowell Gresock-Battles&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Privacy (closed)&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Crocker&lt;br /&gt;
* Jake Levine&lt;br /&gt;
* Nathan Lovejo&lt;br /&gt;
* Sunshine Yin&lt;br /&gt;
* Amrit Dhir&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Digital Humanities&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Josh Frieman&lt;br /&gt;
* Jordan Roberts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Jason Gross&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Bailey&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Global Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Amanda Vaughn&lt;br /&gt;
* Karissa Flemming&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Cooperation&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Joel Knopf&lt;br /&gt;
* Rachel Krol&lt;br /&gt;
* Anayansi Rodriguez&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Rubenstein&lt;br /&gt;
* Taz Shahabuddin&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option B List==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* John Bennett&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option D List==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Adam Derry, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matt Scarola, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Steve Jugle, Yael Resnick, Matt Levitan, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Breanne Gilpatrick, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matt Vitins, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Tom Spencer, Matt McDonell, Jake Laperruque, Jordan Baehr, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Gabriela Grinsteins, option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Yana Welinder, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Molly Jennings, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Frank Sabatini, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Tim Grayson, Cynthia Chi, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matthias Glatthaar, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matt Gelfand, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Igor Gorlach, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Charles Allen, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matthew Becker, Allison Trzop, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Robin Achen, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Sonia McNeil, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* David Ashaolu, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Jonathan Cox, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Option C===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to time constraints, Option C is available to a limited number (10) of groups on a first-come first-served basis.  Students who select this option are encouraged to work in groups, each group will be given approximately 5-10 minutes of presentation time.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For students who select this option, please include your first and last name, as well as the names of any additional group members.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Ivar Hartmann, Fernando Serrati Campos Cervera&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Talk:Student_Projects&amp;diff=1583</id>
		<title>Talk:Student Projects</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Talk:Student_Projects&amp;diff=1583"/>
		<updated>2011-09-05T19:56:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Option A List */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==SIGN-UP Sheet for Student Projects==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Options A, B, D===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For students who wish to sign up for Options A, B, or D, please include your first and last name, any group members, and your selected assignment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option A List==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Note:&#039;&#039;&#039; Please only sign up for &amp;quot;open sessions.&amp;quot;  Due to the large amount of internet (and desire to match students with open sessions) we are limiting the spots going forward.&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Open Sessions:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The History of the Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots)&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
* &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Open Access/Systems&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots)&#039;&#039;&#039;: &lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Study of the Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Mutual Aid&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Jungmee Victoria Lee&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Minds for Sale&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Interoperability&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Future of the Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Daniel Robinson&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Closed Sessions:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Online Liberty and FOE&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Clare Selden&lt;br /&gt;
* Daniel Sinnreich&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Exploring the Arab Spring&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Ryan Rippel&lt;br /&gt;
* Oktawian Kuc&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Changing Internet: Cybersecurity&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Adelman&lt;br /&gt;
* Justin Tresnowski&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Redding&lt;br /&gt;
* Ona Balkus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Intellectual Property&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Esther Lim&lt;br /&gt;
* Gita Srivastava&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;User Innovation&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Pooja Patel&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Pearson&lt;br /&gt;
* Lowell Gresock-Battles&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Privacy (closed)&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Crocker&lt;br /&gt;
* Jake Levine&lt;br /&gt;
* Nathan Lovejo&lt;br /&gt;
* Sunshine Yin&lt;br /&gt;
* Amrit Dhir&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Digital Humanities&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (2 spots):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Josh Frieman&lt;br /&gt;
* Jordan Roberts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Jason Gross&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Bailey&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Global Internet&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Amanda Vaughn&lt;br /&gt;
* Karissa Flemming&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Cooperation&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (closed):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Joel Knopf&lt;br /&gt;
* Rachel Krol&lt;br /&gt;
* Anayansi Rodriguez&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Rubenstein&lt;br /&gt;
* Taz Shahabuddin&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option B List==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* John Bennett&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option D List==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Adam Derry, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matt Scarola, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Steve Jugle, Yael Resnick, Matt Levitan, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Breanne Gilpatrick, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matt Vitins, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Tom Spencer, Matt McDonell, Jake Laperruque, Jordan Baehr, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Gabriela Grinsteins, option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Yana Welinder, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Molly Jennings, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Frank Sabatini, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Tim Grayson, Cynthia Chi, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matthias Glatthaar, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matt Gelfand, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Igor Gorlach, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Charles Allen, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Matthew Becker, Allison Trzop, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Robin Achen, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Sonia McNeil, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* David Ashaolu, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
* Jonathan Cox, Option D&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Option C===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to time constraints, Option C is available to a limited number (10) of groups on a first-come first-served basis.  Students who select this option are encouraged to work in groups, each group will be given approximately 5-10 minutes of presentation time.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For students who select this option, please include your first and last name, as well as the names of any additional group members.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Ivar Hartmann, Fernando Serrati Campos Cervera&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Student_Projects&amp;diff=1521</id>
		<title>Student Projects</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Student_Projects&amp;diff=1521"/>
		<updated>2011-09-02T14:30:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Option A. Session Participation and In the Moment Technologies */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{TOCright}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All HLS students seeking credit for the iLaw Program must complete a final project. We’d developed four options, which are listed below and include written, oral, participatory, or video projects. All students are encouraged, although not required, to work in teams. Please let us know what assignment you choose via the &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Talk:Student_Projects|sign-up page]]&#039;&#039;&#039; or by emailing [mailto:ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu| ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu] by &#039;&#039;&#039;Friday, September 2nd&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please take care in noting the deadlines or respective timeframes for completing projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More information regarding the projects will be made available as we approach September 6th.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option A. Session Participation and In the Moment Technologies==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deep dialogue, hard questions and genuine interactivity are fundamental to the success and mode of the iLaw Program. Participants will be invited to engage with sessions in diverse ways throughout the program—from the wiki to the question tool, open Q&amp;amp;A, structured interposals, open space and invited conversation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These participants will help us to embed uncertainty and dynamic interplay in the sessions, and help to create genuine opportunities to challenge and test ideas. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They will:&lt;br /&gt;
* Choose a &#039;&#039;&#039;session of interest&#039;&#039;&#039;, along with up to 5 other students. &lt;br /&gt;
* During the session, you and your team will &#039;&#039;&#039;take charge of the question tool, monitor back channels and help identify key questions and priority issues.&#039;&#039;&#039; You will help the session leader to integrate them into the Q&amp;amp;A periods and other parts of the discussion. You may also document some questions that might be useful during the final “Future of the Internet” session on Friday.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;New responsibility (updated 9-1):&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; After the session, please provide a &#039;&#039;&#039;2-3 paragraph summary of the key thematic areas, open questions&#039;&#039;&#039;, etc. This summary should be posted to the relevant Talk Page and shared with ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu. It may become a permanent part of wiki or other outputs from iLaw 2011. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option B. Audio/Video Project==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For students with some knowledge/experience with audio/video production, we would be happy to have you record some portion of the proceedings (including interviews with key commentators, session leads and other contributors) and create a multi-media output. This might be a record of the program overall, a deeper dive into a certain topic, etc. Berkman staff may provide some (modest) production support. &#039;&#039;&#039;All final work products are due by the Friday, October 7th&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option C. Final Presentation: Lightning Talk, Provocation, Response Statement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Program_Schedule#Student_Presentations.2FReaction_Statements.2FProposals|2:00-3:30 PM session on Friday afternoon]] is allotted for student and participant presentations. Audience members who sign up will have 5-10 minutes to provide substantive reflections on the iLaw sessions and the program overall, or offer central issues for the faculty to answer/consider during the “Future of the Internet” discussion. They might also provide a deeper dive into a particular module or interesting case for further study, etc. The focus here would be on developing a short and creative presentation or statement, to be followed by brief and lightly moderated Q&amp;amp;A with the broader audience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option D. Written Output: Post-iLaw Reflections==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the wake of the program, and in particular, in light of the “Future of the Internet session,” you will provide a reaction statement or op-ed style piece--no longer than 900 words—that examines some of the hard problems at the core of the developing online space. You might choose to reflect on the evolution of traditional concepts such as privacy, security, and liberty, and their evolution in the online space, or to consider emerging issues that may confirm or challenge some of the core themes that were touched on in our discussion. You could also make the case for other themes, issues, or hard questions that require more attention in future iLaws. The best pieces will be posted to the iLaw wiki.  &#039;&#039;&#039;All final work products are due by the Friday, October 7th&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=1486</id>
		<title>Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=1486"/>
		<updated>2011-08-31T20:34:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Program Materials */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{TOCright}}&lt;br /&gt;
===Welcome to the iLaw 2011 Wiki!===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=3 style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFFCC;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Important Program Information&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| &lt;br /&gt;
The [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society] is very pleased to offer the [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw iLaw 2011 Program], which will take place &#039;&#039;&#039;Tuesday, September 6th - Friday, September 9th&#039;&#039;&#039;.  This wiki will serve as a repository for information and materials related to iLaw 2011.  Here, you will find the [[Program Schedule|iLaw Program Schedule]], information about [[Main Page#Program Materials|individual program sessions]], [[Main Page#Program Materials|required and recommended reading assignments]], [[Final Student Projects|final student projects]], and [[Program Logistics]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;iLaw 2011 will be video recorded.&#039;&#039;&#039;  All audience members, presenters, and other participants are required to sign a consent and release form (per the University&#039;s policy) prior to attending iLaw 2011.  For more information, please visit [[Program_Logistics#Audio and Video Waivers| Audio and Video Waivers]].  If you do not wish to be recorded please email us at ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Please note that iLaw 2011 is a Harvard Law School class that is closed to the public.&#039;&#039;&#039;  We received an enormous amount of interest in this year&#039;s program.  For this reason, we ask that all registered participants commit to attending all sessions on all days -- the evening events, however, are optional. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from the [[Evening Events]], all program sessions will take place in the &amp;quot;Austin North&amp;quot; room of [[Program_Logistics#Map| Austin Hall]].&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Program Schedule==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Program Schedule|See main page on Program Schedule]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Ilawsidebar2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear|left}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Program Materials==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
iLaw 2011 features a mixture of interactive lectures, roundtable-style and moderated discussions led by Harvard Law School faculty members, Berkman Center researchers, fellows, and special guests.  Three types of substantive topical areas will be covered: (1) &amp;quot;Thematic Pillars&amp;quot; (the foundational topics and theories of iLaw), (2) &amp;quot;Cross-sectional Themes&amp;quot; (which explore overlapping themes below the foundational surface), and (3) Case Studies (cases and examples of themes in practice).  Below are links to pages on this wiki categorized by topical area.  These pages contain session overviews and links to the required reading assignments, recommended readings, and related Cross-sectional and Case Study sessions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Note to HLS students:&#039;&#039;&#039; We’ve included a rather large number of readings on the wiki for each session. Although some of the session readings are described as “required,” faculty members and session leaders do not wish these assignments to be onerous. To this end, students will not be expected to have &#039;&#039;closely&#039;&#039; read all of the required materials prior to each session; however, students should at least familiarize themselves with the concepts contained therein. Additional “recommended” readings are included for those who wish to do a deeper dive into a particular topic area; we also hope these materials will also be useful for future research and student assignments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each day will end with an optional evening event.  These events will offer unique opportunities to interact with Berkman Center and Harvard faculty, staff, fellows, and members of the community. Students and audience members are strongly encouraged to attend these events and learn more about the Berkman Center and it&#039;s diverse, enthusiastic community.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more information about the schedule or logistics, please consult the [[Program Schedule]] and [[Program Logistics]] pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Pillar Themes of iLaw===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Open Systems/Access]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[The Changing Internet: Cybersecurity]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Intellectual Property]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Cooperation]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Privacy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Digital Humanities]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-sectional Themes of iLaw===&lt;br /&gt;
[[The History of the Internet]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[The Study of the Internet: New Methods for New Technologies]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[The Global Internet]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Interoperability]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[The Future of the Internet]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Case Studies===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Exploring the Arab Spring]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User Innovation]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Mutual Aid]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Minds for Sale]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Audio/Video Recording Consent Forms (Notice)===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Program Logistics#Audio and Video Recording Consent|See page on Audio and Video Recording Consent]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will require program attendees to sign a consent form, or opt-out of video recording, at registration on Tuesday, prior to the first session.  Please see the above link for more information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Student Projects (Required)===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Student Projects|See main page on Final Student Projects]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===How to Participate at iLaw 2011===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[How To Participate at iLaw|See main page on iLaw Participation]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience members are encouraged to participate at iLaw.  For more information on how to interact with members during sessions, see the above link.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Evening Events]] (Optional)==&lt;br /&gt;
* Monday: [[Evening_Events#Drinks_at_John_Harvard&#039;s|Drinks at John Harvard&#039;s Brew House]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Tuesday: [[Evening_Events#Berkman_Center_Open_House|Berkman Center Open House]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wednesday: [[Evening_Events#metaLAB_.28at.29_Harvard|metaLAB (at) Harvard]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Thursday: [[Evening_Events#Thursday_Evening_with_Berkman_Faculty|Potential Thursday Evening Events]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Videos From Previous iLaw Programs==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[iLaw Videos|See main page on iLaw Videos]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are worth checking out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Logistics==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Program_Logistics|See main page on Program Logistics]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear|right}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==About the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/ Berkman Center Website]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people Berkman Center Directors, Faculty, Fellows, Staff, and Community]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/teaching/cyberlawclinic Information about the Berkman Center Cyberlaw Clinic]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://crcs.seas.harvard.edu/ Information about Harvard&#039;s Center for Research on Computation and Society (CRCS)]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Digital_Libraries,_Archives,_and_Rights_Registries&amp;diff=1406</id>
		<title>Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Digital_Libraries,_Archives,_and_Rights_Registries&amp;diff=1406"/>
		<updated>2011-08-26T21:07:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Overview */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Thursday, 12:30-1:30pm&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Format&#039;&#039;: Roundtable Discussion&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/cnesson Charlie Nesson]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Participants&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/tfisher William Fisher], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jpalfrey John Palfrey], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jschnapp Jeffrey Schnapp]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A discussion moderated by Charlie Nesson will focus on opportunities and challenges regarding the creation and use of digital registries, archives, and libraries. Practical use cases such as the [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/research/dpla Digital Public Library of America (DPLA)] in addition to other efforts to create registries for public domain works will be discussed, building upon and further illustrating previous thematic areas and pillar sessions, including copyright, user innovation, and free and fair use. Central considerations regarding underlying technical architecture, legal challenges, legal support, and liability will inform the conversation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Driving Questions==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&#039;: Suppose it were to be agreed among us that when the founders wrote the Progress clause of our constitution, the exclusive right they were granting to publishers of creative works was the legal right to stop other publishers from selling copies of their works. Can you tell a coherent legal story about how we got from there to here?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&#039;: Viewed from the vantage of equal citizens in a public domain of common (totally usable) knowledge, when did We the People surrender the liberty of privately copying works of any kind?  That is to say, when was this liberty taken from us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Required Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
===Library and Archive Models===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.europeana.eu/portal/ Europeana]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.archive.org/ The Internet Archive]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.hathitrust.org/ Hathi Trust]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/research/dpla# Digital Public Library of America]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Rights Registries===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://imslp.org/wiki/ IMSLP -- Petrucci Music Library]&lt;br /&gt;
* James Grimmelmann, [http://laboratorium.net/archive/2011/03/22/inside_judge_chins_opinion &amp;quot;Inside Judge Chin&#039;s Opinion,&amp;quot;] &#039;&#039;The Laboratorium&#039;&#039;, March 22, 2011, skim all (focus on Section 4, “Copyright”)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Golan v. Holder===&lt;br /&gt;
* U.S. Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §§ [http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000104---A000-.html 104A], [http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000109----000-.html 109(a)] (codifying § 514 of  Uruguay Round Agreements Act)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1636353906906143958&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;as_sdt=2&amp;amp;as_vis=1&amp;amp;oi=scholarr Golan v. Holder, 609 F.3d 1076 (10th Cir. Jun. 21, 2010)],  131 S.Ct. 1600 (March 7, 2011) (granting cert.)&lt;br /&gt;
* See generally, [http://www.americanbar.org/publications/preview_home/10-545.html Golan v. Holder, U.S. Supreme Court Docket No. 10-545]&lt;br /&gt;
** Read all: [http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publishing/previewbriefs/Other_Brief_Updates/10-545_petitioner.pdf Petitioner&#039;s Brief]&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publishing/previewbriefs/Other_Brief_Updates/10-545_respondent.authcheckdam.pdf Respondent&#039;s Brief]&lt;br /&gt;
** Read all: [http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/10-545_tsac_Project_Petrucci.pdf Amicus Brief for Project Petrucci in Support of Petitioner]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recommended Readings and Videos==&lt;br /&gt;
* Citizen Media Law Project, [http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/copyright &amp;quot;Copyright&amp;quot;] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;videoflash&amp;gt;PWrgjRYwTsk&amp;lt;/videoflash&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* June update from John Palfrey on The Digital Public Library of America&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Case Studies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Program_Schedule&amp;diff=1385</id>
		<title>Program Schedule</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Program_Schedule&amp;diff=1385"/>
		<updated>2011-08-26T17:49:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Master Program Schedule */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Master Program Schedule==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=3 style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFFCC;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Important Program Information&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Please note that the iLaw 2011 Program is a Harvard Law School class that is closed to the public. Attendance is restricted to registered students and invited guests.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=1 align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|KEY&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 70px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|width=&amp;quot;175&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;Pillar Theme Sessions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|width=&amp;quot;175&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#F79646;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;Cross-Sectional Theme Sessions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|width=&amp;quot;175&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#4F81BD;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;Case Studies&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable collapsible autocollapse&amp;quot; border = &amp;quot;1&amp;quot;; align = center&lt;br /&gt;
|+&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;DRAFT Program Agenda&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
! width=&amp;quot;200&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Monday - Sept. 5&lt;br /&gt;
! width=&amp;quot;200&amp;quot;|[[Program_Schedule#Tuesday.2C_September_6.2C_2011|Tuesday - Sept. 6]]&lt;br /&gt;
! width=&amp;quot;200&amp;quot;|[[Program_Schedule#Wednesday.2C_September_7.2C_2011|Wednesday - Sept. 7]]&lt;br /&gt;
! width=&amp;quot;200&amp;quot;|[[Program_Schedule#Thursday.2C_September_8.2C_2011|Thursday - Sept. 8]]&lt;br /&gt;
! width=&amp;quot;200&amp;quot;|[[Program_Schedule#Friday.2C_September_9.2C_2011|Friday - Sept. 9]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|9:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;	style=&amp;quot;background-color:#BFBFBF;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;Welcoming Remarks&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
9:00 to 9:15&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: William Fisher and Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|9:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#F79646;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[The History of the Internet]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
9:15 to 11:15&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Jonathan Zittrain and Lawrence Lessig* (TBC)&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|10:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[The Changing Internet: Cybersecurity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
10:00 to 11:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#CCC0DA;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;*[[Mid-Point Check-in]]*&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
Part 2&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
10:00 to 10:20&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#4F81BD;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Minds for Sale]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
10:00 to 11:00&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|10:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Digital Humanities]]&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
10:20 to 12:00&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Jeffrey Schnapp and Jesse Shapins&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|11:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|15-minute Break&lt;br /&gt;
11:15 to 11:30&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|30-minute Break&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|11:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Open Systems/Access]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
11:30 to 1:00&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Yochai Benkler&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|30-minute break&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#F79646;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Interoperability]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
11:30 to 1:00&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Urs Gasser with John Palfrey&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|12:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Intellectual Property]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
12:00 to 1:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: William Fisher and Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|30-minute break&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|12:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#4F81BD;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
12:30 to 1:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Moderator: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|1:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Lunch&lt;br /&gt;
1:00 to 2:00&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Lunch&lt;br /&gt;
1:00 to 2:00&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|1:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Lunch&lt;br /&gt;
1:30 to 2:30&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Lunch&lt;br /&gt;
