Talk:The Future of the Internet: Difference between revisions

From Internet Law Program 2011
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
* How can commons-based peer-production systems help shape/influence state internet regulation?
* How can commons-based peer-production systems help shape/influence state internet regulation?


Digital Humanities
* How do we help citizens become curators of their own cultural history? Is the preserver or archivist an additional model of cultural behavior to Read-Only and Read-Write culture?
* How are those leading the Digital Humanities charge accounting for the technical fragility and legal ambiguity of link-based contributions and information?
* How do experiential, scruffy, and curatorial attitudes of digital humanities reshape the genre of research? Should Digital Humanities projects work to supplement or replace more traditional  modes of scholarship? And how does this fit with Zittrain’s concern about scholarship and entrepreneurship in the university?


. . . to infinity, and beyond!
. . . to infinity, and beyond!

Revision as of 11:29, 9 September 2011

Student Questions for the Discussion Panel

Add your questions for the panel here!

  • What is the next field for explosive growth or progress in the Internet?
  • What kind of feasible projects should the Berkman Center, or students, take on next?
  • What is the future of relatively closed and tethered platforms such as the iPhone? Could that model ultimately prevail?
  • Do you think that social networks have reached full growth or do you see an other model emerging in the future?
  • What is the approach that developing countries should take to the net neutrality issue: the US' or Chile and Netherland's?
  • How important are broadband policies to the commons-based peer-production model that has been discussed during iLaw sessions?
  • How can commons-based peer-production systems help shape/influence state internet regulation?


. . . to infinity, and beyond!