1:30 to 2:30&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|2:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression|Online Liberty and FOE]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
2:00 to 3:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: John Palfrey&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#9BBB59;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Student_Projects#Option_C._Final_Presentation:_Lightning_Talk.2C_Provocation.2C_Response_Statement|Student Questions and Reactions for Faculty-Leads]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
2:00 to 3:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|2:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#4F81BD;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[User Innovation]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
2:30 to 3:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Eric von Hippel and William Fisher&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#F79646;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[The Global Internet]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
2:30 to 3:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Urs Gasser and Herbert Burkert&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|3:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|3:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|15-minute break&lt;br /&gt;
3:30 to 3:45&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|30-minute break&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Cooperation]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
3:30 to 4:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Yochai Benkler&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|30-minute break&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|4:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#4F81BD;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Exploring the Arab Spring]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
3:45 to 4:45&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: John Palfrey, Yochai Benkler, Charlie Nesson, and others&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Privacy]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
4:00 to 5:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Phil Malone, with Herbert Burkert and John Palfrey&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#F79646;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[The Future of the Internet]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
4:00 to 5:00&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|4:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|30-minute break&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|5:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#4F81BD;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Mutual Aid]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
5:00 to 6:00&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#DDD9C3;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;Final BBQ&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
5:00 to 7:00&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|5:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#F79646;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[The Study of the Internet: New Methods for New Technologies]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
5:30 to 6:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Moderator: John Palfrey&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|6:00&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#DDD9C3;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Evening_Events#Drinks_at_John_Harvard&#039;s|Drinks at John Harvard&#039;s Brew House]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
6:00 to 8:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|6:30&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#DDD9C3;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Evening_Events#Berkman_Center_Open_House|Berkman Center Open House]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
6:30 to 8:30&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#CCC0DA;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;*[[Mid-Point Check-in]]*&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
Part 1&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
6:30 to 6:45&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|7:00&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#DDD9C3;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Evening_Events#metaLAB_.28at.29_Harvard|metaLAB (at) Harvard Event]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
7:00 to 9:00&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#DDD9C3;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Evening_Events#Thursday_Evening_with_Berkman_Faculty|Evening with Berkman Faculty]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
7:00 to 9:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|7:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|8:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|8:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|9:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==iLaw 2011 Program Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=3 style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFFCC;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Important Program Information&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Please note that the iLaw 2011 Program is a Harvard Law School class that is closed to the public. Attendance is restricted to registered students and invited guests.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/archive/ last iLaw conference] was held nearly five years ago, the debates at the intersection of technology, law, and policy have continued to evolve. The introduction of new technologies – and new uses of old technologies – raise a broad range of problems to explore. To name a few examples, the intervening years have seen the growth of social networking tools; Facebook has gained more than 750 million users worldwide and has found itself at the center of privacy debates. Information technologies have played an unprecedented role in recent protests in the Middle East and North Africa, at times in tension with US foreign policy and export controls. In the US, government regulators and major ISPs continue to struggle with finding the right balance points for network governance and regulatory authority. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Growing Internet usage trends, disruptive technologies, increased efforts by governments and private entities to control the online space continue to reshape the cyber landscape. These issues, alongside the actors who provide the technologies and the users who engage with them, are at the center of many global policy debates. iLaw 2011 will be a unique opportunity to reexamine these areas of inquiry and core questions while engaging with the new and emerging issues and thorny debates that are constantly reshaping the field. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2011 iLaw Program is designed to take participants through the evolution of information technologies and the Internet, including their past, present, and future. Each module will provide a bridge to the past, beginning with a brief sketch of how a particular issue has evolved over the course of recent decades, both from an intellectual history perspective and via changes in policy, practice, and technology. Faculty and selected guests will use this foundation to explore how technical, social, legal, economic, and policy trends and debates have evolved over time, and identify the primary questions and issues that currently define the online space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Note on Format and Mode===&lt;br /&gt;
Deep dialogue, hard questions and genuine interactivity are fundamental to the success and mode of iLaw. Participants will be invited to engage with sessions in diverse ways throughout the program–from the wiki to the question tool, open Q&amp;amp;A, structured interposals, open space, and invited conversation. Although we expect close to 200 participants, we are committed to genuine interactivity throughout the event; we encourage active engagement from all participants. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Driving Questions from Faculty===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The questions posed below by Berkman Faculty members reflect the fundamental inquiries for participants to consider during the 2011 iLaw Program:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Yochai Benkler&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* How do we systematize cooperative human systems design, now that we all know that online collaboration is a critical component of the networked information economy?&lt;br /&gt;
* How do we integrate power into our understanding of networked society? What are the limits of public action, and what are the limits of decentralized action, given power in the market, the state, real-world society and the network?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;William Fisher&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* To what extent, if any, is legal protection for creative works necessary either to stimulate creativity or to ensure that creators are treated fairly? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Suppose it were to be agreed among us that when the founders wrote the Progress clause of our constitution, the exclusive right they were granting to publishers of creative works was the legal right to stop other publishers from selling copies of their works. Can you tell a coherent legal story about how we got from there to here?&lt;br /&gt;
* Viewed from the vantage of equal citizens in a public domain of common (totally usable) knowledge, when did We the People surrender the liberty of privately copying works of any kind?  That is to say, when was this liberty taken from us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
* How do we reconcile welcome contributions from all corners with poisoned apples?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is the Internet doing to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Driving Questions from Participants and Students===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What questions and concerns are you grappling with in the this field? Where does the future take us?  Please add your own driving questions here: [[Talk:Program Schedule#Driving Questions|Driving Questions]].  As this page is populated, questions will be added below.  Alternatively, add your driving questions to [[How To Participate at iLaw|The Question Tool]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Monday, September 5, 2011==&lt;br /&gt;
===Drinks at John Harvard&#039;s Brew House===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Monday, 6:00 to 8:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Evening_Events#Drinks_at_John_Harvard&#039;s|See main page on Drinks at John Harvard&#039;s]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All participants are invited to join us at John Harvard&#039;s Brew House in Harvard Square for an optional, informal gathering and cash bar with Berkman Community members and fellow participants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tuesday, September 6, 2011==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After introductions led by Terry Fisher and Jonathan Zittrain, the day will begin with [[The History of the Internet]], during which Jonathan Zittrain will introduce and discuss the “generative framework” of the Net, outlining the unique characteristics of Internet architecture that were critical to its success and continued evolution. Yochai Benkler will pick up related themes of openness, access, and distribution and their implications for user choice and online freedom in “[[Open Systems/Access]],” during which WikiLeaks will be featured as a case to examine related issues.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After lunch, John Palfrey will lead “[[Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression]],” which will take a focused look at the issues surrounding online freedom and the different types of control deployed by governments, users, companies, and other actors through a series of illustrative examples presented by audience members. Following this, a moderated discussion featuring selected faculty and guests will focus on the role of new technologies during recent protests in the Middle East and North Africa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the evening, all participant and audience members are invited to attend the Berkman Center’s Open House.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The History of the Internet===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[The History of the Internet|See main page on The History of the Internet]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Tuesday, 9:15 to 11:15&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Jonathan Zittrain with Larry Lessig&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The day will begin with a brief history of the Net and an introduction to the theory of generativity as a framework to understand the Internet’s disruptive power. Jonathan Zittrain’s opening lecture will focus on the Internet’s technical evolution and underlying architecture; the values that informed its early development, including principles related to consensus, openness, and non-discrimination; and the range of players, from users to computer scientists, governments and other bodies, and corporations, who engaged in the various activities, controls, and other arrangements that formed the initial distributed digital governance of the online space.  What characteristics make the evolution of the Internet so unique? What are the issues and organizations that characterize online governance and policy-making today?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Open Systems/Access===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Open Systems/Access|See main page on Open Systems/Access]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Tuesday, 11:30 to 1:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Yochai Benkler&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This session will discuss the enormous benefits of open systems and address the ways in which openness at all layers of the networked environment can be achieved. Yochai Benkler will present a set of examples in which physical access, social production of content, and other forms of user creation and collaboration play a powerful role in supporting freedom and new forms of innovation. Skype will provide an illustrative usecase through which to explore these topics. From these examples, he will draw out how proprietary networks and standards (like mobile networks) differ from open ones (like TCP/IP, competitive infrastructure, free software, open standards, and free culture/content-based models). The case of WikiLeaks will provide a lens through which to view questions related to openness, access, and content distribution at different layers of the network.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression|See main page on Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Tuesday, 2:00 to 3:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: John Palfrey&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Led by John Palfrey, this session will focus on online liberty and freedom of express and expand on some of the core themes introduced in the preceding sessions by providing an overview of the different phases of content regulation on the Internet. It will engage the audience with questions regarding the ways in which different political contexts shape different methods of and motivations for government control, and how various approaches in different countries inform each other. Respondents will be invited to reflect on key issues, including different forms of government controls and online speech regulation: China (a mix of “traditional” technical filtering with legal and informal regulatory mechanisms); the Arab Spring (just-in-time filtering combined with the arrest and intimidation of bloggers and digital activists); Russia (mostly non-technical, second and third generation controls rather than technical filtering); and US/Western Europe (mostly focused on child pornography and the illegal spread of copyrighted content). They will also grapple with hard questions related the role of intermediaries in response to government requests for user information, content removal or account deactivation and the implications of the current phase of control for free expression and privacy worldwide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Exploring the Arab Spring===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Exploring the Arab Spring|See main page on Exploring the Arab Spring]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Tuesday, 3:45 to 4:45&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Moderator: John Palfrey&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Featuring: Yochai Benkler, Bruce Etling, Charlie Nesson, Nagla Rizk, and Ethan Zuckerman (tentative)&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What has become known as the “Arab Spring” will serve as a synthesizing case study that will help to weave together the core themes outlined in both the Open Systems/Access and the Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression sessions, with a particular focus on the use of social media and the rise of information control and counter-control activities during recent protests and uprisings in the Middle East and North Africa. In this highly interactive sessions commentators will not only analyze the role of social media, but also consider the different roles and actors that influenced the events, including governments, activists, citizens, and companies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Evening Event: Berkman Center Open House===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Monday, 6:30 to 8:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;See [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/events/2011/09/openhouse this page] for event details&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All participants will be invited to share in an evening at the Berkman Center, where they will be introduced to projects, staff, fellows, and key research themes and activities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wednesday, September 7, 2011==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second day of iLaw will begin with a session focusing on the “[[The Changing Internet: Cybersecurity]].” Building upon the previous day’s discussions, it will discuss the forces at play that may put values such as openness, autonomy, and diversity at risk.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“[[Intellectual Property]],” a conversation led by Terry Fisher and featuring Charlie Nesson, will provide an introduction to another highly contested area of cyberlaw and policy, outlining some of the central IP issues and debates, including copyright, free and fair use, and the public domain. Emerging technological trends such as cloud computing will be explored in the context of IP theory and practice. The afternoon starts with a session on “[[User Innovation]],” led by Eric von Hippel, who will explore innovation through the lens of user creativity and networked models of production and expression. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pillar session on “[[Privacy]],” led by Phil Malone, and featuring Herbert Burkert and John Palfrey will start with a brief history of privacy, discussing the emergence of data protection law in Europe. Against this backdrop, recent global privacy developments and current online controversies – including behavioral targeting, persistent cookies and Do Not Track legislation; the right to be forgotten/ le droit à l’oubli; location privacy; facial recognition; contextual privacy; Google’s Street View service, and Google’s Buzz rollout – will be explored to gain a deeper understanding of the current the state of privacy law and norms– and their possible future. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The day will wrap up with a cross-sectional session that discusses the different approaches to the study of the Internet – including qualitative and quantitative methods – and their respective merits as well as limitations. More fundamentally, the session will explore as to what extent the Internet has led to methodological challenges – for instance in the context of the analysis of large data sets – and innovations, what types of best practices have developed over time, and what the open questions are. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Changing Internet: Cybersecurity===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[The_Changing_Internet:_Cybersecurity|See main page on The Changing Internet: Cybersecurity]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 10:00 to 11:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead:Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This module will draw on central themes from the previous day regarding the unique qualities of the Internet, and the culture and architecture of openness – of protocols, interfaces, and values – that make it a generative space. What are the threats to this generativity? How do forces like consumerism, corporate interest, government and other controls, and cybersecurity put the open Net at risk? Concepts such as cyberwar will be surfaced via case examples, including phenomena such as Stuxnet and Ghostnet; the role of hackers such as AntiSec, LulzSec, and Anonymous will also be considered. This session will conclude with Q&amp;amp;A with the audience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Intellectual Property===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Intellectual Property|See main page on Intellectual Property]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 12:00 to 1:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: William Fisher and Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Led by William Fisher, this pillar will begin with a brief history of key theories and issues related copyright in the Internet space. By examining some of the hard problems and cases that have defined this field over the last decade, this session will explore some of the central questions that characterize current debates, including the wide spectrum of licensing options, the uncertainty about permissible uses associated with creative works, and the implications of cloud computing. Charlie Nesson will highlight questions regarding the public domain, free and fair use, and the need for digital copyright and public domain registries. This foundational pillar will lay the groundwork for two relevant use cases on User Innovation and Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries (which will take place on Thursday morning).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===User Innovation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[User Innovation|See main page on User Innovation]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 2:30 to 3:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads:Eric von Hippel and William Fisher&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This case study build upon the IP session and will explore the creation of unique works, free and fair use, and other related issues through the prism of user innovation. Eric von Hippel will begin the discussion with an overview of new forms of user creativity and production in the online space, facilitated by the proliferation of freely available information online, the ease with which people can communicate digitally, and advances in innovating technology. This overview will segue into a discussion moderated by William Fisher, which will engage von Hippel and others in exploring models that exemplify the benefits of cheap and easy production while also examining the challenges such as copyright issues surrounding the reappropriation and alteration of original sources that may inhibit users’ capacity to innovate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Privacy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Privacy|See main page on Privacy]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 4:00 to 5:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Phil Malone with Herbert Burkert and John Palfrey&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This pillar topic, led by Phil Malone and featuring Herbert Burkert and John Palfrey, will cover a mixture of privacy history, theory, black letter law, regulatory developments and current controversies. Herbert Burkert will offer a multinational perspective of privacy law and policy, outlining the emergence of data protection law in Europe. Against this backdrop, recent global privacy developments, comparative EU vs. US approaches and current online controversies – including behavioral targeting, persistent cookies and Do Not Track legislation; the right to be forgotten/ le droit à l’oubli; location privacy; facial recognition; contextual privacy; Google’s Street View service, and Google’s Buzz rollout – will be explored to gain a deeper understanding of the current the state of privacy law and norms and possible ways forward. Participants Urs Gasser, and Charlie Nesson will add their perspectives on these issues throughout this session.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Study of the Internet: New Methods for New Technologies===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[The Study of the Internet: New Methods for New Technologies|See main page on The Study of the Internet: New Methods for New Technologies]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 5:30 to 6:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Moderator: John Palfrey&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the range of tools, disciplines, and research approaches that we can bring to bear on the study of the Internet and the study of the impact of new technologies on social, political, economic, legal, and other processes in both the online and offline spaces? This session will explore methods of studying the Internet’s societal implications, including empirical analysis, legal frameworks, policy perspectives, sociological surveys, and other methodologies. It will also surface and explore some of the challenges faced by researchers working with big data sets, with a particular focus on issues related to privacy, data security, and other considerations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mid-Point Check-in===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Mid-Point Check-in|See main page on Mid-point Check-in]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 6:30 to 6:45&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The day will end with a mid-point check in with the audience, led by Charlie Nesson. Charlie will solicit comments from audience members and ask for thoughts, suggestions, and recommendations for program improvements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Evening Event: openLAB_03 (Produced by metaLAB (at) Harvard)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Evening_Events#metaLAB_.28at.29_Harvard|See main page on metaLAB (at) Harvard Event]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 7:00 to 9:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metaLAB has invited us to come to their current residence, Art@29 Garden, to share in an evening exhibition to introduce their new digital art project called [http://metalab.harvard.edu/projects/ Augmented Harvard].  It will be a demo debut – sort of a pop-up show of the public installation – that will set the stage for the [[Digital Humanities]] pillar on Thursday morning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;About Augmented Harvard&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the support of the Provostial Funds for Arts and Humanities, the metaLab is in the early stages of developing a multi-year, University-wide installation that is composed of a network of physical artifacts that unlock site-specific experiences. These artifacts, or HUBS, might consist of such devices as thermal receipt printers, hacked Kinects, speakers or programmable LEDs. Participants in the project encounter these HUBs across the campus or through an open-source iPhone/iPad application. Augmented Harvard allows faculty, students, curators and the public to link Harvard exhibitions to other spaces and objects across the University, and to see otherwise invisible features of the campus landscape such as long-ago demolished structures, alternative architectural plans, and inaccessible archives as they rove the campus core. The initial release is planned in conjunction with the fall 2011 exhibitions GSD’s 75+ and Cold War in the Classroom, co-curated by History of Science PhD students Jeremy Blatter and Christopher Phillips, and to be staged at the Special Exhibitions Gallery of the Collection of Historical Scientific Instruments, with additional materials borrowed from the Harvard Film Archive and the Graduate School of Education’s Monroe C. Gutman Library.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Thursday, September 8, 2011==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Day three of iLaw will begin with a follow-up discussion regarding Tuesday’s “Mid-point Check-in,” during which Charlie Nesson will respond to and solicit participant input regarding program improvements. Next, Jeffrey Schnapp and Jesse Shapins will lead a pillar session on “Digital Humanities,” in which they will consider how digital tools and media have affected how knowledge is produced and disseminated. Expert participants will present a selection of lightening talks on innovative, multi-disciplinary approaches to design on the web, presenting projects that draw on the social sciences, knowledge in the arts, storytelling, and cultural and historical memory. This will lead into moderated discussion led by Charlie Nesson on “Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries.” Mary Lee Kennedy, John Palfrey, Terry Fisher, Jeffrey Schnapp and others will discuss the promise and challenge associated with creating and maintaining digital libraries and archives; rights registries and the contours of copyright, public domain, free and fair use will also be examined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following a 30-minute break, Charlie Nesson will provide an introduction to [[Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries|“Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries.”]]  Mary Lee Kennedy, John Palfrey, and others will then highlight the challenges associated with creating and maintaining digital libraries and archives.  During the session, a number of US and European models will be explored, including the Berkman Center’s contributions to the Digital Public Library of American project.  Charlie Nesson will tack on to this a discussion about rights registries and the contours of copyright, public domain, free and fair use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After lunch, Urs Gasser and Herbert Burkert explore [[The Global Internet|“The Global Internet.”]]  This Cross-sectional session looks at the legal challenges that underlie global e-commerce, international dispute resolution, governance, and jurisdiction and the ways in which private entities, policymakers, and individuals have approached these challenges.  Urs and Herbert will explore many of these issues through a series of mini-case studies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next, Yochai Benkler will lead a lecture, followed by a moderated discussion, on [[Cooperation|“Cooperation.”]]  This will focus on how new technologies are being used to harness and fuel collaboration.  In particular, Yochai and several Berkman fellows will highlight emerging collaborative models and their impact on business processes, “smarter” technology, economic reform, and volunteer contributions to research.  Jonathan Zittrain will conclude the day with interactive discussion about [[Mutual Aid|“Mutual Aid,”]] in which he will describe a defense model to make the Internet more redundant and robust by “mirroring as you link.” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mid-point Check-in, Part 2===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Thursday, 10:00 to 10:20&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Mid-Point Check-in|See main page on Mid-point Check-in]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Charlie Nesson will lead this session and bridge his previous session, “suggestion for improvement” by sharing and commenting on the comments and suggestions obtained from audience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Digital Humanities===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Digital Humanities|See main page on Digital Humanities]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Thursday, 10:20 to 12:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Jeffery Schnapp and Jesse Shapins&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This pillar session will address the current state of digital humanities, an umbrella term for new modes of scholarship that emphasize collaborative, trans-disciplinary, computationally-engaged research, teaching, and dissemination.  Digital Humanities is less a unified field than an array of convergent practices that explore a universe in which print is no longer the normative medium in which knowledge is produced and disseminated; digital tools, techniques, and media have expanded traditional concepts of knowledge in the arts, human and social sciences. The session will address fundamental questions such as: How can traditional humanities skills be reshaped in multimedia terms? How and by whom will the contours of cultural and historical memory be defined in the digital era? How might practices of digital storytelling coincide or diverge from oral or print-based storytelling? What is the place of humanites in a networked world?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries|See main page on Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Thursday, 12:30 to 1:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A discussion moderated by Charlie Nesson will focus on opportunities and challenges regarding the creation and use of digital registries, archives, and libraries. Practical use cases such as the Digital Public Library of America (DPLA) in addition to other efforts to create registries for public domain works will be discussed, building upon and further illustrating previous thematic areas and pillar sessions, including copyright, user innovation, and free and fair use. Central considerations and driving questions regarding underlying technical architecture, legal challenges, legal support, and liability will inform the conversation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Global Internet===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[The Global Internet|See main page on The Global Internet]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Thursday, 2:30 to 3:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Urs Gasser and Herbert Burkert&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the global online space, traditional legal frameworks, such as public international law and international private law, come together with new developments, such as evolving Internet law (focused on new regulations addressing international Internet issues), to create different models for, and forms of, digital governance. Processes and structures, such as online dispute resolution systems, Terms of Use policies, and other mechanisms also shape user activity and permissible behavior. Actions and interventions by private actors, NGOs, and international organizations, also exert control, by defining use and activity, permitting or denying access, and facilitating policy-making – all with varying degrees of harmonization, conflict, and evolution. Through a series of case studies, the attributes, influence, and evolution of these mechanisms will be explored in the context of e-commerce, media and free expression, technical and organizational infrastructure, and other values.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cooperation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Cooperation|See main page on Cooperation]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 3:30 to 4:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Yochai Benkler&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This session will center on the ways in which new technologies harness and fuel new forms of cooperation by lowering costs and enabling collaboration that can be transformative for business, government, and society at large. Yochai Benkler will lead a discussion on emerging cooperative models and their impact on business processes, smarter technology, economic reform, volunteer contributions to research, and other benefits. This session will engage several Berkman Fellows who are conducting observational and experimental research on the underlying social, psychological, and evolutionary mechanisms that affect cooperation, collaboration, dispute resolution, trust, and social and economic exchange. Wikipedia will provide an example through which to gain a deeper sense of the breadth and depth of the phenomenon of online cooperation, as well as illuminating the offline cooperation which forms the foundation of our societies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mutual Aid===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Mutual Aid|See main page on Mutual Aid]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Thursday, 5:00 to 6:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Building upon key themes related to cybersecurity and the role of the private sector in ensuring persistent, secure, and consistently available content on the web, this session will focus on possible responses to the current state of computer and network security.  Drawing conceptually from mutual aid treaties among states in the real world, Jonathan Zittrain will outline a defense scheme that would seek to make the current decentralized Web a more robust one.  His&amp;quot; mirror as you link&amp;quot; system of assistance reimagines the technological relationships between sites and services on the Web, and envisions a new socially- and technologically-based system of redundancy and security.  &amp;quot;Today, if one clicks on a link to an external site and that site is unavailable – perhaps attacked with a classic denial-of-service – there is no alternative to accessing it. Mirror-as-you-link would change that.  Participating Web server administrators could make it so that for some or all of the links to external sites that they offer on their pages, the contents of the faraway sites would be saved (“cached”). They would do this only for sites that wish it to be done, and then only for sites that also perform such mirroring themselves. Then, when one site goes down, a Web surfer clicking on a link to get there can return to the referring site and ask for a copy of whatever he or she is missing since the destination site is down.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Evening Event(s)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Evening Events|See main page on Evening Events for more information and Sign-up Sheet]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be offering a selection of activities led by Berkman Directors, fellows and other interested community members.&lt;br /&gt;
Participants are invited to pitch ideas and to sign up on the wiki for Food for Thought dinners, Poker with Charlie Nesson, and other activities at area restaurants or at the Berkman Center. Please see the Wiki for additional details.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Friday, September 9, 2011==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minds for Sale===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Minds for Sale|See main page on Minds for Sale]]&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Friday, 10:00-11:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this presentation, Jonathan Zittrain will outline his current work on the concepts of ubiquitous&lt;br /&gt;
human computing and distributed work. Encompassing phenomena from gamification,&lt;br /&gt;
CAPCHAs and Mechanical Turk to the X Prize, he will examine the consequences of&lt;br /&gt;
crowdsourcing, economically, legally and socially, review the development and present state of&lt;br /&gt;
the practice, and invite the audience to think ahead to its possible futures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interoperability===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Interoperability|See main page on Interoperability]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Friday, 11:30 – 1:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Urs Gasser, with John Palfrey&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This synthesizing session will examine interoperability and its role in driving innovation in the ICT environment. Urs Gasser and John Palfrey -- who recently completed a book on the topic (slated for release in February 2012) -- will outline a conceptual framework for thinking about interoperability, its driving forces and inhibitors, how it can best be achieved, and why. They will touch on a number of current usecases where interoperability plays a decisive role, including, cloud computing, the Smart Grid, and electronic health records. How do we define interoperability and prioritize it as an important policy goal? What do consumers, companies, and governments stand to gain (or lose) from interoperability or lack thereof? How do concerns related to lack of diversity, or diminished privacy and security interact with interoperability? How are optimal levels of interoperability achieved through law, policy, technology, and innovations in the marketplace?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Student Presentations/Reaction Statements/Proposals===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Student_Projects#Option_C._Final_Presentation:_Lightning_Talk.2C_Provocation.2C_Response_Statement|See &amp;quot;Option C&amp;quot; on the main page for Student Projects]]&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Friday, 2:00-3:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This module will be designed by students and lightly moderated by Charlie Nesson. 5-10 minute reflections might be a take on the “Future of the Internet” discussion, offer central issues for consideration or faculty response, or provide a reaction statement on key elements of the program. Other options include providing a deeper dive into a particular module or interesting case for further study, etc. The focus here would be on developing a short presentation, to be followed by brief Q&amp;amp;A with audience members.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Future of the Internet===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[The Future of the Internet|See main page on The Future of the Internet]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Friday, 4:00 to 5:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a moderated discussion hosted by Jonathan Zittrain, Berkman Directors and Faculty Leads will be invited to reflect on the central themes emerging from the previous days, with a particular focus on the Internet’s future. Participants will engage one another regarding the next “big thing” – anticipated developments, opportunities, emerging issues, and risks within their particular area of research or interest. Foundational to the discussion will be the future of the Internet&#039;s generativity, including innovative and creative outputs and participatory input (the opportunity to connect with other people, work with them, and express oneself). Concerns regarding security, invasions of privacy, and other emerging issues may threaten that generative infrastructure; what are the potential costs? What are the visionary solutions?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Student_Projects&amp;diff=1368</id>
		<title>Student Projects</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Student_Projects&amp;diff=1368"/>
		<updated>2011-08-25T18:26:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Option A. Session Participation and In the Moment Technologies */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{TOCright}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All HLS students seeking credit for the iLaw Program must complete a final project. We’d developed four options, which are listed below and include written, oral, participatory, or video projects. All students are encouraged, although not required, to work in teams. Please let us know what assignment you choose via the &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Talk:Student_Projects|sign-up page]]&#039;&#039;&#039; or by emailing [mailto:ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu| ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu] by &#039;&#039;&#039;Friday, September 2nd&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please take care in noting the deadlines or respective timeframes for completing projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More information regarding the projects will be made available as we approach September 6th.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option A. Session Participation and In the Moment Technologies==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deep dialogue, hard questions and genuine interactivity are fundamental to the success and mode of the iLaw Program. Participants will be invited to engage with sessions in diverse ways throughout the program—from the wiki to the question tool, open Q&amp;amp;A, structured interposals, open space and invited conversation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These participants will help us to embed uncertainty and dynamic interplay in the sessions, and help to create genuine opportunities to challenge and test ideas. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They will:&lt;br /&gt;
* Choose a &#039;&#039;&#039;session of interest&#039;&#039;&#039;, along with up to 5 other students. &lt;br /&gt;
* During the session, you and your team will take charge of the question tool, monitor back channels and help identify key questions and priority issues. You will help the session leader to integrate them into the Q&amp;amp;A periods and other parts of the discussion. You may also document some questions that might be useful during the final “Future of the Internet” session on Friday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option B. Audio/Video Project==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For students with some knowledge/experience with audio/video production, we would be happy to have you record some portion of the proceedings (including interviews with key commentators, session leads and other contributors) and create a multi-media output. This might be a record of the program overall, a deeper dive into a certain topic, etc. Berkman staff may provide some (modest) production support. &#039;&#039;&#039;All final work products are due by the Friday, October 7th&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option C. Final Presentation: Lightning Talk, Provocation, Response Statement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Program_Schedule#Student_Presentations.2FReaction_Statements.2FProposals|2:00-3:30 PM session on Friday afternoon]] is allotted for student and participant presentations. Audience members who sign up will have 5-10 minutes to provide substantive reflections on the iLaw sessions and the program overall, or offer central issues for the faculty to answer/consider during the “Future of the Internet” discussion. They might also provide a deeper dive into a particular module or interesting case for further study, etc. The focus here would be on developing a short and creative presentation or statement, to be followed by brief and lightly moderated Q&amp;amp;A with the broader audience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Option D. Written Output: Post-iLaw Reflections==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the wake of the program, and in particular, in light of the “Future of the Internet session,” you will provide a reaction statement or op-ed style piece--no longer than 900 words—that examines some of the hard problems at the core of the developing online space. You might choose to reflect on the evolution of traditional concepts such as privacy, security, and liberty, and their evolution in the online space, or to consider emerging issues that may confirm or challenge some of the core themes that were touched on in our discussion. You could also make the case for other themes, issues, or hard questions that require more attention in future iLaws. The best pieces will be posted to the iLaw wiki.  &#039;&#039;&#039;All final work products are due by the Friday, October 7th&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Student_Projects|Sign-up Page]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=1364</id>
		<title>Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=1364"/>
		<updated>2011-08-25T18:05:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{TOCright}}&lt;br /&gt;
===Welcome to the iLaw 2011 Wiki!===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=3 style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFFCC;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Important Program Information&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| &lt;br /&gt;
The [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society] is very pleased to offer the [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw iLaw 2011 Program], which will take place &#039;&#039;&#039;Tuesday, September 6th - Friday, September 9th&#039;&#039;&#039;.  This wiki will serve as a repository for information and materials related to iLaw 2011.  Here, you will find the [[Program Schedule|iLaw Program Schedule]], information about [[Main Page#Program Materials|individual program sessions]], [[Main Page#Program Materials|required and recommended reading assignments]], [[Final Student Projects|final student projects]], and [[Program Logistics]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;iLaw 2011 will be video recorded.&#039;&#039;&#039;  All audience members, presenters, and other participants are required to sign a consent and release form (per the University&#039;s policy) prior to attending iLaw 2011.  For more information, please visit [[Program_Logistics#Audio and Video Waivers| Audio and Video Waivers]].  If you do not wish to be recorded please email us at ilaw@cyber.law.harvard.edu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Please note that iLaw 2011 is a Harvard Law School class that is closed to the public.&#039;&#039;&#039;  We received an enormous amount of interest in this year&#039;s program.  For this reason, we ask that all registered participants commit to attending all sessions on all days -- the evening events, however, are optional. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from the [[Evening Events]], all program sessions will take place in the &amp;quot;Austin North&amp;quot; room of [[Program_Logistics#Map| Austin Hall]].&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Program Schedule==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Program Schedule|See main page on Program Schedule]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Ilawsidebar2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear|left}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Program Materials==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
The iLaw program features a mixture of interactive lectures, roundtable-style and moderated discussions lead by Harvard Law School faculty members, Berkman Center researchers, fellows, and special guests.  The sessions, which have been designed to expose students and audience members to the diverse nature of iLaw, will cover three types of substantive topical areas: (1) &amp;quot;Thematic Pillars&amp;quot; (the foundational topics and theories of iLaw), topics, (2) &amp;quot;Cross-sectional Themes&amp;quot; (which explore overlapping themes below the foundational surface), and (3) Case Studies (cases and examples of themes in practice).  Below are links to pages on this wiki categorized by topical area.  These pages contain session overviews and links to the required reading assignments, recommended readings, and related Cross-sectional and Case Study sessions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Note to HLS students:&#039;&#039;&#039; We’ve included a rather large number of readings on the wiki for each session. Although some of the session readings are described as “required,” faculty members and session leaders do not wish these assignments to be onerous. To this end, students will not be expected to have &#039;&#039;closely&#039;&#039; read all of the required materials prior to each session; however, students should at least familiarize themselves with the concepts contained therein. Additional “recommended” readings are included for those who wish to do a deeper dive into a particular topic area; we also hope these materials will also be useful for future research and students assignments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each day will end with an optional evening event.  These events will offer unique opportunities to interact with Berkman Center and Harvard faculty, staff, fellows, and members of the community. Students and audience members are strongly encouraged to attend these events and learn more about the Berkman Center and it&#039;s diverse, enthusiastic community.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more information about the schedule or logistics, please consult the [[Program Schedule]] and [[Program Logistics]] pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Pillar Themes of iLaw===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Open Systems/Access]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[The Changing Internet: Cybersecurity]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Intellectual Property]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Cooperation]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Privacy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Digital Humanities]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-sectional Themes of iLaw===&lt;br /&gt;
[[The History of the Internet]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[The Study of the Internet: New Methods for New Technologies]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[The Global Internet]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Interoperability]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[The Future of the Internet]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Case Studies===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Exploring the Arab Spring]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User Innovation]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Mutual Aid]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Minds for Sale]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Audio/Video Recording Consent Forms (Notice)===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Program Logistics#Audio and Video Recording Consent|See page on Audio and Video Recording Consent]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will require program attendees to sign a consent form, or opt-out of video recording, at registration on Tuesday, prior to the first session.  Please see the above link for more information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Student Projects (Required)===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Student Projects|See main page on Final Student Projects]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===How to Participate at iLaw 2011===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[How To Participate at iLaw|See main page on iLaw Participation]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience members are encouraged to participate at iLaw.  For more information on how to interact with members during sessions, see the above link.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Evening Events]] (Optional)==&lt;br /&gt;
* Monday: [[Evening_Events#Drinks_at_John_Harvard&#039;s|Drinks at John Harvard&#039;s Brew House]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Tuesday: [[Evening_Events#Berkman_Center_Open_House|Berkman Center Open House]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wednesday: [[Evening_Events#metaLAB_.28at.29_Harvard|metaLAB (at) Harvard]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Thursday: [[Evening_Events#Thursday_Evening_with_Berkman_Faculty|Potential Thursday Evening Events]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Videos From Previous iLaw Programs==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[iLaw Videos|See main page on iLaw Videos]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are worth checking out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Logistics==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Program_Logistics|See main page on Program Logistics]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear|right}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==About the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/ Berkman Center Website]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people Berkman Center Directors, Faculty, Fellows, Staff, and Community]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/teaching/cyberlawclinic Information about the Berkman Center Cyberlaw Clinic]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://crcs.seas.harvard.edu/ Information about Harvard&#039;s Center for Research on Computation and Society (CRCS)]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Interoperability&amp;diff=1335</id>
		<title>Interoperability</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Interoperability&amp;diff=1335"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T23:32:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Overview */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Friday, 11:30am-1:00pm&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Format: Lecture with audience participation&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/ugasser Urs Gasser] with [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jpalfrey John Palfrey]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This synthesizing session will examine interoperability and its role in driving innovation in the ICT environment. Urs Gasser and John Palfrey--who recently completed a book on the topic (slated for release in February 2012)--will outline a conceptual framework for thinking about interoperability, its driving forces and inhibitors, how it can best be achieved, and why. They will touch on a number of current usecases where interoperability plays a decisive role, including, cloud computing, the Smart Grid, and electronic health records. John and Urs will also consider a number of questions: What is interoperability? What do consumers, companies, and governments stand to gain (or lose) from interoperability or lack thereof? How do concerns related to lack of diversity, or diminished privacy and security interact with interoperability? How are optimal levels of interoperability achieved through law, policy, technology, and innovations in the marketplace?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Required Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
* Urs Gasser and John Palfrey, [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/interop/ Breaking Down Digital Barriers]; &#039;&#039;please select and read one of the featured case studies.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Urs Gasser and John Palfrey, [http://ssrn.com/abstract=1033226 “Breaking Down Digital Barriers: When and How ICT Interoperability Drives Innovation,”] Berkman Center Research Publication No. 2007-8 (2007).&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cross-Sectional Themes]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Program_Schedule&amp;diff=1334</id>
		<title>Program Schedule</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Program_Schedule&amp;diff=1334"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T23:31:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Interoperability */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Master Program Schedule==&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=1 align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|KEY&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 70px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|width=&amp;quot;175&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;Pillar Theme Sessions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|width=&amp;quot;175&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#F79646;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;Cross-Sectional Theme Sessions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|width=&amp;quot;175&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#4F81BD;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;Case Studies&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable collapsible autocollapse&amp;quot; border = &amp;quot;1&amp;quot;; align = center&lt;br /&gt;
|+&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;DRAFT Program Agenda&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
! width=&amp;quot;200&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Monday - Sept. 5&lt;br /&gt;
! width=&amp;quot;200&amp;quot;|[[Program_Schedule#Tuesday.2C_September_6.2C_2011|Tuesday - Sept. 6]]&lt;br /&gt;
! width=&amp;quot;200&amp;quot;|[[Program_Schedule#Wednesday.2C_September_7.2C_2011|Wednesday - Sept. 7]]&lt;br /&gt;
! width=&amp;quot;200&amp;quot;|[[Program_Schedule#Thursday.2C_September_8.2C_2011|Thursday - Sept. 8]]&lt;br /&gt;
! width=&amp;quot;200&amp;quot;|[[Program_Schedule#Friday.2C_September_9.2C_2011|Friday - Sept. 9]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|9:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;	style=&amp;quot;background-color:#BFBFBF;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;Welcoming Remarks&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
9:00 to 9:15&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: William Fisher and Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|9:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#F79646;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[The History of the Internet]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
9:15 to 11:15&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Jonathan Zittrain and Lawrence Lessig* (TBC)&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|10:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[The Changing Internet: Cybersecurity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
10:00 to 11:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#CCC0DA;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;*[[Mid-Point Check-in]]*&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
Part 2&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
10:00 to 10:20&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#4F81BD;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Minds for Sale]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
10:00 to 11:00&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|10:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Digital Humanities]]&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
10:20 to 12:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Jeffrey Schnapp and Jesse Shapins&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|11:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|15-minute Break&lt;br /&gt;
11:15 to 11:30&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|30-minute Break&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|11:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Open Systems/Access]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
11:30 to 1:00&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Yochai Benkler&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|30-minute break&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#F79646;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Interoperability]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
11:30 to 1:00&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: John Palfrey and Urs Gasser&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|12:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Intellectual Property]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
12:00 to 1:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: William Fisher and Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|30-minute break&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|12:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#4F81BD;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
12:30 to 1:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Moderator: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|1:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Lunch&lt;br /&gt;
1:00 to 2:00&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Lunch&lt;br /&gt;
1:00 to 2:00&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|1:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Lunch&lt;br /&gt;
1:30 to 2:30&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Lunch&lt;br /&gt;
1:30 to 2:30&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|2:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression|Online Liberty and FOE]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
2:00 to 3:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: John Palfrey&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#9BBB59;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Student_Projects#Option_C._Final_Presentation:_Lightning_Talk.2C_Provocation.2C_Response_Statement|Student Questions and Reactions for Faculty-Leads]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
2:00 to 3:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|2:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#4F81BD;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[User Innovation]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
2:30 to 3:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Eric von Hippel and William Fisher&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#F79646;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[The Global Internet]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
1:30 to 2:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Urs Gasser and Herbert Burkert&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|3:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|3:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|15-minute break&lt;br /&gt;
3:30 to 3:45&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|30-minute break&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Cooperation]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
3:30 to 4:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Yochai Benkler&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|15-minute break&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|4:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#4F81BD;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Exploring the Arab Spring]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
3:45 to 4:45&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: John Palfrey, Yochai Benkler, Charlie Nesson, and others&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Privacy]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
4:00 to 5:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: John Palfrey, Herbert Burkert, Phil Malone&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#F79646;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[The Future of the Internet]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
4:00 to 5:00&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|4:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|30-minute break&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|5:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#4F81BD;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Mutual Aid]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
5:00 to 6:00&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#DDD9C3;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;Final BBQ&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
5:00 to 7:00&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|5:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#F79646;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[The Study of the Internet: New Methods for New Technologies]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
5:00 to 6:00&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Moderator: John Palfrey&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|6:00&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#DDD9C3;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Evening_Events#Drinks_at_John_Harvard&#039;s|Drinks at John Harvard&#039;s Brew House]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
6:00 to 8:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|6:30&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#DDD9C3;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Evening_Events#Berkman_Center_Open_House|Berkman Center Open House]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
6:30 to 8:30&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#CCC0DA;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;*[[Mid-Point Check-in]]*&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
Part 1&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
6:30 to 6:45&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|7:00&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#DDD9C3;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Evening_Events#metaLAB_.28at.29_Harvard|metaLAB (at) Harvard Event]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
7:00 to 9:00&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#DDD9C3;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Evening_Events#Thursday_Evening_with_Berkman_Faculty|Evening with Berkman Faculty]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
7:00 to 9:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|7:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|8:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|8:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|9:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==iLaw 2011 Program Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/archive/ last iLaw conference] was held nearly five years ago, the debates at the intersection of technology, law, and policy have continued to evolve. The introduction of new technologies – and new uses of old technologies – raise a broad range of problems to explore. To name a few examples, the intervening years have seen the growth of social networking tools; Facebook has gained more than 750 million users worldwide and has found itself at the center of privacy debates. Information technologies have played an unprecedented role in recent protests in the Middle East and North Africa, at times in tension with US foreign policy and export controls. In the US, government regulators and major ISPs continue to struggle with finding the right balance points for network governance and regulatory authority. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Growing Internet usage trends, disruptive technologies, increased efforts by governments and private entities to control the online space continue to reshape the cyber landscape. These issues, alongside the actors who provide the technologies and the users who engage with them, are at the center of many global policy debates. iLaw 2011 will be a unique opportunity to reexamine these areas of inquiry and core questions while engaging with the new and emerging issues and thorny debates that are constantly reshaping the field. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2011 iLaw Program is designed to take participants through the evolution of information technologies and the Internet, including their past, present, and future. Each module will provide a bridge to the past, beginning with a brief sketch of how a particular issue has evolved over the course of recent decades, both from an intellectual history perspective and via changes in policy, practice, and technology. Faculty and selected guests will use this foundation to explore how technical, social, legal, economic, and policy trends and debates have evolved over time, and identify the primary questions and issues that currently define the online space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Note on Format and Mode===&lt;br /&gt;
Deep dialogue, hard questions and genuine interactivity are fundamental to the success and mode of iLaw. Participants will be invited to engage with sessions in diverse ways throughout the program–from the wiki to the question tool, open Q&amp;amp;A, structured interposals, open space, and invited conversation. Although we expect close to 200 participants, we are committed to genuine interactivity throughout the event; we encourage active engagement from all participants. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Driving Questions from Faculty===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The questions posed below by Berkman Faculty members reflect the fundamental inquiries for participants to consider during the 2011 iLaw Program:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Yochai Benkler&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* How do we systematize cooperative human systems design, now that we all know that online collaboration is a critical component of the networked information economy?&lt;br /&gt;
* How do we integrate power into our understanding of networked society? What are the limits of public action, and what are the limits of decentralized action, given power in the market, the state, real-world society and the network?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;William Fisher&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* To what extent, if any, is legal protection for creative works necessary either to stimulate creativity or to ensure that creators are treated fairly? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Suppose it were to be agreed among us that when the founders wrote the Progress clause of our constitution, the exclusive right they were granting to publishers of creative works was the legal right to stop other publishers from selling copies of their works. Can you tell a coherent legal story about how we got from there to here?&lt;br /&gt;
* Viewed from the vantage of equal citizens in a public domain of common (totally usable) knowledge, when did We the People surrender the liberty of privately copying works of any kind?  That is to say, when was this liberty taken from us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
* How do we reconcile welcome contributions from all corners with poisoned apples?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is the Internet doing to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Driving Questions from Participants and Students===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What questions and concerns are you grappling with in the this field? Where does the future take us?  Please add your own driving questions here: [[Talk:Program Schedule#Driving Questions|Driving Questions]].  As this page is populated, questions will be added below.  Alternatively, add your driving questions to [[How To Participate at iLaw|The Question Tool]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Monday, September 5, 2011==&lt;br /&gt;
===Drinks at John Harvard&#039;s Brew House===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Monday, 6:00 to 8:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Evening_Events#Drinks_at_John_Harvard&#039;s|See main page on Drinks at John Harvard&#039;s]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All participants are invited to join us at John Harvard&#039;s Brew House in Harvard Square for an optional, informal gathering and cash bar with Berkman Community members and fellow participants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tuesday, September 6, 2011==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After introductions led by Terry Fisher and Jonathan Zittrain, the day will begin with [[The History of the Internet]], during which Jonathan Zittrain will introduce and discuss the “generative framework” of the Net, outlining the unique characteristics of Internet architecture that were critical to its success and continued evolution. Yochai Benkler will pick up related themes of openness, access, and distribution and their implications for user choice and online freedom in “[[Open Systems/Access]],” during which WikiLeaks will be featured as a case to examine related issues.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After lunch, John Palfrey will lead “[[Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression]],” which will take a focused look at the issues surrounding online freedom and the different types of control deployed by governments, users, companies, and other actors through a series of illustrative examples presented by audience members. Following this, a moderated discussion featuring selected faculty and guests will focus on the role of new technologies during recent protests in the Middle East and North Africa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the evening, all participant and audience members are invited to attend the Berkman Center’s Open House.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The History of the Internet===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[The History of the Internet|See main page on The History of the Internet]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Tuesday, 9:15 to 11:15&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Jonathan Zittrain with Larry Lessig&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The day will begin with a brief history of the Net and an introduction to the theory of generativity as a framework to understand the Internet’s disruptive power. Jonathan Zittrain’s opening lecture will focus on the Internet’s technical evolution and underlying architecture; the values that informed its early development, including principles related to consensus, openness, and non-discrimination; and the range of players, from users to computer scientists, governments and other bodies, and corporations, who engaged in the various activities, controls, and other arrangements that formed the initial distributed digital governance of the online space.  What characteristics make the evolution of the Internet so unique? What are the issues and organizations that characterize online governance and policy-making today?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Open Systems/Access===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Open Systems/Access|See main page on Open Systems/Access]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Tuesday, 11:30 to 1:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Yochai Benkler&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This session will discuss the enormous benefits of open systems and address the ways in which openness at all layers of the networked environment can be achieved. Yochai Benkler will present a set of examples in which physical access, social production of content, and other forms of user creation and collaboration play a powerful role in supporting freedom and new forms of innovation. Skype will provide an illustrative usecase through which to explore these topics. From these examples, he will draw out how proprietary networks and standards (like mobile networks) differ from open ones (like TCP/IP, competitive infrastructure, free software, open standards, and free culture/content-based models). The case of WikiLeaks will provide a lens through which to view questions related to openness, access, and content distribution at different layers of the network.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression|See main page on Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Tuesday, 2:00 to 3:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: John Palfrey&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Led by John Palfrey, this session will focus on online liberty and freedom of express and expand on some of the core themes introduced in the preceding sessions by providing an overview of the different phases of content regulation on the Internet. It will engage the audience with questions regarding the ways in which different political contexts shape different methods of and motivations for government control, and how various approaches in different countries inform each other. Respondents will be invited to reflect on key issues, including different forms of government controls and online speech regulation: China (a mix of “traditional” technical filtering with legal and informal regulatory mechanisms); the Arab Spring (just-in-time filtering combined with the arrest and intimidation of bloggers and digital activists); Russia (mostly non-technical, second and third generation controls rather than technical filtering); and US/Western Europe (mostly focused on child pornography and the illegal spread of copyrighted content). They will also grapple with hard questions related the role of intermediaries in response to government requests for user information, content removal or account deactivation and the implications of the current phase of control for free expression and privacy worldwide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Exploring the Arab Spring===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Exploring the Arab Spring|See main page on Exploring the Arab Spring]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Tuesday, 3:45 to 4:45&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Moderator: John Palfrey&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Featuring: Yochai Benkler, Bruce Etling, Charlie Nesson, Nagla Rizk, and Ethan Zuckerman (tentative)&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What has become known as the “Arab Spring” will serve as a synthesizing case study that will help to weave together the core themes outlined in both the Open Systems/Access and the Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression sessions, with a particular focus on the use of social media and the rise of information control and counter-control activities during recent protests and uprisings in the Middle East and North Africa. In this highly interactive sessions commentators will not only analyze the role of social media, but also consider the different roles and actors that influenced the events, including governments, activists, citizens, and companies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Evening Event: Berkman Center Open House===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Monday, 6:30 to 8:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;See [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/events/2011/09/openhouse this page] for event details&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All participants will be invited to share in an evening at the Berkman Center, where they will be introduced to projects, staff, fellows, and key research themes and activities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wednesday, September 7, 2011==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second day of iLaw will begin with a session focusing on the “[[The Changing Internet: Cybersecurity]].” Building upon the previous day’s discussions, it will discuss the forces at play that may put values such as openness, autonomy, and diversity at risk. In conversation with Jonathan Zittrain, Jack Goldsmith will help to kick off the discussion by focusing on one of the key pressure points where values collide: cybersecurity issues. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“[[Intellectual Property]],” a conversation led by Terry Fisher and featuring Charlie Nesson, will provide an introduction to another highly contested area of cyberlaw and policy, outlining some of the central IP issues and debates, including copyright, free and fair use, and the public domain. Emerging technological trends such as cloud computing will be explored in the context of IP theory and practice. The afternoon starts with a session on “[[User Innovation]],” led by Eric von Hippel, who will explore innovation through the lens of user creativity and networked models of production and expression. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pillar session on “[[Privacy]],” led by Phil Malone, and featuring Herbert Burkert and John Palfrey will start with a brief history of privacy, discussing the emergence of data protection law in Europe. Against this backdrop, recent global privacy developments and current online controversies – including behavioral targeting, persistent cookies and Do Not Track legislation; the right to be forgotten/ le droit à l’oubli; location privacy; facial recognition; contextual privacy; Google’s Street View service, and Google’s Buzz rollout – will be explored to gain a deeper understanding of the current the state of privacy law and norms– and their possible future. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The day will wrap up with a cross-sectional session that discusses the different approaches to the study of the Internet – including qualitative and quantitative methods – and their respective merits as well as limitations. More fundamentally, the session will explore as to what extent the Internet has led to methodological challenges – for instance in the context of the analysis of large data sets – and innovations, what types of best practices have developed over time, and what the open questions are. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Changing Internet: Cybersecurity===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[The Changing Internet:Cybersecurity|See main page on The Changing Internet: Cybersecurity]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 10:00 to 11:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead:Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This module will draw on central themes from the previous day regarding the unique qualities of the Internet, and the culture and architecture of openness – of protocols, interfaces, and values – that make it a generative space. What are the threats to this generativity? How do forces like consumerism, corporate interest, government and other controls, and cybersecurity put the open Net at risk? Concepts such as cyberwar will be surfaced via case examples, including phenomena such as Stuxnet and Ghostnet; the role of hackers such as AntiSec, LulzSec, and Anonymous will also be considered. This session will conclude with Q&amp;amp;A with the audience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Intellectual Property===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Intellectual Property|See main page on Intellectual Property]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 12:00 to 1:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: William Fisher and Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Led by William Fisher, this pillar will begin with a brief history of key theories and issues related copyright in the Internet space. By examining some of the hard problems and cases that have defined this field over the last decade, this session will explore some of the central questions that characterize current debates, including the wide spectrum of licensing options, the uncertainty about permissible uses associated with creative works, and the implications of cloud computing. Charlie Nesson will highlight questions regarding the public domain, free and fair use, and the need for digital copyright and public domain registries. This foundational pillar will lay the groundwork for two relevant use cases on User Innovation and Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries (which will take place on Thursday morning).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===User Innovation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[User Innovation|See main page on User Innovation]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 2:30 to 3:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads:Eric von Hippel and William Fisher&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This case study build upon the IP session and will explore the creation of unique works, free and fair use, and other related issues through the prism of user innovation. Eric von Hippel will begin the discussion with an overview of new forms of user creativity and production in the online space, facilitated by the proliferation of freely available information online, the ease with which people can communicate digitally, and advances in innovating technology. This overview will segue into a discussion moderated by William Fisher, which will engage von Hippel and others in exploring models that exemplify the benefits of cheap and easy production while also examining the challenges such as copyright issues surrounding the reappropriation and alteration of original sources that may inhibit users’ capacity to innovate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Privacy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Privacy|See main page on Privacy]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 4:00 to 5:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Phil Malone with Herbert Burkert and John Palfrey&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This pillar topic, led by Phil Malone and featuring Herbert Burkert and John Palfrey, will cover a mixture of privacy history, theory, black letter law, regulatory developments and current controversies. Herbert Burkert will offer a multinational perspective of privacy law and policy, outlining the emergence of data protection law in Europe. Against this backdrop, recent global privacy developments, comparative EU vs. US approaches and current online controversies – including behavioral targeting, persistent cookies and Do Not Track legislation; the right to be forgotten/ le droit à l’oubli; location privacy; facial recognition; contextual privacy; Google’s Street View service, and Google’s Buzz rollout – will be explored to gain a deeper understanding of the current the state of privacy law and norms and possible ways forward. Participants Urs Gasser, and Charlie Nesson will add their perspectives on these issues throughout this session.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Study of the Internet: New Methods for New Technologies===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[The Study of the Internet: New Methods for New Technologies|See main page on The Study of the Internet: New Methods for New Technologies]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 5:30 to 6:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Moderator: John Palfrey&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the range of tools, disciplines, and research approaches that we can bring to bear on the study of the Internet and the study of the impact of new technologies on social, political, economic, legal, and other processes in both the online and offline spaces? This session will explore methods of studying the Internet’s societal implications, including empirical analysis, legal frameworks, policy perspectives, sociological surveys, and other methodologies. It will also surface and explore some of the challenges faced by researchers working with big data sets, with a particular focus on issues related to privacy, data security, and other considerations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mid-Point Check-in===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Mid-Point Check-in|See main page on Mid-point Check-in]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 6:30 to 6:45&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The day will end with a mid-point check in with the audience, led by Charlie Nesson. Charlie will solicit comments from audience members and ask for thoughts, suggestions, and recommendations for program improvements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Evening Event: metaLAB (at) Harvard===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Evening_Events#metaLAB_.28at.29_Harvard|See main page on metaLAB (at) Harvard Event]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 7:00 to 9:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metaLAB has invited us to come to their current residence, Art@29 Garden, to share in an evening exhibition to introduce their new digital art project called [http://metalab.harvard.edu/projects/ Augmented Harvard].  It will be a demo debut – sort of a pop-up show of the public installation – that will set the stage for the [[Digital Humanities]] pillar on Thursday morning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;About Augmented Harvard&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the support of the Provostial Funds for Arts and Humanities, the metaLab is in the early stages of developing a multi-year, University-wide installation that is composed of a network of physical artifacts that unlock site-specific experiences. These artifacts, or HUBS, might consist of such devices as thermal receipt printers, hacked Kinects, speakers or programmable LEDs. Participants in the project encounter these HUBs across the campus or through an open-source iPhone/iPad application. Augmented Harvard allows faculty, students, curators and the public to link Harvard exhibitions to other spaces and objects across the University, and to see otherwise invisible features of the campus landscape such as long-ago demolished structures, alternative architectural plans, and inaccessible archives as they rove the campus core. The initial release is planned in conjunction with the fall 2011 exhibitions GSD’s 75+ and Cold War in the Classroom, co-curated by History of Science PhD students Jeremy Blatter and Christopher Phillips, and to be staged at the Special Exhibitions Gallery of the Collection of Historical Scientific Instruments, with additional materials borrowed from the Harvard Film Archive and the Graduate School of Education’s Monroe C. Gutman Library.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Thursday, September 8, 2011==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Day three of iLaw will begin with a follow-up discussion regarding Tuesday’s “Mid-point Check-in,” during which Charlie Nesson will respond to and solicit participant input regarding program improvements. Next, Jeffrey Schnapp and Jesse Shapins will lead a pillar session on “Digital Humanities,” in which they will consider how digital tools and media have affected how knowledge is produced and disseminated. Expert participants will present a selection of lightening talks on innovative, multi-disciplinary approaches to design on the web, presenting projects that draw on the social sciences, knowledge in the arts, storytelling, and cultural and historical memory. This will lead into moderated discussion led by Charlie Nesson on “Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries.” Mary Lee Kennedy, John Palfrey, Terry Fisher, Jeffrey Schnapp and others will discuss the promise and challenge associated with creating and maintaining digital libraries and archives; rights registries and the contours of copyright, public domain, free and fair use will also be examined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following a 30-minute break, Charlie Nesson will provide an introduction to [[Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries|“Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries.”]]  Mary Lee Kennedy, John Palfrey, and others will then highlight the challenges associated with creating and maintaining digital libraries and archives.  During the session, a number of US and European models will be explored, including the Berkman Center’s contributions to the Digital Public Library of American project.  Charlie Nesson will tack on to this a discussion about rights registries and the contours of copyright, public domain, free and fair use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After lunch, Urs Gasser and Herbert Burkert explore [[The Global Internet|“The Global Internet.”]]  This Cross-sectional session looks at the legal challenges that underlie global e-commerce, international dispute resolution, governance, and jurisdiction and the ways in which private entities, policymakers, and individuals have approached these challenges.  Urs and Herbert will explore many of these issues through a series of mini-case studies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next, Yochai Benkler will lead a lecture, followed by a moderated discussion, on [[Cooperation|“Cooperation.”]]  This will focus on how new technologies are being used to harness and fuel collaboration.  In particular, Yochai and several Berkman fellows will highlight emerging collaborative models and their impact on business processes, “smarter” technology, economic reform, and volunteer contributions to research.  Jonathan Zittrain will conclude the day with interactive discussion about [[Mutual Aid|“Mutual Aid,”]] in which he will describe a defense model to make the Internet more redundant and robust by “mirroring as you link.” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mid-point Check-in, Part 2===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Thursday, 10:00 to 10:20&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Mid-Point Check-in|See main page on Mid-point Check-in]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Charlie Nesson will lead this session and bridge his previous session, “suggestion for improvement” by sharing and commenting on the comments and suggestions obtained from audience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Digital Humanities===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Digital Humanities|See main page on Digital Humanities]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Thursday, 10:20 to 12:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Jeffery Schnapp and Jesse Shapins&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This pillar session will address the current state of digital humanities, an umbrella term for new modes of scholarship that emphasize collaborative, trans-disciplinary, computationally-engaged research, teaching, and dissemination.  Digital Humanities is less a unified field than an array of convergent practices that explore a universe in which print is no longer the normative medium in which knowledge is produced and disseminated; digital tools, techniques, and media have expanded traditional concepts of knowledge in the arts, human and social sciences. The session will address fundamental questions such as: How can traditional humanities skills be reshaped in multimedia terms? How and by whom will the contours of cultural and historical memory be defined in the digital era? How might practices of digital storytelling coincide or diverge from oral or print-based storytelling? What is the place of humanites in a networked world?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries|See main page on Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Thursday, 12:30 to 1:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A discussion moderated by Charlie Nesson will focus on opportunities and challenges regarding the creation and use of digital registries, archives, and libraries. Practical use cases such as the Digital Public Library of America (DPLA) in addition to other efforts to create registries for public domain works will be discussed, building upon and further illustrating previous thematic areas and pillar sessions, including copyright, user innovation, and free and fair use. Central considerations and driving questions regarding underlying technical architecture, legal challenges, legal support, and liability will inform the conversation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Global Internet===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[The Global Internet|See main page on The Global Internet]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Thursday, 2:30 to 3:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Urs Gasser and Herbert Burkert&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the global online space, traditional legal frameworks, such as public international law and international private law, come together with new developments, such as evolving Internet law (focused on new regulations addressing international Internet issues), to create different models for, and forms of, digital governance. Processes and structures, such as online dispute resolution systems, Terms of Use policies, and other mechanisms also shape user activity and permissible behavior. Actions and interventions by private actors, NGOs, and international organizations, also exert control, by defining use and activity, permitting or denying access, and facilitating policy-making – all with varying degrees of harmonization, conflict, and evolution. Through a series of case studies, the attributes, influence, and evolution of these mechanisms will be explored in the context of e-commerce, media and free expression, technical and organizational infrastructure, and other values.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cooperation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Cooperation|See main page on Cooperation]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 3:30 to 4:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Yochai Benkler&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This session will center on the ways in which new technologies harness and fuel new forms of cooperation by lowering costs and enabling collaboration that can be transformative for business, government, and society at large. Yochai Benkler will lead a discussion on emerging cooperative models and their impact on business processes, smarter technology, economic reform, volunteer contributions to research, and other benefits. This session will engage several Berkman Fellows who are conducting observational and experimental research on the underlying social, psychological, and evolutionary mechanisms that affect cooperation, collaboration, dispute resolution, trust, and social and economic exchange. Wikipedia will provide an example through which to gain a deeper sense of the breadth and depth of the phenomenon of online cooperation, as well as illuminating the offline cooperation which forms the foundation of our societies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mutual Aid===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Mutual Aid|See main page on Mutual Aid]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Thursday, 5:00 to 6:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Building upon key themes related to cybersecurity and the role of the private sector in ensuring persistent, secure, and consistently available content on the web, this session will focus on possible responses to the current state of computer and network security.  Drawing conceptually from mutual aid treaties among states in the real world, Jonathan Zittrain will outline a defense scheme that would seek to make the current decentralized Web a more robust one.  His&amp;quot; mirror as you link&amp;quot; system of assistance reimagines the technological relationships between sites and services on the Web, and envisions a new socially- and technologically-based system of redundancy and security.  &amp;quot;Today, if one clicks on a link to an external site and that site is unavailable – perhaps attacked with a classic denial-of-service – there is no alternative to accessing it. Mirror-as-you-link would change that.  Participating Web server administrators could make it so that for some or all of the links to external sites that they offer on their pages, the contents of the faraway sites would be saved (“cached”). They would do this only for sites that wish it to be done, and then only for sites that also perform such mirroring themselves. Then, when one site goes down, a Web surfer clicking on a link to get there can return to the referring site and ask for a copy of whatever he or she is missing since the destination site is down.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Evening Event(s)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Evening Events|See main page on Evening Events for more information and Sign-up Sheet]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be offering a selection of activities led by Berkman Directors, fellows and other interested community members.&lt;br /&gt;
Participants are invited to pitch ideas and to sign up on the wiki for Food for Thought dinners, Poker with Charlie Nesson, and other activities at area restaurants or at the Berkman Center. Please see the Wiki for additional details.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Friday, September 9, 2011==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minds for Sale===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Minds for Sale|See main page on Minds for Sale]]&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Friday, 10:00-11:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this presentation, Jonathan Zittrain will outline his current work on the concepts of ubiquitous&lt;br /&gt;
human computing and distributed work. Encompassing phenomena from gamification,&lt;br /&gt;
CAPCHAs and Mechanical Turk to the X Prize, he will examine the consequences of&lt;br /&gt;
crowdsourcing, economically, legally and socially, review the development and present state of&lt;br /&gt;
the practice, and invite the audience to think ahead to its possible futures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interoperability===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Interoperability|See main page on Interoperability]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Friday, 11:30 – 1:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Urs Gasser, with John Palfrey&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This synthesizing session will examine interoperability and its role in driving innovation in the ICT environment. Urs Gasser and John Palfrey -- who recently completed a book on the topic (slated for release in February 2012) -- will outline a conceptual framework for thinking about interoperability, its driving forces and inhibitors, how it can best be achieved, and why. They will touch on a number of current usecases where interoperability plays a decisive role, including, cloud computing, the Smart Grid, and electronic health records. How do we define interoperability and prioritize it as an important policy goal? What do consumers, companies, and governments stand to gain (or lose) from interoperability or lack thereof? How do concerns related to lack of diversity, or diminished privacy and security interact with interoperability? How are optimal levels of interoperability achieved through law, policy, technology, and innovations in the marketplace?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Student Presentations/Reaction Statements/Proposals===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Student_Projects#Option_C._Final_Presentation:_Lightning_Talk.2C_Provocation.2C_Response_Statement|See &amp;quot;Option C&amp;quot; on the main page for Student Projects]]&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Friday, 2:00-3:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This module will be designed by students and lightly moderated by Charlie Nesson. 5-10 minute reflections might be a take on the “Future of the Internet” discussion, offer central issues for consideration or faculty response, or provide a reaction statement on key elements of the program. Other options include providing a deeper dive into a particular module or interesting case for further study, etc. The focus here would be on developing a short presentation, to be followed by brief Q&amp;amp;A with audience members.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Future of the Internet===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[The Future of the Internet|See main page on The Future of the Internet]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Friday, 4:00 to 5:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a moderated discussion hosted by Jonathan Zittrain, Berkman Directors and Faculty Leads will be invited to reflect on the central themes emerging from the previous days, with a particular focus on the Internet’s future. Participants will engage one another regarding the next “big thing” – anticipated developments, opportunities, emerging issues, and risks within their particular area of research or interest. Foundational to the discussion will be the future of the Internet&#039;s generativity, including innovative and creative outputs and participatory input (the opportunity to connect with other people, work with them, and express oneself). Concerns regarding security, invasions of privacy, and other emerging issues may threaten that generative infrastructure; what are the potential costs? What are the visionary solutions?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Program_Schedule&amp;diff=1333</id>
		<title>Program Schedule</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Program_Schedule&amp;diff=1333"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T23:31:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Privacy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Master Program Schedule==&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=1 align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|KEY&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 70px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|width=&amp;quot;175&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;Pillar Theme Sessions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|width=&amp;quot;175&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#F79646;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;Cross-Sectional Theme Sessions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|width=&amp;quot;175&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#4F81BD;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;Case Studies&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable collapsible autocollapse&amp;quot; border = &amp;quot;1&amp;quot;; align = center&lt;br /&gt;
|+&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;DRAFT Program Agenda&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
! width=&amp;quot;200&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Monday - Sept. 5&lt;br /&gt;
! width=&amp;quot;200&amp;quot;|[[Program_Schedule#Tuesday.2C_September_6.2C_2011|Tuesday - Sept. 6]]&lt;br /&gt;
! width=&amp;quot;200&amp;quot;|[[Program_Schedule#Wednesday.2C_September_7.2C_2011|Wednesday - Sept. 7]]&lt;br /&gt;
! width=&amp;quot;200&amp;quot;|[[Program_Schedule#Thursday.2C_September_8.2C_2011|Thursday - Sept. 8]]&lt;br /&gt;
! width=&amp;quot;200&amp;quot;|[[Program_Schedule#Friday.2C_September_9.2C_2011|Friday - Sept. 9]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|9:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;	style=&amp;quot;background-color:#BFBFBF;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;Welcoming Remarks&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
9:00 to 9:15&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: William Fisher and Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|9:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#F79646;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[The History of the Internet]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
9:15 to 11:15&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Jonathan Zittrain and Lawrence Lessig* (TBC)&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|10:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[The Changing Internet: Cybersecurity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
10:00 to 11:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#CCC0DA;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;*[[Mid-Point Check-in]]*&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
Part 2&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
10:00 to 10:20&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#4F81BD;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Minds for Sale]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
10:00 to 11:00&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|10:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Digital Humanities]]&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
10:20 to 12:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Jeffrey Schnapp and Jesse Shapins&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|11:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|15-minute Break&lt;br /&gt;
11:15 to 11:30&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|30-minute Break&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|11:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Open Systems/Access]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
11:30 to 1:00&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Yochai Benkler&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|30-minute break&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#F79646;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Interoperability]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
11:30 to 1:00&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: John Palfrey and Urs Gasser&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|12:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Intellectual Property]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
12:00 to 1:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: William Fisher and Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|30-minute break&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|12:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#4F81BD;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
12:30 to 1:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Moderator: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|1:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Lunch&lt;br /&gt;
1:00 to 2:00&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Lunch&lt;br /&gt;
1:00 to 2:00&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|1:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Lunch&lt;br /&gt;
1:30 to 2:30&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Lunch&lt;br /&gt;
1:30 to 2:30&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|2:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression|Online Liberty and FOE]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
2:00 to 3:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: John Palfrey&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#9BBB59;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Student_Projects#Option_C._Final_Presentation:_Lightning_Talk.2C_Provocation.2C_Response_Statement|Student Questions and Reactions for Faculty-Leads]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
2:00 to 3:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|2:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#4F81BD;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[User Innovation]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
2:30 to 3:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Eric von Hippel and William Fisher&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#F79646;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[The Global Internet]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
1:30 to 2:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Urs Gasser and Herbert Burkert&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|3:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|3:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|15-minute break&lt;br /&gt;
3:30 to 3:45&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|30-minute break&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Cooperation]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
3:30 to 4:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Yochai Benkler&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|15-minute break&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|4:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#4F81BD;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Exploring the Arab Spring]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
3:45 to 4:45&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: John Palfrey, Yochai Benkler, Charlie Nesson, and others&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#C0504D;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Privacy]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
4:00 to 5:30&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: John Palfrey, Herbert Burkert, Phil Malone&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#F79646;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[The Future of the Internet]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
4:00 to 5:00&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|4:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|30-minute break&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|5:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#4F81BD;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Mutual Aid]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
5:00 to 6:00&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#DDD9C3;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;Final BBQ&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
5:00 to 7:00&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|5:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#F79646;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[The Study of the Internet: New Methods for New Technologies]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
5:00 to 6:00&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Moderator: John Palfrey&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|6:00&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#DDD9C3;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Evening_Events#Drinks_at_John_Harvard&#039;s|Drinks at John Harvard&#039;s Brew House]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
6:00 to 8:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|6:30&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#DDD9C3;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Evening_Events#Berkman_Center_Open_House|Berkman Center Open House]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
6:30 to 8:30&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#CCC0DA;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;*[[Mid-Point Check-in]]*&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
Part 1&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
6:30 to 6:45&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|7:00&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#DDD9C3;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Evening_Events#metaLAB_.28at.29_Harvard|metaLAB (at) Harvard Event]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
7:00 to 9:00&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color:#DDD9C3;&amp;quot;|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Evening_Events#Thursday_Evening_with_Berkman_Faculty|Evening with Berkman Faculty]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
7:00 to 9:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|7:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|8:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|8:30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-style=&amp;quot;height: 50px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|9:00&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==iLaw 2011 Program Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/archive/ last iLaw conference] was held nearly five years ago, the debates at the intersection of technology, law, and policy have continued to evolve. The introduction of new technologies – and new uses of old technologies – raise a broad range of problems to explore. To name a few examples, the intervening years have seen the growth of social networking tools; Facebook has gained more than 750 million users worldwide and has found itself at the center of privacy debates. Information technologies have played an unprecedented role in recent protests in the Middle East and North Africa, at times in tension with US foreign policy and export controls. In the US, government regulators and major ISPs continue to struggle with finding the right balance points for network governance and regulatory authority. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Growing Internet usage trends, disruptive technologies, increased efforts by governments and private entities to control the online space continue to reshape the cyber landscape. These issues, alongside the actors who provide the technologies and the users who engage with them, are at the center of many global policy debates. iLaw 2011 will be a unique opportunity to reexamine these areas of inquiry and core questions while engaging with the new and emerging issues and thorny debates that are constantly reshaping the field. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2011 iLaw Program is designed to take participants through the evolution of information technologies and the Internet, including their past, present, and future. Each module will provide a bridge to the past, beginning with a brief sketch of how a particular issue has evolved over the course of recent decades, both from an intellectual history perspective and via changes in policy, practice, and technology. Faculty and selected guests will use this foundation to explore how technical, social, legal, economic, and policy trends and debates have evolved over time, and identify the primary questions and issues that currently define the online space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Note on Format and Mode===&lt;br /&gt;
Deep dialogue, hard questions and genuine interactivity are fundamental to the success and mode of iLaw. Participants will be invited to engage with sessions in diverse ways throughout the program–from the wiki to the question tool, open Q&amp;amp;A, structured interposals, open space, and invited conversation. Although we expect close to 200 participants, we are committed to genuine interactivity throughout the event; we encourage active engagement from all participants. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Driving Questions from Faculty===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The questions posed below by Berkman Faculty members reflect the fundamental inquiries for participants to consider during the 2011 iLaw Program:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Yochai Benkler&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* How do we systematize cooperative human systems design, now that we all know that online collaboration is a critical component of the networked information economy?&lt;br /&gt;
* How do we integrate power into our understanding of networked society? What are the limits of public action, and what are the limits of decentralized action, given power in the market, the state, real-world society and the network?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;William Fisher&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* To what extent, if any, is legal protection for creative works necessary either to stimulate creativity or to ensure that creators are treated fairly? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Suppose it were to be agreed among us that when the founders wrote the Progress clause of our constitution, the exclusive right they were granting to publishers of creative works was the legal right to stop other publishers from selling copies of their works. Can you tell a coherent legal story about how we got from there to here?&lt;br /&gt;
* Viewed from the vantage of equal citizens in a public domain of common (totally usable) knowledge, when did We the People surrender the liberty of privately copying works of any kind?  That is to say, when was this liberty taken from us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
* How do we reconcile welcome contributions from all corners with poisoned apples?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is the Internet doing to us?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Driving Questions from Participants and Students===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What questions and concerns are you grappling with in the this field? Where does the future take us?  Please add your own driving questions here: [[Talk:Program Schedule#Driving Questions|Driving Questions]].  As this page is populated, questions will be added below.  Alternatively, add your driving questions to [[How To Participate at iLaw|The Question Tool]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Monday, September 5, 2011==&lt;br /&gt;
===Drinks at John Harvard&#039;s Brew House===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Monday, 6:00 to 8:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Evening_Events#Drinks_at_John_Harvard&#039;s|See main page on Drinks at John Harvard&#039;s]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All participants are invited to join us at John Harvard&#039;s Brew House in Harvard Square for an optional, informal gathering and cash bar with Berkman Community members and fellow participants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tuesday, September 6, 2011==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After introductions led by Terry Fisher and Jonathan Zittrain, the day will begin with [[The History of the Internet]], during which Jonathan Zittrain will introduce and discuss the “generative framework” of the Net, outlining the unique characteristics of Internet architecture that were critical to its success and continued evolution. Yochai Benkler will pick up related themes of openness, access, and distribution and their implications for user choice and online freedom in “[[Open Systems/Access]],” during which WikiLeaks will be featured as a case to examine related issues.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After lunch, John Palfrey will lead “[[Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression]],” which will take a focused look at the issues surrounding online freedom and the different types of control deployed by governments, users, companies, and other actors through a series of illustrative examples presented by audience members. Following this, a moderated discussion featuring selected faculty and guests will focus on the role of new technologies during recent protests in the Middle East and North Africa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the evening, all participant and audience members are invited to attend the Berkman Center’s Open House.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The History of the Internet===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[The History of the Internet|See main page on The History of the Internet]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Tuesday, 9:15 to 11:15&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Jonathan Zittrain with Larry Lessig&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The day will begin with a brief history of the Net and an introduction to the theory of generativity as a framework to understand the Internet’s disruptive power. Jonathan Zittrain’s opening lecture will focus on the Internet’s technical evolution and underlying architecture; the values that informed its early development, including principles related to consensus, openness, and non-discrimination; and the range of players, from users to computer scientists, governments and other bodies, and corporations, who engaged in the various activities, controls, and other arrangements that formed the initial distributed digital governance of the online space.  What characteristics make the evolution of the Internet so unique? What are the issues and organizations that characterize online governance and policy-making today?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Open Systems/Access===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Open Systems/Access|See main page on Open Systems/Access]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Tuesday, 11:30 to 1:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Yochai Benkler&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This session will discuss the enormous benefits of open systems and address the ways in which openness at all layers of the networked environment can be achieved. Yochai Benkler will present a set of examples in which physical access, social production of content, and other forms of user creation and collaboration play a powerful role in supporting freedom and new forms of innovation. Skype will provide an illustrative usecase through which to explore these topics. From these examples, he will draw out how proprietary networks and standards (like mobile networks) differ from open ones (like TCP/IP, competitive infrastructure, free software, open standards, and free culture/content-based models). The case of WikiLeaks will provide a lens through which to view questions related to openness, access, and content distribution at different layers of the network.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression|See main page on Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Tuesday, 2:00 to 3:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: John Palfrey&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Led by John Palfrey, this session will focus on online liberty and freedom of express and expand on some of the core themes introduced in the preceding sessions by providing an overview of the different phases of content regulation on the Internet. It will engage the audience with questions regarding the ways in which different political contexts shape different methods of and motivations for government control, and how various approaches in different countries inform each other. Respondents will be invited to reflect on key issues, including different forms of government controls and online speech regulation: China (a mix of “traditional” technical filtering with legal and informal regulatory mechanisms); the Arab Spring (just-in-time filtering combined with the arrest and intimidation of bloggers and digital activists); Russia (mostly non-technical, second and third generation controls rather than technical filtering); and US/Western Europe (mostly focused on child pornography and the illegal spread of copyrighted content). They will also grapple with hard questions related the role of intermediaries in response to government requests for user information, content removal or account deactivation and the implications of the current phase of control for free expression and privacy worldwide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Exploring the Arab Spring===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Exploring the Arab Spring|See main page on Exploring the Arab Spring]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Tuesday, 3:45 to 4:45&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Moderator: John Palfrey&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Featuring: Yochai Benkler, Bruce Etling, Charlie Nesson, Nagla Rizk, and Ethan Zuckerman (tentative)&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What has become known as the “Arab Spring” will serve as a synthesizing case study that will help to weave together the core themes outlined in both the Open Systems/Access and the Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression sessions, with a particular focus on the use of social media and the rise of information control and counter-control activities during recent protests and uprisings in the Middle East and North Africa. In this highly interactive sessions commentators will not only analyze the role of social media, but also consider the different roles and actors that influenced the events, including governments, activists, citizens, and companies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Evening Event: Berkman Center Open House===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Monday, 6:30 to 8:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;See [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/events/2011/09/openhouse this page] for event details&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All participants will be invited to share in an evening at the Berkman Center, where they will be introduced to projects, staff, fellows, and key research themes and activities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wednesday, September 7, 2011==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second day of iLaw will begin with a session focusing on the “[[The Changing Internet: Cybersecurity]].” Building upon the previous day’s discussions, it will discuss the forces at play that may put values such as openness, autonomy, and diversity at risk. In conversation with Jonathan Zittrain, Jack Goldsmith will help to kick off the discussion by focusing on one of the key pressure points where values collide: cybersecurity issues. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“[[Intellectual Property]],” a conversation led by Terry Fisher and featuring Charlie Nesson, will provide an introduction to another highly contested area of cyberlaw and policy, outlining some of the central IP issues and debates, including copyright, free and fair use, and the public domain. Emerging technological trends such as cloud computing will be explored in the context of IP theory and practice. The afternoon starts with a session on “[[User Innovation]],” led by Eric von Hippel, who will explore innovation through the lens of user creativity and networked models of production and expression. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pillar session on “[[Privacy]],” led by Phil Malone, and featuring Herbert Burkert and John Palfrey will start with a brief history of privacy, discussing the emergence of data protection law in Europe. Against this backdrop, recent global privacy developments and current online controversies – including behavioral targeting, persistent cookies and Do Not Track legislation; the right to be forgotten/ le droit à l’oubli; location privacy; facial recognition; contextual privacy; Google’s Street View service, and Google’s Buzz rollout – will be explored to gain a deeper understanding of the current the state of privacy law and norms– and their possible future. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The day will wrap up with a cross-sectional session that discusses the different approaches to the study of the Internet – including qualitative and quantitative methods – and their respective merits as well as limitations. More fundamentally, the session will explore as to what extent the Internet has led to methodological challenges – for instance in the context of the analysis of large data sets – and innovations, what types of best practices have developed over time, and what the open questions are. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Changing Internet: Cybersecurity===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[The Changing Internet:Cybersecurity|See main page on The Changing Internet: Cybersecurity]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 10:00 to 11:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead:Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This module will draw on central themes from the previous day regarding the unique qualities of the Internet, and the culture and architecture of openness – of protocols, interfaces, and values – that make it a generative space. What are the threats to this generativity? How do forces like consumerism, corporate interest, government and other controls, and cybersecurity put the open Net at risk? Concepts such as cyberwar will be surfaced via case examples, including phenomena such as Stuxnet and Ghostnet; the role of hackers such as AntiSec, LulzSec, and Anonymous will also be considered. This session will conclude with Q&amp;amp;A with the audience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Intellectual Property===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Intellectual Property|See main page on Intellectual Property]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 12:00 to 1:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: William Fisher and Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Led by William Fisher, this pillar will begin with a brief history of key theories and issues related copyright in the Internet space. By examining some of the hard problems and cases that have defined this field over the last decade, this session will explore some of the central questions that characterize current debates, including the wide spectrum of licensing options, the uncertainty about permissible uses associated with creative works, and the implications of cloud computing. Charlie Nesson will highlight questions regarding the public domain, free and fair use, and the need for digital copyright and public domain registries. This foundational pillar will lay the groundwork for two relevant use cases on User Innovation and Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries (which will take place on Thursday morning).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===User Innovation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[User Innovation|See main page on User Innovation]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 2:30 to 3:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads:Eric von Hippel and William Fisher&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This case study build upon the IP session and will explore the creation of unique works, free and fair use, and other related issues through the prism of user innovation. Eric von Hippel will begin the discussion with an overview of new forms of user creativity and production in the online space, facilitated by the proliferation of freely available information online, the ease with which people can communicate digitally, and advances in innovating technology. This overview will segue into a discussion moderated by William Fisher, which will engage von Hippel and others in exploring models that exemplify the benefits of cheap and easy production while also examining the challenges such as copyright issues surrounding the reappropriation and alteration of original sources that may inhibit users’ capacity to innovate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Privacy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Privacy|See main page on Privacy]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 4:00 to 5:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Phil Malone with Herbert Burkert and John Palfrey&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This pillar topic, led by Phil Malone and featuring Herbert Burkert and John Palfrey, will cover a mixture of privacy history, theory, black letter law, regulatory developments and current controversies. Herbert Burkert will offer a multinational perspective of privacy law and policy, outlining the emergence of data protection law in Europe. Against this backdrop, recent global privacy developments, comparative EU vs. US approaches and current online controversies – including behavioral targeting, persistent cookies and Do Not Track legislation; the right to be forgotten/ le droit à l’oubli; location privacy; facial recognition; contextual privacy; Google’s Street View service, and Google’s Buzz rollout – will be explored to gain a deeper understanding of the current the state of privacy law and norms and possible ways forward. Participants Urs Gasser, and Charlie Nesson will add their perspectives on these issues throughout this session.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Study of the Internet: New Methods for New Technologies===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[The Study of the Internet: New Methods for New Technologies|See main page on The Study of the Internet: New Methods for New Technologies]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 5:30 to 6:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Moderator: John Palfrey&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the range of tools, disciplines, and research approaches that we can bring to bear on the study of the Internet and the study of the impact of new technologies on social, political, economic, legal, and other processes in both the online and offline spaces? This session will explore methods of studying the Internet’s societal implications, including empirical analysis, legal frameworks, policy perspectives, sociological surveys, and other methodologies. It will also surface and explore some of the challenges faced by researchers working with big data sets, with a particular focus on issues related to privacy, data security, and other considerations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mid-Point Check-in===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Mid-Point Check-in|See main page on Mid-point Check-in]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 6:30 to 6:45&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The day will end with a mid-point check in with the audience, led by Charlie Nesson. Charlie will solicit comments from audience members and ask for thoughts, suggestions, and recommendations for program improvements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Evening Event: metaLAB (at) Harvard===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Evening_Events#metaLAB_.28at.29_Harvard|See main page on metaLAB (at) Harvard Event]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 7:00 to 9:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metaLAB has invited us to come to their current residence, Art@29 Garden, to share in an evening exhibition to introduce their new digital art project called [http://metalab.harvard.edu/projects/ Augmented Harvard].  It will be a demo debut – sort of a pop-up show of the public installation – that will set the stage for the [[Digital Humanities]] pillar on Thursday morning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;About Augmented Harvard&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the support of the Provostial Funds for Arts and Humanities, the metaLab is in the early stages of developing a multi-year, University-wide installation that is composed of a network of physical artifacts that unlock site-specific experiences. These artifacts, or HUBS, might consist of such devices as thermal receipt printers, hacked Kinects, speakers or programmable LEDs. Participants in the project encounter these HUBs across the campus or through an open-source iPhone/iPad application. Augmented Harvard allows faculty, students, curators and the public to link Harvard exhibitions to other spaces and objects across the University, and to see otherwise invisible features of the campus landscape such as long-ago demolished structures, alternative architectural plans, and inaccessible archives as they rove the campus core. The initial release is planned in conjunction with the fall 2011 exhibitions GSD’s 75+ and Cold War in the Classroom, co-curated by History of Science PhD students Jeremy Blatter and Christopher Phillips, and to be staged at the Special Exhibitions Gallery of the Collection of Historical Scientific Instruments, with additional materials borrowed from the Harvard Film Archive and the Graduate School of Education’s Monroe C. Gutman Library.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Thursday, September 8, 2011==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Day three of iLaw will begin with a follow-up discussion regarding Tuesday’s “Mid-point Check-in,” during which Charlie Nesson will respond to and solicit participant input regarding program improvements. Next, Jeffrey Schnapp and Jesse Shapins will lead a pillar session on “Digital Humanities,” in which they will consider how digital tools and media have affected how knowledge is produced and disseminated. Expert participants will present a selection of lightening talks on innovative, multi-disciplinary approaches to design on the web, presenting projects that draw on the social sciences, knowledge in the arts, storytelling, and cultural and historical memory. This will lead into moderated discussion led by Charlie Nesson on “Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries.” Mary Lee Kennedy, John Palfrey, Terry Fisher, Jeffrey Schnapp and others will discuss the promise and challenge associated with creating and maintaining digital libraries and archives; rights registries and the contours of copyright, public domain, free and fair use will also be examined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following a 30-minute break, Charlie Nesson will provide an introduction to [[Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries|“Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries.”]]  Mary Lee Kennedy, John Palfrey, and others will then highlight the challenges associated with creating and maintaining digital libraries and archives.  During the session, a number of US and European models will be explored, including the Berkman Center’s contributions to the Digital Public Library of American project.  Charlie Nesson will tack on to this a discussion about rights registries and the contours of copyright, public domain, free and fair use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After lunch, Urs Gasser and Herbert Burkert explore [[The Global Internet|“The Global Internet.”]]  This Cross-sectional session looks at the legal challenges that underlie global e-commerce, international dispute resolution, governance, and jurisdiction and the ways in which private entities, policymakers, and individuals have approached these challenges.  Urs and Herbert will explore many of these issues through a series of mini-case studies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next, Yochai Benkler will lead a lecture, followed by a moderated discussion, on [[Cooperation|“Cooperation.”]]  This will focus on how new technologies are being used to harness and fuel collaboration.  In particular, Yochai and several Berkman fellows will highlight emerging collaborative models and their impact on business processes, “smarter” technology, economic reform, and volunteer contributions to research.  Jonathan Zittrain will conclude the day with interactive discussion about [[Mutual Aid|“Mutual Aid,”]] in which he will describe a defense model to make the Internet more redundant and robust by “mirroring as you link.” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mid-point Check-in, Part 2===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Thursday, 10:00 to 10:20&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Mid-Point Check-in|See main page on Mid-point Check-in]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Charlie Nesson will lead this session and bridge his previous session, “suggestion for improvement” by sharing and commenting on the comments and suggestions obtained from audience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Digital Humanities===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Digital Humanities|See main page on Digital Humanities]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Thursday, 10:20 to 12:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Jeffery Schnapp and Jesse Shapins&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This pillar session will address the current state of digital humanities, an umbrella term for new modes of scholarship that emphasize collaborative, trans-disciplinary, computationally-engaged research, teaching, and dissemination.  Digital Humanities is less a unified field than an array of convergent practices that explore a universe in which print is no longer the normative medium in which knowledge is produced and disseminated; digital tools, techniques, and media have expanded traditional concepts of knowledge in the arts, human and social sciences. The session will address fundamental questions such as: How can traditional humanities skills be reshaped in multimedia terms? How and by whom will the contours of cultural and historical memory be defined in the digital era? How might practices of digital storytelling coincide or diverge from oral or print-based storytelling? What is the place of humanites in a networked world?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries|See main page on Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Thursday, 12:30 to 1:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A discussion moderated by Charlie Nesson will focus on opportunities and challenges regarding the creation and use of digital registries, archives, and libraries. Practical use cases such as the Digital Public Library of America (DPLA) in addition to other efforts to create registries for public domain works will be discussed, building upon and further illustrating previous thematic areas and pillar sessions, including copyright, user innovation, and free and fair use. Central considerations and driving questions regarding underlying technical architecture, legal challenges, legal support, and liability will inform the conversation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Global Internet===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[The Global Internet|See main page on The Global Internet]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Thursday, 2:30 to 3:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: Urs Gasser and Herbert Burkert&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the global online space, traditional legal frameworks, such as public international law and international private law, come together with new developments, such as evolving Internet law (focused on new regulations addressing international Internet issues), to create different models for, and forms of, digital governance. Processes and structures, such as online dispute resolution systems, Terms of Use policies, and other mechanisms also shape user activity and permissible behavior. Actions and interventions by private actors, NGOs, and international organizations, also exert control, by defining use and activity, permitting or denying access, and facilitating policy-making – all with varying degrees of harmonization, conflict, and evolution. Through a series of case studies, the attributes, influence, and evolution of these mechanisms will be explored in the context of e-commerce, media and free expression, technical and organizational infrastructure, and other values.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cooperation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Cooperation|See main page on Cooperation]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 3:30 to 4:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Yochai Benkler&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This session will center on the ways in which new technologies harness and fuel new forms of cooperation by lowering costs and enabling collaboration that can be transformative for business, government, and society at large. Yochai Benkler will lead a discussion on emerging cooperative models and their impact on business processes, smarter technology, economic reform, volunteer contributions to research, and other benefits. This session will engage several Berkman Fellows who are conducting observational and experimental research on the underlying social, psychological, and evolutionary mechanisms that affect cooperation, collaboration, dispute resolution, trust, and social and economic exchange. Wikipedia will provide an example through which to gain a deeper sense of the breadth and depth of the phenomenon of online cooperation, as well as illuminating the offline cooperation which forms the foundation of our societies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mutual Aid===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Mutual Aid|See main page on Mutual Aid]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Thursday, 5:00 to 6:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Building upon key themes related to cybersecurity and the role of the private sector in ensuring persistent, secure, and consistently available content on the web, this session will focus on possible responses to the current state of computer and network security.  Drawing conceptually from mutual aid treaties among states in the real world, Jonathan Zittrain will outline a defense scheme that would seek to make the current decentralized Web a more robust one.  His&amp;quot; mirror as you link&amp;quot; system of assistance reimagines the technological relationships between sites and services on the Web, and envisions a new socially- and technologically-based system of redundancy and security.  &amp;quot;Today, if one clicks on a link to an external site and that site is unavailable – perhaps attacked with a classic denial-of-service – there is no alternative to accessing it. Mirror-as-you-link would change that.  Participating Web server administrators could make it so that for some or all of the links to external sites that they offer on their pages, the contents of the faraway sites would be saved (“cached”). They would do this only for sites that wish it to be done, and then only for sites that also perform such mirroring themselves. Then, when one site goes down, a Web surfer clicking on a link to get there can return to the referring site and ask for a copy of whatever he or she is missing since the destination site is down.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Evening Event(s)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Evening Events|See main page on Evening Events for more information and Sign-up Sheet]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be offering a selection of activities led by Berkman Directors, fellows and other interested community members.&lt;br /&gt;
Participants are invited to pitch ideas and to sign up on the wiki for Food for Thought dinners, Poker with Charlie Nesson, and other activities at area restaurants or at the Berkman Center. Please see the Wiki for additional details.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Friday, September 9, 2011==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minds for Sale===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Minds for Sale|See main page on Minds for Sale]]&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Friday, 10:00-11:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this presentation, Jonathan Zittrain will outline his current work on the concepts of ubiquitous&lt;br /&gt;
human computing and distributed work. Encompassing phenomena from gamification,&lt;br /&gt;
CAPCHAs and Mechanical Turk to the X Prize, he will examine the consequences of&lt;br /&gt;
crowdsourcing, economically, legally and socially, review the development and present state of&lt;br /&gt;
the practice, and invite the audience to think ahead to its possible futures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interoperability===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Interoperability|See main page on Interoperability]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Friday, 11:30 – 1:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Urs Gasser, featuring John Palfrey&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This synthesizing session will examine interoperability and its role in driving innovation in the ICT environment. Urs Gasser and John Palfrey -- who recently completed a book on the topic (slated for release in February 2012) -- will outline a conceptual framework for thinking about interoperability, its driving forces and inhibitors, how it can best be achieved, and why. They will touch on a number of current usecases where interoperability plays a decisive role, including, cloud computing, the Smart Grid, and electronic health records. How do we define interoperability and prioritize it as an important policy goal? What do consumers, companies, and governments stand to gain (or lose) from interoperability or lack thereof? How do concerns related to lack of diversity, or diminished privacy and security interact with interoperability? How are optimal levels of interoperability achieved through law, policy, technology, and innovations in the marketplace?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Student Presentations/Reaction Statements/Proposals===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Student_Projects#Option_C._Final_Presentation:_Lightning_Talk.2C_Provocation.2C_Response_Statement|See &amp;quot;Option C&amp;quot; on the main page for Student Projects]]&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Friday, 2:00-3:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Charlie Nesson&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This module will be designed by students and lightly moderated by Charlie Nesson. 5-10 minute reflections might be a take on the “Future of the Internet” discussion, offer central issues for consideration or faculty response, or provide a reaction statement on key elements of the program. Other options include providing a deeper dive into a particular module or interesting case for further study, etc. The focus here would be on developing a short presentation, to be followed by brief Q&amp;amp;A with audience members.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Future of the Internet===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[The Future of the Internet|See main page on The Future of the Internet]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Friday, 4:00 to 5:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a moderated discussion hosted by Jonathan Zittrain, Berkman Directors and Faculty Leads will be invited to reflect on the central themes emerging from the previous days, with a particular focus on the Internet’s future. Participants will engage one another regarding the next “big thing” – anticipated developments, opportunities, emerging issues, and risks within their particular area of research or interest. Foundational to the discussion will be the future of the Internet&#039;s generativity, including innovative and creative outputs and participatory input (the opportunity to connect with other people, work with them, and express oneself). Concerns regarding security, invasions of privacy, and other emerging issues may threaten that generative infrastructure; what are the potential costs? What are the visionary solutions?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Privacy&amp;diff=1332</id>
		<title>Privacy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Privacy&amp;diff=1332"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T23:30:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Overview */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 4:00-5:30pm&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Format&#039;&#039;: Lecture, featuring guest respondents&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/pmalone Phil Malone], with [http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/index.html?id=964 Herbert Burkert] and [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jpalfrey John Palfrey]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Participants&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/ugasser Urs Gasser], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/cnesson Charlie Nesson], and others&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This pillar topic, led by Phil Malone and featuring Herbert Burkert and John Palfrey, will cover a mixture of privacy history, theory, black letter law, regulatory developments and current controversies. Herbert Burkert will offer a multinational perspective of privacy law and policy, outlining the emergence of data protection law in Europe. Against this backdrop, recent global privacy developments, comparative EU vs. US approaches and current online controversies – including behavioral targeting, persistent cookies and Do Not Track legislation; the right to be forgotten/ le droit à l’oubli; location privacy; facial recognition; contextual privacy; Google’s Street View service, and Google’s Buzz rollout – will be explored to gain a deeper understanding of the current the state of privacy law and norms and possible ways forward. Participants Urs Gasser, and Charlie Nesson will add their perspectives on these issues throughout this session.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Required Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Overview===&lt;br /&gt;
* Hyperpublic Symposium 2011:  [http://www.hyperpublic.org/2011/06/10/urs-gassers-opening-remarks/ Urs Gasser’s Opening Remarks], June 10, 2011.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.economist.com/node/16377097 &amp;quot;Legal Confusion on Internet Privacy: The Clash of Data Civilisations,&amp;quot;] The Economist, June 17, 2010. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Peter Fleischer, [http://peterfleischer.blogspot.com/2010/09/10-paths-and-theyre-all-hard.html “10 Paths and They’re All Hard,]” September 5, 2010. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thierer, “[http://www.forbes.com/2011/04/02/privacy-tax-social-networking-advertising-opinions-contributors-adam-thierer_print.html Birth of the Privacy Tax,]” April 2, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Behavioral Targeting/Do Not Track===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://m.wired.com/epicenter/2011/07/undeletable-cookie/ “Researchers Expose Cunning Online Tracking Service That Can’t Be Dodged,]” Wired epicenter blog, July 29, 2011. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Julia Angwin, [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703940904575395073512989404.html “The Web’s New Gold Mine: Your Secrets,”] Wall Street Journal Onlike (part of the “What They Know” series), July 30, 2010. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* FTC Commissioner, Thomas Rosch, [http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/rosch/110822aspeninfospeech.pdf “Information and Privacy: in search of a data-driven policy,”] August 22, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Kim Hyung-eun, [http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2931289 &amp;quot;Facebook agrees to increase privacy protection&amp;quot;] Korea JoongAng Daily, January 21, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Eric Mack, [http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-20094866-93/facebooks-like-button-illegal-in-german-state/ &amp;quot;Facebook&#039;s &#039;Like&#039; button illegal in German state,&amp;quot;] CNET News, August 19, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Right to Be Forgotten===&lt;br /&gt;
* Suzanne Daley, [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/10/world/europe/10spain.html?_r=2&amp;amp;hp=&amp;amp;pagewanted=all# “On Its Own, Europe Backs Web Privacy Fights,”] New York Times, August 8, 2011. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Peter Fleischer, [http://peterfleischer.blogspot.com/2011/03/foggy-thinking-about-right-to-oblivion.html “Foggy Thinking About the Right to Oblivion,”] Peter Fleischer: Privacy? Blog, March 9, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Adam Thierer, [http://www.forbes.com/sites/adamthierer/2011/04/17/erasing-our-past-on-the-internet/ “Erasing Our Past on the Internet,”] Forbes, April 17, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Natasha Singer, [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/21/business/in-personal-data-a-fight-for-the-right-to-be-forgotten.html &amp;quot;Just Give Me the Right to Be Forgotten,&amp;quot;] New York Times, August 20, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Location Privacy===&lt;br /&gt;
* Jacqui Cheng, [http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2011/06/franken-location-loopholes/ “Franken’s Location-Privacy Bill Would Close Mobile-Tracking ‘Loopholes’,”] Wired epicenter blog, June 17, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* David Thompson, [http://volokh.com/2010/06/11/the-future-of-privacy-facial-recognition-public-facts-and-300-million-little-brothers/ &amp;quot;The Future of Privacy: Facial Recognition, Public Facts, and 300 Million Little Brothers,&amp;quot;] Volokh Conspiracy blog,  June 11, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dominic Basulto, [http://bigthink.com/ideas/39603 “Does Facial Recognition Technology Mean the End of Privacy,”] big think blog, August 5, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Helen Pidd, [http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/aug/03/facebook-facial-recognition-privacy-germany “Facebook facial recognition software violates privacy laws, says Germany,”] guardian.co.uk, August 3, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-08-17/apple-sued-by-south-korean-iphone-users-over-location-data.html &amp;quot;Apple Sued by South Korean iPhone Users Over Location Data&amp;quot;], Business Week, August 17, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Google Street View===&lt;br /&gt;
* Prasad Krishna, [http://www.cis-india.org/internet-governance/blog/privacy/street-view-of-private-and-public &amp;quot;A Street View of Private and the Public,&amp;quot;] Centre for Internet &amp;amp; Society India blog, June 4, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Matt McGee, [http://searchengineland.com/google-street-view-germany-blurry-houses-included-54632 “Google Street View Debuts In Germany, Blurry Houses Included,”] Search Engine Land blog, November 1, 2010. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Matt McGee, [http://searchengineland.com/google-has-stopped-street-view-photography-germany-72368 “Google Has Stopped Street View Photography In Germany,”] Search Engine Land blog, April 10, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Google Buzz===&lt;br /&gt;
* Miguel Helft, [http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/13/technology/internet/13google.html &amp;quot;Critics Say Google Invades Privacy With New Service,&amp;quot;] New York Times, February 12, 2010.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Sarah Kessler, [http://mashable.com/2011/03/30/google-buzz-ftc-settlement/ &amp;quot;Google Settles With FTC Over Buzz Privacy Issues,&amp;quot;] Mashable, March 30, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recommended Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Privacy and Technological Points of Control===&lt;br /&gt;
* John Borland, [http://news.cnet.com/Supreme-Court-rules-against-file-swapping/2100-1030_3-5764135.html “Supreme Court rules against file swapping”], CNET, June 2005&lt;br /&gt;
* Dan Goodin [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/12/07/internet_explorer_do_not_track/ “Microsoft unveils &#039;do not track&#039; option for IE9”], theregister.co.uk, December 7 2010&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Privacy and Reputation===&lt;br /&gt;
* Craig Newmark, [http://www.cnewmark.com/2010/04/trust-and-reputation-systems-redistributing-power-and-influence.html &amp;quot;Trust and reputation systems: redistributing power and influence&amp;quot;], craigconnects blog, April 6, 2010&lt;br /&gt;
* Evlyn Rusli, [http://techcrunch.com/2010/10/19/unvarnished-honestly-kazanjy-funding/ &amp;quot;Unvarnished Becomes Honestly.com, Raises $1.2 Million And Opens The Floodgates&amp;quot;], TechCrunch, October 19, 2010&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Seigenthaler_Sr._Wikipedia_biography_controversy Wikipedia Entry on the Seigenthaler Incident]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Case Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Google Buzz]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Facebook Beacon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Pillars of iLaw]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=The_Global_Internet&amp;diff=1258</id>
		<title>The Global Internet</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=The_Global_Internet&amp;diff=1258"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T20:35:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Program_Schedule#Thursday.2C_September_8.2C_2011|Thursday]], 2:30-3:30pm&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Format&#039;&#039;: Lecture, featuring guest respondents&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads&#039;&#039;: [http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/index.html?id=964 Herbert Burkert] and [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/ugasser Urs Gasser]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Participants&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/cmaracke Catharina Maracke], others &#039;&#039;TBD&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the global online space, traditional legal frameworks, such as public international law and international private law, come together with new developments, such as evolving Internet law (focused on new regulations addressing international Internet issues), to create different models for, and forms of, digital governance. Processes and structures, such as online dispute resolution systems, Terms of Use policies, and other mechanisms also shape user activity and permissible behavior. Actions and interventions by private actors, NGOs, and international organizations, also exert control, by defining use and activity, permitting or denying access, and facilitating policy making—all with varying degrees of harmonization, conflict, and evolution. Through a series of case studies, the attributes, influence, and evolution of these mechanisms will be explored in the context of e-commerce, media and free expression, technical and organizational infrastructure, and other values.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Required Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Governance===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Jonathan Zittrain, [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=395300 &amp;quot;Be Careful What You Ask For: Reconciling A Global Internet And Local Law,&amp;quot;] Cato Institute (2003).&lt;br /&gt;
* Daniel Rosenthal, [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1735479 &amp;quot;Assessing Digital Preemption (and the Future of Law Enforcement?,&amp;quot;] New Criminal Law Review (Fall 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
* Susan P. Crawford, [http://scrawford.net/display/Crawford2.pdf &amp;quot;The ICANN Experiment,&amp;quot;] Cardozo Journal of International Comparative Law, (Fall 2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Law and Global Commerce===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Rachel Donadio, [http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/25/technology/companies/25google.html “Larger Threat Is Seen in Google Case,&amp;quot;] New York Times, February 24, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
* James Vicini, [http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6AS3YJ20101129 “Supreme Court rejects Tiffany trademark appeal vs Ebay,”] Reuters, November 29, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mark Sweney, [http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/mar/23/google-louis-vuitton-search-ads “Google wins Louis Vuitton trademark case,&amp;quot;] The Guardian (UK), March 23, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
* OUT-LAW.COM, [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/05/27/ebay_loreal/ “eBay not obliged to protect trade marks, says High Court,&amp;quot;] May 27, 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gabriele Accardo, [http://ttlfnews.wordpress.com/2011/01/10/advocate-general-advises-ecj-that-ebay-should-not-be-held-liable-for-users%E2%80%99-breach-of-trademark/ “Advocate General advises ECJ that eBay should not be held liable for users’ breach of trademark,&amp;quot;] TTLF Technology Law &amp;amp; Policy News Blog, January 10, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
* Grant Gross, [http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9145198/RIAA_tells_FCC_ISPs_need_to_be_copyright_cops?taxonomyId=13&amp;amp;pageNumber=1 “RIAA tells FCC: ISPs need to be copyright cops,&amp;quot;] Computer World, January 15, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Geist, [http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/3660/125/ “Putting Together the ACTA Puzzle: Privacy, P2P Major Targets,”] Blog, February 3, 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Competition===&lt;br /&gt;
* Urs Gasser, [http://www.yjolt.org/files/gasser-8-YJOLT-201.pdf &amp;quot;Regulating Search Engines: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead,&amp;quot;] 9 Yale Journal of Law &amp;amp; Technology 124, Spring, 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/10/1624 “Antitrust: Commission probes allegations of antitrust violations by Google,”] November, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
* Court of Justice of the European Union Press Release: [http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2010-03/cp100032en.pdf “Google has not infringed trade mark law by allowing advertisers to purchase keywords corresponding to their competitors’ trade marks,”] March, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recommended Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
===Berkman Center&#039;s Independent Review of Accountability and Transparency at ICANN===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/pubrelease/icann/ Independent Review]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The State of Online Business===&lt;br /&gt;
* Dion Hinchcliffe, [http://blogs.zdnet.com/Hinchcliffe/?p=1172 &amp;quot;The app store: The new ‘must-have’ digital business model,&amp;quot;] January, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
* Donnie Dong, [http://english.blawgdog.com/2010/01/ten-websites-leads-you-understanding.html “Ten Websites Lead You Understanding the Features of Cinternet,”] January, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Keen, [http://nextdigitaldecade.com/ndd_book.pdf#page=52 &amp;quot;Why We Must Resist the Temptation of Web 2.0,&amp;quot;] &#039;&#039;The Next Digital Decade&#039;&#039;, Berin Szoka and Adam Marcus (Eds.), (Washington, DC: TechFreedom), 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cross-Sectional Themes]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=The_Global_Internet&amp;diff=1257</id>
		<title>The Global Internet</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=The_Global_Internet&amp;diff=1257"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T20:29:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Program_Schedule#Thursday.2C_September_8.2C_2011|Thursday]], 2:30-3:30pm&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Format&#039;&#039;: Lecture, featuring guest respondents&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads&#039;&#039;: [http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/index.html?id=964 Herbert Burkert] and [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/ugasser Urs Gasser]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the global online space, traditional legal frameworks, such as public international law and international private law, come together with new developments, such as evolving Internet law (focused on new regulations addressing international Internet issues), to create different models for, and forms of, digital governance. Processes and structures, such as online dispute resolution systems, Terms of Use policies, and other mechanisms also shape user activity and permissible behavior. Actions and interventions by private actors, NGOs, and international organizations, also exert control, by defining use and activity, permitting or denying access, and facilitating policy making—all with varying degrees of harmonization, conflict, and evolution. Through a series of case studies, the attributes, influence, and evolution of these mechanisms will be explored in the context of e-commerce, media and free expression, technical and organizational infrastructure, and other values.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Required Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Governance===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Jonathan Zittrain, [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=395300 &amp;quot;Be Careful What You Ask For: Reconciling A Global Internet And Local Law,&amp;quot;] Cato Institute (2003).&lt;br /&gt;
* Daniel Rosenthal, [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1735479 &amp;quot;Assessing Digital Preemption (and the Future of Law Enforcement?,&amp;quot;] New Criminal Law Review (Fall 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
* Susan P. Crawford, [http://scrawford.net/display/Crawford2.pdf &amp;quot;The ICANN Experiment,&amp;quot;] Cardozo Journal of International Comparative Law, (Fall 2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Law and Global Commerce===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Rachel Donadio, [http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/25/technology/companies/25google.html “Larger Threat Is Seen in Google Case,&amp;quot;] New York Times, February 24, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
* James Vicini, [http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6AS3YJ20101129 “Supreme Court rejects Tiffany trademark appeal vs Ebay,”] Reuters, November 29, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mark Sweney, [http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/mar/23/google-louis-vuitton-search-ads “Google wins Louis Vuitton trademark case,&amp;quot;] The Guardian (UK), March 23, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
* OUT-LAW.COM, [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/05/27/ebay_loreal/ “eBay not obliged to protect trade marks, says High Court,&amp;quot;] May 27, 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gabriele Accardo, [http://ttlfnews.wordpress.com/2011/01/10/advocate-general-advises-ecj-that-ebay-should-not-be-held-liable-for-users%E2%80%99-breach-of-trademark/ “Advocate General advises ECJ that eBay should not be held liable for users’ breach of trademark,&amp;quot;] TTLF Technology Law &amp;amp; Policy News Blog, January 10, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
* Grant Gross, [http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9145198/RIAA_tells_FCC_ISPs_need_to_be_copyright_cops?taxonomyId=13&amp;amp;pageNumber=1 “RIAA tells FCC: ISPs need to be copyright cops,&amp;quot;] Computer World, January 15, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Geist, [http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/3660/125/ “Putting Together the ACTA Puzzle: Privacy, P2P Major Targets,”] Blog, February 3, 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Competition===&lt;br /&gt;
* Urs Gasser, [http://www.yjolt.org/files/gasser-8-YJOLT-201.pdf &amp;quot;Regulating Search Engines: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead,&amp;quot;] 9 Yale Journal of Law &amp;amp; Technology 124, Spring, 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/10/1624 “Antitrust: Commission probes allegations of antitrust violations by Google,”] November, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
* Court of Justice of the European Union Press Release: [http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2010-03/cp100032en.pdf “Google has not infringed trade mark law by allowing advertisers to purchase keywords corresponding to their competitors’ trade marks,”] March, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recommended Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
===Berkman Center&#039;s Independent Review of Accountability and Transparency at ICANN===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/pubrelease/icann/ Independent Review]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The State of Online Business===&lt;br /&gt;
* Dion Hinchcliffe, [http://blogs.zdnet.com/Hinchcliffe/?p=1172 &amp;quot;The app store: The new ‘must-have’ digital business model,&amp;quot;] January, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
* Donnie Dong, [http://english.blawgdog.com/2010/01/ten-websites-leads-you-understanding.html “Ten Websites Lead You Understanding the Features of Cinternet,”] January, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Keen, [http://nextdigitaldecade.com/ndd_book.pdf#page=52 &amp;quot;Why We Must Resist the Temptation of Web 2.0,&amp;quot;] &#039;&#039;The Next Digital Decade&#039;&#039;, Berin Szoka and Adam Marcus (Eds.), (Washington, DC: TechFreedom), 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cross-Sectional Themes]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=The_Study_of_the_Internet:_New_Methods_for_New_Technologies&amp;diff=1229</id>
		<title>The Study of the Internet: New Methods for New Technologies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=The_Study_of_the_Internet:_New_Methods_for_New_Technologies&amp;diff=1229"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T18:12:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Overview */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Program_Schedule#Wednesday.2C_September_7.2C_2011|Wednesday]], 5:30-6:30pm&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Format&#039;&#039;: Roundtable Discussion&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Lead&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jpalfrey John Palfrey]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Participants&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jpalfrey Yochai Benkler], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/rfaris Rob Faris], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/EHargittai Eszter Hargittai]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the range of tools, disciplines, and research approaches that we can bring to bear on the study of the Internet and the study of the impact of new technologies on social, political, economic, legal, and other processes in both the online and offline spaces? This session will explore rigorous ways of studying the Internet&#039;s societal implications, including empirical analysis, legal frameworks, policy perspectives, sociological surveys, and other methodologies. It will also surface and explore some of the challenges faced by researchers working with big data sets, with a particular focus on issues related to privacy, data security, and other considerations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Required Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
*John Palfrey, [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/methodseminar/Main_Page Graduate Seminars in General Education 211 : Seminar on Research Methods on Internet and Society Wiki], 2009-2010.&lt;br /&gt;
*John Palfrey, [http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2009/09/04/graduate-seminar-on-research-methods-on-internet-society/ Graduate Seminar on Research Methods on Internet &amp;amp; Society], September 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
*John Palfrey, [http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2009/11/30/research-confidential-and-surveying-bloggers/ Research Confidential and Surveying Bloggers], November 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
* Eszter Hargittai, &#039;&#039;[http://www.press.umich.edu/titleDetailDesc.do?id=268873 Research Confidential: Solutions to Problems Most Social Scientists Pretend They Never Have]&#039;&#039;, 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Case Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Herdict]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[GNI/Role of Intermediaries]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cross-Sectional Themes]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Exploring_the_Arab_Spring&amp;diff=1228</id>
		<title>Exploring the Arab Spring</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Exploring_the_Arab_Spring&amp;diff=1228"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T17:52:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Overview */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Program_Schedule#Tuesday.2C_September_6.2C_2011|Tuesday]], 3:45-4:45pm&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Format&#039;&#039;: Roundtable Discussion&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jpalfrey John Palfrey]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Participants&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/ybenkler Yochai Benkler], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/betling Bruce Etling], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/cnesson Charlie Nesson], [http://www1.aucegypt.edu/faculty/naglarzk/ Nagla Rizk], and [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/ezuckerman Ethan Zuckerman] &#039;&#039;TBC&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What has become known as the &amp;quot;Arab Spring&amp;quot; will serve as a synthesizing case study that will help to weave together the core themes outlined in both the Open Systems/Access and the Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression sessions, with a particular focus on the use of social media and the rise of information control and counter-control activities during recent protests and uprisings in the Middle East and North Africa. In this highly interactive sessions, commentators will not only analyze the role of social media, but also consider the different roles and actors that influenced the events, including governments, activists, citizens, and companies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Required Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
*Dubai School of Government, [http://www.dsg.ae/social.aspx?u=-1&amp;amp;l=e&amp;amp;f=http://www.dsg.ae/portals/0/ASMR2.pdf &amp;quot;Civil Movements: The Impact of Facebook and Twitter&amp;quot;] &#039;&#039;Arab Social Media Report&#039;&#039;, May, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
* Masashi Crete-Nishihata and Jillian York, [http://opennet.net/blog/2011/01/egypt%E2%80%99s-internet-blackout-extreme-example-just-time-blocking “Egypt’s Internet Blackout: Extreme Example of Just-in-Time Blocking,”] ONI Blog, January 28, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
*James Cowie, [http://www.renesys.com/blog/2011/01/egypt-leaves-the-internet.shtml “Egypt Leaves the Internet,”] Renesys, January 27, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recommended Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/mena-net-watch MENA Net Watch], Open Net Initiative&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/mena-net-watch ONI&#039;s Middle East and North Africa Profiles and News]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Case Studies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Exploring_the_Arab_Spring&amp;diff=1227</id>
		<title>Exploring the Arab Spring</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Exploring_the_Arab_Spring&amp;diff=1227"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T17:52:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Overview */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Program_Schedule#Tuesday.2C_September_6.2C_2011|Tuesday]], 3:45-5:00pm&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Format&#039;&#039;: Roundtable Discussion&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jpalfrey John Palfrey]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Participants&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/ybenkler Yochai Benkler], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/betling Bruce Etling], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/cnesson Charlie Nesson], [http://www1.aucegypt.edu/faculty/naglarzk/ Nagla Rizk], and [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/ezuckerman Ethan Zuckerman] &#039;&#039;TBC&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What has become known as the &amp;quot;Arab Spring&amp;quot; will serve as a synthesizing case study that will help to weave together the core themes outlined in both the Open Systems/Access and the Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression sessions, with a particular focus on the use of social media and the rise of information control and counter-control activities during recent protests and uprisings in the Middle East and North Africa. In this highly interactive sessions, commentators will not only analyze the role of social media, but also consider the different roles and actors that influenced the events, including governments, activists, citizens, and companies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Required Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
*Dubai School of Government, [http://www.dsg.ae/social.aspx?u=-1&amp;amp;l=e&amp;amp;f=http://www.dsg.ae/portals/0/ASMR2.pdf &amp;quot;Civil Movements: The Impact of Facebook and Twitter&amp;quot;] &#039;&#039;Arab Social Media Report&#039;&#039;, May, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
* Masashi Crete-Nishihata and Jillian York, [http://opennet.net/blog/2011/01/egypt%E2%80%99s-internet-blackout-extreme-example-just-time-blocking “Egypt’s Internet Blackout: Extreme Example of Just-in-Time Blocking,”] ONI Blog, January 28, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
*James Cowie, [http://www.renesys.com/blog/2011/01/egypt-leaves-the-internet.shtml “Egypt Leaves the Internet,”] Renesys, January 27, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recommended Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/mena-net-watch MENA Net Watch], Open Net Initiative&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/mena-net-watch ONI&#039;s Middle East and North Africa Profiles and News]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Case Studies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Online_Liberty_and_Freedom_of_Expression&amp;diff=1226</id>
		<title>Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Online_Liberty_and_Freedom_of_Expression&amp;diff=1226"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T17:50:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Overview */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Program_Schedule#Tuesday.2C_September_6.2C_2011|Tuesday]], 2:00-3:30pm&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Format&#039;&#039;: Lecture, featuring guest respondents&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jpalfrey John Palfrey]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Potential Participants&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/betling Bruce Etling], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/rfaris Rob Faris], [http://www1.aucegypt.edu/faculty/naglarzk/ Nagla Rizk], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/ezuckerman Ethan Zuckerman]&#039;&#039;TBC&#039;&#039;, and others&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Led by John Palfrey, this session will expand on some of the core themes introduced in the preceding sessions by focusing on online liberty and freedom of expression and providing an overview of the different phases of content regulation on the Internet. The session will engage the audience with questions regarding the ways in which different political contexts shape different methods of and motivations for government control, and how different approaches in different countries inform each other. Respondents from the audience will be invited to comment on key issues, including different forms of government controls and online speech regulation: China (a mix of “traditional” technical filtering with legal and informal regulatory mechanisms); the Arab Spring (just-in-time filtering combined with the arrest and intimidation of bloggers and digital activists); Russia (mostly non-technical, second and third generation controls rather than technical filtering); and US/Western Europe (mostly focused on child pornography and the illegal spread of copyrighted content); the role of intermediaries in response to government requests for user information, content removal or account deactivation; and the implications of the current phase of control for free expression and privacy worldwide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Required Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Filtering===&lt;br /&gt;
*John Palfrey, [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1658191 &amp;quot;Four Phases of Internet Regulation&amp;quot;] &#039;&#039;Social Research&#039;&#039;, Vol. 77, No. 3, Fall 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Summary of Four Phases]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Jonathan Zittrain &amp;amp; John Palfrey, [[Media:Deibert_03_Ch02_029-056.pdf| &amp;quot;Internet Filtering: The Politics and Mechanisms of Control,&amp;quot;]] &#039;&#039;Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering&#039;&#039;, (Cambridge: MIT Press) 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Arab Spring===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://opennet.net/mena-net-watch MENA Net Watch]&lt;br /&gt;
* Masashi Crete-Nishihata and Jillian York, [http://opennet.net/blog/2011/01/egypt%E2%80%99s-internet-blackout-extreme-example-just-time-blocking “Egypt’s Internet Blackout: Extreme Example of Just-in-Time Blocking,”] ONI Blog, January 28, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;[[Exploring the Arab Spring|Also recommended: Exploring the Arab Spring]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recommended Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Filtering===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/blog The OpenNet Initiative&#039;s Blog]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/profiles/china ONI&#039;s China Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/mena-net-watch ONI&#039;s Middle East and North Africa Profiles and News]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/profiles/russia ONI&#039;s Russia Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/regions/namerica ONI&#039;s United States and Canada Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/research/regions/europe ONI&#039;s Europe Profile]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Arab Spring===&lt;br /&gt;
*James Cowie, [http://www.renesys.com/blog/2011/01/egypt-leaves-the-internet.shtml “Egypt Leaves the Internet,”] Renesys, January 27, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Second- and Third-Generation Controls===&lt;br /&gt;
*Ron Deibert and Rafal Rohozinski, [[Media:chapter-1.pdf|“Beyond Denial: Introducing Next Generation Information Access Controls,”]] &#039;&#039;Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace&#039;&#039;, (Cambridge: MIT Press) 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Russia Project===&lt;br /&gt;
*Bruce Etling, et al., [[Media:Public_Discourse_in_the_Russian_Blogosphere_2010.pdf|“Public Discourse in the Russian Blogosphere: Mapping RuNet Politics and Mobilization,”]] October 18, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Cases==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[GNI/Role of Intermediaries]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Pillars of iLaw]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=1225</id>
		<title>Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=1225"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T17:27:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{TOCright}}&lt;br /&gt;
===Welcome to the iLaw 2011 Wiki!===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=3 style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFFCC;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Important Program Information&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| &lt;br /&gt;
The [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society] is very pleased to offer the [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw iLaw 2011 Program], which will take place &#039;&#039;&#039;Tuesday, September 6th - Friday, September 9th&#039;&#039;&#039;.  This wiki will serve as a repository for information and materials related to iLaw 2011.  Here, you will find the [[Program Schedule|iLaw Program Schedule]], information about [[Main Page#Program Materials|individual program sessions]], [[Main Page#Program Materials|required and recommended reading assignments]], [[Final Student Projects|final student projects]], and [[Program Logistics]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The iLaw 2011 Program will be video recorded.  All audience members, presenters, and other participants are required to sign a consent and release form (per the University&#039;s policy) prior to attending iLaw 2011.  For more information, please visit [[Program_Logistics#Audio and Video Waivers| Audio and Video Waivers]].  If you do not wish to be recorded please contact [mailto:candersen@cyber.law.harvard.edu| Carey Andersen].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We received an enormous amount of interest in this year&#039;s program.  For this reason, we ask that all participants commit to attending all sessions in the program -- the evening events, however, are optional. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from the [[Evening Events]], all program sessions will take place in the &amp;quot;Austin North&amp;quot; room [http://map.harvard.edu/?ctrx=758998.5&amp;amp;ctry=2963240.5&amp;amp;level=9&amp;amp;layers=Campus%20Base%20and%20Buildings,Map%20Text in Austin Hall on the Harvard Law School campus].&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Program Schedule==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Program Schedule|See main page on Program Schedule]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Ilawsidebar2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear|left}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Program Materials==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
The iLaw program features a mixture of interactive lectures, roundtable-style and moderated discussions lead by Harvard Law School faculty members, Berkman Center researchers, fellows, and special guests.  The sessions, which have been designed to expose students and audience members to the diverse nature of iLaw, will cover three types of substantive topical areas: (1) &amp;quot;Thematic Pillars&amp;quot; (the foundational topics and theories of iLaw), topics, (2) &amp;quot;Cross-sectional Themes&amp;quot; (which explore overlapping themes below the foundational surface), and (3) Case Studies (cases and examples of themes in practice).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below are links to pages on this wiki categorized by topical area.  These pages contain &#039;&#039;&#039;session overviews&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;links to the required reading assignments&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;recommended readings&#039;&#039;&#039;, and related Cross-sectional or Case Study sessions.  We’ve included a rather large number of readings on the wiki for each session. Although some of the session readings are described as &amp;quot;required,&amp;quot; faculty members and session leaders do not wish these assignments to be onerous. To this end, the faculty and session leaders are not expecting students to have closely read these materials prior to each session; however, they do suggest that students at least familiarize themselves with the concepts contained therein.  Additional “recommended” readings are included for those who wish to do a deeper dive into a particular topic area; we also hope these materials will also be useful for future research and students assignments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each day will end with an optional evening event.  These events will offer unique opportunities to interact with Berkman Center and Harvard faculty, staff, fellows, and members of the community. Students and audience members are strongly encouraged to attend these events and learn more about the Berkman Center and it&#039;s diverse, enthusiastic community.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more information about the schedule or logistics, please consult the [[Program Schedule]] and [[Program Logistics]] pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Pillar Themes of iLaw===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Open Systems/Access]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[The Changing Internet: Cybersecurity]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Intellectual Property]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Cooperation]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Privacy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Digital Humanities]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cross-sectional Themes of iLaw===&lt;br /&gt;
[[The History of the Internet]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[The Study of the Internet: New Methods for New Technologies]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[The Global Internet]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Interoperability]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[The Future of the Internet]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Case Studies===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Exploring the Arab Spring]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User Innovation]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Mutual Aid]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Minds for Sale]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Audio/Video Recording Consent Forms (Must be signed by all attendees)===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Program Logistics#Audio and Video Recording Consent|See page on Audio and Video Recording Consent]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Student Projects (Required)===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Student Projects|See main page on Final Student Projects]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===How to Participate at iLaw 2011===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[How To Participate at iLaw|See main page on iLaw Participation]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Audience members are encouraged to participate at iLaw.  For more information on how to interact with members during sessions, see the above link.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Evening Events]] (Optional)==&lt;br /&gt;
* Monday: [[Evening_Events#Drinks_at_John_Harvard&#039;s|Drinks at John Harvard&#039;s Brew House]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Tuesday: [[Evening_Events#Berkman_Center_Open_House|Berkman Center Open House]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wednesday: [[Evening_Events#metaLAB_.28at.29_Harvard|metaLAB (at) Harvard]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Thursday: [[Evening_Events#Thursday_Evening_with_Berkman_Faculty|Potential Thursday Evening Events]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Videos From Previous iLaw Programs==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[iLaw Videos|See main page on iLaw Videos]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are worth checking out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Logistics==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Program_Logistics|See main page on Program Logistics]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear|right}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==About the Berkman Center for Internet &amp;amp; Society==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/ Berkman Center Website]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people Berkman Center Directors, Faculty, Fellows, Staff, and Community]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/teaching/cyberlawclinic Information about the Berkman Center Cyberlaw Clinic]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://crcs.seas.harvard.edu/ Information about Harvard&#039;s Center for Research on Computation and Society (CRCS)]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Digital_Humanities&amp;diff=1219</id>
		<title>Digital Humanities</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Digital_Humanities&amp;diff=1219"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T14:59:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Program_Schedule#Thursday.2C_September_8.2C_2011|Thursday]], 10:30am-12:00pm&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Format&#039;&#039;: Introductory Lecture, Lightning Presentations and Moderated Discussion&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jschnapp Jeffrey Schnapp]and [http://www.gsd.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/faculty/details.cgi?faculty_id=1535 Jesse Shapins], featuring [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/ugasser Urs Gasser]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Participants&#039;&#039;: Joseph Bergen, James Burns, Zamyla Chan, Jake Levine, Kara Oehler, Kyle Parry, Robert Gerard Pietrusko, Joana Pimenta, Julia Yezbick&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This pillar session will address the current state of digital humanities, an umbrella term for new modes of scholarship that emphasize collaborative, trans-disciplinary, computationally-engaged research, teaching, and dissemination. Digital Humanities is less a unified field than an array of convergent practices that explore a universe in which print is no longer the normative medium in which knowledge is produced and disseminated; digital tools, techniques, and media have expanded traditional concepts of knowledge in the arts, human and social sciences. The session will address fundamental questions such as: How can traditional humanities skills be reshaped in multimedia terms? How and by whom will the contours of cultural and historical memory be defined in the digital era? How might practices of digital storytelling coincide or diverge from oral or print-based storytelling? What is the place of humanitas in a networked world?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lightning Speakers==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://zeega.org/ James Burns]&lt;br /&gt;
*Known Unknown (Kara Oehler)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://sensate.tumblr.com/ Julia Yezbick]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://extramuros.zeega.org/demo/ Robert Gerard Pietrusko]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.jdarchive.org Kyle Parry]&lt;br /&gt;
*Society for Receipt Printer Reincarnation (Joseph Bergen)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://metalab.harvard.edu/projects/ Joana Pimenta] (scroll to &amp;quot;Augmented Harvard&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
* Jake Levine&lt;br /&gt;
* Zamyla Chan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recommended Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://manifesto.humanities.ucla.edu/2009/05/29/the-digital-humanities-manifesto-20/ Digital Humanities 2.0 Manifesto]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://cnx.org/content/m34246/latest/ Digital Humanities 2.0: A Report on Knowledge]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Relevant Models==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://extramuros.zeega.org/demo/ extraMUROS]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.sensatejournal.com/ Sensate]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.zeega.org/ Zeega]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://mediaarchaeologyofplace.org Media Archaeology of Place ]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://mixedrealitycity.org The Mixed-Reality City]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Harvard Projects/Initiatives==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://cmp.gsas.harvard.edu Critical Media Practice]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://sel.fas.harvard.eduSensory Ethnography Lab]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://filmstudycenter.org Film Study Center]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~hsdept/chsi.html Collection of Historic Scientific Instruments]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://hcl.harvard.edu/libraries/houghton/collections/poetry_room.cfm Woodberry Poetry Room]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://mahindrahumanities.fas.harvard.edu/ Mahindra Humanities Center]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gis.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do Center for Geographic Analysis]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://thelaboratory.harvard.edu/ The Laboratory at Harvard]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other Projects==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://hypercities.com/ Todd Presner :: Hypercities]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.classics.ucla.edu/people/faculty/johanson/ Chris Johanson :: Experiential Classics]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.jhfc.duke.edu/jenkins/mousesite/ Timothy Lenoir :: Mouse Site]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.vectorsjournal.org/ Tara McPherson :: Vectors Journal]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.stanford.edu/group/spatialhistory/cgi-bin/site/ Richard White and John Christensen :: The Spatial History Project ]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.blasttheory.co.uk/bt/index.php Blast Theory]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.stanford.edu/group/shl/cgi-bin/drupal/?q=node/31 Stanford Humanities Lab :: Life Squared]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://republicofletters.stanford.edu/ Dan Edelstein :: Mapping the Republic of Letters]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://paj.muohio.edu/paj/index.php/paj/article/viewArticle/4 Johanna Drucker :: Graphesis]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://dornsife.usc.edu/labyrinth/ Marsha Kinder :: The Labyrinth Project]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nines.org/ Jerome McGann :: Making NINES]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=208 Bruce Sterling :: Dead Media Project]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://dlib.etc.ucla.edu/projects/Forum Diane Favro :: Digital Roman Forum]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other Centers==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cdh.ucla.edu/ Center for Digital Humanities at UCLA]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://chnm.gmu.edu/ Center for History and New Media at George Mason]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.artcenter.edu/mdp/ Media Design Program at Art Center College of Design]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://dma.ucla.edu/ Design | Media | Arts at UCLA]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Pillars of iLaw]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Mutual_Aid&amp;diff=1215</id>
		<title>Mutual Aid</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Mutual_Aid&amp;diff=1215"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T14:23:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/ilaw/2011/Program_Schedule#Thursday.2C_September_8.2C_2011 Thursday], 5:00-6:00pm&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead: Jonathan Zittrain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Building upon key themes related to cybersecurity and the role of the private sector in ensuring persistent, secure, and consistently available content on the web, this session will focus on possible responses to the current state of computer and network security.  Drawing conceptually from mutual aid treaties among states in the real world, Jonathan Zittrain will outline a defense scheme that would seek to make the current decentralized Web a more robust one.  His&amp;quot; mirror as you link&amp;quot; system of assistance reimagines the technological relationships between sites and services on the Web, and envisions a new socially- and technologically-based system of redundancy and security.  &amp;quot;Today, if one clicks on a link to an external site and that site is unavailable – perhaps attacked with a classic denial-of-service – there is no alternative to accessing it. Mirror-as-you-link would change that.  Participating Web server administrators could make it so that for some or all of the links to external sites that they offer on their pages, the contents of the faraway sites would be saved (“cached”). They would do this only for sites that wish it to be done, and then only for sites that also perform such mirroring themselves. Then, when one site goes down, a Web surfer clicking on a link to get there can return to the referring site and ask for a copy of whatever he or she is missing since the destination site is down.&amp;quot; (From  Jonathan Zittrain [http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2011/0127_internet_treaty_zittrain.aspx &amp;quot;A Mutual Aid Treaty for the Net&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Required Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
*The Harvard International Law Journal, [http://opiniojuris.org/2011/07/13/hilj-zittrain-responds-to-hollis/ &amp;quot;Jonathan Zittrain responds to Duncan Hollis&amp;quot;], July, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
*Jonathan Zittrain, [http://www.techpolicy.com/Blog/January-2010/Consider-This--A-Mutual-Aid-Treaty-for-the-Interne.aspx &amp;quot;Consider This: A Mutual Aid Treaty for the Internet&amp;quot;], January, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
*Jonathan Zittrain, [http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol78/iss6/3 &amp;quot;The Fourth Quadrant&amp;quot;], 78 Fordham L. Rev. 2767, January, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recommended Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
*Jonathan Zittrain, [http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2011/0127_internet_treaty_zittrain.aspx &amp;quot;A Mutual Aid Treaty for the Net&amp;quot;], 8 The Future of the Constitution Series, The Brookings Institution, January, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Case Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Cross-Sectional Themes]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Digital_Humanities&amp;diff=1213</id>
		<title>Digital Humanities</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Digital_Humanities&amp;diff=1213"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T14:10:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* Overview */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Program_Schedule#Thursday.2C_September_8.2C_2011|Thursday]], 10:30am-12:00pm&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Format&#039;&#039;: Introductory Lecture, Lightning Presentations and Moderated Discussion&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jschnapp Jeffrey Schnapp]and [http://www.gsd.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/faculty/details.cgi?faculty_id=1535 Jesse Shapins], featuring [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/ugasser Urs Gasser]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Participants&#039;&#039;: Victor Ban, Joseph Bergen, James Burns, Peter Galison, Kara Oehler, Kyle Parry,&lt;br /&gt;
Robert Gerard Pietrusko, Joana Pimenta, Julia Yezbick&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This pillar session will address the current state of digital humanities, an umbrella term for new modes of scholarship that emphasize collaborative, trans-disciplinary, computationally-engaged research, teaching, and dissemination. Digital Humanities is less a unified field than an array of convergent practices that explore a universe in which print is no longer the normative medium in which knowledge is produced and disseminated; digital tools, techniques, and media have expanded traditional concepts of knowledge in the arts, human and social sciences. The session will address fundamental questions such as: How can traditional humanities skills be reshaped in multimedia terms? How and by whom will the contours of cultural and historical memory be defined in the digital era? How might practices of digital storytelling coincide or diverge from oral or print-based storytelling? What is the place of humanitas in a networked world?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lightning Speakers==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://zeega.org/ James Burns]&lt;br /&gt;
*Known Unknown (Kara Oehler)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://sensate.tumblr.com/ Julia Yezbick]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://extramuros.zeega.org/demo/ Robert Gerard Pietrusko]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.jdarchive.org Kyle Parry]&lt;br /&gt;
*Society for Receipt Printer Reincarnation (Joseph Bergen)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://metalab.harvard.edu/projects/ Joana Pimenta] (scroll to &amp;quot;Augmented Harvard&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/adup/2011/03/29/introducing-the-harvard-law-and-documentary-studio-updated-locationtime/ Victor Ban]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gsas.harvard.edu/programs_of_study/critical_media_practice.php Peter Galison]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recommended Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://manifesto.humanities.ucla.edu/2009/05/29/the-digital-humanities-manifesto-20/ Digital Humanities 2.0 Manifesto]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://cnx.org/content/m34246/latest/ Digital Humanities 2.0: A Report on Knowledge]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Relevant Models==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://extramuros.zeega.org/demo/ extraMUROS]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.sensatejournal.com/ Sensate]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.zeega.org/ Zeega]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://mediaarchaeologyofplace.org Media Archaeology of Place ]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://mixedrealitycity.org The Mixed-Reality City]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Harvard Projects/Initiatives==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://cmp.gsas.harvard.edu Critical Media Practice]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://sel.fas.harvard.eduSensory Ethnography Lab]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://filmstudycenter.org Film Study Center]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~hsdept/chsi.html Collection of Historic Scientific Instruments]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://hcl.harvard.edu/libraries/houghton/collections/poetry_room.cfm Woodberry Poetry Room]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://mahindrahumanities.fas.harvard.edu/ Mahindra Humanities Center]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gis.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do Center for Geographic Analysis]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://thelaboratory.harvard.edu/ The Laboratory at Harvard]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other Projects==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://hypercities.com/ Todd Presner :: Hypercities]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.classics.ucla.edu/people/faculty/johanson/ Chris Johanson :: Experiential Classics]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.jhfc.duke.edu/jenkins/mousesite/ Timothy Lenoir :: Mouse Site]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.vectorsjournal.org/ Tara McPherson :: Vectors Journal]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.stanford.edu/group/spatialhistory/cgi-bin/site/ Richard White and John Christensen :: The Spatial History Project ]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.blasttheory.co.uk/bt/index.php Blast Theory]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.stanford.edu/group/shl/cgi-bin/drupal/?q=node/31 Stanford Humanities Lab :: Life Squared]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://republicofletters.stanford.edu/ Dan Edelstein :: Mapping the Republic of Letters]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://paj.muohio.edu/paj/index.php/paj/article/viewArticle/4 Johanna Drucker :: Graphesis]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://dornsife.usc.edu/labyrinth/ Marsha Kinder :: The Labyrinth Project]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nines.org/ Jerome McGann :: Making NINES]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=208 Bruce Sterling :: Dead Media Project]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://dlib.etc.ucla.edu/projects/Forum Diane Favro :: Digital Roman Forum]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other Centers==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cdh.ucla.edu/ Center for Digital Humanities at UCLA]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://chnm.gmu.edu/ Center for History and New Media at George Mason]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.artcenter.edu/mdp/ Media Design Program at Art Center College of Design]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://dma.ucla.edu/ Design | Media | Arts at UCLA]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Pillars of iLaw]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Digital_Humanities&amp;diff=1212</id>
		<title>Digital Humanities</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Digital_Humanities&amp;diff=1212"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T14:10:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Program_Schedule#Thursday.2C_September_8.2C_2011|Thursday]], 10:30am-12:00pm&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Format&#039;&#039;: Introductory Lecture, Lightning Presentations and Moderated Discussion&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jschnapp Jeffrey Schnapp]and[http://www.gsd.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/faculty/details.cgi?faculty_id=1535 Jesse Shapins], featuring [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/ugasser Urs Gasser]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Participants&#039;&#039;: Victor Ban, Joseph Bergen, James Burns, Peter Galison, Kara Oehler, Kyle Parry,&lt;br /&gt;
Robert Gerard Pietrusko, Joana Pimenta, Julia Yezbick&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This pillar session will address the current state of digital humanities, an umbrella term for new modes of scholarship that emphasize collaborative, trans-disciplinary, computationally-engaged research, teaching, and dissemination. Digital Humanities is less a unified field than an array of convergent practices that explore a universe in which print is no longer the normative medium in which knowledge is produced and disseminated; digital tools, techniques, and media have expanded traditional concepts of knowledge in the arts, human and social sciences. The session will address fundamental questions such as: How can traditional humanities skills be reshaped in multimedia terms? How and by whom will the contours of cultural and historical memory be defined in the digital era? How might practices of digital storytelling coincide or diverge from oral or print-based storytelling? What is the place of humanitas in a networked world?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lightning Speakers==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://zeega.org/ James Burns]&lt;br /&gt;
*Known Unknown (Kara Oehler)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://sensate.tumblr.com/ Julia Yezbick]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://extramuros.zeega.org/demo/ Robert Gerard Pietrusko]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.jdarchive.org Kyle Parry]&lt;br /&gt;
*Society for Receipt Printer Reincarnation (Joseph Bergen)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://metalab.harvard.edu/projects/ Joana Pimenta] (scroll to &amp;quot;Augmented Harvard&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/adup/2011/03/29/introducing-the-harvard-law-and-documentary-studio-updated-locationtime/ Victor Ban]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gsas.harvard.edu/programs_of_study/critical_media_practice.php Peter Galison]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recommended Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://manifesto.humanities.ucla.edu/2009/05/29/the-digital-humanities-manifesto-20/ Digital Humanities 2.0 Manifesto]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://cnx.org/content/m34246/latest/ Digital Humanities 2.0: A Report on Knowledge]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Relevant Models==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://extramuros.zeega.org/demo/ extraMUROS]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.sensatejournal.com/ Sensate]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.zeega.org/ Zeega]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://mediaarchaeologyofplace.org Media Archaeology of Place ]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://mixedrealitycity.org The Mixed-Reality City]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Harvard Projects/Initiatives==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://cmp.gsas.harvard.edu Critical Media Practice]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://sel.fas.harvard.eduSensory Ethnography Lab]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://filmstudycenter.org Film Study Center]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~hsdept/chsi.html Collection of Historic Scientific Instruments]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://hcl.harvard.edu/libraries/houghton/collections/poetry_room.cfm Woodberry Poetry Room]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://mahindrahumanities.fas.harvard.edu/ Mahindra Humanities Center]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gis.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do Center for Geographic Analysis]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://thelaboratory.harvard.edu/ The Laboratory at Harvard]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other Projects==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://hypercities.com/ Todd Presner :: Hypercities]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.classics.ucla.edu/people/faculty/johanson/ Chris Johanson :: Experiential Classics]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.jhfc.duke.edu/jenkins/mousesite/ Timothy Lenoir :: Mouse Site]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.vectorsjournal.org/ Tara McPherson :: Vectors Journal]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.stanford.edu/group/spatialhistory/cgi-bin/site/ Richard White and John Christensen :: The Spatial History Project ]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.blasttheory.co.uk/bt/index.php Blast Theory]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.stanford.edu/group/shl/cgi-bin/drupal/?q=node/31 Stanford Humanities Lab :: Life Squared]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://republicofletters.stanford.edu/ Dan Edelstein :: Mapping the Republic of Letters]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://paj.muohio.edu/paj/index.php/paj/article/viewArticle/4 Johanna Drucker :: Graphesis]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://dornsife.usc.edu/labyrinth/ Marsha Kinder :: The Labyrinth Project]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nines.org/ Jerome McGann :: Making NINES]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=208 Bruce Sterling :: Dead Media Project]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://dlib.etc.ucla.edu/projects/Forum Diane Favro :: Digital Roman Forum]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other Centers==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cdh.ucla.edu/ Center for Digital Humanities at UCLA]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://chnm.gmu.edu/ Center for History and New Media at George Mason]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.artcenter.edu/mdp/ Media Design Program at Art Center College of Design]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://dma.ucla.edu/ Design | Media | Arts at UCLA]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Pillars of iLaw]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Interoperability&amp;diff=1211</id>
		<title>Interoperability</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Interoperability&amp;diff=1211"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T14:09:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/ilaw/2011/Program_Schedule#Friday.2C_September_9.2C_2011 Friday], 11:30am-1:00pm&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Format: Lecture with audience participation&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/ugasser Urs Gasser], featuring [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jpalfrey John Palfrey]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This synthesizing session will examine interoperability and its role in driving innovation in the ICT environment. Urs Gasser and John Palfrey--who recently completed a book on the topic (slated for release in February 2012)--will outline a conceptual framework for thinking about interoperability, its driving forces and inhibitors, how it can best be achieved, and why. They will touch on a number of current usecases where interoperability plays a decisive role, including, cloud computing, the Smart Grid, and electronic health records. John and Urs will also consider a number of questions: What is interoperability? What do consumers, companies, and governments stand to gain (or lose) from interoperability or lack thereof? How do concerns related to lack of diversity, or diminished privacy and security interact with interoperability? How are optimal levels of interoperability achieved through law, policy, technology, and innovations in the marketplace?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Required Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
* Urs Gasser and John Palfrey, [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/interop/ Breaking Down Digital Barriers]; &#039;&#039;please select and read one of the featured case studies.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Urs Gasser and John Palfrey, [http://ssrn.com/abstract=1033226 “Breaking Down Digital Barriers: When and How ICT Interoperability Drives Innovation,”] Berkman Center Research Publication No. 2007-8 (2007).&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cross-Sectional Themes]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Interoperability&amp;diff=1210</id>
		<title>Interoperability</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Interoperability&amp;diff=1210"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T14:06:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/ilaw/2011/Program_Schedule#Friday.2C_September_9.2C_2011 Friday], 11:30am-1:00pm&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Format: Lecture with audience participation&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leads: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/ugasser Urs Gasser], featuring [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jpalfrey John Palfrey]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This synthesizing session will examine interoperability and its role in driving innovation in the ICT environment. Urs Gasser and John Palfrey--who recently completed a book on the topic (slated for release in February 2012)--will outline a conceptual framework for thinking about interoperability, its driving forces and inhibitors, how it can best be achieved, and why. They will touch on a number of current usecases where interoperability plays a decisive role, including, cloud computing, the Smart Grid, and electronic health records. John and Urs will also consider a number of questions: What is interoperability? What do consumers, companies, and governments stand to gain (or lose) from interoperability or lack thereof? How do concerns related to lack of diversity, or diminished privacy and security interact with interoperability? How are optimal levels of interoperability achieved through law, policy, technology, and innovations in the marketplace?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Required Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
* Urs Gasser and John Palfrey, [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/interop/ Breaking Down Digital Barriers]; &#039;&#039;please select and read one of the featured case studies.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Urs Gasser and John Palfrey, [http://ssrn.com/abstract=1033226 “Breaking Down Digital Barriers: When and How ICT Interoperability Drives Innovation,”] Berkman Center Research Publication No. 2007-8 (2007).&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cross-Sectional Themes]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Evening_Events&amp;diff=1209</id>
		<title>Evening Events</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Evening_Events&amp;diff=1209"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T13:39:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: /* metaLAB (at) Harvard */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{TOCright}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This page lists optional evening events.  These events will offer unique opportunities to interact with Berkman Center and Harvard faculty, staff, fellows, and members of the community. Students and audience members are strongly encouraged to attend these events and learn more about the Berkman Center and it&#039;s diverse, enthusiastic community. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Drinks at John Harvard&#039;s==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Monday, 6:00 to 8:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Monday, all participants are invited to an informal gathering and cash bar at [http://www.johnharvards.com/index.shtml John Harvard&#039;s] in Harvard Square. Mingle and chat with members of the Berkman Community and fellow participants!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Berkman Center Open House==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Tuesday, 6:30 to 8:30&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;See [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/events/2011/09/openhouse this page] for event details&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All participants will be invited to share in an evening with the Berkman Center in the Ropes Gray Room in Pound Hall on the HLS campus. The evening will provide an introduction to projects, staff, fellows, and key research themes and activities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==metaLAB (at) Harvard==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wednesday, 7:00 to 9:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
iLaw participants are invited to join the MetaLab team at Art@29 Garden for an exhibition introducing their new digital art project, [http://metalab.harvard.edu/projects/ Augmented Harvard].  It will be a demo debut –a type of pop-up show of the public installation – that will set the stage for the [[Digital Humanities]] pillar on Thursday morning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;About Augmented Harvard&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the support of the Provostial Funds for Arts and Humanities, we are in the early stages of developing a multi-year, University-wide installation that is composed of a network of physical artifacts that unlock site-specific experiences. These artifacts, or HUBS, might consist of such devices as thermal receipt printers, hacked Kinects, speakers or programmable LEDs. Participants in the project encounter these HUBs across the campus or through an open-source iPhone/iPad application. Augmented Harvard allows faculty, students, curators and the public to link Harvard exhibitions to other spaces and objects across the University, and to see otherwise invisible features of the campus landscape such as long-ago demolished structures, alternative architectural plans, and inaccessible archives as they rove the campus core. The initial release is planned in conjunction with the fall 2011 exhibitions GSD’s 75+ and Cold War in the Classroom, co-curated by History of Science PhD students Jeremy Blatter and Christopher Phillips, and to be staged at the Special Exhibitions Gallery of the Collection of Historical Scientific Instruments, with additional materials borrowed from the Harvard Film Archive and the Graduate School of Education’s Monroe C. Gutman Library.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Thursday Evening with Berkman Faculty==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Thursday, 7:00 to 9:00&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A selection of activities led by Berkman Directors, fellows and other interested community members.&lt;br /&gt;
Participants could elect to participate in any number of events hosted by Berkman Faculty Members and other community members&lt;br /&gt;
We could use offer food and drink in the common room, and then use different rooms in the building to engage in a series of activities, options:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Poker (Charlie Nesson)===&lt;br /&gt;
A night of poker with Charlie.  Players of all skill levels welcome: no prior experience necessary!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Evening_Events#Sign-up_for_Poker_with_Charlie_Nesson|Sign-up List for Poker with Charlie Nesson]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Food for Thought Dinners===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These dinners allow conference attendees to engage in informal, themed conversation with other conference participants. We&#039;ve made the reservations. All you have to do is show up and enjoy! &#039;&#039;&#039;Please note that attendees will pay their own dinner costs&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attendance is limited to eight people per dinner. Please add your name to the dinner you want to attend below. If you decide not to attend a dinner to which you are signed up, please delete yourself from the list. If you have any questions, please email Amar at [mailto:ashar@cyber.law.harvard.edu aashar@cyber.law.harvard.edu].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Restaurant locations and maps are listed with each dinner. For restaurants in Harvard Square, expect approximately a 10-minute walk from Austin. For restaurants in Porter Square, expect approximately a 15 to 20-minute walk from Austin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Important wait list/drop off info:&#039;&#039;&#039; When you add yourself to the wait list for a dinner, please to include your contact contact info. If you sign up but decide not to attend a dinner, please contact the first person on the wait list. Thank you! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====[Berkmanite 1] [Restaurant/Location]--[Topic of Conversation]====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Evening_Events#Food_For_Thought_Dinner_Sign-ups|Sign-up List]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====[Berkmanite 2] [Restaurant/Location]--[Topic of Conversation]====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Evening_Events#Food_For_Thought_Dinner_Sign-ups|Sign-up List]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====[Berkmanite 3] [Restaurant/Location]--[Topic of Conversation]====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Evening_Events#Food_For_Thought_Dinner_Sign-ups|Sign-up List]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Exploring_the_Arab_Spring&amp;diff=1208</id>
		<title>Exploring the Arab Spring</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/teaching/ilaw/2011/?title=Exploring_the_Arab_Spring&amp;diff=1208"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T13:31:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Caroline: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Ilawsidebar}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Program_Schedule#Tuesday.2C_September_6.2C_2011|Tuesday]], 3:45-5:00pm&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Format&#039;&#039;: Roundtable Discussion&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Lead&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/jpalfrey John Palfrey]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Participants&#039;&#039;: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/ybenkler Yochai Benkler], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/betling Bruce Etling], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/cnesson Charlie Nesson], [http://www1.aucegypt.edu/faculty/naglarzk/ Nagla Rizk], and [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/ezuckerman Ethan Zuckerman]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What has become known as the &amp;quot;Arab Spring&amp;quot; will serve as a synthesizing case study that will help to weave together the core themes outlined in both the Open Systems/Access and the Online Liberty and Freedom of Expression sessions, with a particular focus on the use of social media and the rise of information control and counter-control activities during recent protests and uprisings in the Middle East and North Africa. In this highly interactive sessions, commentators will not only analyze the role of social media, but also consider the different roles and actors that influenced the events, including governments, activists, citizens, and companies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Required Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
*Dubai School of Government, [http://www.dsg.ae/social.aspx?u=-1&amp;amp;l=e&amp;amp;f=http://www.dsg.ae/portals/0/ASMR2.pdf &amp;quot;Civil Movements: The Impact of Facebook and Twitter&amp;quot;] &#039;&#039;Arab Social Media Report&#039;&#039;, May, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
* Masashi Crete-Nishihata and Jillian York, [http://opennet.net/blog/2011/01/egypt%E2%80%99s-internet-blackout-extreme-example-just-time-blocking “Egypt’s Internet Blackout: Extreme Example of Just-in-Time Blocking,”] ONI Blog, January 28, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
*James Cowie, [http://www.renesys.com/blog/2011/01/egypt-leaves-the-internet.shtml “Egypt Leaves the Internet,”] Renesys, January 27, 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recommended Readings==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/mena-net-watch MENA Net Watch], Open Net Initiative&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://opennet.net/mena-net-watch ONI&#039;s Middle East and North Africa Profiles and News]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Case Studies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>